The very first house rule is that a member is not do anything which reflects negatively on the creditability of the House.
Weiner's lies and behavior violated this rule.
From Popst #1226:
so..... what about Vitter?
Vitter has been brought up ad nauseum in this thread by the Weiner Apologists.
Here's the difference:
- Vitter's behavior was something from years ago. He stopped it. His wife knew about it and forgave him. By the time it became public knowledge, the statue of limitations had expired. His behavior was also right about the same time as Clinton's - and the big excuse of that era was Everybody Lies About Sex and it's a Private Family Matter. Vitter admitted it and apologized.
- Weiner's behavior was ongoing at the time he was outed as a tweet perv. He engaged in a campaign of lies involving hackers and blaming an innocent online journalist. He coached some of the women to lie. He could not confirm that all of his online sext partners were adults. The contemporary comparison is Chris Lee, who resigned within hours.
I would have preferred for Vitter to resign at the time, but it is old news now. If you wish to go through a witch hunt purge to get rid of all appalling members of Congress, then let's start with Rangel, Waters, and Frank. What they've done to the country is Far Worse than either Weiner or Vitter has done.