So it is a matter of opinion whether it was an accident or a common substitution to mock King
It is a matter of opinion that it was no accident just because racists use it as a common substitution to mock King. One doesn't necessarily have anything to do with the other. Again, you simply do not know.
You're only considering factors that fit your preconceived notion that it was deliberate. You're ignoring the fact that people flub their words every day. In fact, I am the only one here who has considered it or even brought it up.
This is not a simple case of someone saying "
The shitty should..." instead of "
The city should..." and everyone having a good laugh. A man's job was at stake.
It is something the viewers would have to decide. A case where a large percentage of viewers would look at him as a racist every time he is on camera
And a large percentage of viewers could be wrong. If we didn't have the atmosphere of racism paranoia in this country right now, that same large percentage of viewers might have just laughed it off.
The network decided they didn’t want to put up with it
Put up with what? Did this guy have a history or reputation of racism? Have they had any kinds of problems with him before? If not then the station panicked and bowed to the paranoids. That's it.
I don't remember if I asked you but I know I have asked this question a few times already in this discussion and not one person has answered it. Question: Do you at least acknowledge the possibility that it was an innocent flub?