Completely incorrect. Certainly under Capitalism, we have owners, and employees, but under Capitalism, there are no barriers to become an owner. An employee can become an owner, they can own their own property, and the fruits of their labor.
That's true since there is no legal prohibition preventing a worker from becoming an owner or shareholder. Ethical inhibitions from becoming rich by exploiting the labor of others present other problems.
No one's labor is exploited.
Every employee enters an employment contract by choice for an agreed upon wage.
If an employee is dissatisfied with the arrangement between him and his employer he can terminate that agreement at any time.
This is true, but the question also is this, do employers understand the geographical structure of the community in which it finds to operate in, and in this understanding can there be found the urges or tendencies (by some companies), to exploit the strained and hungry labor forces, otherwise knowing that they are just desperate enough to capitulate, and then obey to the point of becoming almost slaves to the system if the much needed competition in the area is few and far between ????
What about when the illegals were being worked in direct competition with Americans, and then they were winning out because they were illegal and cheap ??
Alot of bad things have went on in the past, and it's not so easily forgotten about.