Weakest President in Modern History

[Thinker101]

There is no 'misinformation' in my posts.....every item is linked, sourced and documented.

Bullshit.

You claim in your fake cut and pastes that Obama has added $9 trillion to the debt. Yet you are unable to back up your lie with a list of Obama spending.

Not only is Trump the weakest president in modern history, you're one of the weakest posters on USMB.

Numbers to 2015:
http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/terence-p-jeffrey/

 

[radical right]

Let's see how that 'best President' left town....on a rail....

"His presidency will end with Democrats in possession of 11 fewer Senate seats (depending on how you count), more than 60 fewer House seats, at least 14 fewer governorships and more than 900 fewer seats in state legislatures than when it began. That’s a staggering toll."

I thought the measure of a president was in what condition he left his country, not in what condition he left his party. As president as leader of the free world should take that role more seriously then being the head of his party.

 

[WaitingFor2020]

It was just announced that Trump has backed down AGAIN, this time on NAFTA.

He backed down on replacing Obamacare.
He backed down on his pledge to build the wall.
He backed down on demanding funding for that wall.
He backed down on cutting funds for Planned Parenthood.

What am I forgetting? There's been so many failures already.

He's weak, like a little girl.

George Will really laid him out in WaPo last week. When you've got the cornerstone for conservative thought saying stuff like this, it's time for impeachment.

Trump has a dangerous disability


By George F. Will Opinion writer May 3

It is urgent for Americans to think and speak clearly about President Trump’s inability to do either. This seems to be not a mere disinclination but a disability. It is not merely the result of intellectual sloth but of an untrained mind bereft of information and married to stratospheric self-confidence.

In February, acknowledging Black History Month, Trump said that “Frederick Douglass is an example of somebody who’s done an amazing job and is getting recognized more and more, I notice.” Because Trump is syntactically challenged, it was possible and tempting to see this not as a historical howler about a man who died 122 years ago, but as just another of Trump’s verbal fender benders, this one involving verb tenses.

Now, however, he has instructed us that Andrew Jackson was angry about the Civil War that began 16 years after Jackson’s death. Having, let us fancifully imagine, considered and found unconvincing William Seward’s 1858 judgment that the approaching Civil War was “an irrepressible conflict,” Trump says:
“People don’t realize, you know, the Civil War, if you think about it, why? People don’t ask that question, but why was there the Civil War? Why could that one not have been worked out?”

Library shelves groan beneath the weight of books asking questions about that war’s origins, so who, one wonders, are these “people” who don’t ask the questions that Trump evidently thinks have occurred to him uniquely? Presumably they are not the astute “lot of,” or at least “some,” people Trump referred to when speaking about his February address to a joint session of Congress: “A lot of people have said that, some people said it was the single best speech ever made in that chamber.” Which demotes Winston Churchill, among many others.

What is most alarming (and mortifying to the University of Pennsylvania, from which he graduated) is not that Trump has entered his eighth decade unscathed by even elementary knowledge about the nation’s history. As this column has said before, the problem isn’t that he does not know this or that, or that he does not know that he does not know this or that. Rather, the dangerous thing is that he does not know what it is to know something.

 

[Reasonable]

 

[Dschrute3]

Sounds like a whole lotta hateful wishful thinking on the OP's part. Go figure?

 

[Doc1]

Presidents, ALL Presidents do what their told. They don't work for you, they don't work for me. They work for the Bankers, they work for the MIC and they work for the ruling elite.

 

[radical right]

Presidents, ALL Presidents do what their told. They don't work for you, they don't work for me. They work for the Bankers, they work for the MIC and they work for the ruling elite.

What their told?

Another Trump supporter emulates Trumps grammatical abilities.

 

[Doc1]

Presidents, ALL Presidents do what their told. They don't work for you, they don't work for me. They work for the Bankers, they work for the MIC and they work for the ruling elite.

What their told?

Another Trump supporter emulates Trumps grammatical abilities.

Is that all you've got boy? You'll need much more than that.

 

[Doc1]

The last President that didn't follow orders was JFK.

 

[radical right]

What their told?

Another Trump supporter emulates Trumps grammatical abilities.

Is that all you've got boy? You'll need much more than that.

It's common four sum people two confuse homophones. Butt what's you're excuse?

 

[Doc1]

What their told?

Another Trump supporter emulates Trumps grammatical abilities.

Is that all you've got boy? You'll need much more than that.

It's common four sum people two confuse homophones. Butt what's you're excuse?

A common weakness of children like you is overcompensation. You try and cover what you don't know up with bluster. Won't work with me.

 

[radical right]

A common weakness of children like you is overcompensation. You try and cover what you don't know up with bluster. Won't work with me.

Are you switching to Yoda speak now? Or is this a bad attempt at ending a sentence with a proposition?

 

[radical right]

'A common weakness of children like you is overcompensation. You try and cover what you don't know up with bluster.'

You know nothing about, what you speak.

 

[12icer]

He is saying childish liberal stupidity is just a good laugh for us radical igmo.

 

[Doc1]

'A common weakness of children like you is overcompensation. You try and cover what you don't know up with bluster.'

You know nothing about, what you speak.

(smile) You poor little boy, little dick too? Is there no end to what you must overcompensate for?

 

[WaitingFor2020]

View attachment 125382

THANK YOU STEPHEN COLBERT!

 

[radical right]

(smile) You poor little boy, little dick too? Is there no end to what you must overcompensate for?

As porky pig would say, "what's up doc1?"

 

[Doc1]

(smile) You poor little boy, little dick too? Is there no end to what you must overcompensate for?

As porky pig would say, "what's up doc1?"

As I thought child, you have nothing. You're dismissed.

 

[Synthaholic]

Sounds like a whole lotta hateful wishful thinking on the OP's part. Go figure?

Man up, snowflake.

 

[Synthaholic]

You try and cover what you don't know up with bluster. Won't work with me.

Neither will facts or reality.