We will never convince the deniers.

[Pilot1]

God are you stupid.

Very convincing response.

 

[JLW]

We will never convince the deniers. Giant world wide conspiracy theories are fun and exciting to think about. Slowly changing climates, where the action happens over years or even decades, just can't compete with that for entertainment value.
Then there is the feeling of belonging these socially handicapped tRumpkins get from high-fiving each other every time they think they've scored some sort of point. For instance the 2 dozen or so threads that were started about the polar vortex disruptions last week.

And finally there's the way these things are presented to them, as if they are some kinda privileged information that only a chosen few get to know. It makes them feel (falsely) superior to everyone else, even if only for a few minutes, and that can be a powerful thing if you suffer from low self esteem like the vast majority of these nut-bars do.

There could be a Cat 5 hurricane in January, 110 degrees in Fairbanks in November, and virtual dead zones throughout the planet and moron deniers would just call it weather.

We have to place deniers in the same category we place all nutjobs like alien abductees, deep state derpers and people who are awaiting the second coming of Hale-Bopp.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

How many trillions do we need to waste...err...invest in windmills, to make sure the climate never ever changes?

By how much must we lower CO2 to stop the climate from ever changing again?

$78 Trillion

 

[CrusaderFrank]

We will never convince the deniers. Giant world wide conspiracy theories are fun and exciting to think about. Slowly changing climates, where the action happens over years or even decades, just can't compete with that for entertainment value.
Then there is the feeling of belonging these socially handicapped tRumpkins get from high-fiving each other every time they think they've scored some sort of point. For instance the 2 dozen or so threads that were started about the polar vortex disruptions last week.

And finally there's the way these things are presented to them, as if they are some kinda privileged information that only a chosen few get to know. It makes them feel (falsely) superior to everyone else, even if only for a few minutes, and that can be a powerful thing if you suffer from low self esteem like the vast majority of these nut-bars do.

There could be a Cat 5 hurricane in January, 110 degrees in Fairbanks in November, and virtual dead zones throughout the planet and moron deniers would just call it weather.

We have to place deniers in the same category we place all nutjobs like alien abductees, deep state derpers and people who are awaiting the second coming of Hale-Bopp.

Too bad Hillary lost and now you and your fellow goose steppers aren't able to take action against us.

You can only dream

And goosestep

 

[CrusaderFrank]

How many trillions do we need to waste...err...invest in windmills, to make sure the climate never ever changes?

A great deal less than we will pay moving hundreds of millions of people away from the coastlines.

Time Warner a leading purveyor of AGW Cult Fiction just spent $1 billion to move

To

The

Manhattan

WATERFRONT

 

[fncceo]

Slowly changing climates, where the action happens over years or even decades, just can't compete with that for entertainment value.

Untrue... I find your ideas highly entertaining.

Just not all that convincing.

 

[tycho1572]

The earths climate has changed many times over the past million years. The only difference now is some people have figured out a way to capitalize on this natural occurrence.

 

[sparky]

We will never convince the deniers. Giant world wide conspiracy theories are fun and exciting to think about. Slowly changing climates, where the action happens over years or even decades, just can't compete with that for entertainment value.
Then there is the feeling of belonging these socially handicapped tRumpkins get from high-fiving each other every time they think they've scored some sort of point. For instance the 2 dozen or so threads that were started about the polar vortex disruptions last week.

And finally there's the way these things are presented to them, as if they are some kinda privileged information that only a chosen few get to know. It makes them feel (falsely) superior to everyone else, even if only for a few minutes, and that can be a powerful thing if you suffer from low self esteem like the vast majority of these nut-bars do.

~S~

 

[tycho1572]

Some people, like Crepitus, are gullible and quick to believe these doomsday scenarios.
Hell...AOC thinks the earth is going to end in 12years if we don’t do something! lol

 

[Oddball]

There could be a Cat 5 hurricane in January, 110 degrees in Fairbanks in November, and virtual dead zones throughout the planet and moron deniers would just call it weather.

We have to place deniers in the same category we place all nutjobs like alien abductees, deep state derpers and people who are awaiting the second coming of Hale-Bopp.

And your stupid computer models could never ever be predictive -oh wait, they never ever have been- and you warmer moonbats would still walk the streets with sandwich boards.

 

[Crepitus]

Slowly changing climates, where the action happens over years or even decades, just can't compete with that for entertainment value.

Untrue... I find your ideas highly entertaining.

Just not all that convincing.

How nice for you.

 

[tycho1572]

If it makes you feel any better, Crepitus, .... I’m good with you being gullible and believing this nonsense about how we can change what’s been been happening with our climate over the past millions of years.

 

[skookerasbil]

Lol.....this thread screams.....

I'm lOsInG

 

[skookerasbil]

I'm laughing about the whole premise of the thread, "Convincing the deniers....."

How about convincing the entire planet dummy!!. Nobody is caring about climate change action. Twenty years and the scientists STILL haven't made their case!

 

[Crick]

If it makes you feel any better, Crepitus, .... I’m good with you being gullible and believing this nonsense about how we can change what’s been been happening with our climate over the past millions of years.

Not millions. 150 or less.

 

[SSDD]

We will never convince the deniers. .

Not without

1. Observed, measured evidence which supports the AGW hypothesis over natural variability.

2. Observed, measured evidence which establishes a coherent link between the absorption of infrared radiation by a gas and warming in the atmosphere.

3. A published paper in which the hypothetical warming due to mankind's burning of hydrocarbon fuels, which is the foundation of the anthropogenic global warming hypothesis has been empirically measured, quantified, and then attributed to so called green house gasses.

We all know that you can produce none of those...and without them, the real question is "What convinced you?"

 

[Crick]

1) Shakun and Marcott's work established quite clearly that natural tempertature changes take place at a tiny fraction of the rate at which they are taking place now.

2) CO2 being heated by exposure to IR radiation: http://www.physics.upenn.edu/~pcn/Ms/18PhysTeacher.pdf

3) The Physical Science Basis contains reams of such evidence.

 

[Crick]

This is the Environment Forum.

 

[Oddball]

 

[danielpalos]

New Cities in more optimal locations. The North should show the South, the way!