“There are always two sides to every story, and it is generally wise, and safe, and charitable, to take the best; and yet there is probably no one way in which persons are so liable to be wrong, as in presuming the worst is true, and in forming and expressing their judgement of others, and of their actions, without waiting till all the truth is known.”
― Jonathan Edwards,
Charity & Its Fruits
I am indeed waiting until
all truths are known until I render my final and best judgements, for whatever that is worth.
Too bad other people cannot do the same and want to impose their virtue signaling political "white wash"
over the whole matter (all puns fully intended).
George Floyd IS innocent as far as anyone knows right now and maybe forever more.
But is he
truly and factually innocent? Well, we just don't know and I'm not obliged to lie and say we do know to make you feel better about yourself because the justice you want to see done will be magically conferred
(whether due or not).
My early impression of Floyd is that he had a spotty legal record and now I can't find a single reference to
that anywhere, as part of his secular martyring and media cleansing.
If that were true, IF, then that might cast doubt on the claim of innocence in passing counterfeit bills.
But that just can't be discussed or examined now or possibly ever.
I don't claim to know one way or the other.
However my conscience is clear on the matter and I don't have to feel good about myself because I've
never condemned the man and applaud removing the bad cops from the Minneapolis police force. How about you?