We Finally Know the Case Against Trump, and It Is Strong

[Flopper]

There isn't a lot of evidence in the public sphere, but what there is is pretty damaging to reasonable doubt. If you look at court documents and don't get suckered into what the talking heads on TV say or hang on every word Trump says.

It's the evidence presented to the Grand Jury, the Court, and laid before the Jury (if the case gets that far) that will matter.

Will Trump be convicted? I don't know. But to claim the case resets solely on the testimony of Cohen is, IMHO, a very bad mistake. Something people can assume Trump's layers are not making now that the Prosecution is/has turned over all evidence to the defense.

But you have a good day, some of us will continue to watch the case unfold and talk about the facts.

WW

Just using common sense one would have to conclude......
The primary purpose of the hushmoney payments was to influence the election. Claims that Trump spent $420,000 on payments and associate legal fees to protect his family from knowledge of his infidelities is ludicrous. Only weeks before the election his family as well whole nation was treated to his to confessions on the Access Hollywood tapes. He was cheating on Ivana with Marla who became his second wife and he cheated on Melania with McDougal only a few years after the marriage.. The McDougal affair was in all the gossip columns. There is no way that Melania would not be well aware of his promiscuities. In fact, the whole country was.

The claim that Cohen operated without Trump's knowledge and support is equally nonsensical. Cohen would not have made hushmoney payments and set up the scheme to hide them if Trump did not ask him to do it and paid him to do it.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Just using common sense one would have to conclude......
The primary purpose of the hushmoney payments was to influence the election. Claims that Trump spent $420,000 on payments and associate legal fees to protect his family from knowledge of his infidelities is ludicrous. Only weeks before the election his family as well whole nation was treated to his to confessions on the Access Hollywood tapes. He was cheating on Ivana with Marla who became his second wife and he cheated on Melania with McDougal only a few years after the marriage.. The McDougal affair was in all the gossip columns. There is no way that Melania would not be well aware of his promiscuities. In fact, the whole country was.

The claim that Cohen operated without Trump's knowledge and support is equally nonsensical. Cohen would not have made hushmoney payments and set up the scheme to hide them if Trump did not ask him to do it and paid him to do it.

The primary purpose of the hushmoney payments was to influence the election.

So, what if it was? The primary purpose of many stories in the MSM is to influence the election.

 

[Flopper]

The primary purpose of the hushmoney payments was to influence the election.

So, what if it was? The primary purpose of many stories in the MSM is to influence the election.

Because it was the key point on which the Cohen trial was based and an important point in upcoming Trump trial. Hushmoney payoffs with no intent to influence the election would mean no violation of election laws.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Because it was the key point on which the Cohen trial was based and an important point in upcoming Trump trial. Hushmoney payoffs with no intent to influence the election would mean no violation of election laws.

Why isn't CNN on trial for all their "campaign contributions" to Hillary?

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Why isn't CNN on trial for all their "campaign contributions" to Hillary?

Because nobody is giving any attention to that right wing fantasy.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Because nobody is giving any attention to that right wing fantasy.

CNN has no influence on elections?

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

CNN has no influence on elections?

Who cares?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Who cares?

Flopper.

 

[Faun]

Why isn't CNN on trial for all their "campaign contributions" to Hillary?

How much did they contribute?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

How much did they contribute?

Every positive story for Hillary has to be worth hundreds of thousands of dollars.

 

[Vrenn]

Every positive story for Hillary has to be worth hundreds of thousands of dollars.

Positive stories that are untrue are the easiest to fact check. Off the map; lies are the hardest when repeated over and over until you get a huge following.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Positive stories that are untrue are the easiest to fact check. Off the map; lies are the hardest when repeated over and over until you get a huge following.

Every negative story about a Republican is a campaign donation to the Democrat.
They need to declare those as well.

 

[Faun]

Every positive story for Hillary has to be worth hundreds of thousands of dollars.

Sounds like you're just making up numbers now.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Flopper.

Nah, I don't think he cares about that red herring.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Sounds like you're just making up numbers now.

Maybe millions?

 

[Faun]

Maybe millions?

LOL

As if it matters what numbers you make up.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

LOL

As if it matters what numbers you make up.

They probably made 100s of millions of dollars of unreported, in-kind
donations meant to influence the election.

 

[Faun]

They probably made 100s of millions of dollars of unreported, in-kind
donations meant to influence the election.

Anytime a conservative says, "probably," everything which follows is made up bullshit.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Anytime a conservative says, "probably," everything which follows is made up bullshit.

I'll bet it was over $1 billion.

 

[Meister]

Anytime a conservative says, "probably," everything which follows is made up bullshit.

Kinda like when a democrat says "We're going to get to the bottom of this", huh?