We are all owed an explanation from the fbi about Thomas Crooks

We are all owed an explanation from the FBI about Thomas Crooks


“What is going on?”
The story was buried within a couple of weeks, by the FBI and the Quisling Media. The body on the roof was destroyed ASAP by vreamation destroying evidence. There’s been zero substantive information released. The FBI has clammed up — what’s with that? President Trump’s order to reveal what’s going on is being ignored.
This assassination attempt, it's failure, followed by a cover-up stinks to high heaven.
It always struck me that the FBI would gave allowed the family to cremate the body within ten days after the shooting. And that advance notice was given to his parents five hours before the FBI first visited their house- five hours to clean up and make the house interior look oddly pristine.
Who went to Crook’s home and surgically cleaned and sanitized it so as to leave no trace of anything? From what I’ve heard it looked like experts at eliminating any evidence went over his place with such precision that it had to have been done by... fill in the blank
The FBI under Christopher was acting as if they were in on the plot and we saw that the Secret Service also seemed to be out to lunch. But who put them up to it? Jill, Joe or Barry?


One day, the rest of the MAGA base will come to realize we got played
 
You misspelled "likely", and "explanation".
1. PA state police offered the SS radios, the SS said "no thanks"
2. PA state police offered the SS a drone for surveillance,since theirs was broken, SS said "no thanks"
3. PA state police warned the SS about that roof, the SS said "no worries"
4. People saw Crooks on the roof and warned the SS, the SS did nothing
5. There was an acoustic analysis that showed anomalies
6. The FBI could have done an analysis of Crooks' iPhone to show where he went in the days before the attack
7. Were polygraph tests given to ALL of the SS in the Butler loop, starting with the top bimbo?

I'm not satisfied that a thorough investigation was done, Occams Razor or not.
 
1. PA state police offered the SS radios, the SS said "no thanks"
2. PA state police offered the SS a drone for surveillance,since theirs was broken, SS said "no thanks"
3. PA state police warned the SS about that roof, the SS said "no worries"
4. People saw Crooks on the roof and warned the SS, the SS did nothing
5. There was an acoustic analysis that showed anomalies
6. The FBI could have done an analysis of Crooks' iPhone to show where he went in the days before the attack
7. Were polygraph tests given to ALL of the SS in the Butler loop, starting with the top bimbo?

I'm not satisfied that a thorough investigation was done, Occams Razor or not.
Incompetence? That's what I said. Crooks got lucky.
 
He got lucky.
<~~~~~~>
Lucky by what standard?
Multiple independent and internal government reports have identified a "cascade of preventable failures" and "inexcusable" mistakes by the Secret Service?
More like he was allowed the access to the shooter's perch.
 
Last edited:
If you guys haven’t figured it out yet, our government has lied to us for decades. They still lie about JFK, RJK, and MLK. 9/11 is a lie. Seth Rich murder still unsolved. They’re lying about Charlie Kirk. Gary Webb, Mark Middleton, Epstein, and many more.

Thinking the FBI will ever be transparent and open, is terribly naive.
It is obvious by now to intelligent folks, regardless of their politics, the elected officials aren't really in charge anymore.

This whole Epstein fiasco should have been a clear sign of that. Neither party wants a full accounting on that. Mostly because it cuts straight to the core of the corruption. The controlled media has been doing a fine job at making that into a partisan issue.


Magic bullet.
Tower Seven.
It came from a wet market.

:rolleyes:

It just goes on and on, and there is never any accountability.
 
Exactly! What are you people not getting? The SS fucked up and Crooks got lucky!
<~~~~~~>
Was it a "screw-up", or assistance through incompetence.
.While incompetence is often cited as a defense or explanation by agencies, it does not legally excuse criminal complicity if intent to assist can be proven.
In legal terms, the distinction between criminal complicity and negligence is primarily defined by the 'mens rea' (guilty mind), or the level of intent and awareness the individual possesses regarding the crime.
Was the hierarchy of the Secret Service complicit in the attempted assassination of Donald Trump?
 
<~~~~~~>
Was it a "screw-up", or assistance through incompetence.
.While incompetence is often cited as a defense or explanation by agencies, it does not legally excuse criminal complicity if intent to assist can be proven.
In legal terms, the distinction between criminal complicity and negligence is primarily defined by the 'mens rea' (guilty mind), or the level of intent and awareness the individual possesses regarding the crime.
Was the hierarchy of the Secret Service complicit in the attempted assassination of Donald Trump?
Good luck proving that. It's been 6 months, and you have nothing.
 
15th post
Back
Top Bottom