Way back in the day of the cowboy’s gun control was tougher than it is today

You call millions of legal gun owners criminals?

How about you go disarm all the criminals in Chicago?
The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia.
 
The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia.
More tantrums. Nobody's going to give up their legally-owned weapons just because you're a little bitch.
 
How do you suggest gun owners be regulated?
To provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining, the Militia, and for governing such Part of them as may be employed in the Service of the United States, reserving to the States respectively, the Appointment of the Officers, and the Authority of training the Militia according to the discipline prescribed by Congress;
 
To provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining, the Militia, and for governing such Part of them as may be employed in the Service of the United States, reserving to the States respectively, the Appointment of the Officers, and the Authority of training the Militia according to the discipline prescribed by Congress;
I didn't ask you to cut and paste, kid.

Let's try it another way:

What would you do about the gun owners who want no part of your militia?
 
You need to figure out what you believe, kid. First, you want legal gun owners regulated, then you say their rights shall not be infringed.
You are simply being disingenuous; a typical right-wing modus operandi. Only well regulated militia of the People are necessary to the security of a free State and shall not be Infringed when keeping and bearing Arms for their State or the Union.
 
No, boy. You said you want legal gun owners regulated. Man up.
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia.
 
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia.
We have a Second Amendment and should have no security problems in our free States. Don't grab guns, grab gun lovers and Regulate them Well!

Run along now, kid.
 
The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia.
Still trying to run away from your call for legal gun owners to be punished by the government, I see.

The internet's forever, kid. You're never going to cut & paste your way out of this.

But you'll keep trying, guaranteed.
 
Still trying to run away from your call for legal gun owners to be punished by the government, I see.

The internet's forever, kid. You're never going to cut & paste your way out of this.

But you'll keep trying, guaranteed.
Thanks. You merely project since you are the one making that assumption and begging the question. However did you reach Your conclusion? Can you show your reasoning?
 
Thanks. You merely project since you are the one making that assumption and begging the question. However did you reach Your conclusion? Can you show your reasoning?
My reasoning is that's exactly what you said when you said gun owners should be regulated.

No assumption. No question-begging. You said it, and your pathetic denials are indeed pathetic.

Run along, boy.
 
My reasoning is that's exactly what you said when you said gun owners should be regulated.

No assumption. No question-begging. You said it, and your pathetic denials are indeed pathetic.

Run along, boy.
Gun lovers are subject to regulation in any State of our Union.

Subject only to the police power, the right of the individual citizen to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. (Illinois State Constitution)
 
Gun lovers are subject to regulation in any State of our Union.

Subject only to the police power, the right of the individual citizen to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. (Illinois State Constitution)
I don't think you're aware of this, but the Illinois State Constitution is only effect in the state of Illinois.

Maybe try reading the things you're desperately cutting and pasting...?
 

Forum List

Back
Top