Water Engines and Perpetual Motion Machines

[Larsky]

Why are they being suppressed by Big Oil?

 

[Moonglow]

It's such a dirty 5 letter word even I can't utter it...

 

[Larsky]

It's such a dirty 5 letter word even I can't utter it...

Bucks? Dough? Clams?

 

[Moonglow]

It's such a dirty 5 letter word even I can't utter it...

Bucks? Dough? Clams?

Money....

 

[rightwinger]

I invented a perpetual motion machine

I take one of these bobbing birds and put it in the ocean

 

[Larsky]

I invented a perpetual motion machine

I take one of these bobbing birds and put it in the ocean

There is water at the bottom of the Ocean.

 

[rightwinger]

I invented a perpetual motion machine

I take one of these bobbing birds and put it in the ocean

There is water at the bottom of the Ocean.

I thought there was only whale shit

 

[hadit]

Perpetual motion is physically impossible, so that's a non-starter. As for water engines, give us the physics that say it's possible. You can't burn water directly, we know that, and it takes more energy to split the hydrogen from the oxygen than you get by burning it, so that's a non-starter. How again are water engines supposed to work?

 

[konradv]

Perpetual motion is physically impossible, so that's a non-starter. As for water engines, give us the physics that say it's possible. You can't burn water directly, we know that, and it takes more energy to split the hydrogen from the oxygen than you get by burning it, so that's a non-starter. How again are water engines supposed to work?

That's the thing about conspiracy theorists, they ask questions; they don't answer them.

 

[hadit]

Perpetual motion is physically impossible, so that's a non-starter. As for water engines, give us the physics that say it's possible. You can't burn water directly, we know that, and it takes more energy to split the hydrogen from the oxygen than you get by burning it, so that's a non-starter. How again are water engines supposed to work?

That's the thing about conspiracy theorists, they ask questions; they don't answer them.

Seriously. We're supposed to believe that companies are refusing to use technology that would make them untold amounts of money. The first to patent, manufacture and market such an engine would be wealthy beyond their wildest dreams and corner the biggest market in world history, yet they don't do it? Ridiculous.

 

[konradv]

Perpetual motion is physically impossible, so that's a non-starter. As for water engines, give us the physics that say it's possible. You can't burn water directly, we know that, and it takes more energy to split the hydrogen from the oxygen than you get by burning it, so that's a non-starter. How again are water engines supposed to work?

That's the thing about conspiracy theorists, they ask questions; they don't answer them.

Seriously. We're supposed to believe that companies are refusing to use technology that would make them untold amounts of money. The first to patent, manufacture and market such an engine would be wealthy beyond their wildest dreams and corner the biggest market in world history, yet they don't do it? Ridiculous.

I agree.