Wasserman Scultz can't tell the Difference between being a Socialist and a Democrat!

I really don't know that it was a fair question.

However, DWS is not the best when it comes to thinking on her feet. Generally, she provides canned answers and obviously none of her talking points fits.

I find it really remarkable the number of websites that are featuring this interview. It is amazing how fast things go viral.
 
I really don't know that it was a fair question.

However, DWS is not the best when it comes to thinking on her feet. Generally, she provides canned answers and obviously none of her talking points fits.

I find it really remarkable the number of websites that are featuring this interview. It is amazing how fast things go viral.


Indeed, it's gone viral so fast that one would have though she killed a LION.
 
I really don't know that it was a fair question.

However, DWS is not the best when it comes to thinking on her feet. Generally, she provides canned answers and obviously none of her talking points fits.

I find it really remarkable the number of websites that are featuring this interview. It is amazing how fast things go viral.


I find it amazing no one on the left can answer Matthew's question. It is absolutely stunning to me.

I mean....can folks on the left truly be this ignorant?


DA1mLll.jpg
 
I really don't know that it was a fair question.

However, DWS is not the best when it comes to thinking on her feet. Generally, she provides canned answers and obviously none of her talking points fits.

I find it really remarkable the number of websites that are featuring this interview. It is amazing how fast things go viral.


I find it amazing no one on the left can answer Matthew's question. It is absolutely stunning to me.

I mean....can folks on the left truly be this ignorant?


DA1mLll.jpg


You really have to ask?
 
Historical facts are not jabbering.
There you go again twisting and adding something that was not said.
It proves you do not know our history and how much better off our education system was before the Feds got involved.

Our public education system was run by government since its inception.

Do you REALLY want to revert to some sort of system where poor families cannot get their children educated because of the cost?

What is wrong with you?

No it wasn't.
Department of Education Organization Act (Public Law 96-88) and signed into law by President Jimmy Carter on October 17, 1979, it began operating on May 4, 1980.

All of our children had a better education including the poor before the Feds created the department.

A government run school system funded by taxpayer dollars that offers a basic education to children regardless of their ability to pay

is Socialism.

You either support that Socialism or you don't.

Yes or no.


All I said was we had better education before the Feds created that department.

Yeah well that's not the first retarded thing you've said.

But back to the point.

Is public education socialism or not?

Anytime anyone states historical facts you refuse to accept it.
It is now but before the Feds took over it wasn't.
 
Our public education system was run by government since its inception.

Do you REALLY want to revert to some sort of system where poor families cannot get their children educated because of the cost?

What is wrong with you?

No it wasn't.
Department of Education Organization Act (Public Law 96-88) and signed into law by President Jimmy Carter on October 17, 1979, it began operating on May 4, 1980.

All of our children had a better education including the poor before the Feds created the department.

A government run school system funded by taxpayer dollars that offers a basic education to children regardless of their ability to pay

is Socialism.

You either support that Socialism or you don't.

Yes or no.


All I said was we had better education before the Feds created that department.

Yeah well that's not the first retarded thing you've said.

But back to the point.

Is public education socialism or not?

Anytime anyone states historical facts you refuse to accept it.
It is now but before the Feds took over it wasn't.

Government is government. Socialism is socialism at any level of government.

IS PUBLIC EDUCATION SOCIALISM OR NOT?
 
Okay.....I'm done here. We've truly entered an intellectual wasteland when the head of the Democrat Party cannot define what her Party stands for and no left leaning person on USMB can define the difference between the Democrat Party and Socialism.

If anyone every does attempt an answer can you tag me?

Thanks. :bye1:
 
A government run school system funded by taxpayer dollars that offers a basic education to children regardless of their ability to pay

is Socialism.

You either support that Socialism or you don't.

Yes or no.


That is an example....(a false one imo). I was looking for your definition of modern socialism. Is it the European Greece or France style, or the old school Soviet version.

Thanks. :)

A false one? Why? What specifically is non-socialistic about a government run public school system?


Okay....you won't answer Matthews question. Not surprised.


Next! :lol:

I answered 100 posts ago, genius. Learn to read.


I never saw a thing. Please point to the specific post.

Thanks a bunch. :)

Apologize for being an asshole and I will. Otherwise do what normal people do. Read.
 
No it wasn't.
Department of Education Organization Act (Public Law 96-88) and signed into law by President Jimmy Carter on October 17, 1979, it began operating on May 4, 1980.

All of our children had a better education including the poor before the Feds created the department.

A government run school system funded by taxpayer dollars that offers a basic education to children regardless of their ability to pay

is Socialism.

You either support that Socialism or you don't.

Yes or no.


All I said was we had better education before the Feds created that department.

Yeah well that's not the first retarded thing you've said.

But back to the point.

Is public education socialism or not?

Anytime anyone states historical facts you refuse to accept it.
It is now but before the Feds took over it wasn't.

Government is government. Socialism is socialism at any level of government.

IS PUBLIC EDUCATION SOCIALISM OR NOT?


No. I have now answered twice. Your up. Go for it. :D
 
This is HILLARIOUS! Chris Matthews is obviously a shill for HILLARY!, but it is quite amusing to see him nail Debbie Wasserman Schultz. She will not answer his question to tell the difference between being a Socialist and a Democrat.



She doesn't say she "doesn't know". She evades the question.

And rightly so --- you can't possibly answer that question in the 0.4 seconds of space Droolmaster Matthews allows for responses.


Piffle. You can try to spin it however you wish, but she clearly looks dumbfounded when asked the question.


There's nothing to "spin" -- have you ever watched Chris Matthews? He doesn't do interviews. He does monologues with question marks that can't be answered because he's already talking over the second word of your response.

Everything that's wrong with television dumb-down is encapsulated in that spittle dripping out the side of his mouth. Superficial bullshit.

One woman told Chris, "I'll answer if you stop talking". I love her for that.
 
That is an example....(a false one imo). I was looking for your definition of modern socialism. Is it the European Greece or France style, or the old school Soviet version.

Thanks. :)

A false one? Why? What specifically is non-socialistic about a government run public school system?


Okay....you won't answer Matthews question. Not surprised.


Next! :lol:

I answered 100 posts ago, genius. Learn to read.


I never saw a thing. Please point to the specific post.

Thanks a bunch. :)

Apologize for being an asshole and I will. Otherwise do what normal people do. Read.


I have read through the entire thread. You got nothing. Zero. You are as clueless as Debbie. Sorry. :(
 
Name the Republicans who would end public education.

By doing so, you will have shown us which Republicans are not socialists in their own right.
 
lol, Bernie the Socialist is beating Trump the new rightwing God by 20 points.

Maybe that explains the rightwing meltdown in this thread.


And Walker is beating Bernie by 5. So your point is?
 
The above poster said earlier today that the power to discriminate and deny rights should be returned to the states;

that's a perfect example of what a perverse definition of 'freedom' the RWnuts have come up with.

Ah lying!

What WOULD you Communists do if you couldn't lie through your fucking teeth? :dunno:

The poster I referred to said this earlier today:

"Discrimination laws should be up to the States to make them not the Feds."

NOW, you tell me how I was lying.

We were talking about the 1st amendment and freedom of religion.
You made it about race.

You made it about race by making your statement include race. If you did not mean to, you should admit you are an inarticulate idiot, and move on.
 
The moral cowardice of the left also never ceases to amaze. A simple question that goes to the core of the American Left's beliefs and they are too cowardly or ignorant to answer.

It truly is very sad. :(


images
 
This is HILLARIOUS! Chris Matthews is obviously a shill for HILLARY!, but it is quite amusing to see him nail Debbie Wasserman Schultz. She will not answer his question to tell the difference between being a Socialist and a Democrat.



She doesn't say she "doesn't know". She evades the question.

And rightly so --- you can't possibly answer that question in the 0.4 seconds of space Droolmaster Matthews allows for responses.


Piffle. You can try to spin it however you wish, but she clearly looks dumbfounded when asked the question.

Lol

No doubt
 
The above poster said earlier today that the power to discriminate and deny rights should be returned to the states;

that's a perfect example of what a perverse definition of 'freedom' the RWnuts have come up with.

Ah lying!

What WOULD you Communists do if you couldn't lie through your fucking teeth? :dunno:

The poster I referred to said this earlier today:

"Discrimination laws should be up to the States to make them not the Feds."

NOW, you tell me how I was lying.

We were talking about the 1st amendment and freedom of religion.
You made it about race.

You made it about race by making your statement include race. If you did not mean to, you should admit you are an inarticulate idiot, and move on.


Still ducking the question?


1213841779552.png~c200
 
lol, Bernie the Socialist is beating Trump the new rightwing God by 20 points.

Maybe that explains the rightwing meltdown in this thread.


And Walker is beating Bernie by 5. So your point is?

So a socialist is about 1 point outside the margin of error against the great white hope of modern American conservatism?

lol, that makes it even funnier.
 
You clearly have no comprehension.

Socialism is all about the abolition of private property. If you don't know this basic fact, you are a fool. Is there something in "becomes obsolete" you need explained to you? Apparently so.
Is Sweden socialist?
Did Sweden abolish private property?

Was the Soviet Union communist?
Did the SOviet Union abolish private property?

Is North Korea communist?
Did North Korea abolish private property?

You're distance from reality is enormous.

Is public education socialist?

Absolutely, that's why 80% of NYC School student can't read at grade level

You think poor kids would read better if there was no affordable school system for them?

How would that work?

I think they'd do better in charter schools. Public education has done them a great disservice
Another believer in the theory that if government didnt do something no one would do it.
Hint: there was no universal free public education until the Civil War in many places.
 

Forum List

Back
Top