Washington Post audio of Trump berating and threatening Georgia Secretary of State for not "finding" votes to change election result. Sedition?

Are you insane? The Post literally lied about what he said....he never asked the Sec of State to change the election resutls.....

That's what the Post implied with their lies....but in reality all Trump said was to do a good job, and that he has the most in important job in the country at the moment.

Your post highlights the damage done by these propagandist.....fish will eat up the lie, and despite the truth coming out, fish will still accept the lie
They never retracted the story. That's your false narrative. They corrected the 2 quotes discussed. He said those things but with different words. He's heard saying on the recording where he said there was "dishonesty" (instead of "fraud") and said she will find it she compares signatures from this election with signatures from past elections. That's looking for fraud. So yes, he said that. The Washington Post corrected the quote, not the story, because he didn't use the words, "find the fraud."
Retracted, corrected their lies on the backpage after the truth came out....whatever....they lied and got caught.....sorry you fell for the Big Lie.....the Germans felt ashamed and embarrassed after their Big Lie was exposed to...well most did, some still held on to it....
The one lying is you.

You claimed they "retracted the story." They did no such thing. They corrected 2 quotes while the story remains. You should stop telling that lie.

You claimed the retracted the story "in the OP." They did no such thing. Retraction/correction aside, the story in the OP was about a call Trump made to Raffensperger; the correction issued the other day was about a call Trump made to Watson. The story in the OP has nothing to do with this. You should stop telling that lie.
The headline of the story was the lie! The entire story is nothing without the lie.
 
It's always amazing to me that members of the Trump Cult

Your inability to respect that other people support politically different candidates than you, makes you look intellectually immature. and ignorant.

The issue isn't support for "politically different" candidates. The issue is support for a candidate who believes that black and brown people are not deserving of the same rights, protections and opportunities as white people. That American must remain a white ruled country.A candidate who seeks to drive wedges of race and politics between people, and one who wants to be "President for Life" - a desire he has expressed on more than one occasion.

It would be one thing if Trump were proposing some bold and sweeping change to American political life, and a plan for the nation, but he has none of those things. Trump seeks power for its own sake, and has absolutely no interest in doing anything for the nation, other than to wield power, to help his friends and punish his enemies.

There is no plan for America, other than to keep non-whites out of positions of power, other than to end Democracy in the USA. That's why Trump is being so bitterly opposed - he wants to be a dicatator, and you support that notion.

It's beyond despicable. It's treasonous, seditious, and you're correct in your assumption that you will not be tolerated.
 
Are you insane? The Post literally lied about what he said....he never asked the Sec of State to change the election resutls.....

That's what the Post implied with their lies....but in reality all Trump said was to do a good job, and that he has the most in important job in the country at the moment.

Your post highlights the damage done by these propagandist.....fish will eat up the lie, and despite the truth coming out, fish will still accept the lie
They never retracted the story. That's your false narrative. They corrected the 2 quotes discussed. He said those things but with different words. He's heard saying on the recording where he said there was "dishonesty" (instead of "fraud") and said she will find it she compares signatures from this election with signatures from past elections. That's looking for fraud. So yes, he said that. The Washington Post corrected the quote, not the story, because he didn't use the words, "find the fraud."
Retracted, corrected their lies on the backpage after the truth came out....whatever....they lied and got caught.....sorry you fell for the Big Lie.....the Germans felt ashamed and embarrassed after their Big Lie was exposed to...well most did, some still held on to it....
The one lying is you.

You claimed they "retracted the story." They did no such thing. They corrected 2 quotes while the story remains. You should stop telling that lie.

You claimed the retracted the story "in the OP." They did no such thing. Retraction/correction aside, the story in the OP was about a call Trump made to Raffensperger; the correction issued the other day was about a call Trump made to Watson. The story in the OP has nothing to do with this. You should stop telling that lie.
The headline of the story was the lie! The entire story is nothing without the lie.
LOL

You don't even know what phone call this was about. You lied about that too.

And the story still stands despite the correction. You lied about that too.

Your lies aside, Trump calls Watson and says what he said. Watson reports to Fuchs that Trump called her and asked her to "find the fraud." Fuchs talks to the Washington Post and tells them Trump called Watson and asked her to "find the fraud."

So where's the lie?
 
Are you insane? The Post literally lied about what he said....he never asked the Sec of State to change the election resutls.....

That's what the Post implied with their lies....but in reality all Trump said was to do a good job, and that he has the most in important job in the country at the moment.

Your post highlights the damage done by these propagandist.....fish will eat up the lie, and despite the truth coming out, fish will still accept the lie
They never retracted the story. That's your false narrative. They corrected the 2 quotes discussed. He said those things but with different words. He's heard saying on the recording where he said there was "dishonesty" (instead of "fraud") and said she will find it she compares signatures from this election with signatures from past elections. That's looking for fraud. So yes, he said that. The Washington Post corrected the quote, not the story, because he didn't use the words, "find the fraud."
Retracted, corrected their lies on the backpage after the truth came out....whatever....they lied and got caught.....sorry you fell for the Big Lie.....the Germans felt ashamed and embarrassed after their Big Lie was exposed to...well most did, some still held on to it....
The one lying is you.

You claimed they "retracted the story." They did no such thing. They corrected 2 quotes while the story remains. You should stop telling that lie.

You claimed the retracted the story "in the OP." They did no such thing. Retraction/correction aside, the story in the OP was about a call Trump made to Raffensperger; the correction issued the other day was about a call Trump made to Watson. The story in the OP has nothing to do with this. You should stop telling that lie.
The headline of the story was the lie! The entire story is nothing without the lie.
LOL

You don't even know what phone call this was about. You lied about that too.

And the story still stands despite the correction. You lied about that too.

Your lies aside, Trump calls Watson and says what he said. Watson reports to Fuchs that Trump called her and asked her to "find the fraud." Fuchs talks to the Washington Post and tells them Trump called Watson and asked her to "find the fraud."

So where's the lie?
Of course I do....the story is bogus now, because it was based on a lie..

He never said find the fraud....hence a lie.
 
Are you insane? The Post literally lied about what he said....he never asked the Sec of State to change the election resutls.....

That's what the Post implied with their lies....but in reality all Trump said was to do a good job, and that he has the most in important job in the country at the moment.

Your post highlights the damage done by these propagandist.....fish will eat up the lie, and despite the truth coming out, fish will still accept the lie
They never retracted the story. That's your false narrative. They corrected the 2 quotes discussed. He said those things but with different words. He's heard saying on the recording where he said there was "dishonesty" (instead of "fraud") and said she will find it she compares signatures from this election with signatures from past elections. That's looking for fraud. So yes, he said that. The Washington Post corrected the quote, not the story, because he didn't use the words, "find the fraud."
Retracted, corrected their lies on the backpage after the truth came out....whatever....they lied and got caught.....sorry you fell for the Big Lie.....the Germans felt ashamed and embarrassed after their Big Lie was exposed to...well most did, some still held on to it....
The one lying is you.

You claimed they "retracted the story." They did no such thing. They corrected 2 quotes while the story remains. You should stop telling that lie.

You claimed the retracted the story "in the OP." They did no such thing. Retraction/correction aside, the story in the OP was about a call Trump made to Raffensperger; the correction issued the other day was about a call Trump made to Watson. The story in the OP has nothing to do with this. You should stop telling that lie.
The headline of the story was the lie! The entire story is nothing without the lie.
LOL

You don't even know what phone call this was about. You lied about that too.

And the story still stands despite the correction. You lied about that too.

Your lies aside, Trump calls Watson and says what he said. Watson reports to Fuchs that Trump called her and asked her to "find the fraud." Fuchs talks to the Washington Post and tells them Trump called Watson and asked her to "find the fraud."

So where's the lie?
Of course I do....the story is bogus now, because it was based on a lie..

He never said find the fraud....hence a lie.
No, you don't. You're lying again. You claimed this was about Trump calling Raffensperger. That's a lie.

And Watson, who was on this call, reported he asked her to "find the fraud." So how is it a lie for the Washington Post to report what Watson said?
 
Are you insane? The Post literally lied about what he said....he never asked the Sec of State to change the election resutls.....

That's what the Post implied with their lies....but in reality all Trump said was to do a good job, and that he has the most in important job in the country at the moment.

Your post highlights the damage done by these propagandist.....fish will eat up the lie, and despite the truth coming out, fish will still accept the lie
They never retracted the story. That's your false narrative. They corrected the 2 quotes discussed. He said those things but with different words. He's heard saying on the recording where he said there was "dishonesty" (instead of "fraud") and said she will find it she compares signatures from this election with signatures from past elections. That's looking for fraud. So yes, he said that. The Washington Post corrected the quote, not the story, because he didn't use the words, "find the fraud."
Retracted, corrected their lies on the backpage after the truth came out....whatever....they lied and got caught.....sorry you fell for the Big Lie.....the Germans felt ashamed and embarrassed after their Big Lie was exposed to...well most did, some still held on to it....
The one lying is you.

You claimed they "retracted the story." They did no such thing. They corrected 2 quotes while the story remains. You should stop telling that lie.

You claimed the retracted the story "in the OP." They did no such thing. Retraction/correction aside, the story in the OP was about a call Trump made to Raffensperger; the correction issued the other day was about a call Trump made to Watson. The story in the OP has nothing to do with this. You should stop telling that lie.
The headline of the story was the lie! The entire story is nothing without the lie.

There was no lie. There were corrections to the quotes. The story stands.

But given the Report issued yesterday wherein the FBI reported that Russia mounted a massive mis-information campaign against the 2020 US elections, using those close to the President to spread lies and propaganda against the Biden Family, and against Hunter and Joe Biden in particular, promoting FALSE IDEAS THAT THE BIDENS ARE CORRUPT, and that Trump, and other senior members of government - yeah Ron Johnson, we mean you, were fed this Russian propaganda direct from Vladimir Putin, and they used these lies in their campaign and narratives around the campaign.

Why aren't you talking about how Donald Trump used proveably false RUSSIAN PROPAGANDA fed to RUDY GUILIANI, via Putin's spy - under the personal direction of Putin, TO MESS WITH THE GENERAL ELECTION.

WHY AREN'T YOU TALKING ABOUT THOSE LIES?

 
Are you insane? The Post literally lied about what he said....he never asked the Sec of State to change the election resutls.....

That's what the Post implied with their lies....but in reality all Trump said was to do a good job, and that he has the most in important job in the country at the moment.

Your post highlights the damage done by these propagandist.....fish will eat up the lie, and despite the truth coming out, fish will still accept the lie
They never retracted the story. That's your false narrative. They corrected the 2 quotes discussed. He said those things but with different words. He's heard saying on the recording where he said there was "dishonesty" (instead of "fraud") and said she will find it she compares signatures from this election with signatures from past elections. That's looking for fraud. So yes, he said that. The Washington Post corrected the quote, not the story, because he didn't use the words, "find the fraud."
Retracted, corrected their lies on the backpage after the truth came out....whatever....they lied and got caught.....sorry you fell for the Big Lie.....the Germans felt ashamed and embarrassed after their Big Lie was exposed to...well most did, some still held on to it....
The one lying is you.

You claimed they "retracted the story." They did no such thing. They corrected 2 quotes while the story remains. You should stop telling that lie.

You claimed the retracted the story "in the OP." They did no such thing. Retraction/correction aside, the story in the OP was about a call Trump made to Raffensperger; the correction issued the other day was about a call Trump made to Watson. The story in the OP has nothing to do with this. You should stop telling that lie.
The headline of the story was the lie! The entire story is nothing without the lie.
LOL

You don't even know what phone call this was about. You lied about that too.

And the story still stands despite the correction. You lied about that too.

Your lies aside, Trump calls Watson and says what he said. Watson reports to Fuchs that Trump called her and asked her to "find the fraud." Fuchs talks to the Washington Post and tells them Trump called Watson and asked her to "find the fraud."

So where's the lie?
Of course I do....the story is bogus now, because it was based on a lie..

He never said find the fraud....hence a lie.
No, you don't. You're lying again. You claimed this was about Trump calling Raffensperger. That's a lie.

And Watson, who was on this call, reported he asked her to "find the fraud." So how is it a lie for the Washington Post to report what Watson said?
Look I get it, you are one of those folks that despite the truth coming out, will still believe the BIG LIE
 
Are you insane? The Post literally lied about what he said....he never asked the Sec of State to change the election resutls.....

That's what the Post implied with their lies....but in reality all Trump said was to do a good job, and that he has the most in important job in the country at the moment.

Your post highlights the damage done by these propagandist.....fish will eat up the lie, and despite the truth coming out, fish will still accept the lie
They never retracted the story. That's your false narrative. They corrected the 2 quotes discussed. He said those things but with different words. He's heard saying on the recording where he said there was "dishonesty" (instead of "fraud") and said she will find it she compares signatures from this election with signatures from past elections. That's looking for fraud. So yes, he said that. The Washington Post corrected the quote, not the story, because he didn't use the words, "find the fraud."
Retracted, corrected their lies on the backpage after the truth came out....whatever....they lied and got caught.....sorry you fell for the Big Lie.....the Germans felt ashamed and embarrassed after their Big Lie was exposed to...well most did, some still held on to it....
The one lying is you.

You claimed they "retracted the story." They did no such thing. They corrected 2 quotes while the story remains. You should stop telling that lie.

You claimed the retracted the story "in the OP." They did no such thing. Retraction/correction aside, the story in the OP was about a call Trump made to Raffensperger; the correction issued the other day was about a call Trump made to Watson. The story in the OP has nothing to do with this. You should stop telling that lie.
The headline of the story was the lie! The entire story is nothing without the lie.
LOL

You don't even know what phone call this was about. You lied about that too.

And the story still stands despite the correction. You lied about that too.

Your lies aside, Trump calls Watson and says what he said. Watson reports to Fuchs that Trump called her and asked her to "find the fraud." Fuchs talks to the Washington Post and tells them Trump called Watson and asked her to "find the fraud."

So where's the lie?
Of course I do....the story is bogus now, because it was based on a lie..

He never said find the fraud....hence a lie.
No, you don't. You're lying again. You claimed this was about Trump calling Raffensperger. That's a lie.

And Watson, who was on this call, reported he asked her to "find the fraud." So how is it a lie for the Washington Post to report what Watson said?
Look I get it, you are one of those folks that despite the truth coming out, will still believe the BIG LIE
Why can't you just answer the question?

How is it a lie for the Washington Post to report what Watson said?
 
Are you insane? The Post literally lied about what he said....he never asked the Sec of State to change the election resutls.....

That's what the Post implied with their lies....but in reality all Trump said was to do a good job, and that he has the most in important job in the country at the moment.

Your post highlights the damage done by these propagandist.....fish will eat up the lie, and despite the truth coming out, fish will still accept the lie
They never retracted the story. That's your false narrative. They corrected the 2 quotes discussed. He said those things but with different words. He's heard saying on the recording where he said there was "dishonesty" (instead of "fraud") and said she will find it she compares signatures from this election with signatures from past elections. That's looking for fraud. So yes, he said that. The Washington Post corrected the quote, not the story, because he didn't use the words, "find the fraud."
Retracted, corrected their lies on the backpage after the truth came out....whatever....they lied and got caught.....sorry you fell for the Big Lie.....the Germans felt ashamed and embarrassed after their Big Lie was exposed to...well most did, some still held on to it....
The one lying is you.

You claimed they "retracted the story." They did no such thing. They corrected 2 quotes while the story remains. You should stop telling that lie.

You claimed the retracted the story "in the OP." They did no such thing. Retraction/correction aside, the story in the OP was about a call Trump made to Raffensperger; the correction issued the other day was about a call Trump made to Watson. The story in the OP has nothing to do with this. You should stop telling that lie.
The headline of the story was the lie! The entire story is nothing without the lie.

There was no lie. There were corrections to the quotes. The story stands.

But given the Report issued yesterday wherein the FBI reported that Russia mounted a massive mis-information campaign against the 2020 US elections, using those close to the President to spread lies and propaganda against the Biden Family, and against Hunter and Joe Biden in particular, promoting FALSE IDEAS THAT THE BIDENS ARE CORRUPT, and that Trump, and other senior members of government - yeah Ron Johnson, we mean you, were fed this Russian propaganda direct from Vladimir Putin, and they used these lies in their campaign and narratives around the campaign.

Why aren't you talking about how Donald Trump used proveably false RUSSIAN PROPAGANDA fed to RUDY GUILIANI, via Putin's spy - under the personal direction of Putin, TO MESS WITH THE GENERAL ELECTION.

WHY AREN'T YOU TALKING ABOUT THOSE LIES?

The story was based on the line....heck it ws the headline! The story is completely different, in fact it's at none story when you actually put the truth in it.....

Why? Because that was 2016 and we had numerous investigations that found out that there was no Russian-Trump campaign conspiracy....
 
Are you insane? The Post literally lied about what he said....he never asked the Sec of State to change the election resutls.....

That's what the Post implied with their lies....but in reality all Trump said was to do a good job, and that he has the most in important job in the country at the moment.

Your post highlights the damage done by these propagandist.....fish will eat up the lie, and despite the truth coming out, fish will still accept the lie
They never retracted the story. That's your false narrative. They corrected the 2 quotes discussed. He said those things but with different words. He's heard saying on the recording where he said there was "dishonesty" (instead of "fraud") and said she will find it she compares signatures from this election with signatures from past elections. That's looking for fraud. So yes, he said that. The Washington Post corrected the quote, not the story, because he didn't use the words, "find the fraud."
Retracted, corrected their lies on the backpage after the truth came out....whatever....they lied and got caught.....sorry you fell for the Big Lie.....the Germans felt ashamed and embarrassed after their Big Lie was exposed to...well most did, some still held on to it....
The one lying is you.

You claimed they "retracted the story." They did no such thing. They corrected 2 quotes while the story remains. You should stop telling that lie.

You claimed the retracted the story "in the OP." They did no such thing. Retraction/correction aside, the story in the OP was about a call Trump made to Raffensperger; the correction issued the other day was about a call Trump made to Watson. The story in the OP has nothing to do with this. You should stop telling that lie.
The headline of the story was the lie! The entire story is nothing without the lie.
LOL

You don't even know what phone call this was about. You lied about that too.

And the story still stands despite the correction. You lied about that too.

Your lies aside, Trump calls Watson and says what he said. Watson reports to Fuchs that Trump called her and asked her to "find the fraud." Fuchs talks to the Washington Post and tells them Trump called Watson and asked her to "find the fraud."

So where's the lie?
Of course I do....the story is bogus now, because it was based on a lie..

He never said find the fraud....hence a lie.
No, you don't. You're lying again. You claimed this was about Trump calling Raffensperger. That's a lie.

And Watson, who was on this call, reported he asked her to "find the fraud." So how is it a lie for the Washington Post to report what Watson said?
Look I get it, you are one of those folks that despite the truth coming out, will still believe the BIG LIE
Why can't you just answer the question?

How is it a lie for the Washington Post to report what Watdon said?
Because Walton lied, and the Post, published the lie, they didn't even bother to investigate....they ran with the lie
 
Are you insane? The Post literally lied about what he said....he never asked the Sec of State to change the election resutls.....

That's what the Post implied with their lies....but in reality all Trump said was to do a good job, and that he has the most in important job in the country at the moment.

Your post highlights the damage done by these propagandist.....fish will eat up the lie, and despite the truth coming out, fish will still accept the lie
They never retracted the story. That's your false narrative. They corrected the 2 quotes discussed. He said those things but with different words. He's heard saying on the recording where he said there was "dishonesty" (instead of "fraud") and said she will find it she compares signatures from this election with signatures from past elections. That's looking for fraud. So yes, he said that. The Washington Post corrected the quote, not the story, because he didn't use the words, "find the fraud."
Retracted, corrected their lies on the backpage after the truth came out....whatever....they lied and got caught.....sorry you fell for the Big Lie.....the Germans felt ashamed and embarrassed after their Big Lie was exposed to...well most did, some still held on to it....
The one lying is you.

You claimed they "retracted the story." They did no such thing. They corrected 2 quotes while the story remains. You should stop telling that lie.

You claimed the retracted the story "in the OP." They did no such thing. Retraction/correction aside, the story in the OP was about a call Trump made to Raffensperger; the correction issued the other day was about a call Trump made to Watson. The story in the OP has nothing to do with this. You should stop telling that lie.
The headline of the story was the lie! The entire story is nothing without the lie.

There was no lie. There were corrections to the quotes. The story stands.

But given the Report issued yesterday wherein the FBI reported that Russia mounted a massive mis-information campaign against the 2020 US elections, using those close to the President to spread lies and propaganda against the Biden Family, and against Hunter and Joe Biden in particular, promoting FALSE IDEAS THAT THE BIDENS ARE CORRUPT, and that Trump, and other senior members of government - yeah Ron Johnson, we mean you, were fed this Russian propaganda direct from Vladimir Putin, and they used these lies in their campaign and narratives around the campaign.

Why aren't you talking about how Donald Trump used proveably false RUSSIAN PROPAGANDA fed to RUDY GUILIANI, via Putin's spy - under the personal direction of Putin, TO MESS WITH THE GENERAL ELECTION.

WHY AREN'T YOU TALKING ABOUT THOSE LIES?

The story was based on the line....heck it ws the headline! The story is completely different, in fact it's at none story when you actually put the truth in it.....

Why? Because that was 2016 and we had numerous investigations that found out that there was no Russian-Trump campaign conspiracy....
2016?

You're lying again.

That's about the 2020 election.
 
Are you insane? The Post literally lied about what he said....he never asked the Sec of State to change the election resutls.....

That's what the Post implied with their lies....but in reality all Trump said was to do a good job, and that he has the most in important job in the country at the moment.

Your post highlights the damage done by these propagandist.....fish will eat up the lie, and despite the truth coming out, fish will still accept the lie
They never retracted the story. That's your false narrative. They corrected the 2 quotes discussed. He said those things but with different words. He's heard saying on the recording where he said there was "dishonesty" (instead of "fraud") and said she will find it she compares signatures from this election with signatures from past elections. That's looking for fraud. So yes, he said that. The Washington Post corrected the quote, not the story, because he didn't use the words, "find the fraud."
Retracted, corrected their lies on the backpage after the truth came out....whatever....they lied and got caught.....sorry you fell for the Big Lie.....the Germans felt ashamed and embarrassed after their Big Lie was exposed to...well most did, some still held on to it....
The one lying is you.

You claimed they "retracted the story." They did no such thing. They corrected 2 quotes while the story remains. You should stop telling that lie.

You claimed the retracted the story "in the OP." They did no such thing. Retraction/correction aside, the story in the OP was about a call Trump made to Raffensperger; the correction issued the other day was about a call Trump made to Watson. The story in the OP has nothing to do with this. You should stop telling that lie.
The headline of the story was the lie! The entire story is nothing without the lie.
LOL

You don't even know what phone call this was about. You lied about that too.

And the story still stands despite the correction. You lied about that too.

Your lies aside, Trump calls Watson and says what he said. Watson reports to Fuchs that Trump called her and asked her to "find the fraud." Fuchs talks to the Washington Post and tells them Trump called Watson and asked her to "find the fraud."

So where's the lie?
Of course I do....the story is bogus now, because it was based on a lie..

He never said find the fraud....hence a lie.
No, you don't. You're lying again. You claimed this was about Trump calling Raffensperger. That's a lie.

And Watson, who was on this call, reported he asked her to "find the fraud." So how is it a lie for the Washington Post to report what Watson said?
Look I get it, you are one of those folks that despite the truth coming out, will still believe the BIG LIE
Why can't you just answer the question?

How is it a lie for the Washington Post to report what Watdon said?
Because Walton lied, and the Post, published the lie, they didn't even bother to investigate....they ran with the lie
LOL

Now you're changing your story, you should issue a correction. This is the first time you said it was Watson who lied. And let's not forget your earlier lie that Trump called Raffensperger, not Watson.

And yes, they did investigate Watson's story. What they didn't get was confirmation from the White House that he used those words. It's not a lie to use quotes given by someone. And Watson was right since the phone call reveals he did want her to find fraud. He said so. He asked her to compare signatures to find the "dishonesty." "Dishonesty" in an election is called "fraud."
 
Yes, they admitted the quotes they were given were not accurate
When you translate “not accurate” from liberish to English the word is “lies”

No, the word is "misquoted". What he said was not mischaracterized, nor was the intent of the call. You're trying to portray this as something it's not to deflect from the crimes which have been exposed here. It's not working. It's like Clinton saying "I did not have sex with that woman".

I'd much rather discuss how Putin put his words into Trump's mouth, and the mouths of the entire Republican Party.
 
President Trump urged fellow Republican Brad Raffensperger, the Georgia secretary of state, to “find” enough votes to overturn his defeat in an extraordinary one-hour phone call Saturday that election experts said raised legal questions.

The Washington Post obtained a recording of the conversation in which Trump alternately berated Raffensperger, tried to flatter him, begged him to act and threatened him with vague criminal consequences if the secretary of state refused to pursue his false claims, at one point warning that Raffensperger was taking “a big risk.”

Throughout the call, Raffensperger and his office’s general counsel rejected Trump’s assertions, explaining that the president is relying on debunked conspiracy theories and that President-elect Joe Biden’s 11,779-vote victory in Georgia was fair and accurate.



Trump is engaging of sedition and overturning the will of the people through fraud.

Trump should be arrested for sedition for attempting to overthrow the newly elected government of the United States of America.

Everything Trump touches dies.

Is American democracy next?
Nope. Not when Democrats are stealing elections with vote harvesting.

Trump lost get over it, we have new president now. Just come to grips with the fact that Trump is a one and done.


Is he though? As teh lies you people used to get rid of him are revealed, why should he not come back?

Let him come on back.
Revenge Tour 2024.

I guess the racist are really going to ramp it up.
Democratic Party = Anti-White

The Democrat Party is what 75% white, so that makes about as much sense as you do.
No it's not. Also those are NOT white people. Just a bunch of goddamn idiots.

So the real white folks are Trump Humpers.


Whites can be anti-white racists. It is called self hatred. I have seen it personally.

So to be a real white person you have to be a Republican Trump Humper.

Obviously not, you drooling retard.

But you have to deny racism or its effect on minorities to be a "real" white person. You can't say that "black lives matter". Or even believe it.


What is the unstated premise of the slogan, "black lives matter"?

That black lives are currently valued less than white lives, in the USA.

It's a premise that has a LOT of validity. Especially when the President ordered the entire country to re-open three days after a report was released that said that black and brown people were dying in much higher numbers than white people.

The slogan is not, "black lives matter as much", but that they "matter".

This nation has had a bi-partisan consensus on black equality since before I was born.

For you people to talk to us like we are klansmen from the 1920s, is insulting to an extreme degree.

It is also worth noting that calling for a "peaceful protest" while pushing such inflammatory crap, is as convincing as holding a kid's arm and making him punch himself, while crying out, "why are you hitting yourself?"

Methinks that you doth protest too much.

Trump was very clear that black votes don't matter, and tried to eliminate them. When you stop voting for a guy who talks talking like a 1920's Klansman, we'll stop thinking that you're a racist. Until then, the Republican Party is now publically and openly, the party of White Supremacy.

Yet he got more black and hispanic votes than any republican in recent history. Go figure. I guess some of them didn't believe your lies.

He got more VOTES than any candidate in the history of the nation, save one, so high numbers of hispanics and blacks is hardly surprising. You really can fool some of the people all of the time.

Unfortunately for Trump, the only other candidate to get MORE votes that Trump is Biden, so there's that.


So now you're walking back your racist propaganda?

.
Yes, they admitted the quotes they were given were not accurate
When you translate “not accurate” from liberish to English the word is “lies”

There were no lies. Trump didn't say the word "fraud", but he did say "dishonesty". The meaning of what he said wasn't changed, nor was the intent of the call.

It's always amazing to me that members of the Trump Cult are so outraged and calling WAPO on this "lie", when Trump lied to you thousands of times, and you smiled and asked for more. FOX New lies to you every single day, endlessless, and that's just fine for you. But should anyone in the MSM, misstate ANYTHING, even to this small degree, well the outrage never ends.


It's clear you got the commie talking points, spin on you ignorant foreign commie bitch.

.
 
President Trump urged fellow Republican Brad Raffensperger, the Georgia secretary of state, to “find” enough votes to overturn his defeat in an extraordinary one-hour phone call Saturday that election experts said raised legal questions.

The Washington Post obtained a recording of the conversation in which Trump alternately berated Raffensperger, tried to flatter him, begged him to act and threatened him with vague criminal consequences if the secretary of state refused to pursue his false claims, at one point warning that Raffensperger was taking “a big risk.”

Throughout the call, Raffensperger and his office’s general counsel rejected Trump’s assertions, explaining that the president is relying on debunked conspiracy theories and that President-elect Joe Biden’s 11,779-vote victory in Georgia was fair and accurate.



Trump is engaging of sedition and overturning the will of the people through fraud.

Trump should be arrested for sedition for attempting to overthrow the newly elected government of the United States of America.

Everything Trump touches dies.

Is American democracy next?
Nope. Not when Democrats are stealing elections with vote harvesting.

Trump lost get over it, we have new president now. Just come to grips with the fact that Trump is a one and done.


Is he though? As teh lies you people used to get rid of him are revealed, why should he not come back?

Let him come on back.
Revenge Tour 2024.

I guess the racist are really going to ramp it up.
Democratic Party = Anti-White

The Democrat Party is what 75% white, so that makes about as much sense as you do.
No it's not. Also those are NOT white people. Just a bunch of goddamn idiots.

So the real white folks are Trump Humpers.


Whites can be anti-white racists. It is called self hatred. I have seen it personally.

So to be a real white person you have to be a Republican Trump Humper.

Obviously not, you drooling retard.

But you have to deny racism or its effect on minorities to be a "real" white person. You can't say that "black lives matter". Or even believe it.


What is the unstated premise of the slogan, "black lives matter"?

That black lives are currently valued less than white lives, in the USA.

It's a premise that has a LOT of validity. Especially when the President ordered the entire country to re-open three days after a report was released that said that black and brown people were dying in much higher numbers than white people.

The slogan is not, "black lives matter as much", but that they "matter".

This nation has had a bi-partisan consensus on black equality since before I was born.

For you people to talk to us like we are klansmen from the 1920s, is insulting to an extreme degree.

It is also worth noting that calling for a "peaceful protest" while pushing such inflammatory crap, is as convincing as holding a kid's arm and making him punch himself, while crying out, "why are you hitting yourself?"

Methinks that you doth protest too much.

Trump was very clear that black votes don't matter, and tried to eliminate them. When you stop voting for a guy who talks talking like a 1920's Klansman, we'll stop thinking that you're a racist. Until then, the Republican Party is now publically and openly, the party of White Supremacy.


Yet he got more black and hispanic votes than any republican in recent history. Go figure. I guess some of them didn't believe your lies.

.

Yea 20 votes, wow what a breakthrough.


Wow, another typical commie lair.

.
 
President Trump urged fellow Republican Brad Raffensperger, the Georgia secretary of state, to “find” enough votes to overturn his defeat in an extraordinary one-hour phone call Saturday that election experts said raised legal questions.

The Washington Post obtained a recording of the conversation in which Trump alternately berated Raffensperger, tried to flatter him, begged him to act and threatened him with vague criminal consequences if the secretary of state refused to pursue his false claims, at one point warning that Raffensperger was taking “a big risk.”

Throughout the call, Raffensperger and his office’s general counsel rejected Trump’s assertions, explaining that the president is relying on debunked conspiracy theories and that President-elect Joe Biden’s 11,779-vote victory in Georgia was fair and accurate.



Trump is engaging of sedition and overturning the will of the people through fraud.

Trump should be arrested for sedition for attempting to overthrow the newly elected government of the United States of America.

Everything Trump touches dies.

Is American democracy next?
Nope. Not when Democrats are stealing elections with vote harvesting.

Trump lost get over it, we have new president now. Just come to grips with the fact that Trump is a one and done.


Is he though? As teh lies you people used to get rid of him are revealed, why should he not come back?

Let him come on back.
Revenge Tour 2024.

I guess the racist are really going to ramp it up.
Democratic Party = Anti-White

The Democrat Party is what 75% white, so that makes about as much sense as you do.
No it's not. Also those are NOT white people. Just a bunch of goddamn idiots.

So the real white folks are Trump Humpers.


Whites can be anti-white racists. It is called self hatred. I have seen it personally.

So to be a real white person you have to be a Republican Trump Humper.

Obviously not, you drooling retard.

But you have to deny racism or its effect on minorities to be a "real" white person. You can't say that "black lives matter". Or even believe it.


What is the unstated premise of the slogan, "black lives matter"?

That black lives are currently valued less than white lives, in the USA.

It's a premise that has a LOT of validity. Especially when the President ordered the entire country to re-open three days after a report was released that said that black and brown people were dying in much higher numbers than white people.

The slogan is not, "black lives matter as much", but that they "matter".

This nation has had a bi-partisan consensus on black equality since before I was born.

For you people to talk to us like we are klansmen from the 1920s, is insulting to an extreme degree.

It is also worth noting that calling for a "peaceful protest" while pushing such inflammatory crap, is as convincing as holding a kid's arm and making him punch himself, while crying out, "why are you hitting yourself?"

Methinks that you doth protest too much.

Trump was very clear that black votes don't matter, and tried to eliminate them. When you stop voting for a guy who talks talking like a 1920's Klansman, we'll stop thinking that you're a racist. Until then, the Republican Party is now publically and openly, the party of White Supremacy.


Yet he got more black and hispanic votes than any republican in recent history. Go figure. I guess some of them didn't believe your lies.

.

Yea 20 votes, wow what a breakthrough.


Wow, another typical commie lair.

.

Take that Commie bullshit polish it up, turn that sum bitch sideways and stick it straight up your candy ass.
 
It's always amazing to me that members of the Trump Cult

Your inability to respect that other people support politically different candidates than you, makes you look intellectually immature. and ignorant.

The issue isn't support for "politically different" candidates. The issue is support for a candidate who believes that black and brown people are not deserving of the same rights, protections and opportunities as white people. That American must remain a white ruled country.A candidate who seeks to drive wedges of race and politics between people, and one who wants to be "President for Life" - a desire he has expressed on more than one occasion.

It would be one thing if Trump were proposing some bold and sweeping change to American political life, and a plan for the nation, but he has none of those things. Trump seeks power for its own sake, and has absolutely no interest in doing anything for the nation, other than to wield power, to help his friends and punish his enemies.

There is no plan for America, other than to keep non-whites out of positions of power, other than to end Democracy in the USA. That's why Trump is being so bitterly opposed - he wants to be a dicatator, and you support that notion.

It's beyond despicable. It's treasonous, seditious, and you're correct in your assumption that you will not be tolerated.

Moron, you just described the democrat party.......they are the ones segregating society based on race, they are the ones keeping black, hispanic and asian children from getting decent educations.......

You are blind and dumb...
 
President Trump urged fellow Republican Brad Raffensperger, the Georgia secretary of state, to “find” enough votes to overturn his defeat in an extraordinary one-hour phone call Saturday that election experts said raised legal questions.

The Washington Post obtained a recording of the conversation in which Trump alternately berated Raffensperger, tried to flatter him, begged him to act and threatened him with vague criminal consequences if the secretary of state refused to pursue his false claims, at one point warning that Raffensperger was taking “a big risk.”

Throughout the call, Raffensperger and his office’s general counsel rejected Trump’s assertions, explaining that the president is relying on debunked conspiracy theories and that President-elect Joe Biden’s 11,779-vote victory in Georgia was fair and accurate.



Trump is engaging of sedition and overturning the will of the people through fraud.

Trump should be arrested for sedition for attempting to overthrow the newly elected government of the United States of America.

Everything Trump touches dies.

Is American democracy next?
Nope. Not when Democrats are stealing elections with vote harvesting.

Trump lost get over it, we have new president now. Just come to grips with the fact that Trump is a one and done.


Is he though? As teh lies you people used to get rid of him are revealed, why should he not come back?

Let him come on back.
Revenge Tour 2024.

I guess the racist are really going to ramp it up.
Democratic Party = Anti-White

The Democrat Party is what 75% white, so that makes about as much sense as you do.
No it's not. Also those are NOT white people. Just a bunch of goddamn idiots.

So the real white folks are Trump Humpers.


Whites can be anti-white racists. It is called self hatred. I have seen it personally.

So to be a real white person you have to be a Republican Trump Humper.

Obviously not, you drooling retard.

But you have to deny racism or its effect on minorities to be a "real" white person. You can't say that "black lives matter". Or even believe it.


What is the unstated premise of the slogan, "black lives matter"?

That black lives are currently valued less than white lives, in the USA.

It's a premise that has a LOT of validity. Especially when the President ordered the entire country to re-open three days after a report was released that said that black and brown people were dying in much higher numbers than white people.

The slogan is not, "black lives matter as much", but that they "matter".

This nation has had a bi-partisan consensus on black equality since before I was born.

For you people to talk to us like we are klansmen from the 1920s, is insulting to an extreme degree.

It is also worth noting that calling for a "peaceful protest" while pushing such inflammatory crap, is as convincing as holding a kid's arm and making him punch himself, while crying out, "why are you hitting yourself?"

Methinks that you doth protest too much.

Trump was very clear that black votes don't matter, and tried to eliminate them. When you stop voting for a guy who talks talking like a 1920's Klansman, we'll stop thinking that you're a racist. Until then, the Republican Party is now publically and openly, the party of White Supremacy.


Yet he got more black and hispanic votes than any republican in recent history. Go figure. I guess some of them didn't believe your lies.

.

Yea 20 votes, wow what a breakthrough.


Wow, another typical commie lair.

.

Take that Commie bullshit polish it up, turn that sum bitch sideways and stick it straight up your candy ass.


Feel free to do the same with you commie lies. LMAO

.
 
President Trump urged fellow Republican Brad Raffensperger, the Georgia secretary of state, to “find” enough votes to overturn his defeat in an extraordinary one-hour phone call Saturday that election experts said raised legal questions.

The Washington Post obtained a recording of the conversation in which Trump alternately berated Raffensperger, tried to flatter him, begged him to act and threatened him with vague criminal consequences if the secretary of state refused to pursue his false claims, at one point warning that Raffensperger was taking “a big risk.”

Throughout the call, Raffensperger and his office’s general counsel rejected Trump’s assertions, explaining that the president is relying on debunked conspiracy theories and that President-elect Joe Biden’s 11,779-vote victory in Georgia was fair and accurate.



Trump is engaging of sedition and overturning the will of the people through fraud.

Trump should be arrested for sedition for attempting to overthrow the newly elected government of the United States of America.

Everything Trump touches dies.

Is American democracy next?

 
President Trump urged fellow Republican Brad Raffensperger, the Georgia secretary of state, to “find” enough votes to overturn his defeat in an extraordinary one-hour phone call Saturday that election experts said raised legal questions.

The Washington Post obtained a recording of the conversation in which Trump alternately berated Raffensperger, tried to flatter him, begged him to act and threatened him with vague criminal consequences if the secretary of state refused to pursue his false claims, at one point warning that Raffensperger was taking “a big risk.”

Throughout the call, Raffensperger and his office’s general counsel rejected Trump’s assertions, explaining that the president is relying on debunked conspiracy theories and that President-elect Joe Biden’s 11,779-vote victory in Georgia was fair and accurate.



Trump is engaging of sedition and overturning the will of the people through fraud.

Trump should be arrested for sedition for attempting to overthrow the newly elected government of the United States of America.

Everything Trump touches dies.

Is American democracy next?


^^^ debunked
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom