Washington Post audio of Trump berating and threatening Georgia Secretary of State for not "finding" votes to change election result. Sedition?

[struth]

You're lying again. You really should stop.

its your choice

either they lied to you or you are being led around by the nose by incompetents

Nope, you lied. That was proven by your inability to show the WP lied despite you calling them liars.

The Post claimed the President said something he didn't....they did it without looking for the truth, or waiting for it, that was intentional....that was a lie

Now you're lying. They got the quotes from Georgia's Republican deputy Secretary of State and yes, they say they attempted to obtain confirmation but the White House wouldn't respond. That's not a lie. A lie would be publishing that article knowing Trump didn't use those exact words. No one on your side has been able to show that to be the case.

I am not lying, the lie was in the Post.....the confirmation came from the transcript of the call. The OP, and I'll quote says this:

"The Washington Post obtained a recording of the conversation in which Trump alternately berated Raffensperger, tried to flatter him, begged him to act and threatened him with vague criminal consequences if the secretary of state refused to pursue his false claims, at one point warning that Raffensperger was taking “a big risk.”

-They didn't name their source, they didn't obtain the recording....they lied.....when the transcript came to light, it didn't say what they claimed, and what the Dems in the impeachment hearing claimed.

Of course you're lying as you have no evidence they lied. And they ultimately did reveal their sources... Frances Watson informed Jordan Fuchs who informed the Washington Post.

Do you live under a rock? They just admitted they got the transcript and retracted the story in the OP....granted it was months later, after the transcript was made public

 

[Faun]

You're lying again. You really should stop.

its your choice

either they lied to you or you are being led around by the nose by incompetents

Nope, you lied. That was proven by your inability to show the WP lied despite you calling them liars.

The Post claimed the President said something he didn't....they did it without looking for the truth, or waiting for it, that was intentional....that was a lie

Now you're lying. They got the quotes from Georgia's Republican deputy Secretary of State and yes, they say they attempted to obtain confirmation but the White House wouldn't respond. That's not a lie. A lie would be publishing that article knowing Trump didn't use those exact words. No one on your side has been able to show that to be the case.

I am not lying, the lie was in the Post.....the confirmation came from the transcript of the call. The OP, and I'll quote says this:

"The Washington Post obtained a recording of the conversation in which Trump alternately berated Raffensperger, tried to flatter him, begged him to act and threatened him with vague criminal consequences if the secretary of state refused to pursue his false claims, at one point warning that Raffensperger was taking “a big risk.”

-They didn't name their source, they didn't obtain the recording....they lied.....when the transcript came to light, it didn't say what they claimed, and what the Dems in the impeachment hearing claimed.

Of course you're lying as you have no evidence they lied. And they ultimately did reveal their sources... Frances Watson informed Jordan Fuchs who informed the Washington Post.

Do you live under a rock? They just admitted they got the transcript and retracted the story in the OP....granted it was months later, after the transcript was made public

Yes, they admitted the quotes they were given were not accurate. You do know a lie is telling something you know is untrue, don'tcha? You have no proof they knew those quotes were inaccurate.

 

[Dragonlady]

President Trump urged fellow Republican Brad Raffensperger, the Georgia secretary of state, to “find” enough votes to overturn his defeat in an extraordinary one-hour phone call Saturday that election experts said raised legal questions.

The Washington Post obtained a recording of the conversation in which Trump alternately berated Raffensperger, tried to flatter him, begged him to act and threatened him with vague criminal consequences if the secretary of state refused to pursue his false claims, at one point warning that Raffensperger was taking “a big risk.”

Throughout the call, Raffensperger and his office’s general counsel rejected Trump’s assertions, explaining that the president is relying on debunked conspiracy theories and that President-elect Joe Biden’s 11,779-vote victory in Georgia was fair and accurate.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/trump-raffensperger-call-georgia-vote/2021/01/03/d45acb92-4dc4-11eb-bda4-615aaefd0555_story.html

Trump is engaging of sedition and overturning the will of the people through fraud.

Trump should be arrested for sedition for attempting to overthrow the newly elected government of the United States of America.

Everything Trump touches dies.

Is American democracy next?

Nope. Not when Democrats are stealing elections with vote harvesting.

Trump lost get over it, we have new president now. Just come to grips with the fact that Trump is a one and done.

Is he though? As teh lies you people used to get rid of him are revealed, why should he not come back?

Let him come on back.

Revenge Tour 2024.

I guess the racist are really going to ramp it up.

Democratic Party = Anti-White

The Democrat Party is what 75% white, so that makes about as much sense as you do.

No it's not. Also those are NOT white people. Just a bunch of goddamn idiots.

So the real white folks are Trump Humpers.

Whites can be anti-white racists. It is called self hatred. I have seen it personally.

So to be a real white person you have to be a Republican Trump Humper.

Obviously not, you drooling retard.

But you have to deny racism or its effect on minorities to be a "real" white person. You can't say that "black lives matter". Or even believe it.

What is the unstated premise of the slogan, "black lives matter"?

That black lives are currently valued less than white lives, in the USA.

It's a premise that has a LOT of validity. Especially when the President ordered the entire country to re-open three days after a report was released that said that black and brown people were dying in much higher numbers than white people.

The slogan is not, "black lives matter as much", but that they "matter".

This nation has had a bi-partisan consensus on black equality since before I was born.

For you people to talk to us like we are klansmen from the 1920s, is insulting to an extreme degree.

It is also worth noting that calling for a "peaceful protest" while pushing such inflammatory crap, is as convincing as holding a kid's arm and making him punch himself, while crying out, "why are you hitting yourself?"

Methinks that you doth protest too much.

Trump was very clear that black votes don't matter, and tried to eliminate them. When you stop voting for a guy who talks talking like a 1920's Klansman, we'll stop thinking that you're a racist. Until then, the Republican Party is now publically and openly, the party of White Supremacy.

Yet he got more black and hispanic votes than any republican in recent history. Go figure. I guess some of them didn't believe your lies.

He got more VOTES than any candidate in the history of the nation, save one, so high numbers of hispanics and blacks is hardly surprising. You really can fool some of the people all of the time.

Unfortunately for Trump, the only other candidate to get MORE votes that Trump is Biden, so there's that.

 

[Dragonlady]

You're lying again. You really should stop.

its your choice

either they lied to you or you are being led around by the nose by incompetents

Nope, you lied. That was proven by your inability to show the WP lied despite you calling them liars.

The Post claimed the President said something he didn't....they did it without looking for the truth, or waiting for it, that was intentional....that was a lie

Now you're lying. They got the quotes from Georgia's Republican deputy Secretary of State and yes, they say they attempted to obtain confirmation but the White House wouldn't respond. That's not a lie. A lie would be publishing that article knowing Trump didn't use those exact words. No one on your side has been able to show that to be the case.

I am not lying, the lie was in the Post.....the confirmation came from the transcript of the call. The OP, and I'll quote says this:

"The Washington Post obtained a recording of the conversation in which Trump alternately berated Raffensperger, tried to flatter him, begged him to act and threatened him with vague criminal consequences if the secretary of state refused to pursue his false claims, at one point warning that Raffensperger was taking “a big risk.”

-They didn't name their source, they didn't obtain the recording....they lied.....when the transcript came to light, it didn't say what they claimed, and what the Dems in the impeachment hearing claimed.

Of course you're lying as you have no evidence they lied. And they ultimately did reveal their sources... Frances Watson informed Jordan Fuchs who informed the Washington Post.

Do you live under a rock? They just admitted they got the transcript and retracted the story in the OP....granted it was months later, after the transcript was made public

There was no retraction of the story. Washington Post published a a "correction" to the words ascribed to the President, but the changes didn't alter the fact that the President called the election worker and tried to get her to change the election results in Georgia.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2021/03/16/washington-post-correction-trump-call-georgia-investigator/

Trump didn't use the word "fraud", he said she'd find "dishonesty". Once again, you're trying to split hairs to try to make out Trump didn't commit a criminal act and try to intimmidate election officials into changing the results.

 

[OKTexas]

President Trump urged fellow Republican Brad Raffensperger, the Georgia secretary of state, to “find” enough votes to overturn his defeat in an extraordinary one-hour phone call Saturday that election experts said raised legal questions.

The Washington Post obtained a recording of the conversation in which Trump alternately berated Raffensperger, tried to flatter him, begged him to act and threatened him with vague criminal consequences if the secretary of state refused to pursue his false claims, at one point warning that Raffensperger was taking “a big risk.”

Throughout the call, Raffensperger and his office’s general counsel rejected Trump’s assertions, explaining that the president is relying on debunked conspiracy theories and that President-elect Joe Biden’s 11,779-vote victory in Georgia was fair and accurate.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/trump-raffensperger-call-georgia-vote/2021/01/03/d45acb92-4dc4-11eb-bda4-615aaefd0555_story.html

Trump is engaging of sedition and overturning the will of the people through fraud.

Trump should be arrested for sedition for attempting to overthrow the newly elected government of the United States of America.

Everything Trump touches dies.

Is American democracy next?

Nope. Not when Democrats are stealing elections with vote harvesting.

Trump lost get over it, we have new president now. Just come to grips with the fact that Trump is a one and done.

Is he though? As teh lies you people used to get rid of him are revealed, why should he not come back?

Let him come on back.

Revenge Tour 2024.

I guess the racist are really going to ramp it up.

Democratic Party = Anti-White

The Democrat Party is what 75% white, so that makes about as much sense as you do.

No it's not. Also those are NOT white people. Just a bunch of goddamn idiots.

So the real white folks are Trump Humpers.

Whites can be anti-white racists. It is called self hatred. I have seen it personally.

So to be a real white person you have to be a Republican Trump Humper.

Obviously not, you drooling retard.

But you have to deny racism or its effect on minorities to be a "real" white person. You can't say that "black lives matter". Or even believe it.

What is the unstated premise of the slogan, "black lives matter"?

That black lives are currently valued less than white lives, in the USA.

It's a premise that has a LOT of validity. Especially when the President ordered the entire country to re-open three days after a report was released that said that black and brown people were dying in much higher numbers than white people.

The slogan is not, "black lives matter as much", but that they "matter".

This nation has had a bi-partisan consensus on black equality since before I was born.

For you people to talk to us like we are klansmen from the 1920s, is insulting to an extreme degree.

It is also worth noting that calling for a "peaceful protest" while pushing such inflammatory crap, is as convincing as holding a kid's arm and making him punch himself, while crying out, "why are you hitting yourself?"

Methinks that you doth protest too much.

Trump was very clear that black votes don't matter, and tried to eliminate them. When you stop voting for a guy who talks talking like a 1920's Klansman, we'll stop thinking that you're a racist. Until then, the Republican Party is now publically and openly, the party of White Supremacy.

Yet he got more black and hispanic votes than any republican in recent history. Go figure. I guess some of them didn't believe your lies.

He got more VOTES than any candidate in the history of the nation, save one, so high numbers of hispanics and blacks is hardly surprising. You really can fool some of the people all of the time.

Unfortunately for Trump, the only other candidate to get MORE votes that Trump is Biden, so there's that.

So now you're walking back your racist propaganda?

.

 

[Mac-7]

Yes, they admitted the quotes they were given were not accurate

When you translate “not accurate” from liberish to English the word is “lies”

 

[Dragonlady]

President Trump urged fellow Republican Brad Raffensperger, the Georgia secretary of state, to “find” enough votes to overturn his defeat in an extraordinary one-hour phone call Saturday that election experts said raised legal questions.

The Washington Post obtained a recording of the conversation in which Trump alternately berated Raffensperger, tried to flatter him, begged him to act and threatened him with vague criminal consequences if the secretary of state refused to pursue his false claims, at one point warning that Raffensperger was taking “a big risk.”

Throughout the call, Raffensperger and his office’s general counsel rejected Trump’s assertions, explaining that the president is relying on debunked conspiracy theories and that President-elect Joe Biden’s 11,779-vote victory in Georgia was fair and accurate.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/trump-raffensperger-call-georgia-vote/2021/01/03/d45acb92-4dc4-11eb-bda4-615aaefd0555_story.html

Trump is engaging of sedition and overturning the will of the people through fraud.

Trump should be arrested for sedition for attempting to overthrow the newly elected government of the United States of America.

Everything Trump touches dies.

Is American democracy next?

Nope. Not when Democrats are stealing elections with vote harvesting.

Trump lost get over it, we have new president now. Just come to grips with the fact that Trump is a one and done.

Is he though? As teh lies you people used to get rid of him are revealed, why should he not come back?

Let him come on back.

Revenge Tour 2024.

I guess the racist are really going to ramp it up.

Democratic Party = Anti-White

The Democrat Party is what 75% white, so that makes about as much sense as you do.

No it's not. Also those are NOT white people. Just a bunch of goddamn idiots.

So the real white folks are Trump Humpers.

Whites can be anti-white racists. It is called self hatred. I have seen it personally.

So to be a real white person you have to be a Republican Trump Humper.

Obviously not, you drooling retard.

But you have to deny racism or its effect on minorities to be a "real" white person. You can't say that "black lives matter". Or even believe it.

What is the unstated premise of the slogan, "black lives matter"?

That black lives are currently valued less than white lives, in the USA.

It's a premise that has a LOT of validity. Especially when the President ordered the entire country to re-open three days after a report was released that said that black and brown people were dying in much higher numbers than white people.

The slogan is not, "black lives matter as much", but that they "matter".

This nation has had a bi-partisan consensus on black equality since before I was born.

For you people to talk to us like we are klansmen from the 1920s, is insulting to an extreme degree.

It is also worth noting that calling for a "peaceful protest" while pushing such inflammatory crap, is as convincing as holding a kid's arm and making him punch himself, while crying out, "why are you hitting yourself?"

Methinks that you doth protest too much.

Trump was very clear that black votes don't matter, and tried to eliminate them. When you stop voting for a guy who talks talking like a 1920's Klansman, we'll stop thinking that you're a racist. Until then, the Republican Party is now publically and openly, the party of White Supremacy.

Yet he got more black and hispanic votes than any republican in recent history. Go figure. I guess some of them didn't believe your lies.

He got more VOTES than any candidate in the history of the nation, save one, so high numbers of hispanics and blacks is hardly surprising. You really can fool some of the people all of the time.

Unfortunately for Trump, the only other candidate to get MORE votes that Trump is Biden, so there's that.

So now you're walking back your racist propaganda?

.

Yes, they admitted the quotes they were given were not accurate

When you translate “not accurate” from liberish to English the word is “lies”

There were no lies. Trump didn't say the word "fraud", but he did say "dishonesty". The meaning of what he said wasn't changed, nor was the intent of the call.

It's always amazing to me that members of the Trump Cult are so outraged and calling WAPO on this "lie", when Trump lied to you thousands of times, and you smiled and asked for more. FOX New lies to you every single day, endlessless, and that's just fine for you. But should anyone in the MSM, misstate ANYTHING, even to this small degree, well the outrage never ends.

 

[struth]

[/QUOTE]

There was no retraction of the story. Washington Post published a a "correction" to the words ascribed to the President, but the changes didn't alter the fact that the President called the election worker and tried to get her to change the election results in Georgia.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2021/03/16/washington-post-correction-trump-call-georgia-investigator/

Trump didn't use the word "fraud", he said she'd find "dishonesty". Once again, you're trying to split hairs to try to make out Trump didn't commit a criminal act and try to intimmidate election officials into changing the results.
[/QUOTE]
huh? they literally said they had to correction the story because they misquoted the President.....

I am not spliting hairs, they literally changed the entire tone and convo

They said he said to "Find the fraud" and he'd "be a national hero" if h hen it reality he simly asked to

You're lying again. You really should stop.

its your choice

either they lied to you or you are being led around by the nose by incompetents

Nope, you lied. That was proven by your inability to show the WP lied despite you calling them liars.

The Post claimed the President said something he didn't....they did it without looking for the truth, or waiting for it, that was intentional....that was a lie

Now you're lying. They got the quotes from Georgia's Republican deputy Secretary of State and yes, they say they attempted to obtain confirmation but the White House wouldn't respond. That's not a lie. A lie would be publishing that article knowing Trump didn't use those exact words. No one on your side has been able to show that to be the case.

I am not lying, the lie was in the Post.....the confirmation came from the transcript of the call. The OP, and I'll quote says this:

"The Washington Post obtained a recording of the conversation in which Trump alternately berated Raffensperger, tried to flatter him, begged him to act and threatened him with vague criminal consequences if the secretary of state refused to pursue his false claims, at one point warning that Raffensperger was taking “a big risk.”

-They didn't name their source, they didn't obtain the recording....they lied.....when the transcript came to light, it didn't say what they claimed, and what the Dems in the impeachment hearing claimed.

Of course you're lying as you have no evidence they lied. And they ultimately did reveal their sources... Frances Watson informed Jordan Fuchs who informed the Washington Post.

Do you live under a rock? They just admitted they got the transcript and retracted the story in the OP....granted it was months later, after the transcript was made public

There was no retraction of the story. Washington Post published a a "correction" to the words ascribed to the President, but the changes didn't alter the fact that the President called the election worker and tried to get her to change the election results in Georgia.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2021/03/16/washington-post-correction-trump-call-georgia-investigator/

Trump didn't use the word "fraud", he said she'd find "dishonesty". Once again, you're trying to split hairs to try to make out Trump didn't commit a criminal act and try to intimmidate election officials into changing the results.

Are you insane? The Post literally lied about what he said....he never asked the Sec of State to change the election resutls.....

That's what the Post implied with their lies....but in reality all Trump said was to do a good job, and that he has the most in important job in the country at the moment.

Your post highlights the damage done by these propagandist.....fish will eat up the lie, and despite the truth coming out, fish will still accept the lie

 

[Superbadbrutha]

President Trump urged fellow Republican Brad Raffensperger, the Georgia secretary of state, to “find” enough votes to overturn his defeat in an extraordinary one-hour phone call Saturday that election experts said raised legal questions.

The Washington Post obtained a recording of the conversation in which Trump alternately berated Raffensperger, tried to flatter him, begged him to act and threatened him with vague criminal consequences if the secretary of state refused to pursue his false claims, at one point warning that Raffensperger was taking “a big risk.”

Throughout the call, Raffensperger and his office’s general counsel rejected Trump’s assertions, explaining that the president is relying on debunked conspiracy theories and that President-elect Joe Biden’s 11,779-vote victory in Georgia was fair and accurate.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/trump-raffensperger-call-georgia-vote/2021/01/03/d45acb92-4dc4-11eb-bda4-615aaefd0555_story.html

Trump is engaging of sedition and overturning the will of the people through fraud.

Trump should be arrested for sedition for attempting to overthrow the newly elected government of the United States of America.

Everything Trump touches dies.

Is American democracy next?

Nope. Not when Democrats are stealing elections with vote harvesting.

Trump lost get over it, we have new president now. Just come to grips with the fact that Trump is a one and done.

Is he though? As teh lies you people used to get rid of him are revealed, why should he not come back?

Let him come on back.

Revenge Tour 2024.

I guess the racist are really going to ramp it up.

Democratic Party = Anti-White

The Democrat Party is what 75% white, so that makes about as much sense as you do.

No it's not. Also those are NOT white people. Just a bunch of goddamn idiots.

So the real white folks are Trump Humpers.

Whites can be anti-white racists. It is called self hatred. I have seen it personally.

So to be a real white person you have to be a Republican Trump Humper.

Obviously not, you drooling retard.

But you have to deny racism or its effect on minorities to be a "real" white person. You can't say that "black lives matter". Or even believe it.

What is the unstated premise of the slogan, "black lives matter"?

That black lives are currently valued less than white lives, in the USA.

It's a premise that has a LOT of validity. Especially when the President ordered the entire country to re-open three days after a report was released that said that black and brown people were dying in much higher numbers than white people.

The slogan is not, "black lives matter as much", but that they "matter".

This nation has had a bi-partisan consensus on black equality since before I was born.

For you people to talk to us like we are klansmen from the 1920s, is insulting to an extreme degree.

It is also worth noting that calling for a "peaceful protest" while pushing such inflammatory crap, is as convincing as holding a kid's arm and making him punch himself, while crying out, "why are you hitting yourself?"

Methinks that you doth protest too much.

Trump was very clear that black votes don't matter, and tried to eliminate them. When you stop voting for a guy who talks talking like a 1920's Klansman, we'll stop thinking that you're a racist. Until then, the Republican Party is now publically and openly, the party of White Supremacy.

Yet he got more black and hispanic votes than any republican in recent history. Go figure. I guess some of them didn't believe your lies.

.

Yea 20 votes, wow what a breakthrough.

 

[CowboyTed]

You're lying again. You really should stop.

its your choice

either they lied to you or you are being led around by the nose by incompetents

Nope, you lied. That was proven by your inability to show the WP lied despite you calling them liars.

The Post claimed the President said something he didn't....they did it without looking for the truth, or waiting for it, that was intentional....that was a lie

Now you're lying. They got the quotes from Georgia's Republican deputy Secretary of State and yes, they say they attempted to obtain confirmation but the White House wouldn't respond. That's not a lie. A lie would be publishing that article knowing Trump didn't use those exact words. No one on your side has been able to show that to be the case.

I am not lying, the lie was in the Post.....the confirmation came from the transcript of the call. The OP, and I'll quote says this:

"The Washington Post obtained a recording of the conversation in which Trump alternately berated Raffensperger, tried to flatter him, begged him to act and threatened him with vague criminal consequences if the secretary of state refused to pursue his false claims, at one point warning that Raffensperger was taking “a big risk.”

-They didn't name their source, they didn't obtain the recording....they lied.....when the transcript came to light, it didn't say what they claimed, and what the Dems in the impeachment hearing claimed.

Of course you're lying as you have no evidence they lied. And they ultimately did reveal their sources... Frances Watson informed Jordan Fuchs who informed the Washington Post.

Do you live under a rock? They just admitted they got the transcript and retracted the story in the OP....granted it was months later, after the transcript was made public

There was no retraction of the story. Washington Post published a a "correction" to the words ascribed to the President, but the changes didn't alter the fact that the President called the election worker and tried to get her to change the election results in Georgia.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2021/03/16/washington-post-correction-trump-call-georgia-investigator/

Trump didn't use the word "fraud", he said she'd find "dishonesty". Once again, you're trying to split hairs to try to make out Trump didn't commit a criminal act and try to intimmidate election officials into changing the results.

If a boss came down to a employee and spoke in that tone and suggested that she get naked...

Trumpsters would claim he didn't fuck her. Thus is innocent...

Human Resources might have a different view.

 

[Correll]

It's always amazing to me that members of the Trump Cult

Your inability to respect that other people support politically different candidates than you, makes you look intellectually immature. and ignorant.

 

[Billiejeens]

Moron, they're not on any hook. You think they give a shit that a lying idiot like you thinks they lied?

I wont trade insults with you

you are a stupid person who cant discuss an issue civilly

as for WAPO I think you will care when their lies are no longer accepted as facts

Credibility is all they have

and when thats gone they have nothing

Their audience is brain dead robots like fawn, that want to be told what they want to hear.
There is no credibility involved.

 

[Mac-7]

Their audience is brain dead robots like fawn, that want to be told what they want to hear.
There is no credibility involved.

Trading insults is less taxing on Faun’s brain than debating an issue

 

[Faun]

Their audience is brain dead robots like fawn, that want to be told what they want to hear.
There is no credibility involved.

Trading insults is less taxing on Faun’s brain than debating an issue

LOL

Please, you can't stop lying. You still haven't offered even the slightest bit of evidence that they lied. You yourself made a mistake. According to your conservative logic, that wasn't a mistake, it was a lie.

 

[Mac-7]

Please, you can't stop lying. You still haven't offered even the slightest bit of evidence that they lied. You yourself made a mistake. According to your conservative logic, that wasn't a mistake, it was a lie.

Its obvious you are never going to admit that WAPO lied

but because they were caught in this lie their effectiveness as a propaganda tool for the democrats is reduced

 

[Billiejeens]

Please, you can't stop lying. You still haven't offered even the slightest bit of evidence that they lied. You yourself made a mistake. According to your conservative logic, that wasn't a mistake, it was a lie.

Its obvious you are never going to admit that WAPO lied

but because they were caught in this lie their effectiveness as a propaganda tool for the democrats is reduced

The word that you are looking for is "enhanced".

 

[Faun]

Are you insane? The Post literally lied about what he said....he never asked the Sec of State to change the election resutls.....

That's what the Post implied with their lies....but in reality all Trump said was to do a good job, and that he has the most in important job in the country at the moment.

Your post highlights the damage done by these propagandist.....fish will eat up the lie, and despite the truth coming out, fish will still accept the lie

They never retracted the story. That's your false narrative. They corrected the 2 quotes discussed. He said those things but with different words. He's heard saying on the recording where he said there was "dishonesty" (instead of "fraud") and said she will find it she compares signatures from this election with signatures from past elections. That's looking for fraud. So yes, he said that. The Washington Post corrected the quote, not the story, because he didn't use the words, "find the fraud."

 

[Faun]

Please, you can't stop lying. You still haven't offered even the slightest bit of evidence that they lied. You yourself made a mistake. According to your conservative logic, that wasn't a mistake, it was a lie.

Its obvious you are never going to admit that WAPO lied

but because they were caught in this lie their effectiveness as a propaganda tool for the democrats is reduced

You're lying again. At this point, I see you're just pathological. The truth is I would absolutely admit they lied if someone showed me they lied. But neither you nor anyone else has even come close to that. You simply saying, "they lied," because they were given wrong quotes which they corrected does not convince they lied.

Savvy? You need evidence. Your word alone doesn't mean shit.

 

[struth]

Are you insane? The Post literally lied about what he said....he never asked the Sec of State to change the election resutls.....

That's what the Post implied with their lies....but in reality all Trump said was to do a good job, and that he has the most in important job in the country at the moment.

Your post highlights the damage done by these propagandist.....fish will eat up the lie, and despite the truth coming out, fish will still accept the lie

They never retracted the story. That's your false narrative. They corrected the 2 quotes discussed. He said those things but with different words. He's heard saying on the recording where he said there was "dishonesty" (instead of "fraud") and said she will find it she compares signatures from this election with signatures from past elections. That's looking for fraud. So yes, he said that. The Washington Post corrected the quote, not the story, because he didn't use the words, "find the fraud."

Retracted, corrected their lies on the backpage after the truth came out....whatever....they lied and got caught.....sorry you fell for the Big Lie.....the Germans felt ashamed and embarrassed after their Big Lie was exposed to...well most did, some still held on to it....

hahaha and the fake quote was the entire story!

 

[Faun]

Are you insane? The Post literally lied about what he said....he never asked the Sec of State to change the election resutls.....

That's what the Post implied with their lies....but in reality all Trump said was to do a good job, and that he has the most in important job in the country at the moment.

Your post highlights the damage done by these propagandist.....fish will eat up the lie, and despite the truth coming out, fish will still accept the lie

They never retracted the story. That's your false narrative. They corrected the 2 quotes discussed. He said those things but with different words. He's heard saying on the recording where he said there was "dishonesty" (instead of "fraud") and said she will find it she compares signatures from this election with signatures from past elections. That's looking for fraud. So yes, he said that. The Washington Post corrected the quote, not the story, because he didn't use the words, "find the fraud."

Retracted, corrected their lies on the backpage after the truth came out....whatever....they lied and got caught.....sorry you fell for the Big Lie.....the Germans felt ashamed and embarrassed after their Big Lie was exposed to...well most did, some still held on to it....

The one lying is you.

You claimed they "retracted the story." They did no such thing. They corrected 2 quotes while the story remains. You should stop telling that lie.

You claimed the retracted the story "in the OP." They did no such thing. Retraction/correction aside, the story in the OP was about a call Trump made to Raffensperger; the correction issued the other day was about a call Trump made to Watson. The story in the OP has nothing to do with this. You should stop telling that lie.