it’s called the Castle Doctrinecare to provide a link to that law?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
it’s called the Castle Doctrinecare to provide a link to that law?
nah i really think he’s that stupidHe's just baiting a trap... looking for someone to defend the white guy, looking for racism, it's everywhere ya know?
And that's a little different in each state.it’s called the Castle Doctrine
which state says that your abode is an out building? and is this state one of those?And that's a little different in each state.
Any building on your property is still part of your home.
Castle doctrine - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
A castle doctrine, also known as a castle law or a defense of habitation law, is a legal doctrine that designates a person's abode or any legally occupied place
His detached garage is a legally occupied space.
legally occupied space.which state says that your abode is an out building? and is this state one of those?
sure, but a detached garage or outbuilding isn't occupied.legally occupied space.
Any building on his property is a legally occupied place.
A castle doctrine, also known as a castle law or a defense of habitation law, is a legal doctrine that designates a person's abode or any legally occupied place
Who is telling the story?You can't just unexpectedly open fire on trespassers. The response has to match the threat.
If the reporter is a journalism school grad he may not understand the function of a grand juryA Grand Jury doesn't CONVICT anybody. All they can do is recommend an indictment.
It was legally occupied as soon as he walked into it because he owned it.,sure, but a detached garage or outbuilding isn't occupied.
Legally occupied place might be the persons place of business while they are there, or if they were in the garage when the B&E took place.
I can't be in my home watching TV, then go to the detached building and shoot someone that has broken in as the facts in this case showed.
hahaha sorry that’s not how it worksIt was legally occupied as soon as he walked into it because he owned it.,
They committed a crime but didn’t deserve to die unless they were threatening, which doesn’t seem likely.Ohio Man Who ‘Didn’t Say Anything’ Before Shooting Into Car and Killing Two of Three Teens Found Smoking In His Garage Was Convicted In Their Deaths, Faces Life Sentence
An Ohio grand jury found a 65-year-old Dayton man guilty of murder in the shooting deaths of two Black teenagers last week, Dayton Daily News […]finance.yahoo.com
"An Ohio grand jury found a 65-year-old Dayton man guilty of murder in the shooting deaths of two teens last week, Dayton Daily News reported. The Montgomery County Common Pleas Court jury convicted 65-year-old Victor Santana of four counts of murder, four counts of felonious assault and one count of attempt to commit murder.
On the night of Aug. 28, 2019, Harrison, Henderson and Gibson, who was 19 at the time, snuck into a detached garage behind Santana’s home to smoke marijuana in a car they thought was abandoned. Gibson said Santana opened the door to the vehicle in the dark and fired without warning. “He didn’t say nothing at all,” he testified. Gibson hid under the car and escaped after Santana left the scene."
Sounds to me that this guy got a raw deal....Anytime someone is on your property without permission; you should have every right to kill them where they stand.....Unfortunately, the Stand Your Ground law in his state was enacted after this shooting and didn't apply to this case...Hopefully he can win this on appeal....I had a couple of kids sneak onto my property to hang out and drink and smoke weed...since the back of my property is adjacent to the community lake; kids try to hang out there...I told them to leave; but thinking back, I could have easily just shot them...luckily, they were not armed...and ran off.....
Yea, you may have some who will say "oh, they were kids and kids make mistakes" -- but in my opinion, kids stop being kids when they commit crimes like this....if you as a parent allow your kids to sneak onto other people's property, allow them to drink and do drugs -- you should be charged with some type of crime -- that parent should be held accountable....This type of stuff didn't happen in the past...kids didn't just disrespect the law and disobey their parents and authority like this.....these 2 boys had to learn that lesson with their life -- hopefully other kids will take heed and make better choices...
Amen. If the kids weren't armed, what reason was there for that man to take out a weapon?You can't just unexpectedly open fire on trespassers. The response has to match the threat.
That's exactly how it works.hahaha sorry that’s not how it works
no that’s not how it works. You don’t have a right to get out of your bed, go to an out building and shoot a trepasser deadThat's exactly how it works.
It was his property and the right to self defense doesn't only exist in the place where you sleep.
Was it reasonable for a 65 year old man to be in fear for his safety when 3 young men break into his garage
the answer is a resounding FUCK YES.
You do if you reasonable fear for your safety and this 65 year old man who saw 3 young men break into his garage reasonably feared for his safety.no that’s not how it works. You don’t have a right to get out of your bed, go to an out building and shoot a trepasser dead
that’s not the castle doctrine, that’s normal self defense, and no it wasn’t reasonableYou do if you reasonable fear for your safety and this 65 year old man who saw 3 young men break into his garage reasonably feared for his safety.
Yes it was. Any 65 year old man would feel his safety was threatened if 3 young men broke into his garage. It would be foolish of them if he wasn't in fear for his safety.that’s not the castle doctrine, that’s normal self defense, and no it wasn’t reasonable
being in fear of your safety, and fear of your life are two different things.Yes it was. Any 65 year old man would feel his safety was threatened if 3 young men broke into his garage. It would be foolish of them if he wasn't in fear for his safety.
He had an absolute legal right to be in his own garage which is part of his home even if it is a detached building