Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Such as, the right of the individual citizen to keep and bear arms in accordance with the Second Amendment?Yes, our welfare clause is General not Common or Limited and must therefore provide for any given contingency.
That's a 1920s Al Capone trope. Some random dude with a bullet will make a martyr out of another liberal and guns will be banned forever after that, just as the Marxists intend.I wouldn't give sainthood . I would put 180 grains of lead in his head giving him justice.
Yes, our welfare clause is General not Common or Limited and must therefore provide for any given contingency.in his assessment of the constitution in that it says what the gov't can't do, but not what it can do?
lol. You only have ignorance not any understanding of the plain terms used in our Constitution. Why do y'all believe your ignorance? It is annoying and just plain unethical and immoral.Yes, our welfare clause is General not Common or Limited and must therefore provide for any given contingency.in his assessment of the constitution in that it says what the gov't can't do, but not what it can do?
You keep pushing this point of view.
Do we have to keep showing you how you are wrong ?
I'll put my word comprehension skills up against anyone's- keep in mind, Mr Know-it-all, interpretation and context do not exist without definition. Period.You only have ignorance not any understanding of the plain terms used in our Constitution.
Thanks. But, can you do it without resorting to fallacy?I'll put my word comprehension skills up against anyone's- keep in mind, Mr Know-it-all, interpretation and context do not exist without definition. Period.You only have ignorance not any understanding of the plain terms used in our Constitution.
What part of the italicized portion of Article 1, Section 8 do you believe supports Your assertion and not mine?
general Welfare, is not welfare in general. Period. Welfare is a noun when capitalized- FYI- person, place or thing, not an action.to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States;
To defend, is not, to offend, generally speaking- making it common is a lie. Just because a congress critter, or POTUS declares Authorization of Military Action is not a Declaration of War- therefore, the defense of, is a lie- no matter how it's sliced or diced- the Debts, for the Defense are just that. Offense is not Defense. If it goes all out, lining the pockets (through campaign donations) by Defense Contractor Lobbyist of congress critters and POTUS is not providing for anything other than the previously mentioned retirement portfolio- it does not "defend" us- it does, in fact, cause us misery- in more than one way. Yes, the Defense Industry is deeply embedded in our economy (of top down Keynesean economics) which is hardly what the constitution authorizes, i.e., to coin and set the value of money- to abdicate a responsibility to another is not in the constitution and it doesn't absolve them of theft or immoral actions under false pretense and/or the color of law- acting under the color of law, is not adhering to a rule of law- there's that word, rule, again, which the employees (elected servants) disregard, with regularity- and people like yourself, who believe you're really intelligent who disregard the definition of words, undet the pretext of interpretation or context, try to make simple English an esoteric endeavor- it ain't.to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence
Why do you believe that? And, even if we go with your view, the general welfare being a Thing, means it is a general power within which all necessary and proper laws should be pursuant to. The general welfare is not the same as the general malfare.general Welfare, is not welfare in general. Period. Welfare is a noun when capitalized- FYI- person, place or thing, not an action.
Where did you get that notion? They used Simple English- for a reason- it's easy to comprehend.our Founding Fathers used capitalization for Emphasis instead of italics or underlining.
Really? So, you feel the fed gov't can think for you? I don't recall seeing that in the constitution. Can you point it out?the general welfare being a Thing, means it is a general power within which all necessary and proper laws should be pursuant to.
Because it does emphasize those terms. Simple English is still there, just without italics and underlining.Where did you get that notion? They used Simple English- for a reason- it's easy to comprehend.
You need to explain your view. It is not readily apparent to me.Really? So, you feel the fed gov't can think for you?
lol. You only have ignorance not any understanding of the plain terms used in our Constitution. Why do y'all believe your ignorance? It is annoying and just plain unethical and immoral.Yes, our welfare clause is General not Common or Limited and must therefore provide for any given contingency.in his assessment of the constitution in that it says what the gov't can't do, but not what it can do?
You keep pushing this point of view.
Do we have to keep showing you how you are wrong ?
You have not shown it. There is no theoretical upward limit to general welfare markets. How can a general power not cover any given contingency in the most generalistic fashion and manner deemed both necessary and proper in modern times?We've shown time and time again that the General Welfare Clause is, in fact, limited. You've never been able to show otherwise.
You seem to imply that right wing modus operandi would be the let the Poor starve simply because they are not worth it under Capitalism.The only welfare liberals know is government handouts.
What capitalism are you referring to? Crony capitalism practiced in the keynesean economic policy we employ, or the drug cartel form of pure capitalism? SMH- get a refund on your education.You seem to imply that right wing modus operandi would be the let the Poor starve simply because they are not worth it under Capitalism.
Simple English is a word becomes a noun when capitalized in a sentence- person, place, or thing- not an action.Simple English is still there,
Diversions and red herrings are usually considered fallacies. Our welfare clause is General and we have a Commerce clause in particular with which to promote the general welfare. There is no provision for excuses in our federal doctrine. We need solutions not right wingers who merely doth protest too much.What capitalism are you referring to? Crony capitalism practiced in the keynesean economic policy we employ, or the drug cartel form of pure capitalism? SMH- get a refund on your education.You seem to imply that right wing modus operandi would be the let the Poor starve simply because they are not worth it under Capitalism.
Those rules are recent and did not apply back then. Besides, if what you allege concerning the general welfare must also apply to the common Defense.Simple English is a word becomes a noun when capitalized in a sentence- person, place, or thing- not an action.Simple English is still there,
