Was it over a video or not? Liberals need to pick a story and stick to it.

[candycorn]

Ben-gotcha has done nothing except elevate Ms. Clinton.

Yeah, that's why 60% of Americans don't trust her...only liberal sheep continue the lie, even after Hillary admitted it was a terrorist attack.

Hey if you guys still want to talk about something that happened in 2010 and try to make it relevant…please go ahead. Worked wonders for Romney.

 

[ClosedCaption]

You keep saying you est it wasnt because of a protest and everytime someone asked where this was established you change the subject

YOU LIE:

"Hillary Told the Egyptian Prime Minister at 3:04 PM ET the day after the attacks that they “had nothing to do with the film. It was a planned attack – not a protest. … Based on the information we saw today we believe the group that claimed responsibility for this was affiliated with al Qaeda.”

-- CIA Head: 'Analysts Never Said the Video was a Factor in the Benghazi Attacks'

Now go away, liar.

So again I ask you. How do "we know" it was not because of the video? She told the PM that but is that the facts?

 

[idb]

Within an hour of the attack in Benghazi beginning the State Department lead in Tripoli, who testified he had talked to Americans on the ground in Benghazi, said he spoke directly with Hillary Clinton and told her it was a terrorist attack.

As Americans fought to survive in Benghazi the State Department and WH changed the CIA's initial report - calling the attack a terrorist attack - 13 times, removing all references to terrorism.

According to Hillary Clinton herself in her own e-mails, on the night of the terrorist attack on Benghazi Hillary told the Egyptian Ambassador, 'We KNOW it was a terrorist attack, that the video had nothing to do with it.'

According to Hillary Clinton herself in her own e-mails, on the night of the terrorist attack on Benghazi Hillary told her own daughter in an e-mail that 'we' had lost 4 Americans in Benghazi due to a terrorist attack.

The next morning Rice and Hillary told the world that Benghazi had been a protest over a video gone wrong. Hillary vowed to make the film maker, who had exercised his 1st Amendment Right, pay, putting him in jail...which they did.

According to Obama HE acknowledged it had been a terrorist attack.

The CIA NEVER said it was a protest.

The FBI said there were NO SIGNS of a protest and called it a terrorist attack.

Hillary told the grieving families, as their loved ones returned home in flag-draped coffins, they had died because of a protest.

Weeks later, after Obama had claimed he knew it was a terrorist attack.

In an interview Hillary called the Benghazi attack a terrorist attack.

Hillary then testified before Congress. During that testimony she declared she had no idea what it was, whether it had been a protest or a 'couple of people out for a walk one night (with ak-47s, rocket launchers, mortars and mortar shells to sustain an attack for approximately 8 - 10 hours) and decided they wanted to kill some Americans..." (She never mentioned the words 'terrorist attack in that false denial.)

When pressed on the issue Hillary finally declared it had been a terrorist attack.

....Hillary supporters still claim - despite the CIA, FBI, Obama, and Hillary declaring it was a terrorist attack - Benghazi was a 'protest'.

The Benghazi Mom came out and declared Hillary told her it had been over a protest.


AGAIN, many liberals are still arguing it WAS a protest. HILLARY, however, came out and denied she ever said that, even called the mom a LIAR.
-- So Hillary is saying it WASN'T a protest?

If it was really a protest then there would be no reason to call the mom a liar, because telling her it was a protest would be telling the truth .... if it had been a protest...right?

Libs, meanwhile, continue to claim it WAS a protest and the mom is a....liar?! Again, the mom is declaring Hillary told her it was a protest. If it was a protest, why are libs attacking the mom for saying Hillary told her that's what it was?!

And finally, stretching the hell out of Slick Willey's defense of 'the definition of the word 'is', part of Hillary's defense regarding Benghazi being a protest hinges on the definition of the words 'Protest' and 'terrorist attack'.

Evidently, according to Dems - whose definition of 'terrorist attack' differs from the CIA, FBI, State department, Obama, etc... - approx. 100 people carrying AK-47s, rocket launchers, mortar tubes, mortars, and enough ammunition to carry out a 'protest' for 8-10 hours, setting fire to and destroying a compound and murdering 4 Americans who fought for their lives for hours and who waited for help that never came is NOT a 'terrorist attack'. It is a 'protest'.

So, with liberals changing their stance whenever it benefits them on this argument, can liberals FINALLY pick one argument or the other - that Benghazi was a protest or a terrorist attack and stick to it?!

Thank you.

Well, since they were already dead - what difference does it make?

They were alive and Hillary chose to let them die. The aircraft used in Clinton's Libyan war were staged an hour away and could have been used.

Someone should investigate the whole mess.

 

[BlindBoo]

Susan Rice claimed the attack was over a protest.

Here is the whole transcript

GREGORY: Well, let’s talk-- talk about-- well, you talked about this as spontaneous. Can you say definitively that the attacks on-- on our consulate in Libya that killed ambassador Stevens and others there security personnel, that was spontaneous, was it a planned attack? Was there a terrorist element to it?

MS. RICE: Well, let us-- let me tell you the-- the best information we have at present. First of all, there’s an FBI investigation which is ongoing. And we look to that investigation to give us the definitive word as to what transpired. But putting together the best information that we have available to us today our current assessment is that what happened in Benghazi was in fact initially a spontaneous reaction to what had just transpired hours before in Cairo, almost a copycat of-- of the demonstrations against our facility in Cairo, which were prompted, of course, by the video. What we think then transpired in Benghazi is that opportunistic extremist elements came to the consulate as this was unfolding. They came with heavy weapons which unfortunately are readily available in post revolutionary Libya. And it escalated into a much more violent episode. Obviously, that’s-- that’s our best judgment now. We’ll await the results of the investigation. And the president has been very clear--we’ll work with the Libyan authorities to bring those responsible to justice.

They simply assumed there was a protest like was going on all over the Muslim world and that the extremist took advantage of that.

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

Susan Rice claimed the attack was over a protest.

Here is the whole transcript

GREGORY: Well, let’s talk-- talk about-- well, you talked about this as spontaneous. Can you say definitively that the attacks on-- on our consulate in Libya that killed ambassador Stevens and others there security personnel, that was spontaneous, was it a planned attack? Was there a terrorist element to it?

MS. RICE: Well, let us-- let me tell you the-- the best information we have at present. First of all, there’s an FBI investigation which is ongoing. And we look to that investigation to give us the definitive word as to what transpired. But putting together the best information that we have available to us today our current assessment is that what happened in Benghazi was in fact initially a spontaneous reaction to what had just transpired hours before in Cairo, almost a copycat of-- of the demonstrations against our facility in Cairo, which were prompted, of course, by the video. What we think then transpired in Benghazi is that opportunistic extremist elements came to the consulate as this was unfolding. They came with heavy weapons which unfortunately are readily available in post revolutionary Libya. And it escalated into a much more violent episode. Obviously, that’s-- that’s our best judgment now. We’ll await the results of the investigation. And the president has been very clear--we’ll work with the Libyan authorities to bring those responsible to justice.

They simply assumed there was a protest like was going on all over the Muslim world and that the extremist took advantage of that.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Well, since they were already dead - what difference does it make?

Regarding Hillary and her zombie liberal followers, 'NUFF SAID!

Dead is dead. Video or not won't change that fact. Would they still be alive if Hillary had not said it was because of a video? Please explain...

So why did Hillary lie to the families?

And why did both the idiots refuse to use airpower? Naval Air Station Sigonella was about an hour away. It was the location planes were staged during Clinton's fight with Gaddafi. The team defending the Ambassador was equipped with laser guidance systems to direct air strikes against the mortar teams. Obama and Clinton shit their pants when the shit hit the fan. She is incapable of making sound decisions. This proves it.

They were worried that their operation to arm the Islamist was going to go bad -- and more importantly, to them, that is was going to go public had we tried to intervene. They sacrificed the Consulate, didn't send anyone to investigate for months and threatened any reporter digging too deeply.

 

[ScienceRocks]

Either way I doubt based on the investigations that we could of saved them. Stop blaming Hillary or you better be ready to blame Reagan for 300 dead marines or Bush for all the attacks he didn't do shit about.

 

[BlindBoo]

Susan Rice claimed the attack was over a protest.

Here is the whole transcript

GREGORY: Well, let’s talk-- talk about-- well, you talked about this as spontaneous. Can you say definitively that the attacks on-- on our consulate in Libya that killed ambassador Stevens and others there security personnel, that was spontaneous, was it a planned attack? Was there a terrorist element to it?

MS. RICE: Well, let us-- let me tell you the-- the best information we have at present. First of all, there’s an FBI investigation which is ongoing. And we look to that investigation to give us the definitive word as to what transpired. But putting together the best information that we have available to us today our current assessment is that what happened in Benghazi was in fact initially a spontaneous reaction to what had just transpired hours before in Cairo, almost a copycat of-- of the demonstrations against our facility in Cairo, which were prompted, of course, by the video. What we think then transpired in Benghazi is that opportunistic extremist elements came to the consulate as this was unfolding. They came with heavy weapons which unfortunately are readily available in post revolutionary Libya. And it escalated into a much more violent episode. Obviously, that’s-- that’s our best judgment now. We’ll await the results of the investigation. And the president has been very clear--we’ll work with the Libyan authorities to bring those responsible to justice.

They simply assumed there was a protest like was going on all over the Muslim world and that the extremist took advantage of that.

BOB SCHIEFFER: And joining us now, Susan Rice, the U.N. ambassador, our U.N. ambassador. Madam Ambassador, he says this is something that has been in the planning stages for months. I understand you have been saying that you think it was spontaneous? Are we not on the same page here?

SUSAN RICE (Ambassador to the United Nations): Bob, let me tell you what we understand to be the assessment at present. First of all, very importantly, as you discussed with the President, there is an investigation that the United States government will launch led by the FBI, that has begun and--

BOB SCHIEFFER (overlapping): But they are not there.

SUSAN RICE: They are not on the ground yet, but they have already begun looking at all sorts of evidence of-- of various sorts already available to them and to us. And they will get on the ground and continue the investigation. So we'll want to see the results of that investigation to draw any definitive conclusions. But based on the best information we have to date, what our assessment is as of the present is in fact what began spontaneously in Benghazi as a reaction to what had transpired some hours earlier in Cairo where, of course, as you know, there was a violent protest outside of our embassy

BOB SCHIEFFER: Mm-Hm.

SUSAN RICE: --sparked by this hateful video. But soon after that spontaneous protest began outside of our consulate in Benghazi, we believe that it looks like extremist elements, individuals, joined in that-- in that effort with heavy weapons of the sort that are, unfortunately, readily now available in Libya post-revolution. And that it spun from there into something much, much more violent.

BOB SCHIEFFER: But you do not agree with him that this was something that had been plotted out several months ago?

SUSAN RICE: We do not-

"Face the Nation" transcripts, September 16, 2012: Libyan Pres. Magariaf, Amb. Rice and Sen. McCain - Page 2 - CBS News

It's the same talking points. So if you take out the spontaneous protest what do you have left?

Extremist with heavy weapons, and a mob who ransacked the place, setting it on fire, killing the Ambassador and Sean Smith who died of smoke inhalation.

 

[Conservative65]

What difference does it make? Dredging up old, tired stories isn't going to save Trump from free-fall.

Nothing old and tired about 4 honorable Americans dying as a result of a liar like Hillary whose only concern is covering her ass.

 

[Conservative65]

Either way I doubt based on the investigations that we could of saved them. Stop blaming Hillary or you better be ready to blame Reagan for 300 dead marines or Bush for all the attacks he didn't do shit about.

Oh, the other guy excuse.

Hate to break it to you but Reagan placed blame on himself. He said on 12/27/1983 that "If there is to be blame, it rests here in this office and with this President".

That's a leader not a liar. You support a liar that runs from responsibility.

 

[Conservative65]

Why are "Terrorist Attack" and "Anger over a Video" Mutually exclusive explanations?

Same way a random riot and a planned event are mutually exclusive.

You really are that stupid.

Pucker up.

 

[Conservative65]

Why are "Terrorist Attack" and "Anger over a Video" Mutually exclusive explanations?

'Terrorist Attack' and 'Protest' are since libs / Hillary claim(ed) there was a protest while the CIA, FBI, State department officials on the ground in Benghazi when the terrorist attack began all said there never was a protest, not even any sign of a protest.

Again, still not seeing how they were mutually exclusive.

Especially given the guy who orchestrated the attack said, "Um, yeah, we were upset about the video".

Try taking your head out of your ass and you might be able to see the truth.

Which one is it. Not seeing or simply not wanting to see?

 

[TooTall]

Within an hour of the attack in Benghazi beginning the State Department lead in Tripoli, who testified he had talked to Americans on the ground in Benghazi, said he spoke directly with Hillary Clinton and told her it was a terrorist attack.

As Americans fought to survive in Benghazi the State Department and WH changed the CIA's initial report - calling the attack a terrorist attack - 13 times, removing all references to terrorism.

According to Hillary Clinton herself in her own e-mails, on the night of the terrorist attack on Benghazi Hillary told the Egyptian Ambassador, 'We KNOW it was a terrorist attack, that the video had nothing to do with it.'

According to Hillary Clinton herself in her own e-mails, on the night of the terrorist attack on Benghazi Hillary told her own daughter in an e-mail that 'we' had lost 4 Americans in Benghazi due to a terrorist attack.

The next morning Rice and Hillary told the world that Benghazi had been a protest over a video gone wrong. Hillary vowed to make the film maker, who had exercised his 1st Amendment Right, pay, putting him in jail...which they did.

According to Obama HE acknowledged it had been a terrorist attack.

The CIA NEVER said it was a protest.

The FBI said there were NO SIGNS of a protest and called it a terrorist attack.

Hillary told the grieving families, as their loved ones returned home in flag-draped coffins, they had died because of a protest.

Weeks later, after Obama had claimed he knew it was a terrorist attack.

In an interview Hillary called the Benghazi attack a terrorist attack.

Hillary then testified before Congress. During that testimony she declared she had no idea what it was, whether it had been a protest or a 'couple of people out for a walk one night (with ak-47s, rocket launchers, mortars and mortar shells to sustain an attack for approximately 8 - 10 hours) and decided they wanted to kill some Americans..." (She never mentioned the words 'terrorist attack in that false denial.)

When pressed on the issue Hillary finally declared it had been a terrorist attack.

....Hillary supporters still claim - despite the CIA, FBI, Obama, and Hillary declaring it was a terrorist attack - Benghazi was a 'protest'.

The Benghazi Mom came out and declared Hillary told her it had been over a protest.


AGAIN, many liberals are still arguing it WAS a protest. HILLARY, however, came out and denied she ever said that, even called the mom a LIAR.
-- So Hillary is saying it WASN'T a protest?

If it was really a protest then there would be no reason to call the mom a liar, because telling her it was a protest would be telling the truth .... if it had been a protest...right?

Libs, meanwhile, continue to claim it WAS a protest and the mom is a....liar?! Again, the mom is declaring Hillary told her it was a protest. If it was a protest, why are libs attacking the mom for saying Hillary told her that's what it was?!

And finally, stretching the hell out of Slick Willey's defense of 'the definition of the word 'is', part of Hillary's defense regarding Benghazi being a protest hinges on the definition of the words 'Protest' and 'terrorist attack'.

Evidently, according to Dems - whose definition of 'terrorist attack' differs from the CIA, FBI, State department, Obama, etc... - approx. 100 people carrying AK-47s, rocket launchers, mortar tubes, mortars, and enough ammunition to carry out a 'protest' for 8-10 hours, setting fire to and destroying a compound and murdering 4 Americans who fought for their lives for hours and who waited for help that never came is NOT a 'terrorist attack'. It is a 'protest'.

So, with liberals changing their stance whenever it benefits them on this argument, can liberals FINALLY pick one argument or the other - that Benghazi was a protest or a terrorist attack and stick to it?!

Thank you.

It doesn't matter. Everyone knew there were terrorists in Libya. Everyone saw that some Muslims were capable of reacting violently to what they considered offenses to the Prophet.

Everyone knew that but Hillary. That is why she didn't honor any of the requests for additional security at the Benghazi consulate.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Well, since they were already dead - what difference does it make?

Regarding Hillary and her zombie liberal followers, 'NUFF SAID!

Dead is dead. Video or not won't change that fact. Would they still be alive if Hillary had not said it was because of a video? Please explain...

So why did Hillary lie to the families?

Some of the families said she never mentioned the video - so stop your lies.

None of the other family members who agreed to be interviewed said Clinton made any reference to a video. Indeed, other family members have been puzzled by the confident assertions of Woods and Smith.

“It was absolutely never mentioned, and it is totally new to me,” said Jan Stevens, the father of U.S. ambassador Christopher Stevens. “She gave us her sympathy. We had a great deal of talk about the problems of the world, the college her daughter attended. It was very small talk, nothing substantive.”

What Benghazi family members say Hillary Clinton said about the video

What did Hillary Clinton tell families in Benghazi case?

Hillary ABSOLUTELY mentioned the videos to the families.

 

[Weatherman2020]

What difference does it make? Dredging up old, tired stories isn't going to save Trump from free-fall.

Good little sheep like being lied to.

 

[Weatherman2020]

The next morning Rice and Hillary told the world that Benghazi had been a protest over a video gone wrong

According to the transcripts they thought the terrorist had joined in a copy-cat protest of the one in Cairo, and by weeks end, like the ones breaking out all over the Muslim world, and used that as cover for staging their attack. They were wrong, there was no protest.

Recent history shows that Muslim mobs will riot over Cartoons, and books. Did they riot over a video?

Per Hillarys email to her daughter it was a terrorist attack.....

 

[Rozman]

The future Queen must be defended at all costs.....

 

[Weatherman2020]

What difference does it make? Dredging up old, tired stories isn't going to save Trump from free-fall.

Copied right from the Hellary comment to the House Oversight committee. Democrats are so good at falling in line like good little soldiers....just check your brain at the door.

If the Hillary bashers had a brain, they'd realize this topic had already been beat to death

Yeah, let's talk about Bush's illegal war!

 

[SassyIrishLass]

Ben-gotcha has done nothing except elevate Ms. Clinton.

Yeah, that's why 60% of Americans don't trust her...only liberal sheep continue the lie, even after Hillary admitted it was a terrorist attack.

Hey if you guys still want to talk about something that happened in 2010 and try to make it relevant…please go ahead. Worked wonders for Romney.

After 7 1/2 years of BBBBUUUUUTTTTT BOOOOOOOSH!!!!!! That is pretty comical

 

[Weatherman2020]

Reactions to Innocence of Muslims - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Chronology of the reactions to Innocence of Muslims - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Anti-Muslim Video Sparks More Violent Demonstrations Across Muslim World

Deadly violent protests all over the world. Are Republicans actually denying that happened? Could they be that determined to stay ignorant?
What is it?

Worldwide violent protests over a stupid YouTube.
And not a peep about the atrocities committed in the name of their religion every single day.

Thanks for validating Islam should be outlawed worldwide as a terrorist organization.