Was it over a video or not? Liberals need to pick a story and stick to it.

[easyt65]

Within an hour of the attack in Benghazi beginning the State Department lead in Tripoli, who testified he had talked to Americans on the ground in Benghazi, said he spoke directly with Hillary Clinton and told her it was a terrorist attack.

As Americans fought to survive in Benghazi the State Department and WH changed the CIA's initial report - calling the attack a terrorist attack - 13 times, removing all references to terrorism.

According to Hillary Clinton herself in her own e-mails, on the night of the terrorist attack on Benghazi Hillary told the Egyptian Ambassador, 'We KNOW it was a terrorist attack, that the video had nothing to do with it.'

According to Hillary Clinton herself in her own e-mails, on the night of the terrorist attack on Benghazi Hillary told her own daughter in an e-mail that 'we' had lost 4 Americans in Benghazi due to a terrorist attack.

The next morning Rice and Hillary told the world that Benghazi had been a protest over a video gone wrong. Hillary vowed to make the film maker, who had exercised his 1st Amendment Right, pay, putting him in jail...which they did.

According to Obama HE acknowledged it had been a terrorist attack.

The CIA NEVER said it was a protest.

The FBI said there were NO SIGNS of a protest and called it a terrorist attack.

Hillary told the grieving families, as their loved ones returned home in flag-draped coffins, they had died because of a protest.

Weeks later, after Obama had claimed he knew it was a terrorist attack.

In an interview Hillary called the Benghazi attack a terrorist attack.

Hillary then testified before Congress. During that testimony she declared she had no idea what it was, whether it had been a protest or a 'couple of people out for a walk one night (with ak-47s, rocket launchers, mortars and mortar shells to sustain an attack for approximately 8 - 10 hours) and decided they wanted to kill some Americans..." (She never mentioned the words 'terrorist attack in that false denial.)

When pressed on the issue Hillary finally declared it had been a terrorist attack.

....Hillary supporters still claim - despite the CIA, FBI, Obama, and Hillary declaring it was a terrorist attack - Benghazi was a 'protest'.

The Benghazi Mom came out and declared Hillary told her it had been over a protest.


AGAIN, many liberals are still arguing it WAS a protest. HILLARY, however, came out and denied she ever said that, even called the mom a LIAR.
-- So Hillary is saying it WASN'T a protest?

If it was really a protest then there would be no reason to call the mom a liar, because telling her it was a protest would be telling the truth .... if it had been a protest...right?

Libs, meanwhile, continue to claim it WAS a protest and the mom is a....liar?! Again, the mom is declaring Hillary told her it was a protest. If it was a protest, why are libs attacking the mom for saying Hillary told her that's what it was?!

And finally, stretching the hell out of Slick Willey's defense of 'the definition of the word 'is', part of Hillary's defense regarding Benghazi being a protest hinges on the definition of the words 'Protest' and 'terrorist attack'.

Evidently, according to Dems - whose definition of 'terrorist attack' differs from the CIA, FBI, State department, Obama, etc... - approx. 100 people carrying AK-47s, rocket launchers, mortar tubes, mortars, and enough ammunition to carry out a 'protest' for 8-10 hours, setting fire to and destroying a compound and murdering 4 Americans who fought for their lives for hours and who waited for help that never came is NOT a 'terrorist attack'. It is a 'protest'.

So, with liberals changing their stance whenever it benefits them on this argument, can liberals FINALLY pick one argument or the other - that Benghazi was a protest or a terrorist attack and stick to it?!

Thank you.

 

[konradv]

What difference does it make? Dredging up old, tired stories isn't going to save Trump from free-fall.

 

[Lakhota]

Within an hour of the attack in Benghazi beginning the State Department lead in Tripoli, who testified he had talked to Americans on the ground in Benghazi, said he spoke directly with Hillary Clinton and told her it was a terrorist attack.

As Americans fought to survive in Benghazi the State Department and WH changed the CIA's initial report - calling the attack a terrorist attack - 13 times, removing all references to terrorism.

According to Hillary Clinton herself in her own e-mails, on the night of the terrorist attack on Benghazi Hillary told the Egyptian Ambassador, 'We KNOW it was a terrorist attack, that the video had nothing to do with it.'

According to Hillary Clinton herself in her own e-mails, on the night of the terrorist attack on Benghazi Hillary told her own daughter in an e-mail that 'we' had lost 4 Americans in Benghazi due to a terrorist attack.

The next morning Rice and Hillary told the world that Benghazi had been a protest over a video gone wrong. Hillary vowed to make the film maker, who had exercised his 1st Amendment Right, pay, putting him in jail...which they did.

According to Obama HE acknowledged it had been a terrorist attack.

The CIA NEVER said it was a protest.

The FBI said there were NO SIGNS of a protest and called it a terrorist attack.

Hillary told the grieving families, as their loved ones returned home in flag-draped coffins, they had died because of a protest.

Weeks later, after Obama had claimed he knew it was a terrorist attack.

In an interview Hillary called the Benghazi attack a terrorist attack.

Hillary then testified before Congress. During that testimony she declared she had no idea what it was, whether it had been a protest or a 'couple of people out for a walk one night (with ak-47s, rocket launchers, mortars and mortar shells to sustain an attack for approximately 8 - 10 hours) and decided they wanted to kill some Americans..." (She never mentioned the words 'terrorist attack in that false denial.)

When pressed on the issue Hillary finally declared it had been a terrorist attack.

....Hillary supporters still claim - despite the CIA, FBI, Obama, and Hillary declaring it was a terrorist attack - Benghazi was a 'protest'.

The Benghazi Mom came out and declared Hillary told her it had been over a protest.


AGAIN, many liberals are still arguing it WAS a protest. HILLARY, however, came out and denied she ever said that, even called the mom a LIAR.
-- So Hillary is saying it WASN'T a protest?

If it was really a protest then there would be no reason to call the mom a liar, because telling her it was a protest would be telling the truth .... if it had been a protest...right?

Libs, meanwhile, continue to claim it WAS a protest and the mom is a....liar?! Again, the mom is declaring Hillary told her it was a protest. If it was a protest, why are libs attacking the mom for saying Hillary told her that's what it was?!

And finally, stretching the hell out of Slick Willey's defense of 'the definition of the word 'is', part of Hillary's defense regarding Benghazi being a protest hinges on the definition of the words 'Protest' and 'terrorist attack'.

Evidently, according to Dems - whose definition of 'terrorist attack' differs from the CIA, FBI, State department, Obama, etc... - approx. 100 people carrying AK-47s, rocket launchers, mortar tubes, mortars, and enough ammunition to carry out a 'protest' for 8-10 hours, setting fire to and destroying a compound and murdering 4 Americans who fought for their lives for hours and who waited for help that never came is NOT a 'terrorist attack'. It is a 'protest'.

So, with liberals changing their stance whenever it benefits them on this argument, can liberals FINALLY pick one argument or the other - that Benghazi was a protest or a terrorist attack and stick to it?!

Thank you.

Well, since they were already dead - what difference does it make?

 

[easyt65]

Well, since they were already dead - what difference does it make?

Regarding Hillary and her zombie liberal followers, 'NUFF SAID!

 

[Lakhota]

Well, since they were already dead - what difference does it make?

Regarding Hillary and her zombie liberal followers, 'NUFF SAID!

Dead is dead. Video or not won't change that fact. Would they still be alive if Hillary had not said it was because of a video? Please explain...

 

[NYcarbineer]

Within an hour of the attack in Benghazi beginning the State Department lead in Tripoli, who testified he had talked to Americans on the ground in Benghazi, said he spoke directly with Hillary Clinton and told her it was a terrorist attack.

As Americans fought to survive in Benghazi the State Department and WH changed the CIA's initial report - calling the attack a terrorist attack - 13 times, removing all references to terrorism.

According to Hillary Clinton herself in her own e-mails, on the night of the terrorist attack on Benghazi Hillary told the Egyptian Ambassador, 'We KNOW it was a terrorist attack, that the video had nothing to do with it.'

According to Hillary Clinton herself in her own e-mails, on the night of the terrorist attack on Benghazi Hillary told her own daughter in an e-mail that 'we' had lost 4 Americans in Benghazi due to a terrorist attack.

The next morning Rice and Hillary told the world that Benghazi had been a protest over a video gone wrong. Hillary vowed to make the film maker, who had exercised his 1st Amendment Right, pay, putting him in jail...which they did.

According to Obama HE acknowledged it had been a terrorist attack.

The CIA NEVER said it was a protest.

The FBI said there were NO SIGNS of a protest and called it a terrorist attack.

Hillary told the grieving families, as their loved ones returned home in flag-draped coffins, they had died because of a protest.

Weeks later, after Obama had claimed he knew it was a terrorist attack.

In an interview Hillary called the Benghazi attack a terrorist attack.

Hillary then testified before Congress. During that testimony she declared she had no idea what it was, whether it had been a protest or a 'couple of people out for a walk one night (with ak-47s, rocket launchers, mortars and mortar shells to sustain an attack for approximately 8 - 10 hours) and decided they wanted to kill some Americans..." (She never mentioned the words 'terrorist attack in that false denial.)

When pressed on the issue Hillary finally declared it had been a terrorist attack.

....Hillary supporters still claim - despite the CIA, FBI, Obama, and Hillary declaring it was a terrorist attack - Benghazi was a 'protest'.

The Benghazi Mom came out and declared Hillary told her it had been over a protest.


AGAIN, many liberals are still arguing it WAS a protest. HILLARY, however, came out and denied she ever said that, even called the mom a LIAR.
-- So Hillary is saying it WASN'T a protest?

If it was really a protest then there would be no reason to call the mom a liar, because telling her it was a protest would be telling the truth .... if it had been a protest...right?

Libs, meanwhile, continue to claim it WAS a protest and the mom is a....liar?! Again, the mom is declaring Hillary told her it was a protest. If it was a protest, why are libs attacking the mom for saying Hillary told her that's what it was?!

And finally, stretching the hell out of Slick Willey's defense of 'the definition of the word 'is', part of Hillary's defense regarding Benghazi being a protest hinges on the definition of the words 'Protest' and 'terrorist attack'.

Evidently, according to Dems - whose definition of 'terrorist attack' differs from the CIA, FBI, State department, Obama, etc... - approx. 100 people carrying AK-47s, rocket launchers, mortar tubes, mortars, and enough ammunition to carry out a 'protest' for 8-10 hours, setting fire to and destroying a compound and murdering 4 Americans who fought for their lives for hours and who waited for help that never came is NOT a 'terrorist attack'. It is a 'protest'.

So, with liberals changing their stance whenever it benefits them on this argument, can liberals FINALLY pick one argument or the other - that Benghazi was a protest or a terrorist attack and stick to it?!

Thank you.

It doesn't matter. Everyone knew there were terrorists in Libya. Everyone saw that some Muslims were capable of reacting violently to what they considered offenses to the Prophet.

 

[JoeB131]

Why are "Terrorist Attack" and "Anger over a Video" Mutually exclusive explanations?

 

[easyt65]

Why are "Terrorist Attack" and "Anger over a Video" Mutually exclusive explanations?

'Terrorist Attack' and 'Protest' are since libs / Hillary claim(ed) there was a protest while the CIA, FBI, State department officials on the ground in Benghazi when the terrorist attack began all said there never was a protest, not even any sign of a protest.

 

[JoeB131]

Why are "Terrorist Attack" and "Anger over a Video" Mutually exclusive explanations?

'Terrorist Attack' and 'Protest' are since libs / Hillary claim(ed) there was a protest while the CIA, FBI, State department officials on the ground in Benghazi when the terrorist attack began all said there never was a protest, not even any sign of a protest.

Again, still not seeing how they were mutually exclusive.

Especially given the guy who orchestrated the attack said, "Um, yeah, we were upset about the video".

 

[BluesLegend]

Liberals lie and spin and their party is proud of it.

 

[ClosedCaption]

I keep asking how does any winger say it was not because of the video? How do you know that?

 

[buckeye45_73]

Within an hour of the attack in Benghazi beginning the State Department lead in Tripoli, who testified he had talked to Americans on the ground in Benghazi, said he spoke directly with Hillary Clinton and told her it was a terrorist attack.

As Americans fought to survive in Benghazi the State Department and WH changed the CIA's initial report - calling the attack a terrorist attack - 13 times, removing all references to terrorism.

According to Hillary Clinton herself in her own e-mails, on the night of the terrorist attack on Benghazi Hillary told the Egyptian Ambassador, 'We KNOW it was a terrorist attack, that the video had nothing to do with it.'

According to Hillary Clinton herself in her own e-mails, on the night of the terrorist attack on Benghazi Hillary told her own daughter in an e-mail that 'we' had lost 4 Americans in Benghazi due to a terrorist attack.

The next morning Rice and Hillary told the world that Benghazi had been a protest over a video gone wrong. Hillary vowed to make the film maker, who had exercised his 1st Amendment Right, pay, putting him in jail...which they did.

According to Obama HE acknowledged it had been a terrorist attack.

The CIA NEVER said it was a protest.

The FBI said there were NO SIGNS of a protest and called it a terrorist attack.

Hillary told the grieving families, as their loved ones returned home in flag-draped coffins, they had died because of a protest.

Weeks later, after Obama had claimed he knew it was a terrorist attack.

In an interview Hillary called the Benghazi attack a terrorist attack.

Hillary then testified before Congress. During that testimony she declared she had no idea what it was, whether it had been a protest or a 'couple of people out for a walk one night (with ak-47s, rocket launchers, mortars and mortar shells to sustain an attack for approximately 8 - 10 hours) and decided they wanted to kill some Americans..." (She never mentioned the words 'terrorist attack in that false denial.)

When pressed on the issue Hillary finally declared it had been a terrorist attack.

....Hillary supporters still claim - despite the CIA, FBI, Obama, and Hillary declaring it was a terrorist attack - Benghazi was a 'protest'.

The Benghazi Mom came out and declared Hillary told her it had been over a protest.


AGAIN, many liberals are still arguing it WAS a protest. HILLARY, however, came out and denied she ever said that, even called the mom a LIAR.
-- So Hillary is saying it WASN'T a protest?

If it was really a protest then there would be no reason to call the mom a liar, because telling her it was a protest would be telling the truth .... if it had been a protest...right?

Libs, meanwhile, continue to claim it WAS a protest and the mom is a....liar?! Again, the mom is declaring Hillary told her it was a protest. If it was a protest, why are libs attacking the mom for saying Hillary told her that's what it was?!

And finally, stretching the hell out of Slick Willey's defense of 'the definition of the word 'is', part of Hillary's defense regarding Benghazi being a protest hinges on the definition of the words 'Protest' and 'terrorist attack'.

Evidently, according to Dems - whose definition of 'terrorist attack' differs from the CIA, FBI, State department, Obama, etc... - approx. 100 people carrying AK-47s, rocket launchers, mortar tubes, mortars, and enough ammunition to carry out a 'protest' for 8-10 hours, setting fire to and destroying a compound and murdering 4 Americans who fought for their lives for hours and who waited for help that never came is NOT a 'terrorist attack'. It is a 'protest'.

So, with liberals changing their stance whenever it benefits them on this argument, can liberals FINALLY pick one argument or the other - that Benghazi was a protest or a terrorist attack and stick to it?!

Thank you.

Well, since they were already dead - what difference does it make?

Same things with gold star families......go home and shut up.....your son is dead what difference does it make?

 

[BlindBoo]

The next morning Rice and Hillary told the world that Benghazi had been a protest over a video gone wrong

According to the transcripts they thought the terrorist had joined in a copy-cat protest of the one in Cairo, and by weeks end, like the ones breaking out all over the Muslim world, and used that as cover for staging their attack. They were wrong, there was no protest.

Recent history shows that Muslim mobs will riot over Cartoons, and books. Did they riot over a video?

 

[buckeye45_73]

The next morning Rice and Hillary told the world that Benghazi had been a protest over a video gone wrong

According to the transcripts they thought the terrorist had joined in a copy-cat protest of the one in Cairo, and by weeks end, like the ones breaking out all over the Muslim world, and used that as cover for staging their attack. They were wrong, there was no protest.

Recent history shows that Muslim mobs will riot over Cartoons, and books. Did they riot over a video?

They happened to have heavy military equipment?

 

[BlindBoo]

The next morning Rice and Hillary told the world that Benghazi had been a protest over a video gone wrong

According to the transcripts they thought the terrorist had joined in a copy-cat protest of the one in Cairo, and by weeks end, like the ones breaking out all over the Muslim world, and used that as cover for staging their attack. They were wrong, there was no protest.

Recent history shows that Muslim mobs will riot over Cartoons, and books. Did they riot over a video?

They happened to have heavy military equipment?

I bet most militias ( or terrorist organizations) in Benghazi have RPG's and mortars. It not a Egypt.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Why are "Terrorist Attack" and "Anger over a Video" Mutually exclusive explanations?

'Terrorist Attack' and 'Protest' are since libs / Hillary claim(ed) there was a protest while the CIA, FBI, State department officials on the ground in Benghazi when the terrorist attack began all said there never was a protest, not even any sign of a protest.

What did the actual perpetrators say was their motivation?

 

[NYcarbineer]

Why are "Terrorist Attack" and "Anger over a Video" Mutually exclusive explanations?

Apparently these people want you to believe that the Benghazi attack was carried out by an odd branch of the terrorist network composed of Islamist extremists who for some reason are not offended by attacks on the Prophet.

 

[mudwhistle]

Within an hour of the attack in Benghazi beginning the State Department lead in Tripoli, who testified he had talked to Americans on the ground in Benghazi, said he spoke directly with Hillary Clinton and told her it was a terrorist attack.

As Americans fought to survive in Benghazi the State Department and WH changed the CIA's initial report - calling the attack a terrorist attack - 13 times, removing all references to terrorism.

According to Hillary Clinton herself in her own e-mails, on the night of the terrorist attack on Benghazi Hillary told the Egyptian Ambassador, 'We KNOW it was a terrorist attack, that the video had nothing to do with it.'

According to Hillary Clinton herself in her own e-mails, on the night of the terrorist attack on Benghazi Hillary told her own daughter in an e-mail that 'we' had lost 4 Americans in Benghazi due to a terrorist attack.

The next morning Rice and Hillary told the world that Benghazi had been a protest over a video gone wrong. Hillary vowed to make the film maker, who had exercised his 1st Amendment Right, pay, putting him in jail...which they did.

According to Obama HE acknowledged it had been a terrorist attack.

The CIA NEVER said it was a protest.

The FBI said there were NO SIGNS of a protest and called it a terrorist attack.

Hillary told the grieving families, as their loved ones returned home in flag-draped coffins, they had died because of a protest.

Weeks later, after Obama had claimed he knew it was a terrorist attack.

In an interview Hillary called the Benghazi attack a terrorist attack.

Hillary then testified before Congress. During that testimony she declared she had no idea what it was, whether it had been a protest or a 'couple of people out for a walk one night (with ak-47s, rocket launchers, mortars and mortar shells to sustain an attack for approximately 8 - 10 hours) and decided they wanted to kill some Americans..." (She never mentioned the words 'terrorist attack in that false denial.)

When pressed on the issue Hillary finally declared it had been a terrorist attack.

....Hillary supporters still claim - despite the CIA, FBI, Obama, and Hillary declaring it was a terrorist attack - Benghazi was a 'protest'.

The Benghazi Mom came out and declared Hillary told her it had been over a protest.


AGAIN, many liberals are still arguing it WAS a protest. HILLARY, however, came out and denied she ever said that, even called the mom a LIAR.
-- So Hillary is saying it WASN'T a protest?

If it was really a protest then there would be no reason to call the mom a liar, because telling her it was a protest would be telling the truth .... if it had been a protest...right?

Libs, meanwhile, continue to claim it WAS a protest and the mom is a....liar?! Again, the mom is declaring Hillary told her it was a protest. If it was a protest, why are libs attacking the mom for saying Hillary told her that's what it was?!

And finally, stretching the hell out of Slick Willey's defense of 'the definition of the word 'is', part of Hillary's defense regarding Benghazi being a protest hinges on the definition of the words 'Protest' and 'terrorist attack'.

Evidently, according to Dems - whose definition of 'terrorist attack' differs from the CIA, FBI, State department, Obama, etc... - approx. 100 people carrying AK-47s, rocket launchers, mortar tubes, mortars, and enough ammunition to carry out a 'protest' for 8-10 hours, setting fire to and destroying a compound and murdering 4 Americans who fought for their lives for hours and who waited for help that never came is NOT a 'terrorist attack'. It is a 'protest'.

So, with liberals changing their stance whenever it benefits them on this argument, can liberals FINALLY pick one argument or the other - that Benghazi was a protest or a terrorist attack and stick to it?!

Thank you.

Democrats don't really have to offer up an apology or a retraction. It's why they are so dangerous. They never are held to account for their lies and deceptions.

 

[JBond]

Within an hour of the attack in Benghazi beginning the State Department lead in Tripoli, who testified he had talked to Americans on the ground in Benghazi, said he spoke directly with Hillary Clinton and told her it was a terrorist attack.

As Americans fought to survive in Benghazi the State Department and WH changed the CIA's initial report - calling the attack a terrorist attack - 13 times, removing all references to terrorism.

According to Hillary Clinton herself in her own e-mails, on the night of the terrorist attack on Benghazi Hillary told the Egyptian Ambassador, 'We KNOW it was a terrorist attack, that the video had nothing to do with it.'

According to Hillary Clinton herself in her own e-mails, on the night of the terrorist attack on Benghazi Hillary told her own daughter in an e-mail that 'we' had lost 4 Americans in Benghazi due to a terrorist attack.

The next morning Rice and Hillary told the world that Benghazi had been a protest over a video gone wrong. Hillary vowed to make the film maker, who had exercised his 1st Amendment Right, pay, putting him in jail...which they did.

According to Obama HE acknowledged it had been a terrorist attack.

The CIA NEVER said it was a protest.

The FBI said there were NO SIGNS of a protest and called it a terrorist attack.

Hillary told the grieving families, as their loved ones returned home in flag-draped coffins, they had died because of a protest.

Weeks later, after Obama had claimed he knew it was a terrorist attack.

In an interview Hillary called the Benghazi attack a terrorist attack.

Hillary then testified before Congress. During that testimony she declared she had no idea what it was, whether it had been a protest or a 'couple of people out for a walk one night (with ak-47s, rocket launchers, mortars and mortar shells to sustain an attack for approximately 8 - 10 hours) and decided they wanted to kill some Americans..." (She never mentioned the words 'terrorist attack in that false denial.)

When pressed on the issue Hillary finally declared it had been a terrorist attack.

....Hillary supporters still claim - despite the CIA, FBI, Obama, and Hillary declaring it was a terrorist attack - Benghazi was a 'protest'.

The Benghazi Mom came out and declared Hillary told her it had been over a protest.


AGAIN, many liberals are still arguing it WAS a protest. HILLARY, however, came out and denied she ever said that, even called the mom a LIAR.
-- So Hillary is saying it WASN'T a protest?

If it was really a protest then there would be no reason to call the mom a liar, because telling her it was a protest would be telling the truth .... if it had been a protest...right?

Libs, meanwhile, continue to claim it WAS a protest and the mom is a....liar?! Again, the mom is declaring Hillary told her it was a protest. If it was a protest, why are libs attacking the mom for saying Hillary told her that's what it was?!

And finally, stretching the hell out of Slick Willey's defense of 'the definition of the word 'is', part of Hillary's defense regarding Benghazi being a protest hinges on the definition of the words 'Protest' and 'terrorist attack'.

Evidently, according to Dems - whose definition of 'terrorist attack' differs from the CIA, FBI, State department, Obama, etc... - approx. 100 people carrying AK-47s, rocket launchers, mortar tubes, mortars, and enough ammunition to carry out a 'protest' for 8-10 hours, setting fire to and destroying a compound and murdering 4 Americans who fought for their lives for hours and who waited for help that never came is NOT a 'terrorist attack'. It is a 'protest'.

So, with liberals changing their stance whenever it benefits them on this argument, can liberals FINALLY pick one argument or the other - that Benghazi was a protest or a terrorist attack and stick to it?!

Thank you.

Well, since they were already dead - what difference does it make?

They were alive and Hillary chose to let them die. The aircraft used in Clinton's Libyan war were staged an hour away and could have been used.

 

[easyt65]

I bet most militias ( or terrorist organizations) in Benghazi have RPG's and mortars. It not a Egypt.

Yeah, and you are stupid enough to believe all protestors in Libya go out to protest carrying AK-47s, around 30 - 40 rocket launchers, mortars, and enough ammo to keep a 'protest' going for around 8 - 10 hours.