Was Iran Better Off Under the Shah?

Litwin

Diamond Member
Joined
Sep 3, 2017
Messages
58,271
Reaction score
8,633
Points
1,915
Location
GDL&Sweden
1776469780290.webp





Fun fact: all the leftists - Bolsheviks who helped the Ayatollah gain power were all erased. Typical leftists stuff :auiqs.jpg:

MASKAL MEME logo.webp
 
Last edited:
Of course Iran was better off under the Shah.
It's a no brainer.
Who would want to live in that theocratic hell hole ruled by sexual deviants and psychopaths under the guise of a fake religion?
 
The Iranian revolution was a Communist/Marxist takeover, cloaked in a religious costume. The People didn't really understand what was coming.

No outside force can do regime change in Iran. It must come from within.
 
The Iranian revolution was a Communist/Marxist takeover, cloaked in a religious costume
120% agreed with you, you just stole my post 👍 . How do you know it?It’s funny, but many Westerners still don’t see the real nature of the Mullah politburo even today, 50 years after the Shia Bolsheviks carried out the local October coup.

Lockback LuckyDuck01!

 
The public, especially the women had more freedoms and could dress in western styles. All governments should be secular and keep religion out of peoples personal life.
The Shah was a great leader for the Iranian people.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom