First of all, you misspelled Faux......and no, Obama isn't afraid of Faux News.....he just refuses to participate in an interview with a totally Republican biased network that calls itself "fair and balanced" when everyone knows it is totally right biased.
Faux News has not been unfair to Trump......Megan's questions were about Trump's exact tweets....so no, there is no comparison. Obama is the real deal, not some blowhard that acts tough and then gives in fear of a woman who embarrassed him and put him on the spot by quoting his own statements on a Republican biased TV station.
No, President Obama did a interview with Fox News ( I am spelling it correctly and please drop the partisan bullshit with me ) but it still does not negate the fact that his own staff have utter stuff about Fox News that even News Agencies like ABC took offense to, so President Obama and Trump have something in common.
You might want to ignore the fact that President Obama is thin skin just like Trump, but I will not...
No, you're still spelling it wrong......it's been proven they really are Faux News.....and everything that Obama said about Faux is the truth, so quit the partisan bullshit with me! Trump will appear on Faux News if they remove Megan Kelly.......Obama will not appear on Faux regardless.....so, if you want to stretch the facts to suit your partisan belief....go ahead and say they have something in common.
If you want to write like a Partisan whore by all means then do it but the reality is Fox News is not spelled the way you are spelling it and only MSNBC and Democracy Now viewers spell it that way.
You call it what you want, I'll call it by what it is. So why are you offended by it? Are you a Faux Newsbot?
It must be stated over and over again: the Fox News Channel is not a news channel. It's a Republican party propaganda channel. As such, its first amendment right to say whatever it likes ought to be protected, but not its "right" to call itself "news". That's false advertising, and it ought to be outlawed by whoever regulates such things.
Perhaps if they changed the name to the Republican News Channel (RNC for short), there would be no complaint. Until they do, however, they need to be called out by the rest of us for exactly what they are.
Fox News's faux news | Brad Friedman
Also President Obama did a Interview with Bill O'Reilly, so I guess he did do a interview with Fox in the past or were you too far up his ass to remember that interview?
I know he did, and he learned quickly that they only wanted to attack him, not really do an interview. Are you that far up Faux News' ass to get this upset over me calling Faux News by its true name?
Also it was not the truth what his staff said and even ABC News took offense to what his staff member said in the past, but of course a partisan whore would never see it that way, right?
Why don't you post the comment you are referring to so we can discuss whether or not it is true? Because you are a partisan whore yourself and likes to project?
So with that you have a lot in common with Trump seeing you both live in a delusional world and not in reality!
The only one delusional here is you.....defending Faux News when everyone, including many partisan conservatives, know the truth about Faux.
"
Tapper: It’s escaped none of our notice that the White House has decided in the last few weeks to declare one of our sister organizations “not a news organization” and to tell the rest of us not to treat them like a news organization. Can you explain why it’s appropriate for the White House to decide that a news organization is not one?
Gibbs: Jake, we render, we render an opinion based on some of their coverage and the fairness that, the fairness of that coverage.
Tapper: But that’s a pretty sweeping declaration that they are “not a news organization.” How are they any different from, say –
Gibbs: ABC -
Tapper: ABC. MSNBC. Univision. I mean how are they any different?
Gibbs: You and I should watch sometime around 9 o’clock tonight. Or 5 o’clock this afternoon.
Tapper: I’m not talking about their opinion programming or issues you have with certain reports. I’m talking about saying thousands of individuals who work for a media organization, do not work for a “news organization” -- why is that appropriate for the White House to say?
Gibbs: That’s our opinion. "
Jake Tapper Defends FOX News
Tapper was correct and The White House was wrong. The President Staff had no right claiming what it claimed, and Tapper comment is correct that what idiots like you forget is what you believe is news is a opinion commentary and not the actual news.
Sean Hannity is giving his opinion on events but is not Sheppard Smith.
There is a difference but those like you can not understand this because MSNBC and The Guardian has brainwashed you into believing that all of Fox News is propaganda and if so then the same should be written about every cable News Station with the exception of Al-Jazeera America which will be going off the air this year.
So as you make your bullshit claims you need to realize Megyn Kelly is a commentator for Fox News Network and is the same as Hannity and should not be confused with a real journalist.
It would be like me claiming Rachel Maddow is a real reporter when in fact she is a commentator that spin what she is reporting.
So keep up your partisan whore ways because all you are is a pathetic excuse of human waste!