War Crimes for Trump and Hegseth?

[struth]

I didn’t think that ya retard. I’d explain that I was illustrating what .5% inflation does to a 100 dollar purchase but you’re too stupid to comprehend

Well, I got to be honest, I am not at all surprised you don't think before you post, but it's what you posted.

 

[Lesh]

Well, I got to be honest, I am not at all surprised you don't think before you post, but it's what you posted.

Like I said.. you’re too stupid to comprehend just how stupid you are

 

[struth]

Like I said.. you’re too stupid to comprehend just how stupid you are

.5 percent inflation = fifty cents...hahaha is calling people stupid

 

[Lesh]

.5 percent inflation = fifty cents...hahaha is calling people stupid

On $100?

How fuckkng stupid are you?

 

[Rawley]

Venezuela is an open door for Cuba China and Russia to take control of south and central America. Drug sales fund much of the terror in this e=area s well as all over the world. Democrats as usual have no idea and dont care abut the threat of the Americans killed by these drugs. So Trump does something about it and is successful showing America democrats are incompetent. Their response impeach him, he is killing helpless fishermen, war crimes blah blah blah.

They have their marching orders - narco-terrorists good, Trump bad.

 

[struth]

On $100?

How fuckkng stupid are you?

That’s not what you said first

But moreover, what Trump has done us lower that…so people are saving that compared to under your xiden regime

 

[White 6]

UNCLOS Articles 92, 94, 110, and customary maritime law spell out the consequences clearly:

1. Stateless vessels have no sovereign protection. A flagged ship is an extension of its flag-state’s sovereignty. A stateless vessel is not. This matters because “war crimes” presuppose protected persons or protected property. A stateless vessel is legally unprotected.

2. Any state may stop, board, search, seize, or disable, a stateless vessel. UNCLOS Article 110 explicitly authorizes boarding and seizure. The law does not require states to risk their own personnel or assets while doing so. Disabling a vessel that refuses inspection, including firing on it, is legally permitted under both UNCLOS and long-established state practice.

3. War crimes require an armed conflict. You cannot commit a “war crime” outside an armed conflict. War crimes occur only within the context of international humanitarian law (IHL). Enforcing maritime law against a stateless vessel is a law enforcement action, not an IHL situation.
No armed conflict = no war crime possible.

4. Lethal force may be used when a vessel refuses lawful orders. The International Maritime Organization’s “Use of Force” guidance for maritime interdiction recognizes that disabling fire, even lethal force, is lawful when a vessel refuses lawful boarding, attempts to flee, poses a threat, or engages in illicit activities such as piracy or narcotics trafficking.
Once again: law enforcement rules apply, not IHL.

5. Sinking a stateless vessel is not prohibited by UNCLOS. UNCLOS permits seizure of a stateless vessel and leaves the means entirely to the enforcing state so long as necessity and proportionality are respected. If the vessel flees, attacks, or refuses lawful commands, sinking it is legally permissible. Many states routinely do this to drug-smuggling vessels (e.g., semi-submersibles) without it ever being treated as a war crime.

6. No flag = no jurisdictional shield. The entire reason international law requires ships to fly a flag is to prevent this exact situation. Flagless vessels are legally vulnerable by design.
Because a stateless vessel has no protected status, because UNCLOS authorizes interdiction of such vessels, because lethal force may be used in maritime law enforcement when necessary, and because war crimes require an armed conflict that is not present here, sinking an unflagged ship in international waters is not a war crime.

It says nothing about launching a rocket attack instead of "stop, board, search, seize, or disable, a stateless vessel." It certainly does not authorize a second strike on shipwrecked sailers in international waters.

 

[struth]

It says nothing about launching a rocket attack instead of "stop, board, search, seize, or disable, a stateless vessel." It certainly does not authorize a second strike on shipwrecked sailers in international waters.

It says you can disable it. Dropping a rocket does that

 

[White 6]

It says you can disable it. Dropping a rocket does that

But, it does not say you can kill survivors of your first attack. The idea is barbaric.

 

[struth]

But, it does not say you can kill survivors of your first attack. The idea is barbaric.

Doesn’t say you can’t, especially if they are continuing to engage in their unlawful mission to harm you

Frankly I think being a terrorist is barbaric

Not surprised you think taking them out is

 

[IM2]

It's a sick ******* party and will eventually destroy the United States unless and until it is destroyed and replaced with a liberal but rational group.

Republicans are currently destroying the country.

 

[kyzr]

More than just claims backed by nothing

It was on the official DHS website, that beats typing lies.

 

[struth]

Republicans are currently destroying the country.

A demafacist would think that

 

[Lesh]

It was on the official DHS website, that beats typing lies.

And what evidence did they produce?

None?

 

[Crepitus]

 

[JoeB131]

Venezuela is an open door for Cuba China and Russia to take control of south and central America.

Except none of them are interested. We are only interested in Venezuela because they have oil, better quality oil than we have.

Drug sales fund much of the terror in this e=area s well as all over the world.

Oh, I agree. When we toppled the Taliban, Opium flooded Europe. Not to mention Ronnie Ray-gun funded the Contras and the flooded the country with Cocaine.

Democrats as usual have no idea and dont care abut the threat of the Americans killed by these drugs. So Trump does something about it and is successful showing America democrats are incompetent.

Or maybe we think that instead of using a 2 million dollar missile to blow up a fishing boat we could invest that money into rehab and treatment programs.

Their response impeach him, he is killing helpless fishermen, war crimes blah blah blah.

All very true.

 

[JoeB131]

ICE has not officially reported how many have used the app. So that 35,000 is suspect.

Actually, those numbers HAVE been reported. They have to be because someone has to pay for the plane ticket and write the $1000.00 checks.

ICE/DHS/CBP can get them on planes to their country of origin, duh.

Except those numbers wouldn't be the "self-deporting", they just be among the 360,000 deported.

You type stuff with no proof. I have an official link that says 2m illegals were deported or self-deported under Trump.

When the government lies on a regular basis, official links are meaningless.

 

[Zavulon]

If we don’t do something about Maduro Venezuela will continue to foster its Chinese relationships and further the importation of drugs made with Chinese precursors all while establishing FOBs in proximity to the US and Panama Canal

And if you do something stupid - not only Venezuela, but also other countries of the region will seek for buying Russian and Chinese weapons and protection.
And killing civilian sailors in high seas - is exactly that kind of thing.

 

[kyzr]

And what evidence did they produce? None?

What do you want? fingers? Scalps?

 

[kyzr]

Actually, those numbers HAVE been reported. They have to be because someone has to pay for the plane ticket and write the $1000.00 checks.

That number officially is 1.6 million.

How many people have self deported since the Trump Adm...

Executive summary The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) under the Trump administration has publicly claimed that roughly 1.6 million people "self‑depor...

factually.co

Except those numbers wouldn't be the "self-deporting", they just be among the 360,000 deported.
When the government lies on a regular basis, official links are meaningless.

Actually your typing without proof is meaningless.