Jake Winker Frogen
Platinum Member
- Apr 24, 2020
- 1,530
- 597
- 928
To my mind the Bush Administration made several titanic mistakes.
First they did not articulate the regime change argument as well as they could have, the destabilising effect Saddam had in the entire region, they relied on the WMD argument almost exclusively. (Though I do believe they believed he still had them, because he was behaving like he still had them. He did not even fully cooperate during his "final chance" the UN Blix inspections. And the former Clinton CIA Director told Bush "it is a slam dunk" they will find WMD.)
Second, the removal of Saddam himself went very well, the Iraqi army largely not fighting for him at all, there was no occupational planning or political vision on who would really replace him?
Then they made the most tragic decision of all, and completely disbanded an Iraqi army which was still largely armed as they did not fight at all, even after a large group of officers went to the US occupational authority offering to work for the occupation rather than fight against it.
Hell they did even not secure munitions and explosives at Iraqi military bases which should have been priority number one upon occupation.
Boom, instant insurgency, with other groups, such as Islamic radicals then exploited creating alliances with the no unemployed Iraqi army.
Also I think it was a mistake when it became clear the Shia Sunni divide was so intense, so insanely bloody, that no unified state could really function effectively, that the US did not break off the Kurds.
Progressive, loyal allies and wildly pro American.
First they did not articulate the regime change argument as well as they could have, the destabilising effect Saddam had in the entire region, they relied on the WMD argument almost exclusively. (Though I do believe they believed he still had them, because he was behaving like he still had them. He did not even fully cooperate during his "final chance" the UN Blix inspections. And the former Clinton CIA Director told Bush "it is a slam dunk" they will find WMD.)
Second, the removal of Saddam himself went very well, the Iraqi army largely not fighting for him at all, there was no occupational planning or political vision on who would really replace him?
Then they made the most tragic decision of all, and completely disbanded an Iraqi army which was still largely armed as they did not fight at all, even after a large group of officers went to the US occupational authority offering to work for the occupation rather than fight against it.
Hell they did even not secure munitions and explosives at Iraqi military bases which should have been priority number one upon occupation.
Boom, instant insurgency, with other groups, such as Islamic radicals then exploited creating alliances with the no unemployed Iraqi army.
Also I think it was a mistake when it became clear the Shia Sunni divide was so intense, so insanely bloody, that no unified state could really function effectively, that the US did not break off the Kurds.
Progressive, loyal allies and wildly pro American.