Walz claims he served at Bagram AFB.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Walz said “a weapon I carried in war”

Which was a lie in two ways

First Walz never went to war

And neither did the AR 15
He deployed during war jackass
 
The actual speech has been posted on this thread. They misquoted him

Stop repeating lies
it isn't about his speech, it is about how he hid the timeline in both the book and the speech. He implied it was when he was a soldier. And he wasn't . That's a cover up.
 
Walz never never claimed to have been IN COMBAT

So stop lying about that

He never said he SERVED at Bagram or that Bagram was in Iraq

You have been corrected multiple times and yet you continue to lie about those things

It’s what you do
sure he did, his own words the same gun I carried in war. He wasn't in war, war is combat. I wish you illiterates would fking educate yourselves and stop with the willful ignorance shit.
 
He deployed during war jackass
he didn't go to war. that's the difference. He did not go where soldiers were in combat.
I wish you illiterates would fking educate yourselves and stop with the willful ignorance shit.
 
The problem w Walz is it isn't just one passing comment like what the Democrats and their Media do with Trump. This is a consistent PATTERN of statements, postings and speeches over YEARS that misrepresent his rank, where he has been and what he as done. We'll see if the gaslighting machine can make it all go away.
Dude could clear this up in 30 seconds if he had the balls to do an interview.
 
he didn't go to war. that's the difference. He did not go where soldiers were in combat.
I wish you illiterates would fking educate yourselves and stop with the willful ignorance shit.
He never said he did, moron
 
it isn't about his speech, it is about how he hid the timeline in both the book and the speech. He implied it was when he was a soldier. And he wasn't . That's a cover up.
He had nothing to do with the book that misquoted him jackass

And now you know so just stop
 
**** you

In order to qualify as a combat vet he had to be deployed to Afghanistan and he never was
Ummmm what?

“Qualify as a combat vet”?

No one claimed he was a combat vet jackass
 
CHILDHOOD asthma.

No attacks after 13
Yeah, that's the definition. Congrats! Biden didn't mention any attacks or when he had them. If they were before age 13, not even a waiver is required. After age 13, but none in the last three years requires a medical consult and can be waivered. That was the standard 4 years ago when I retired.
 
Last edited:
Ummmm what?

“Qualify as a combat vet”?

No one claimed he was a combat vet jackass
Yes they did

Thats what saying he was part of Enduring Freedom means

And Walz wasnt

Btw, save the foul language for the customers you pick up off the street

I wont pay you a dime, and wouldnt play even if it was free
 
This misquoted Walz


I stood one night in the dark of night on the tarmac at Bagram Air Base in Iraq

That's not what he said in this speech. about 1h38min in. Just so you don't have to look it up further.


This is the moment when all the usual suspects with either do one of two things, they'll either flee from this thread, and join or start another one on Walz claiming to have been in Iraq again, or they'll begin to talk on a completely different topic to deflect from their gullibility and stupidity. Watch. They live for the lies. They've built this entire fantasy world out of them.
 
Last edited:
Yes they did

Thats what saying he was part of Enduring Freedom means

And Walz wasnt

Btw, save the foul language for the customers you pick up off the street

I wont pay you a dime, and wouldnt play even if it was free
Nope. Lots of guys were part of enduring freedom that weren’t combat vets
 
15th post
Yes they did

Thats what saying he was part of Enduring Freedom means

And Walz wasnt

Btw, save the foul language for the customers you pick up off the street

I wont pay you a dime, and wouldnt play even if it was free
Nope. Lots of guys were part of enduring freedom that weren’t combat vets
 
I give him credit for his service... but he is misleading and he lies about his service... big difference... he doesn't have to lie...
Can't you see that?...

At what point does it become a lie though? Walz was in fact promoted to that rank for many months, and he did retire while he was a CSM. It's just not official on paper. What I have an issue here is, the fact that Walz would have been sent to Iraq with that rank, he would have commanded his unit with that rank, and he would have come home with his rank as a CSM, and if he had retired before completely a basic academic course to make it official he can still be accused of stealing valor by those two commanders. If I'm going to be promoted to a certain rank and you're going to send me off to war with that rank I better be allowed to at least say i'm at that rank when I retire, whether or not I finished one educational course or not! It's not like 99.7% even knows the diference between a master sergeant and a CSM anyway for him to somehow get any points out of it. Saying he served 24 years is far and away more significant.
 
Dude could clear this up in 30 seconds if he had the balls to do an interview.
His answer to his pattern of lying and misrepresenting what he did and DID NOT do: "I am damn proud of my 24 years of service!". Well goody for him, nobody doubts he put in 24 years. He's just another poser liar that the Democrats seem to LOVE to promote to their highest ranks.
 
Nope. Lots of guys were part of enduring freedom that weren’t combat vets
No

You are wrong

Service members were either part of Enduring Freedom IN AFGHANISTAN or they werent

Walz wasnt
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom