Walz claims he served at Bagram AFB.

[jc456]

You quote stuff that you can ascertain clearly and easily to be incorrect, yet you refuse to do so. That makes what you're saying inaccurate at best and a bold-faced lie at worst.

I quoted what was quoted by the Military of Minnesota Veterans Museum. go ***** at them since you believe everything demofk!!!!

 

[MarathonMike]

First, he doesn’t even get the country correct. Second, he never served in Iraq or Afghanistan.

You can’t spin his lies away, folks.


He is a stolen valor POS.

Walz Claimed He Stood in War Zone at Bagram Air Base in Iraq, What?

Governor Tim Walz found himself at the center of a controversy following his speech at the 2021 "9/11 Day of Remembrance" in Minnesota. During his remarks,

www.shorenewsnetwork.com

The problem w Walz is it isn't just one passing comment like what the Democrats and their Media do with Trump. This is a consistent PATTERN of statements, postings and speeches over YEARS that misrepresent his rank, where he has been and what he as done. We'll see if the gaslighting machine can make it all go away.

 

[forkup]

perception is what perception is and that's on him. Just post the clarification from the Veterans Museum.

It's on him that you're willing to make bad faith arguments? I don't think so.

 

[Rambunctious]

Of course, and there's absolutely no instances of terrorist attacks in that time period in Europe right?

What does that have to do with this?....

 

[forkup]

What does that have to do with this?....

Well, since you give credit to Vance for being in theater, although he never fought. I was just wondering why Walz doesn't get any credit providing base security in Europe. Since we are talking about marginal risks?

You are perfectly happy to pillory Walz for saying he carried weapons in war, although he was deployed during Enduring freedom, also known as the war on terror. So despite being someone who served 24 years, he deserves no credit. Vance on the other hand does?

 

[jc456]

It's on him that you're willing to make bad faith arguments? I don't think so.

well he put it out there so if you wish to silence those who use a brain cell or two, yeah, it's up to him to correct his statements.

 

[jc456]

Well, since you give credit to Vance for being in theater, although he never fought. I was just wondering why Walz doesn't get any credit providing base security in Europe. Since we are talking about marginal risks?

So for you the risk is the same? yeah, go tell that to families who lost loved ones in the theatre.

You are perfectly happy to pillory Walz for saying he carried weapons in war, although he was deployed during Enduring freedom, also known as the war on terror. So despite being someone who served 24 years, he deserves no credit. Vance on the other hand does?

He doesn't get credit for lying about what he did, correct. He didn't do what he said. Just a simple fact that bothers the shit out of you I see. Wow, someone else's career is worth that much of your defense? When you know he said what he's accused of? Wow again.

 

[forkup]

well he put it out there so if you wish to silence those who use a brain cell or two, yeah, it's up to him to correct his statements.

He doesn't need to "correct" things he never said. That's the point. You're claiming you aren't responsible for KNOWINGLY saying stuff that isn't right. But that the person you're lying about is responsible.

What would be the point? You LIE because it's politically convenient. No matter how many "corrections" Walz puts out you will simply keep on lying.

 

[jc456]

He doesn't need to "correct" things he never said. That's the point. You're claiming you aren't responsible for KNOWINGLY saying stuff that isn't right. But that the person you're lying about is responsible.

didn't the veterans museum use quotes? Are you saying they lied in their book? You should go tell them.

What would be the point? You LIE because it's politically convenient. No matter how many "corrections" Walz puts out you will simply keep on lying.

What is it I lied about? I posted quotes, what is it you're suggesting I lied about?

 

[forkup]

So for you the risk is the same? yeah, go tell that to families who lost loved ones in the theatre.

He doesn't get credit for lying about what he did, correct. He didn't do what he said. Just a simple fact that bothers the shit out of you I see. Wow, someone else's career is worth that much of your defense? When you know he said what he's accused of? Wow again.

He provided base security without ever picking up a gun. I see. As for risks. It's all relative. Sure, people in theater have a higher risk. People in theater riding a desk less than those kicking down doors. A soldier sitting in an airbase somewhere in Turkey less than them. The point is, at what point does serving on deployment go from honorable service to no big deal?

 

[forkup]

didn't the veterans museum use quotes? Are you saying they lied in their book? You should go tell them.

What is it I lied about? I posted quotes, what is it you're suggesting I lied about?

You lie about what Walz ACTUALLY said, since those veterans museum quotes, is quoting a speech by Walz, which I provided. They DON'T match. You can't both perpetuate something that you know to be a lie and disavow responsibility for that lie by hiding behind a source that you know to be lying.

 

[jc456]

He provided base security without ever picking up a gun. I see.

He had a gun in training camp. It was his statement he was in combat with it. That is the lie. It's his statement, and you choose to forgive him. Good for you, his brothers who were there in combat disagree with you! So it's you belittling their effort since you minimize the risk.

As for risks. It's all relative. Sure, people in theater have a higher risk. People in theater riding a desk less than those kicking down doors. A soldier sitting in an airbase somewhere in Turkey less than them. The point is, at what point does serving on deployment go from honorable service to no big deal?

you minimize risk to being in Theater to base your point. That's insulting.

 

[forkup]

It was his statement he was in combat with it.

It was his statement that he served in war with it, not combat.

you minimize risk to being in Theater to base your point. That's insulting.

I don't minimize anything. I clearly stated the difference of relative risks of in theater, in combat, or simply on deployment.

And for the love of God stop trying to virtue signal. This whole thread is about you, and people like you, lying about a speech during a 9/11 remembrance because you feel it helps you politically. You don't get to criticize ME on disrespecting anyone.

 

[jc456]

It was his statement that he served in war with it, not combat.

Same difference to veterans. In war is in combat. You just enjoy being a dick.

I don't minimize anything. I clearly stated the difference of relative risks of in theater, in combat, or simply on deployment.

You made the statement no difference from being in combat or security in Europe. And then you wrote
People in theater riding a desk less than those kicking down doors. A soldier sitting in an airbase somewhere in Turkey less than them.
Minimized, and the class can say differently.

And for the love of God stop trying to virtue signal.

I presented facts about the scenarios you spoke light of.

This whole thread is about you, and people like you, lying about a speech during a 9/11 remembrance because you feel it helps you politically. You don't get to criticize ME on disrespecting anyone.

Sounds like you're ashamed of yourself making such a stupid statement

 

[Rambunctious]

Well, since you give credit to Vance for being in theater, although he never fought. I was just wondering why Walz doesn't get any credit providing base security in Europe. Since we are talking about marginal risks?

You are perfectly happy to pillory Walz for saying he carried weapons in war, although he was deployed during Enduring freedom, also known as the war on terror. So despite being someone who served 24 years, he deserves no credit. Vance on the other hand does?

I give him credit for his service... but he is misleading and he lies about his service... big difference... he doesn't have to lie...
Can't you see that?...

 

[jc456]

I give him credit for his service... but he is misleading and he lies about his service... big difference... he doesn't have to lie...
Can't you see that?...

No he can’t

 

[Rambunctious]

No he can’t

It's unreal isin't it?...

 

[Lesh]

Walz never never claimed to have been IN COMBAT

So stop lying about that

He never said he SERVED at Bagram or that Bagram was in Iraq

You have been corrected multiple times and yet you continue to lie about those things

It’s what you do

 

[Lesh]

I quoted what was quoted by the Military of Minnesota Veterans Museum. go ***** at them since you believe everything demofk!!!!

The actual speech has been posted on this thread. They misquoted him

Stop repeating lies

 

[Mac-7]

The actual speech has been posted on this thread. They misquoted him

Stop repeating lies

Walz said “a weapon I carried in war”

Which was a lie in two ways

First Walz never went to war

And neither did the AR 15