Define 'take care of'? Most small businesses labor under a huge mountain of debt, taxes and start up costs, they can't afford to take care of themselves let alone somebody else. It isn't the place of the employer to *take care of* their employees. They don't own them, for pete's sakes. They pay them what they can afford to do a job that has to be done, in order to increase their profits and move them towards being self sufficient and ultimately, lucrative.
I swear entitlement whores think that poor working people are slaves or something.
Then simple enough solution. Provide Every American a living, including health care, and then people will just work if they are into that sort of thing and want a little extra.
You see, the thing is, if you guys on the right are going to insist on "the Market" providing a living for people and their health coverage, you can turn around and poor-mouth when said market is unable to provide these things to the people doing the actual work.
You don't think we can provide for ourselves? I find this view sort of contradictory, given that the usual liberal claim is that government is just "us".
I think we could if we had laws that provided for an equitable division of wealth.
Why do we need law to distribute our wealth? You can distribute your wealth however you like without passing any laws - or, well, I guess the Democrats are looking to change that. But for now at least.
Dblack, you know all this, but I'm going to say it anyway.
Wealth is created and consumed. It is not static. If you 'divide up' the wealth equally, the rich would still be rich, and the poor would still be poor, because wealth is created and destroyed.
Have you seen a poor person with a luxury car? I have. What does it look like on the inside? It's trashed. Ruined. Damaged and destroyed.
Why? The poor person didn't take care of the car.
I grew up in a upper middle class area. Kids drove to school in their parents leftover BMW and Porche. Want to know how those cars looked after a few years? Ruined. Their kids didn't take care of the car, because it was given to them. People don't respect stuff they are given without working for it.
Cigarette burns in the seats. Trash in the foot wells. Ketchup stains from fast food. Beer stains from a bottle that tipped over.
Moving wealth around, doesn't make wealth grow. It causes the wealth to be consumed.
When you give wealth to a rich person, he uses that wealth, to create more wealth.
When you give wealth to a poor person, they consume it, and the wealth is gone.
You give tons of corn to a farmer, and he plants it to grow more corn. You give tons of corn to a fool, and he cooks it, has a feast and a party, and then is poor again.
Steve Jobs, got $5 Million dollars, which he used to invest into Pixar. Pixar grew, made dozens of box office hit movies, and Jobs sold Pixar for $5 Bilion dollars.
Sharon Tirabassi, won the $10 Million dollar lottery, and spent it all, consumed all that wealth, and now is impoverished, and rides the bus to work.
If you divided up the wealth, by law, the same thing would happen. The rich would use their wealth to be richer, and the poor would consume their wealth and remain poor.
The solution, is not to make some law somewhere, that will harm the economy, without achieving your goal of helping the poor. The solution, is to teach people to save and invest.
You realize that if a person saves just $100 a month, just $100.... and invests it into a good growth stock mutual fund, they will retire with a million dollars, or close to it.