VP Debate Tonight At 9:00 PM ET

[Lisa558]

You had no point, idiot. Front doors are not relevant to the Constitution. The electoral college is.

Idiot MAGA bumpkin.

Of course I had a point. You’re too much of a stupid leftist to figure it out.

 

[Dr. Phosphorous]

Of course I had a point. You’re too much of a stupid leftist to figure it out.

No, sorry MAGA bumpkin imbecile. You did not.

 

[jotathought]

The Constitution says nothing about presidential candidates getting fewer votes and still winning the election, Kleetus. Nothing about the electoral college says that.

The Constitution also doesn't include who can vote; it was left up to each individual state to decide, which is why we have additional amendments expanding voting rights to specific groups. The founding fathers, who were much smarter than you, did not want a direct democratic vote and drafted Article II, Section 1 establishing the Electoral College as the method for electing the President and Vice President. Cheers!

 

[jotathought]

The Constitution says nothing about presidential candidates getting fewer votes and still winning the election, Kleetus. Nothing about the electoral college says that.

That's because the men much smarter than you established the electoral college process for electing our president and vice president. They did not want a direct democracy rule, and if you knew your history, you wouldn't be making stupid remarks like this. It was intentional.

 

[Dr. Phosphorous]

The Constitution also doesn't include who can vote; it was left up to each individual state to decide, which is why we have additional amendments expanding voting rights to specific groups. The founding fathers, who were much smarter than you, did not want a direct democratic vote and drafted Article II, Section 1 establishing the Electoral College as the method for electing the President and Vice President. Cheers!

This is the bottom line -- the founding fathers never intended for the presidential candidate who got fewer votes to win the election.

You worthless Repugs want to keep this electoral college farce because it's the only chance in hell that Trump has of winning again.

 

[Dr. Phosphorous]

That's because the men much smarter than you established the electoral college process for electing our president and vice president. They did not want a direct democracy rule, and if you knew your history, you wouldn't be making stupid remarks like this. It was intentional.

Irrelevant, gomer. The founding fathers never intended for the presidential candidate who got fewer votes to win the election.

This has nothing to do with the tiresome democracy vs republic debate.

 

[Lisa558]

Dr. Phosphorous

The founding fathers never intended that TWO states should decide who wins the election, while people in rural states are overlooked entirely.

And that’s what would happen if we abolished the Electoral College.

 

[Dr. Phosphorous]

Dr. Phosphorous

The founding fathers never intended that TWO states should decide who wins the election, while people in rural states are overlooked entirely.

And that’s what would happen if we abolished the Electoral College.

Every colony/state was rural in the 1780s when the Constitution was written, you hopeless imbecile. You have no idea what you are saying.

 

[Lisa558]

Every colony/state was rural in the 1780s when the Constitution was written, you hopeless imbecile. You have no idea what you are saying.

Some more than others. And the Founding Fathers wanted a layer of protection from idiot voters such as yourself and people who had common sense - hence, the elector system.

 

[Dr. Phosphorous]

Some more than others. And the Founding Fathers wanted a layer of protection from idiot voters such as yourself and people who had common sense - hence, the elector system.

You're fucking clueless, bumpkin.

The Constitution gives two Senate seats to every state, including states with small populations. That is how the rights of small states are guaranteed, not from the electoral college.

 

[john doe 101]

No one, not even you knows who actually won the 2020 election because the left did everything in it's power to keep it out of court. Yeah recounts were done, and investigations were done, but just as evidence would come to the forefront it would be shot down, slowed down or deflected on and on and on. Gaining control of the media/social media platforms was the biggest prize the left was able to take control of over the year's, and it unfolded right before everyone's eyes.

Two huge agendas have emerged triumphant in it all, but the people are waking up to it all, and the connections are being made. Will it be too late ? The left hopes it has the momentum, but a weak foundation is always set to crumble.

I know exactly who won the election. Biden did you dumb piece of shit.

 

[jotathought]

This is the bottom line -- the founding fathers never intended for the presidential candidate who got fewer votes to win the election.

You worthless Repugs want to keep this electoral college farce because it's the only chance in hell that Trump has of winning again.

Yes, they did. In fact, they were aware of the potential for contradictions between the popular vote and the electoral vote through several avenues, including historical precedents that were studied, state constitutions, debates at the 1787 Constitutional Convention that discussed this very scenario, and establishing checks and balances within the established system of government.

You don't know what the fuck you're talking about. I can lend you my daughter's 4th-grade Civics book if you want to read about it and learn a few things.

 

[jotathought]

Irrelevant, gomer. The founding fathers never intended for the presidential candidate who got fewer votes to win the election.

This has nothing to do with the tiresome democracy vs republic debate.

Yes they did, and I already responded to this. Try reading some history before making stupid statements that have no factual backing.

 

[Faun]

No one, not even you knows who actually won the 2020 election because the left did everything in it's power to keep it out of court. Yeah recounts were done, and investigations were done, but just as evidence would come to the forefront it would be shot down, slowed down or deflected on and on and on. Gaining control of the media/social media platforms was the biggest prize the left was able to take control of over the year's, and it unfolded right before everyone's eyes.

Two huge agendas have emerged triumphant in it all, but the people are waking up to it all, and the connections are being made. Will it be too late ? The left hopes it has the momentum, but a weak foundation is always set to crumble.

You're deranged. Anyone outside the cult knows every count. Every recount. Every audit. Every investigation. Every certification. Showed Biden won.

On the flip side, every court case. Every claim of fraud. Every maneuver. Every conviction. Proved Trump lost.

Matters not if you're incapable of accepting it. It's set in stone now. Unlovable and recorded on history for all future generations.

 

[Faun]

Try to use your brains to understand the point.

Oh wait…..you have no brains, which explains why you’re voting for an empty headed Marxist as U.S. President, and her sidekick Communist-lover VP.

And you're running a Nazi.

See how that works?

 

[beagle9]

Dr. Phosphorous

The founding fathers never intended that TWO states should decide who wins the election, while people in rural states are overlooked entirely.

And that’s what would happen if we abolished the Electoral College.

He's desperate Lisa... Go easy on him...

 

[Faun]

The Constitution also doesn't include who can vote; it was left up to each individual state to decide, which is why we have additional amendments expanding voting rights to specific groups. The founding fathers, who were much smarter than you, did not want a direct democratic vote and drafted Article II, Section 1 establishing the Electoral College as the method for electing the President and Vice President. Cheers!

And each state awards electors to the WINNER of their state. Two, proportionally. It's criminal for a candidate to conspire with members of their political party, to declare that candidate as the winner of the state they lost and get the losing candidate's electors to swear on a worthless piece of paper, that they represent the winning candidate. Then attempt to get that uncertified slate on the hands of the VP on January 6th following the election in order to flip the election in favor of the losing candidate.

The Founding Father's absolutely never wanted that level of criminality to infect our elections.

 

[Lisa558]

He's desperate Lisa... Go easy on him...

What? And ruin all my fun?

 

[jotathought]

And each state awards electors to the WINNER of their state. Two, proportionally. It's criminal for a candidate to conspire with members of their political party, to declare that candidate as the winner of the state they lost and get the losing candidate's electors to swear on a worthless piece of paper, that they represent the winning candidate. Then attempt to get that uncertified slate on the hands of the VP on January 6th following the election in order to flip the election in favor of the losing candidate.

The Founding Father's absolutely never wanted that level of criminality to infect our elections.

Not all states do it this way, as there are 10 - 12 states that have agreed to allocate their electoral votes to the candidate who wins the national popular vote, regardless of the outcome in their own state.

 

[Lisa558]

Not all states do it this way, as there are 10 - 12 states that have agreed to allocate their electoral votes to the candidate who wins the national popular vote, regardless of the outcome in their own state.

I’m guessing those would be blue states.