Vote Fraud Allegations Gathers Steam

[jimnyc]

copyrighted material excerpt - Link to original article as per rule 5 of the US MessBrd

If it's your own work there is no need to place a link. If it's not, link to the original article. Either way, you are not going to be linking to your site from here. Consider this your 2nd warning.

 

[CivilLiberty]

Do you believe Andy you have a right to know every move or decision the government makes, especially concerning national security?

No, of course not - I'm just pointing out that the only "evidence" that there have been "hundreds" of plots foiled is the statements of 2 Bush appointees.


Regards

A

 

[CivilLiberty]

Is there a reason that you can't share them here or are you just using USMB a sounding board?

I did list some of them earlier in this thread.

After the uproar of the posting of my article that began this thread, I was thinking I should refrain from posting complete articles here in the future, hence my suggestion for my site.

I'll put together a summary a start a new thread when I have time.


Regards


Andy

 

[no1tovote4]

Hey Civil,

Instead of trying to link to your site if you want to actually have discourse please post your article directly. Since it was written by you you don't need a link to it and we can have an actual converstion. The Moderators are not going to let you advertise your site here.

 

[CivilLiberty]

I'll take their word for it. What do you have to dispute those numbers? Anything at all?

Only that "hundreds" seems like a very inflated number, considering the relatively few terrorist attacks that occurred each year before 9/11.


A

 

[CivilLiberty]

Yes, I always find it funny when some self proclaimed genius can't get the simplest of words correct. You have an edge on me possibly as an editor, other than that you don't have shit on anyone here. You lack something that is easier to attain than fancy degrees or writing awards - common sense.

Typo: An accidental mistyping of a word.

This is quite different from mangling the english language every time one opens their mouth.


Regards,


A

 

[jimnyc]

Only that "hundreds" seems like a very inflated number, considering the relatively few terrorist attacks that occurred each year before 9/11.


A

Relatively few? 355 in 2001 and 199 in 2002 is just a few?

Here's more showing how the attacks have went down over the past few years.

http://www.dcmilitary.com/marines/hendersonhall/8_17/national_news/22937-1.html

 

[jimnyc]

Typo: An accidental mistyping of a word.

This is quite different from mangling the english language every time one opens their mouth.


Regards,


A

When someone can't speak/type while calling another a moron...

Blame it on a typo all you like. Maybe Bush will say the same. Either way, you look awfully foolish.

 

[Mr. P]

• I came here
• The VERY FIRST response to the post was an ad hominem from Mr. P
  

Regards


Andy

ad hominem

As the Spaniard..in the princes bride said..you use that word ...you keep saying that and I don't think it means what you think it means.

Here....O wise one.

Main Entry: 1ad ho·mi·nem
Pronunciation: (')ad-'hä-m&-"nem, -n&m
Function: adjective
Etymology: New Latin, literally, to the person
1 : appealing to feelings or prejudices rather than intellect
2 : marked by an attack on an opponent's character rather than by an answer to the contentions made

So how do ya figure my first post fits either of those definitions?

 

[CivilLiberty]

If it's your own work there is no need to place a link. If it's not, link to the original article. Either way, you are not going to be linking to your site from here. Consider this your 2nd warning.

So, if I link to someone ELSE's article I'm NOT advertising THEIR site, but if I link to one of MY articles I AM advertising MY site.


Hmm. Pardon me if that does not sound capricious in the extreme.



ADVERTISING would be along the lines of:

"Come visit my forum <link>"

or

"Visit my neat new site! <link>"


Linking to an article I previously wrote, to further explain my point, is not advertising - anymore than linking to ANY article is advertising.



Regards,



Andy

 

[spillmind]

Ok, how about we ask you to show PROOF of any wrongdoing. Not just weird exit polls or theories, PROOF!

i thought not!

 

[dilloduck]

I did list some of them earlier in this thread.

After the uproar of the posting of my article that began this thread, I was thinking I should refrain from posting complete articles here in the future, hence my suggestion for my site.

I'll put together a summary a start a new thread when I have time.


Regards


Andy

Hopefully you didn't assume to receive a lot of praise for posting something on this board that has been beaten to death numerous times by numerous posters. I'm guessing that's why some people may be calling you arrogant. A rehash of old liberal conspiracy claims is a pretty bold undertaking here and to try to resurrect it again after 2000 does require a degree of self overestimation. I'm assuming your real agenda is to attack anything that you feel to be infringing on personal rights. Maybe our DEM ACLU member will come back and give you some assistance regarding the nature of her attempts at showing us the light.

 

[CivilLiberty]

Relatively few? 355 in 2001 and 199 in 2002 is just a few?

Here's more showing how the attacks have went down over the past few years.

http://www.dcmilitary.com/marines/hendersonhall/8_17/national_news/22937-1.html

Sorry, I meant against US citizens/installations as opposed to world wide terror.

And looking more closely at Muellers statement, it seems that he was referring to world wide terror, and that included in that "hundreds" includes the terror plots "foiled" by international agencies. That certainly makes it a different scope.

Your original statement, that I questioned, was:

"4- Thousands of terrorists have been killed or captured and hundreds of terrorist plots have been foiled in the past 3 years."


Since it was in a reply dealing largely with the Bush administration, and in that context seemed to imply Bush (and not world) policies, I questioned it's validity.

I'll assume you meant world wide, and certainly you can't expect me to believe the Bush administration is responsible for those numbers, because clearly it's a result of interdiction by several difference countries.


Regards,

A

 

[CivilLiberty]

I'm assuming your real agenda is to attack anything that you feel to be infringing on personal rights.

Personal rights, small government - those are core values to me.


Regards


Andy

 

[dilloduck]

Personal rights, small government - those are core values to me.


Regards


Andy

Gotcha---I'm for that too. Apparently where to draw the line is the problem.

 

[Mr. P]

Personal rights, small government - those are core values to me.


Regards


Andy

Well you have to be a bit more specific, but in general I agree with that.

 

[CivilLiberty]

When someone can't speak/type while calling another a moron...Blame it on a typo all you like. Maybe Bush will say the same. Either way, you look awfully foolish.

Yea, I hate it when that happens.

I don't know how Bush could "say the same". It's not just his incorrect word usage, or his mangling of pronunciations that are so bad (though they are bad). His rambling, stuttering sentence structure makes it hard to define his speech patterns as a "typo".

More like a "screw loose".


Regards,

A

 

[dilloduck]

Yea, I hate it when that happens.

I don't know how Bush could "say the same". It's not just his incorrect word usage, or his mangling of pronunciations that are so bad (though they are bad). His rambling, stuttering sentence structure makes it hard to define his speech patterns as a "typo".

More like a "screw loose".


Regards,

A

Why must you insult Bush to promote your agenda?

 

[manu1959]

Yea, I hate it when that happens.

I don't know how Bush could "say the same". It's not just his incorrect word usage, or his mangling of pronunciations that are so bad (though they are bad). His rambling, stuttering sentence structure makes it hard to define his speech patterns as a "typo".

More like a "screw loose".


Regards,

A

it must really frost you hermes tie wearin, wind surfin, snoboardin, geese huntin folks to no end to have lost to a bunch of morons twice on the trot

merican folks just wouldn't go for a self confessed traitor and war criminal...man we must be dumber than we thought....btw does a moron think an idiot is smart?

 

[manu1959]

Why must you insult Bush to promote your agenda?

tis my understanding that........... that is the "plan"......we can do better

(say that to your wife sometime and see where it gets ya)