Vote for your race??

This is not 1860. Robert Byrd denounced the klan. He's dead now. The republican party has been just as racist. In fact it's the party of racists now which is why every republican stormfront trooper here runs their mouths saying the same old shit talking about what the democrats did in 1860. But when we blacks start talking the 1860's, they don't count. So they don't count now.

The south was democratic in 1860. The south is republican now. The northeast was republican in 1860. The northeast is democratic now. Maybe you talk to pogo about that.
Byrd filibustered the Civil Rights Act in 1964, not 1860, and he denounced the klan to save his political career and you know it. He was your party's leader in the Senate until '87. He used the word ni**er on tv shortly before he died. You're an idiot, and you embrace the Democratic Party because they buy your vote with a welfare check. You're still their slave.

If I really wanted be a slave I'd be republican. Because that is where your party wants to take us blacks back to.
You're already there, you're just too stupid to realize it.

A republican racist trying to tell me how I am some slave to democrats is not something I am going to listen to.
I understand....... The Truth Hurts

Yeah it must be tough to face the truth that we all know the republican party is the racist party.
 
Just like clockwork. Pogo springs into action with his revisionist history lesson. Too bad he isn't man enough to admit his party is the party of racism. Here, pukeface, get a fucking education about your party's racist history.
Jim Crow Laws - Facts & Summary - HISTORY.com
KU KLUX KLAN
For the next 15 years, local government, as well as the national Democratic Party and even President Andrew Johnson, thwarted efforts to help the freed slaves move forward.
Ku Klux Klan - Facts & Summary - HISTORY.com
Hey pogo, maybe later on (after your butt feels better) we can talk about Robert KKK Byrd and your party's love for him, including Hillary's.
View attachment 202794

This is not 1860. Robert Byrd denounced the klan. He's dead now. The republican party has been just as racist. In fact it's the party of racists now which is why every republican stormfront trooper here runs their mouths saying the same old shit talking about what the democrats did in 1860. But when we blacks start talking the 1860's, they don't count. So they don't count now.

The south was democratic in 1860. The south is republican now. The northeast was republican in 1860. The northeast is democratic now. Maybe you talk to pogo about that.
Byrd filibustered the Civil Rights Act in 1964, not 1860, and he denounced the klan to save his political career and you know it. He was your party's leader in the Senate until '87. He used the word ni**er on tv shortly before he died. You're an idiot, and you embrace the Democratic Party because they buy your vote with a welfare check. You're still their slave.

If I really wanted be a slave I'd be republican. Because that is where your party wants to take us blacks back to.
You're already there, you're just too stupid to realize it.

A republican racist trying to tell me how I am some slave to democrats is not something I am going to listen to.
Of course you don't listen. That's why you're still a slave.
 
Byrd filibustered the Civil Rights Act in 1964, not 1860, and he denounced the klan to save his political career and you know it. He was your party's leader in the Senate until '87. He used the word ni**er on tv shortly before he died. You're an idiot, and you embrace the Democratic Party because they buy your vote with a welfare check. You're still their slave.

If I really wanted be a slave I'd be republican. Because that is where your party wants to take us blacks back to.
You're already there, you're just too stupid to realize it.

A republican racist trying to tell me how I am some slave to democrats is not something I am going to listen to.
I understand....... The Truth Hurts

Yeah it must be tough to face the truth that we all know the republican party is the racist party.
The Republican Party did not support slavery - Dem Party did.
The Republican Party did not pass Jim Crow laws - Dem Party did.
The Republican Party did not create the KKK - Dems did.
The Republican Party broke the Dem filibuster and passed the 1964 Civil Rights Act.
It's easier to stay on the plantation if you let them convince you that someone else is to blame for your failures.
 
If I really wanted be a slave I'd be republican. Because that is where your party wants to take us blacks back to.
You're already there, you're just too stupid to realize it.

A republican racist trying to tell me how I am some slave to democrats is not something I am going to listen to.
I understand....... The Truth Hurts

Yeah it must be tough to face the truth that we all know the republican party is the racist party.
The Republican Party did not support slavery - Dem Party did.
The Republican Party did not pass Jim Crow laws - Dem Party did.
The Republican Party did not create the KKK - Dems did.
The Republican Party broke the Dem filibuster and passed the 1964 Civil Rights Act.
It's easier to stay on the plantation if you let them convince you that someone else is to blame for your failures.

You are republican and you are racist. I am not going to listen to what you have to say about the democratic party. I know the histories and the present of both parties and your halfstory just isn't going to be heard.
 
You're already there, you're just too stupid to realize it.

A republican racist trying to tell me how I am some slave to democrats is not something I am going to listen to.
I understand....... The Truth Hurts

Yeah it must be tough to face the truth that we all know the republican party is the racist party.
The Republican Party did not support slavery - Dem Party did.
The Republican Party did not pass Jim Crow laws - Dem Party did.
The Republican Party did not create the KKK - Dems did.
The Republican Party broke the Dem filibuster and passed the 1964 Civil Rights Act.
It's easier to stay on the plantation if you let them convince you that someone else is to blame for your failures.

You are republican and you are racist. I am not going to listen to what you have to say about the democratic party. I know the histories and the present of both parties and your halfstory just isn't going to be heard.
You're the guy Malcom X is talking about in this speech, IM2.

 
A republican racist trying to tell me how I am some slave to democrats is not something I am going to listen to.
I understand....... The Truth Hurts

Yeah it must be tough to face the truth that we all know the republican party is the racist party.
The Republican Party did not support slavery - Dem Party did.
The Republican Party did not pass Jim Crow laws - Dem Party did.
The Republican Party did not create the KKK - Dems did.
The Republican Party broke the Dem filibuster and passed the 1964 Civil Rights Act.
It's easier to stay on the plantation if you let them convince you that someone else is to blame for your failures.

You are republican and you are racist. I am not going to listen to what you have to say about the democratic party. I know the histories and the present of both parties and your halfstory just isn't going to be heard.
You're the guy Malcom X is talking about in this speech, IM2.



Keep trying all you want but I am not listening. X said the same things about republicans

 
Last edited:
I understand....... The Truth Hurts

Yeah it must be tough to face the truth that we all know the republican party is the racist party.
The Republican Party did not support slavery - Dem Party did.
The Republican Party did not pass Jim Crow laws - Dem Party did.
The Republican Party did not create the KKK - Dems did.
The Republican Party broke the Dem filibuster and passed the 1964 Civil Rights Act.
It's easier to stay on the plantation if you let them convince you that someone else is to blame for your failures.

You are republican and you are racist. I am not going to listen to what you have to say about the democratic party. I know the histories and the present of both parties and your halfstory just isn't going to be heard.
You're the guy Malcom X is talking about in this speech, IM2.



Keep trying all you want but I am not listening. X said the same things about republicans


He barely mentioned Republicans. Clearly he is telling you what you don't want to hear and you're struggling to make it about Republicans. You close your eyes to the truth because you can't admit you were sold a bill of goods by the Democrats. Malcom X called out guys like you way back in the 60s. You sold your integrity and your loyalty for a welfare check and have been dependent on the government ever since. But I guess that beats working, huh?
 
If I really wanted be a slave I'd be republican. Because that is where your party wants to take us blacks back to.
You're already there, you're just too stupid to realize it.

A republican racist trying to tell me how I am some slave to democrats is not something I am going to listen to.
I understand....... The Truth Hurts

Yeah it must be tough to face the truth that we all know the republican party is the racist party.
The Republican Party did not support slavery - Dem Party did.
The Republican Party did not pass Jim Crow laws - Dem Party did.
The Republican Party did not create the KKK - Dems did.
The Republican Party broke the Dem filibuster and passed the 1964 Civil Rights Act.
It's easier to stay on the plantation if you let them convince you that someone else is to blame for your failures.


Once AGAIN --- nobody with a political party ever created either KKK. Would you like me to cut and paste where I schooled your sorry ass on this same mythology only last week, or would you prefer I cut and paste where I schooled your sorry ass on this same myth three, four, five years ago -- yet here you come with the same discredited spiel expecting different results?

The rest of your blanket statement fallacies are in tatters. No political party 'supported slavery' -- it was a contentious and divisive issue within and without every party that existed when it did. No party passed Jim Crow laws --- local politics did that. And the CRA filibuster was broken by Humphrey and Mansfield with support from Dirksen and LBJ --- again, not a "party" thing but a regional thing.

I know it makes the world easier in the intellectually-arrested mind of a six-year-old to paint everything in a nice simplistic false dichotomy of two colors but this planet simply does not work that way. Never has and never will. So you might as well grow up out of this goofy shit because nobody but nobody is buying it.
 
You're already there, you're just too stupid to realize it.

A republican racist trying to tell me how I am some slave to democrats is not something I am going to listen to.
I understand....... The Truth Hurts

Yeah it must be tough to face the truth that we all know the republican party is the racist party.
The Republican Party did not support slavery - Dem Party did.
The Republican Party did not pass Jim Crow laws - Dem Party did.
The Republican Party did not create the KKK - Dems did.
The Republican Party broke the Dem filibuster and passed the 1964 Civil Rights Act.
It's easier to stay on the plantation if you let them convince you that someone else is to blame for your failures.


Once AGAIN --- nobody with a political party ever created either KKK. Would you like me to cut and paste where I schooled your sorry ass on this same mythology only last week, or would you prefer I cut and paste where I schooled your sorry ass on this same myth three, four, five years ago -- yet here you come with the same discredited spiel expecting different results?

The rest of your blanket statement fallacies are in tatters. No political party 'supported slavery' -- it was a contentious and divisive issue within and without every party that existed when it did. No party passed Jim Crow laws --- local politics did that. And the CRA filibuster was broken by Humphrey and Mansfield with support from Dirksen and LBJ --- again, not a "party" thing but a regional thing.

I know it makes the world easier in the intellectually-arrested mind of a six-year-old to paint everything in a nice simplistic false dichotomy of two colors but this planet simply does not work that way. Never has and never will. So you might as well grow up out of this goofy shit because nobody but nobody is buying it.

Grr, I have to agree with Pogo derp on this. :(

iu
 
Byrd filibustered the Civil Rights Act in 1964, not 1860, and he denounced the klan to save his political career and you know it. He was your party's leader in the Senate until '87. He used the word ni**er on tv shortly before he died. You're an idiot, and you embrace the Democratic Party because they buy your vote with a welfare check. You're still their slave.

If I really wanted be a slave I'd be republican. Because that is where your party wants to take us blacks back to.
You're already there, you're just too stupid to realize it.

A republican racist trying to tell me how I am some slave to democrats is not something I am going to listen to.
I understand....... The Truth Hurts

Yeah it must be tough to face the truth that we all know the republican party is the racist party.



That is not and never has been true. You should be ashamed of yourself for being associated with the democrat party. Study some history.
 
You're already there, you're just too stupid to realize it.

A republican racist trying to tell me how I am some slave to democrats is not something I am going to listen to.
I understand....... The Truth Hurts

Yeah it must be tough to face the truth that we all know the republican party is the racist party.
The Republican Party did not support slavery - Dem Party did.
The Republican Party did not pass Jim Crow laws - Dem Party did.
The Republican Party did not create the KKK - Dems did.
The Republican Party broke the Dem filibuster and passed the 1964 Civil Rights Act.
It's easier to stay on the plantation if you let them convince you that someone else is to blame for your failures.


Once AGAIN --- nobody with a political party ever created either KKK. Would you like me to cut and paste where I schooled your sorry ass on this same mythology only last week, or would you prefer I cut and paste where I schooled your sorry ass on this same myth three, four, five years ago -- yet here you come with the same discredited spiel expecting different results?

The rest of your blanket statement fallacies are in tatters. No political party 'supported slavery' -- it was a contentious and divisive issue within and without every party that existed when it did. No party passed Jim Crow laws --- local politics did that. And the CRA filibuster was broken by Humphrey and Mansfield with support from Dirksen and LBJ --- again, not a "party" thing but a regional thing.

I know it makes the world easier in the intellectually-arrested mind of a six-year-old to paint everything in a nice simplistic false dichotomy of two colors but this planet simply does not work that way. Never has and never will. So you might as well grow up out of this goofy shit because nobody but nobody is buying it.
You've schooled nobody ever, and saying so does not make it a reality. You split hairs. The Democratic Party did not officially create the KKK, I didn't say they did. I said Democrats did. Their purpose was to intimidate Republicans (you know, the ones who ended slavery). Did you think they were Republicans?
Ku Klux Klan - Facts & Summary - HISTORY.com

Jim Crow laws were not passed by Republicans, were they? Local politics? Yeah, DEMOCRAT local politics with Democrat governors. There were no black Democrats, they were loyal to the party that freed them (the REPUBLICAN Party).
Jim Crow Laws - Facts & Summary - HISTORY.com

And the 1964 Civil Rights Act filibuster was broken by Everett Dirksen, a REPUBLICAN. He's the one who gathered the votes to break the filibuster led by Democrat icon Robert Byrd (former klansman and Hillary Clinton mentor) who later was elevated to Senate Majority Leader of the Democratic Party. Are you listening, IM2?
 
A republican racist trying to tell me how I am some slave to democrats is not something I am going to listen to.
I understand....... The Truth Hurts

Yeah it must be tough to face the truth that we all know the republican party is the racist party.
The Republican Party did not support slavery - Dem Party did.
The Republican Party did not pass Jim Crow laws - Dem Party did.
The Republican Party did not create the KKK - Dems did.
The Republican Party broke the Dem filibuster and passed the 1964 Civil Rights Act.
It's easier to stay on the plantation if you let them convince you that someone else is to blame for your failures.


Once AGAIN --- nobody with a political party ever created either KKK. Would you like me to cut and paste where I schooled your sorry ass on this same mythology only last week, or would you prefer I cut and paste where I schooled your sorry ass on this same myth three, four, five years ago -- yet here you come with the same discredited spiel expecting different results?

The rest of your blanket statement fallacies are in tatters. No political party 'supported slavery' -- it was a contentious and divisive issue within and without every party that existed when it did. No party passed Jim Crow laws --- local politics did that. And the CRA filibuster was broken by Humphrey and Mansfield with support from Dirksen and LBJ --- again, not a "party" thing but a regional thing.

I know it makes the world easier in the intellectually-arrested mind of a six-year-old to paint everything in a nice simplistic false dichotomy of two colors but this planet simply does not work that way. Never has and never will. So you might as well grow up out of this goofy shit because nobody but nobody is buying it.
You've schooled nobody ever, and saying so does not make it a reality. You split hairs. The Democratic Party did not officially create the KKK, I didn't say they did. I said Democrats did. Their purpose was to intimidate Republicans (you know, the ones who ended slavery). Did you think they were Republicans?
Ku Klux Klan - Facts & Summary - HISTORY.com
:laughing0301:

Once again tailfin-boi splunks around in the swamp of his own ignorance, the Magic Land of Dichotomy where every living being is either a "Democrat" or a "Republican".

Once again, Fin-Boi --- this has gotta be a dozen-and-a-half times now:
  1. James Crowe
  2. Calvin Jones
  3. John B. Kennedy
  4. John Lester
  5. Frank O. McCord
  6. Richard Reed
--- the six young soldiers who originally founded the Klan in 1865. Go find me a political affiliation for ANY of them. In a time and place where political parties didn't even exist.

Or does that make your Magic Dichotomy Fantasyland cry? Tennessee was not part of the United States in 1865; it was most recently part of the CSA ... which had no political parties. But go ahead ---- show me where any of these six twentysomething war vets ventured out to the US to join a political party.

Give up? How 'bout you try this one:


--- the con artist / salesman / defrocked minister who conjured up a reiteration of the Klan in 1915, four-plus decades after the original one dried up, in order to make money off memberships by making the Klan pictured in "Birth of a Nation" into a real thing.

You know, the Klan that spread coast-to-coast into millions of memberships, got a Democratic governor removed in Oklahoma, got Republican governors elected in Colorado, Indiana, Kansas and Maine, plus a Republican Senator in Colorado....? Oh and by the way your own state as well -- not just the city council of Anaheim but the Republican governor elected in 1922.....

You know, the Klan that endorsed Calvin Coolidge because he was the only major candidate who didn't denounce them? And then not only endorsed Hoover but ran a vicious national smear campaign against the Democrat Al Smith because he was a Catholic?

You know, the Klan that opposed and railed against Catholics, blacks, Mexicans, Jews, immigrants in general and labor unions, all of which were and are Democratic Party constituent groups?

Now why would a "Democratic Party operation" be opposing its own candidates?
Huh Fin-boi?

Got a political party affiliation for Colonel Joe? No I can't find one either.

You remember Colonel Joe? The Klan founder who pointedly described it as a benevolent, patriotic, non-political organization so he could go tax-free in his state charter? The charter that was revoked by Governor Ellis Arnall --- a Democrat?

Watcha got, Finny?

Have a seat when your butt stops hurtin'. I did warn ya.
 
I understand....... The Truth Hurts

Yeah it must be tough to face the truth that we all know the republican party is the racist party.
The Republican Party did not support slavery - Dem Party did.
The Republican Party did not pass Jim Crow laws - Dem Party did.
The Republican Party did not create the KKK - Dems did.
The Republican Party broke the Dem filibuster and passed the 1964 Civil Rights Act.
It's easier to stay on the plantation if you let them convince you that someone else is to blame for your failures.


Once AGAIN --- nobody with a political party ever created either KKK. Would you like me to cut and paste where I schooled your sorry ass on this same mythology only last week, or would you prefer I cut and paste where I schooled your sorry ass on this same myth three, four, five years ago -- yet here you come with the same discredited spiel expecting different results?

The rest of your blanket statement fallacies are in tatters. No political party 'supported slavery' -- it was a contentious and divisive issue within and without every party that existed when it did. No party passed Jim Crow laws --- local politics did that. And the CRA filibuster was broken by Humphrey and Mansfield with support from Dirksen and LBJ --- again, not a "party" thing but a regional thing.

I know it makes the world easier in the intellectually-arrested mind of a six-year-old to paint everything in a nice simplistic false dichotomy of two colors but this planet simply does not work that way. Never has and never will. So you might as well grow up out of this goofy shit because nobody but nobody is buying it.
You've schooled nobody ever, and saying so does not make it a reality. You split hairs. The Democratic Party did not officially create the KKK, I didn't say they did. I said Democrats did. Their purpose was to intimidate Republicans (you know, the ones who ended slavery). Did you think they were Republicans?
Ku Klux Klan - Facts & Summary - HISTORY.com
:laughing0301:

Once again tailfin-boi splunks around in the swamp of his own ignorance, the Magic Land of Dichotomy where every living being is either a "Democrat" or a "Republican".

Once again, Fin-Boi --- this has gotta be a dozen-and-a-half times now:
  1. James Crowe
  2. Calvin Jones
  3. John B. Kennedy
  4. John Lester
  5. Frank O. McCord
  6. Richard Reed
--- the six young soldiers who originally founded the Klan in 1865. Go find me a political affiliation for ANY of them. In a time and place where political parties didn't even exist.

Or does that make your Magic Dichotomy Fantasyland cry? Tennessee was not part of the United States in 1865; it was most recently part of the CSA ... which had no political parties. But go ahead ---- show me where any of these six twentysomething war vets ventured out to the US to join a political party.

Give up? How 'bout you try this one:


--- the con artist / salesman / defrocked minister who conjured up a reiteration of the Klan in 1915, four-plus decades after the original one dried up, in order to make money off memberships by making the Klan pictured in "Birth of a Nation" into a real thing.

You know, the Klan that spread coast-to-coast into millions of memberships, got a Democratic governor removed in Oklahoma, got Republican governors elected in Colorado, Indiana, Kansas and Maine, plus a Republican Senator in Colorado....? Oh and by the way your own state as well -- not just the city council of Anaheim but the Republican governor elected in 1922.....

You know, the Klan that endorsed Calvin Coolidge because he was the only major candidate who didn't denounce them? And then not only endorsed Hoover but ran a vicious national smear campaign against the Democrat Al Smith because he was a Catholic?

You know, the Klan that opposed and railed against Catholics, blacks, Mexicans, Jews, immigrants in general and labor unions, all of which were and are Democratic Party constituent groups?

Now why would a "Democratic Party operation" be opposing its own candidates?
Huh Fin-boi?

Got a political party affiliation for Colonel Joe? No I can't find one either.

You remember Colonel Joe? The Klan founder who pointedly described it as a benevolent, patriotic, non-political organization so he could go tax-free in his state charter? The charter that was revoked by Governor Ellis Arnall --- a Democrat?

Watcha got, Finny?

Have a seat when your butt stops hurtin'. I did warn ya.
I like how you post a bunch of nothing and claim victory. You've proven nothing, not one damn thing. But you might want to try this one, gas bag.

Nathan Bedford Forrest - Wikipedia

Or this one.

1868 Democratic National Convention - Wikipedia The first paragraph says it all, shitwad. Go ahead, deny the KKK did not represent the interests of the Democratic Party.
 
Yeah it must be tough to face the truth that we all know the republican party is the racist party.
The Republican Party did not support slavery - Dem Party did.
The Republican Party did not pass Jim Crow laws - Dem Party did.
The Republican Party did not create the KKK - Dems did.
The Republican Party broke the Dem filibuster and passed the 1964 Civil Rights Act.
It's easier to stay on the plantation if you let them convince you that someone else is to blame for your failures.


Once AGAIN --- nobody with a political party ever created either KKK. Would you like me to cut and paste where I schooled your sorry ass on this same mythology only last week, or would you prefer I cut and paste where I schooled your sorry ass on this same myth three, four, five years ago -- yet here you come with the same discredited spiel expecting different results?

The rest of your blanket statement fallacies are in tatters. No political party 'supported slavery' -- it was a contentious and divisive issue within and without every party that existed when it did. No party passed Jim Crow laws --- local politics did that. And the CRA filibuster was broken by Humphrey and Mansfield with support from Dirksen and LBJ --- again, not a "party" thing but a regional thing.

I know it makes the world easier in the intellectually-arrested mind of a six-year-old to paint everything in a nice simplistic false dichotomy of two colors but this planet simply does not work that way. Never has and never will. So you might as well grow up out of this goofy shit because nobody but nobody is buying it.
You've schooled nobody ever, and saying so does not make it a reality. You split hairs. The Democratic Party did not officially create the KKK, I didn't say they did. I said Democrats did. Their purpose was to intimidate Republicans (you know, the ones who ended slavery). Did you think they were Republicans?
Ku Klux Klan - Facts & Summary - HISTORY.com
:laughing0301:

Once again tailfin-boi splunks around in the swamp of his own ignorance, the Magic Land of Dichotomy where every living being is either a "Democrat" or a "Republican".

Once again, Fin-Boi --- this has gotta be a dozen-and-a-half times now:
  1. James Crowe
  2. Calvin Jones
  3. John B. Kennedy
  4. John Lester
  5. Frank O. McCord
  6. Richard Reed
--- the six young soldiers who originally founded the Klan in 1865. Go find me a political affiliation for ANY of them. In a time and place where political parties didn't even exist.

Or does that make your Magic Dichotomy Fantasyland cry? Tennessee was not part of the United States in 1865; it was most recently part of the CSA ... which had no political parties. But go ahead ---- show me where any of these six twentysomething war vets ventured out to the US to join a political party.

Give up? How 'bout you try this one:


--- the con artist / salesman / defrocked minister who conjured up a reiteration of the Klan in 1915, four-plus decades after the original one dried up, in order to make money off memberships by making the Klan pictured in "Birth of a Nation" into a real thing.

You know, the Klan that spread coast-to-coast into millions of memberships, got a Democratic governor removed in Oklahoma, got Republican governors elected in Colorado, Indiana, Kansas and Maine, plus a Republican Senator in Colorado....? Oh and by the way your own state as well -- not just the city council of Anaheim but the Republican governor elected in 1922.....

You know, the Klan that endorsed Calvin Coolidge because he was the only major candidate who didn't denounce them? And then not only endorsed Hoover but ran a vicious national smear campaign against the Democrat Al Smith because he was a Catholic?

You know, the Klan that opposed and railed against Catholics, blacks, Mexicans, Jews, immigrants in general and labor unions, all of which were and are Democratic Party constituent groups?

Now why would a "Democratic Party operation" be opposing its own candidates?
Huh Fin-boi?

Got a political party affiliation for Colonel Joe? No I can't find one either.

You remember Colonel Joe? The Klan founder who pointedly described it as a benevolent, patriotic, non-political organization so he could go tax-free in his state charter? The charter that was revoked by Governor Ellis Arnall --- a Democrat?

Watcha got, Finny?

Have a seat when your butt stops hurtin'. I did warn ya.
I like how you post a bunch of nothing and claim victory. You've proven nothing, not one damn thing. But you might want to try this one, gas bag.

Nathan Bedford Forrest - Wikipedia

Or this one.

1868 Democratic National Convention - Wikipedia The first paragraph says it all, shitwad. Go ahead, deny the KKK did not represent the interests of the Democratic Party.

Neither Forrest, nor a political convention of 1868 or any other year, had jack cheese to do with founding the Klan. I need no primer on Forrest. He was elected in absentia to be its CEO in an attempt to clean up its image, already tarnished by violence. Citing exactly that dynamic his first (and only) order in that position was to disband the organization and order its effects and paraphernalia destroyed. Your second link mentions nothing about the Klan at all.

Meanwhile you were, again, in keeping with the tradition of the last six years, completely unable to find any trace of political affiliation for any of the actual Klan founders, Crowe, Jones, Kennedy, Lester, McCord, Reed or Simmons. Which we all knew you would fail to do since you've had six years to do it and have come up with absolute bupkis.
 
  • Thanks
Reactions: IM2
A republican racist trying to tell me how I am some slave to democrats is not something I am going to listen to.
I understand....... The Truth Hurts

Yeah it must be tough to face the truth that we all know the republican party is the racist party.
The Republican Party did not support slavery - Dem Party did.
The Republican Party did not pass Jim Crow laws - Dem Party did.
The Republican Party did not create the KKK - Dems did.
The Republican Party broke the Dem filibuster and passed the 1964 Civil Rights Act.
It's easier to stay on the plantation if you let them convince you that someone else is to blame for your failures.


Once AGAIN --- nobody with a political party ever created either KKK. Would you like me to cut and paste where I schooled your sorry ass on this same mythology only last week, or would you prefer I cut and paste where I schooled your sorry ass on this same myth three, four, five years ago -- yet here you come with the same discredited spiel expecting different results?

The rest of your blanket statement fallacies are in tatters. No political party 'supported slavery' -- it was a contentious and divisive issue within and without every party that existed when it did. No party passed Jim Crow laws --- local politics did that. And the CRA filibuster was broken by Humphrey and Mansfield with support from Dirksen and LBJ --- again, not a "party" thing but a regional thing.

I know it makes the world easier in the intellectually-arrested mind of a six-year-old to paint everything in a nice simplistic false dichotomy of two colors but this planet simply does not work that way. Never has and never will. So you might as well grow up out of this goofy shit because nobody but nobody is buying it.
You've schooled nobody ever, and saying so does not make it a reality. You split hairs. The Democratic Party did not officially create the KKK, I didn't say they did. I said Democrats did. Their purpose was to intimidate Republicans (you know, the ones who ended slavery). Did you think they were Republicans?
Ku Klux Klan - Facts & Summary - HISTORY.com

Jim Crow laws were not passed by Republicans, were they? Local politics? Yeah, DEMOCRAT local politics with Democrat governors. There were no black Democrats, they were loyal to the party that freed them (the REPUBLICAN Party).
Jim Crow Laws - Facts & Summary - HISTORY.com

And the 1964 Civil Rights Act filibuster was broken by Everett Dirksen, a REPUBLICAN. He's the one who gathered the votes to break the filibuster led by Democrat icon Robert Byrd (former klansman and Hillary Clinton mentor) who later was elevated to Senate Majority Leader of the Democratic Party. Are you listening, IM2?

Barack Obama was president for 2 terms. Nominated by the democratic party. He served as president from 2008 until 2016. Republicans obstructed his every move. Republicans in congress did not even show up for work while trying to sabotage his presidency. Fuck what happened in 1964.

A Wolf found great difficulty in getting at the sheep owing to the vigilance of the shepherd and his dogs.

But one day it found the skin of a sheep that had been flayed and thrown aside, so it put it on over its own pelt and strolled down among the sheep.

The Lamb that belonged to the sheep, whose skin the Wolf was wearing, began to follow the Wolf in the Sheep's clothing; so, leading the Lamb a little apart, he soon made a meal off her, and for some time he succeeded in deceiving the sheep, and enjoying hearty meals.

You republicans fool no one. OK? Do you understand dumb fuck? Repeating the same dumb ass bullshit republican lies are not going to work here. Get it? Blacks are not going to join the republican party as it currently stands to end up without equal rights and back in segregation.
 
Yeah it must be tough to face the truth that we all know the republican party is the racist party.
The Republican Party did not support slavery - Dem Party did.
The Republican Party did not pass Jim Crow laws - Dem Party did.
The Republican Party did not create the KKK - Dems did.
The Republican Party broke the Dem filibuster and passed the 1964 Civil Rights Act.
It's easier to stay on the plantation if you let them convince you that someone else is to blame for your failures.

You are republican and you are racist. I am not going to listen to what you have to say about the democratic party. I know the histories and the present of both parties and your halfstory just isn't going to be heard.
You're the guy Malcom X is talking about in this speech, IM2.



Keep trying all you want but I am not listening. X said the same things about republicans


He barely mentioned Republicans. Clearly he is telling you what you don't want to hear and you're struggling to make it about Republicans. You close your eyes to the truth because you can't admit you were sold a bill of goods by the Democrats. Malcom X called out guys like you way back in the 60s. You sold your integrity and your loyalty for a welfare check and have been dependent on the government ever since. But I guess that beats working, huh?


Wrong answer there son.
 
I understand....... The Truth Hurts

Yeah it must be tough to face the truth that we all know the republican party is the racist party.
The Republican Party did not support slavery - Dem Party did.
The Republican Party did not pass Jim Crow laws - Dem Party did.
The Republican Party did not create the KKK - Dems did.
The Republican Party broke the Dem filibuster and passed the 1964 Civil Rights Act.
It's easier to stay on the plantation if you let them convince you that someone else is to blame for your failures.

You are republican and you are racist. I am not going to listen to what you have to say about the democratic party. I know the histories and the present of both parties and your halfstory just isn't going to be heard.
You're the guy Malcom X is talking about in this speech, IM2.



Keep trying all you want but I am not listening. X said the same things about republicans


This is what you get when you expect stupid whites like SJ to understand that the Dems back then would be the Repubs of now.
 
I'm getting tired of welfare drawing white trash talking shit. I know what X stood for, he didn't like either party. He's the one who said blacks must control the politics of our communities. Maybe it's time you whites shut the fuck up trying to tell us what black leaders stood for. Your punk asses can't even explain what white leaders are saying and after 242 years, your asses can't even explain what the so-called white "founders" stood for.
 
Quoting MLK
Saturday October 15th 2011 by abagond



Quoting Martin Luther King, Jr is a common racist defence of White Americans.

How can quoting one of the greatest civil rights leaders be racist? TransGriot put it this way:

Far too many times people are fixated on or like to quote the pre-August 28, 1963 words of the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. People also have this irritating tendency to hurl pre-1963 MLK quotes at POC’s when they get nervous about POC’s venting about their battles with whiteness and white supremacy.

Whites quote MLK to silence.

The quote they most often use:

I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character.

King is seen as pushing a see-no-evil, kumbayah colour-blindness as the way to bring people together and end racism. So when people of colour are see-evil, race conscious and not properly kumbayah, whites use this quote to shut them up as being “divisive”, as going against the true spirit of Dr King (as sanitized by white people).

Yet King saw the evils of American society quite clearly – not just against blacks but in general. And he was hardly the sort to keep quiet about it to make peace with whites, which is what MLK-quoters seem to expect from people of colour. King:

Racial segregation must be seen for what it is – and that is an evil system, a new form of slavery covered up with certain niceties of complexity.



When machines and computers, profit motives and property rights are considered more important than people, the giant triplets of racism, materialism, and militarism are incapable of being conquered.



John Kenneth Galbraith said that a guaranteed annual income could be done for about twenty billion dollars a year. And I say to you today, that if our nation can spend thirty-five billion dollars a year to fight an unjust, evil war in Vietnam, and twenty billion dollars to put a man on the moon, it can spend billions of dollars to put God’s children on their own two feet right here on earth.



A nation that continues year after year to spend more money on military defense than on programs of social uplift is approaching spiritual death.



Don’t let anybody make you think God chose America as his divine messianic force to be a sort of policeman of the whole world.



It’s an evil war. No matter where it leads, no matter what abuses it may bring, I’m going to tell the truth.



We have destroyed their two most cherished institutions: the family and the village. We have destroyed their land and their crops. … We have corrupted their women and children and killed their men.

And far from pushing colour-blindness, King saw black pride as necessary:

We must stand up and say, “I’m black and I’m beautiful,” and this self-affirmation is the black man’s need, made compelling by the white man’s crimes against him.

Quoting MLK
 
Quoting MLK
Saturday October 15th 2011 by abagond



Quoting Martin Luther King, Jr is a common racist defence of White Americans.

How can quoting one of the greatest civil rights leaders be racist? TransGriot put it this way:

Far too many times people are fixated on or like to quote the pre-August 28, 1963 words of the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. People also have this irritating tendency to hurl pre-1963 MLK quotes at POC’s when they get nervous about POC’s venting about their battles with whiteness and white supremacy.

Whites quote MLK to silence.

The quote they most often use:

I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character.

King is seen as pushing a see-no-evil, kumbayah colour-blindness as the way to bring people together and end racism. So when people of colour are see-evil, race conscious and not properly kumbayah, whites use this quote to shut them up as being “divisive”, as going against the true spirit of Dr King (as sanitized by white people).

Yet King saw the evils of American society quite clearly – not just against blacks but in general. And he was hardly the sort to keep quiet about it to make peace with whites, which is what MLK-quoters seem to expect from people of colour. King:

Racial segregation must be seen for what it is – and that is an evil system, a new form of slavery covered up with certain niceties of complexity.



When machines and computers, profit motives and property rights are considered more important than people, the giant triplets of racism, materialism, and militarism are incapable of being conquered.



John Kenneth Galbraith said that a guaranteed annual income could be done for about twenty billion dollars a year. And I say to you today, that if our nation can spend thirty-five billion dollars a year to fight an unjust, evil war in Vietnam, and twenty billion dollars to put a man on the moon, it can spend billions of dollars to put God’s children on their own two feet right here on earth.



A nation that continues year after year to spend more money on military defense than on programs of social uplift is approaching spiritual death.



Don’t let anybody make you think God chose America as his divine messianic force to be a sort of policeman of the whole world.



It’s an evil war. No matter where it leads, no matter what abuses it may bring, I’m going to tell the truth.



We have destroyed their two most cherished institutions: the family and the village. We have destroyed their land and their crops. … We have corrupted their women and children and killed their men.

And far from pushing colour-blindness, King saw black pride as necessary:

We must stand up and say, “I’m black and I’m beautiful,” and this self-affirmation is the black man’s need, made compelling by the white man’s crimes against him.

Quoting MLK
God damn that was an awesome post!
 
  • Thanks
Reactions: IM2

Forum List

Back
Top