Vote For ME. I'll Make You Rich!

[Highlight]

Or at the very least, lift you out of poverty. But first, let me start out with this. When Ross Perot was running against Bill Clinton, he knew what Clinton had in mind with his NAFTA bullshit. Which of course many republicans were also on board with. Ross Perot said that if that happened, you would hear "A huge sucking sound" as jobs left the U.S. And that's EXACTLY what happened! And how the business interests profited!

I don't know what it was back then, but today the average Chinese worker makes around $3.60 per hour. The average American worker makes around $28.16 per hour. Now, did the goods sold in the U.S. from places like China all of a sudden become incredibly cheap? Not from what I remember. So where did all that money go? Into the pockets of big business. And now Trump is trying to tell us that the wealthy need MORE money! And doing things like cutting over a trillion dollars from things like Medicare, Medicaid and Food Stamps alone.

I have a better idea. (Use the scare word "socialist" if you are depraved enough to) To start out, I was reading that it would cost around 168 billion a year to lift the poor in this country out of poverty. If we had just a 2% tax on the wealthy, the revenue that would generate each year is around 3.12 TRILLION! That is about 18.5 times more than what it would cost to lift every poor American out of poverty each year. With enough left over to make a serious dent in the National Debt besides.

Now I know there are many Trumptard cultists out there who prefer the "**** the poor" approach. But even they should be in favor of a strong economy. Do you know what happens when the poor have money? They spend it. Do you know what happens when people spend money? The economy improves! Who can be against that.


CNBC
cnbc.com › 2020 › 09 › 18 › michael-farr-the-problem-with-the-us-economy-is-there-are-too-many-poor-people.html
Michael Farr: The problem with the U.S. economy is there are too many poor people

University of Chicago News
news.uchicago.edu › story › why-sending-money-neediest-can-boost-us-economy


Why sending money to the neediest can boost the U.S. economy | University of Chicago News

 

[Concerned American]

I was reading that it would cost around 168 billion a year to lift the poor in this country out of poverty.

I was reading that it would cost zero $$$ if you and the rest of the parasites like you got off of your butts and WORKED to earn a living. Novel concept---people actually earn their way out of poverty instead of expecting others to support them.

 

[Dr.Destructo]

Or at the very least, lift you out of poverty. But first, let me start out with this. When Ross Perot was running against Bill Clinton, he knew what Clinton had in mind with his NAFTA bullshit. Which of course many republicans were also on board with. Ross Perot said that if that happened, you would hear "A huge sucking sound" as jobs left the U.S. And that's EXACTLY what happened! And how the business interests profited!

I don't know what it was back then, but today the average Chinese worker makes around $3.60 per hour. The average American worker makes around $28.16 per hour. Now, did the goods sold in the U.S. from places like China all of a sudden become incredibly cheap? Not from what I remember. So where did all that money go? Into the pockets of big business. And now Trump is trying to tell us that the wealthy need MORE money! And doing things like cutting over a trillion dollars from things like Medicare, Medicaid and Food Stamps alone.

I have a better idea. (Use the scare word "socialist" if you are depraved enough to) To start out, I was reading that it would cost around 168 billion a year to lift the poor in this country out of poverty. If we had just a 2% tax on the wealthy, the revenue that would generate each year is around 3.12 TRILLION! That is about 18.5 times more than what it would cost to lift every poor American out of poverty each year. With enough left over to make a serious dent in the National Debt besides.

Now I know there are many Trumptard cultists out there who prefer the "**** the poor" approach. But even they should be in favor of a strong economy. Do you know what happens when the poor have money? They spend it. Do you know what happens when people spend money? The economy improves! Who can be against that.


CNBC
cnbc.com › 2020 › 09 › 18 › michael-farr-the-problem-with-the-us-economy-is-there-are-too-many-poor-people.html
Michael Farr: The problem with the U.S. economy is there are too many poor people

University of Chicago News
news.uchicago.edu › story › why-sending-money-neediest-can-boost-us-economy


Why sending money to the neediest can boost the U.S. economy | University of Chicago News

$28.00 an hour is AVERAGE????

FOR WHO?????!!!!!

I don't know anybody, other than executives and managers, that make over $16.00 an hour...........ANYWHERE!!!!

Companies are so ******* corrupt now, it's a national cancer eating this country alive!!!!

 

[Concerned American]

$28.00 an hour is AVERAGE????

FOR WHO?????!!!!!

I don't know anybody, other than executives and managers, that make over $16.00 an hour...........ANYWHERE!!!!

Companies are so ******* corrupt now, it's a national cancer eating this country alive!!!!

Burger flippers in CA and WA make $20/hr.

 

[konradv]

I was reading that it would cost zero $$$ if you and the rest of the parasites like you got off of your butts and WORKED to earn a living. Novel concept---people actually earn their way out of poverty instead of expecting others to support them.

Tell Elon to go back to work. I’m tired of supporting him.

 

[Highlight]

I was reading that it would cost zero $$$ if you and the rest of the parasites like you got off of your butts and WORKED to earn a living. Novel concept---people actually earn their way out of poverty instead of expecting others to support them.

You need to go to my thread, "Trump: Words of wisdom." Watch the video. Because besides Trump, the person speaking was speaking about YOU. Also, it is the wealthy who are the real parasites. They don't work for a living. They sponge off those who actually do the work. For a billionaire to earn a billion dollars, he would have to work something around 16,000 times harder than the average worker. The average billionaire couldn't work harder than a single average worker. Let alone 16,000 of them.

 

[Concerned American]

You need to go to my thread, "Trump: Words of wisdom." Watch the video. Because besides Trump, the person speaking was speaking about YOU. Also, it is the wealthy who are the real parasites. They don't work for a living. They sponge off those who actually do the work. For a billionaire to earn a billion dollars, he would have to work something around 16,000 times harder than the average worker. The average billionaire couldn't work harder than a single average worker. Let alone 16,000 of them.

View attachment 1141715

Maybe you ought to ask your democrat heeeeroes, Gates, Bezos, Zuckerberg and Buffett. You are a confirmed parasite who is jealous of those who have because you either have no ambition or no intelligence to EARN your own way. You don't have the option to determine what is earning. Some people have garnered knowledge and they have leveraged it to the point that people are willing to pay for that knowledge--Do you consider that earning? As for your biased videos by other people who believe in parasitic communism/socialism, don't waste my time with your BS.

 

[Highlight]

$28.00 an hour is AVERAGE????

FOR WHO?????!!!!!

I don't know anybody, other than executives and managers, that make over $16.00 an hour...........ANYWHERE!!!!

Companies are so ******* corrupt now, it's a national cancer eating this country alive!!!!

I totally agree! Also, you have to remember that is an average. In 1999, Bill Gates made around $475,000 per hour. Today, though from what I have heard he no longer runs microsoft, he earns around $319,635 per hour.

 

[Concerned American]

I totally agree! Also, you have to remember that is an average. In 1999, Bill Gates made around $475,000 per hour. Today, though from what I have heard he no longer runs microsoft, he earns around $319,635 per hour.

View attachment 1141734

View attachment 1141736

Your memes don't cut the mustard, parasite. Try getting true, verified links. Not moronic memes or opinionated Tik Tok posts. SMH, you're not very good at this noob.

 

[Mashmont]

Or at the very least, lift you out of poverty. But first, let me start out with this. When Ross Perot was running against Bill Clinton, he knew what Clinton had in mind with his NAFTA bullshit. Which of course many republicans were also on board with. Ross Perot said that if that happened, you would hear "A huge sucking sound" as jobs left the U.S. And that's EXACTLY what happened! And how the business interests profited!

I don't know what it was back then, but today the average Chinese worker makes around $3.60 per hour. The average American worker makes around $28.16 per hour. Now, did the goods sold in the U.S. from places like China all of a sudden become incredibly cheap? Not from what I remember. So where did all that money go? Into the pockets of big business. And now Trump is trying to tell us that the wealthy need MORE money! And doing things like cutting over a trillion dollars from things like Medicare, Medicaid and Food Stamps alone.

I have a better idea. (Use the scare word "socialist" if you are depraved enough to) To start out, I was reading that it would cost around 168 billion a year to lift the poor in this country out of poverty. If we had just a 2% tax on the wealthy, the revenue that would generate each year is around 3.12 TRILLION! That is about 18.5 times more than what it would cost to lift every poor American out of poverty each year. With enough left over to make a serious dent in the National Debt besides.

Now I know there are many Trumptard cultists out there who prefer the "**** the poor" approach. But even they should be in favor of a strong economy. Do you know what happens when the poor have money? They spend it. Do you know what happens when people spend money? The economy improves! Who can be against that.


CNBC
cnbc.com › 2020 › 09 › 18 › michael-farr-the-problem-with-the-us-economy-is-there-are-too-many-poor-people.html
Michael Farr: The problem with the U.S. economy is there are too many poor people

University of Chicago News
news.uchicago.edu › story › why-sending-money-neediest-can-boost-us-economy


Why sending money to the neediest can boost the U.S. economy | University of Chicago News

Socialism has never worked in the history of the world. Consfiscating the earnings of the successful has never helped the poor. Giving the achievers freedom helps all income groups. Charities do much better when the achievers are doing well.

 

[Mashmont]

I totally agree! Also, you have to remember that is an average. In 1999, Bill Gates made around $475,000 per hour. Today, though from what I have heard he no longer runs microsoft, he earns around $319,635 per hour.

View attachment 1141734

View attachment 1141736

Question. I always ask this question of leftwingers, but they are never able to answer: How does it harm poor people if the .01% population is super rich, rather than just rich?

In fact, I would contend that the super rich help the poor far more than if they weren't super rich.
Here's an example. Consider any small town of 10,000 people in the rust belt which is poor because industry has left Let's suppose Jeff Bezos and his $242 billion moved there. The guy's spending and needs would create dozens of businesses and thousands of jobs, just maintaining his presence alone.

 

[Highlight]

Your memes don't cut the mustard, parasite. Try getting true, verified links. Not moronic memes or opinionated Tik Tok posts. SMH, you're not very good at this noob.

I could back up what those memes say with however many websites you like. But you just aren't worth the bother. Just like your hero Trump, the person speaking in this video was also speaking about YOU.

 

[Highlight]

Socialism has never worked in the history of the world. Consfiscating the earnings of the successful has never helped the poor. Giving the achievers freedom helps all income groups. Charities do much better when the achievers are doing well.

Socialism is working well all over Europe. At least they are far more socialist than this country is. You know what has been proven to "work" most often through human history? Slavery! And it is still going strong. We can and should do better. Also, you are going to call a 2% tax on the wealthy "confiscating the earnings of the successful?" How about doing me a favor and never reply to one of my threads again.

 

[Concerned American]

I could back up what those memes say with however many websites you like. But you just aren't worth the bother. Just like your hero Trump, the person speaking in this video was also speaking about YOU.

View attachment 1141750

Naw, you're just like most other parasitic progs on this board. You spout a lot of BS. self-righteous indignation, expecting unearned entitlements but you haven't a clue as to anything to substantiate your ignorant opinion.

 

[Highlight]

Question. I always ask this question of leftwingers, but they are never able to answer: How does it harm poor people if the .01% population is super rich, rather than just rich?

In fact, I would contend that the super rich help the poor far more than if they weren't super rich.
Here's an example. Consider any small town of 10,000 people in the rust belt which is poor because industry has left Let's suppose Jeff Bezos and his $242 billion moved there. The guy's spending and needs would create dozens of businesses and thousands of jobs, just maintaining his presence alone.

Try asking a question without so many possible replies, douchbag. Try rereading my thread. Try realizing that poverty is BAD!

 

[Concerned American]

Socialism is working well all over Europe.

If you promise never to return, a number of we, board members, might spring for your plane ticket to one of those countries of your choice.

Also, you are going to call a 2% tax on the wealthy "confiscating the earnings of the successful?"

Two percent of $1B is $20M, moron. That is more than 40 of you and your parasitic friends will likely earn in a lifetime. Why should the successful be penalized because of your ineptitude?

How about doing me a favor and never reply to one of my threads again.

How about doing everybody on this board a favor and quit posting this claptrap.

 

[Mashmont]

Try asking a question without so many possible replies, douchbag. Try rereading my thread. Try realizing that poverty is BAD!

Marxists aren't serious people. They can't be, because Marxism isn't a serious alternative.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

I totally agree! Also, you have to remember that is an average. In 1999, Bill Gates made around $475,000 per hour. Today, though from what I have heard he no longer runs microsoft, he earns around $319,635 per hour.

View attachment 1141734

View attachment 1141736

You have the mind of a poor person. You will never have anything.

 

[Hollie]

You have the mind of a poor person. You will never have anything.

Yep. He has a huge sense of entitlement. An entitlement to the successes of others. He insists that others can’t be successful because he is unsuccessful.

 

[westwall]

Or at the very least, lift you out of poverty. But first, let me start out with this. When Ross Perot was running against Bill Clinton, he knew what Clinton had in mind with his NAFTA bullshit. Which of course many republicans were also on board with. Ross Perot said that if that happened, you would hear "A huge sucking sound" as jobs left the U.S. And that's EXACTLY what happened! And how the business interests profited!

I don't know what it was back then, but today the average Chinese worker makes around $3.60 per hour. The average American worker makes around $28.16 per hour. Now, did the goods sold in the U.S. from places like China all of a sudden become incredibly cheap? Not from what I remember. So where did all that money go? Into the pockets of big business. And now Trump is trying to tell us that the wealthy need MORE money! And doing things like cutting over a trillion dollars from things like Medicare, Medicaid and Food Stamps alone.

I have a better idea. (Use the scare word "socialist" if you are depraved enough to) To start out, I was reading that it would cost around 168 billion a year to lift the poor in this country out of poverty. If we had just a 2% tax on the wealthy, the revenue that would generate each year is around 3.12 TRILLION! That is about 18.5 times more than what it would cost to lift every poor American out of poverty each year. With enough left over to make a serious dent in the National Debt besides.

Now I know there are many Trumptard cultists out there who prefer the "**** the poor" approach. But even they should be in favor of a strong economy. Do you know what happens when the poor have money? They spend it. Do you know what happens when people spend money? The economy improves! Who can be against that.


CNBC
cnbc.com › 2020 › 09 › 18 › michael-farr-the-problem-with-the-us-economy-is-there-are-too-many-poor-people.html
Michael Farr: The problem with the U.S. economy is there are too many poor people

University of Chicago News
news.uchicago.edu › story › why-sending-money-neediest-can-boost-us-economy


Why sending money to the neediest can boost the U.S. economy | University of Chicago News

We have already spent 5 trillion in the "war on poverty".

It was a failure. Just like your ridiculous numbers.

You people have no clue how to do anything.