Virginia HS announces Honors placements will now be race-based

[Conservative65]

Black man keeping you down shoog?

Since blacks benefit from a government endorsed program that uses race to give them an advantage, the keeping down thing doesn't exist. If you use such a program, you've already indicated you can't do it on your own.

Like the GI Bill?

The GI Bill is only for Veterans how is that racism you dumb ****?

He has to make up something to keep his delusions alive.

Me think the lady doth protest too much. We have the internet now you know.

Socialism is only for the right people, not all citizens.

Then you shouldn't have a problem finding proof of a claim YOU made. Typical lefty. Make a claim he refuses to back up.

 

[Conservative65]

You mean something someone earned by being a GI? I didn't know anyone had to do anything but be born black to be black.

As per usual in america, black GIs were cockblocked darling, please educate yourself.

Every black person i served with received the benefits of the GI Bill. As usual, you dont know what youre talking about.

I love anecdotes, don't you? Read up on objective reality pard. It will assist your arguments against it in fooling the unaware.

You say the objective reality is there yet provide none of it.

We've yet to see what you demand of others son. Your slogans are feckless.

I'm didn't make the claim. You did.

 

[Fenton Lum]

Actually

As per usual in america, black GIs were cockblocked darling, please educate yourself.

Every black person i served with received the benefits of the GI Bill. As usual, you dont know what youre talking about.

I love anecdotes, don't you? Read up on objective reality pard. It will assist your arguments against it in fooling the unaware.

You say the objective reality is there yet provide none of it.

We've yet to see what you demand of others son. Your slogans are feckless.

I'm didn't make the claim. You did.

Actually you did make a claim, you can't even be honset about that.

 

[Conservative65]

Actually

Every black person i served with received the benefits of the GI Bill. As usual, you dont know what youre talking about.

I love anecdotes, don't you? Read up on objective reality pard. It will assist your arguments against it in fooling the unaware.

You say the objective reality is there yet provide none of it.

We've yet to see what you demand of others son. Your slogans are feckless.

I'm didn't make the claim. You did.

Actually you did make a claim, you can't even be honset about that.

I made the claim you didn't provide proof of your claim. Since you haven't, I've proven my claim.

 

[Fenton Lum]

Since blacks benefit from a government endorsed program that uses race to give them an advantage, the keeping down thing doesn't exist. If you use such a program, you've already indicated you can't do it on your own.

Like the GI Bill?

The GI Bill is only for Veterans how is that racism you dumb ****?

He has to make up something to keep his delusions alive.

Me think the lady doth protest too much. We have the internet now you know.

Socialism is only for the right people, not all citizens.

Then you shouldn't have a problem finding proof of a claim YOU made. Typical lefty. Make a claim he refuses to back up.

And now you're reduced to slinging labels as per usual. Since you wish to hide from the truth, here's one to get you started. Now you can deny this as well on your road to obfuscation. If you had any curiosity rather than a mission of denial, you would do your own research and discover a not so rosey picture.

To say the there was no racial disparity in the ramifications and roll out of the GI Bill is simply patently false, but you cannot abide any query of the power structure. Such is the nature of american society. Horses to water, same phenomenon.

And you will now simply spin this into your being right about everything as well, as per usual. So this isn't really for you anyway, but the information is public for any who wish to understand this society better. Deny on my freind. I would suggest you stay tuned to your usual outlets of "information" rather than use this as a launching pad to research more for yourself; your meme will be threatened.

Sarah Turner and John Bound’s in depth analysis found the effects of the GI Bill to be racially unequal following World War II. The educational level completed by the veterans differed for black and white veterans, even though the bill technically provided the exact same aid to both races (Turner and Bound 2002). Turner and Bound argue that this disparity was completely based upon the location in which the veterans resided. In Turner and Bound’s research, they discovered that the accessibility of upper level education was much more constricted in the South than in the North. The colleges for black people were much less numerous than those for whites and the enrollment sizes were smaller in the South than in the North (Turner and Bound 2002, 7). Furthermore, admissions officers were much more likely to allow a black person into a traditionally white college in the Northern states than anywhere else. Harley L. Browning, Sally C. Lopreato, and Dudley L. Poston add to this argument and claim that, immediately after World War II, this inequality was also a result of different sets of societal norms in the different places where the veterans lived. They argue that when black veterans returned home, they were much less likely to try to leave the familiar socioeconomic class they had belonged to before the war. This was a lower class than most whites had been in pre-war. However, all of these historians only analyze the effects of the GI Bill immediately after World War II and fail to include evaluation of the time when Jim Crow did not play a major role in the South. In and of itself, the Bill was “race-neutral”; however, multiple external factors help explain why the benefits of the Bill were distributed unevenly among the races.


In addition to looking at the correlation between race, location, and levels of education of the veterans following World War II, I also analyze these trends in the time period following the Korean Conflict GI Bill in 1952 and the Post-Korean Conflict and Vietnam Era GI Bill in 1966. These two extensions provided similar benefits to the veterans of each respective war (Dortch 2016, 7). These later extensions occurred during the Cold War era, a tumultuous time period in American history with an extreme effect on the society and education system. During this time the government allocated funds to enhance both public and private educational opportunities, especially in science and math (Thelin, Edwards, and Moyen 2016). In addition, the Civil Rights movement in the 1960s broke down barriers for black people in higher education all across the country and most notably, in the South. However, there is very little literature discussing the distribution of the GI Bill during this time frame, so all analysis I have done is based upon the consideration of the census data and the information available about the effects of the Civil Rights movement and Cold War policies, rather than on historians’ studies of the bills.
Black and White Veterans and the GI Bill | History 90.01: Topics in Digital History

Searchlock.com

 

[Fenton Lum]

Actually

I love anecdotes, don't you? Read up on objective reality pard. It will assist your arguments against it in fooling the unaware.

You say the objective reality is there yet provide none of it.

We've yet to see what you demand of others son. Your slogans are feckless.

I'm didn't make the claim. You did.

Actually you did make a claim, you can't even be honset about that.

I made the claim you didn't provide proof of your claim. Since you haven't, I've proven my claim.

You're nothing but canned slogans and denialist hot air son.

 

[Conservative65]

Like the GI Bill?

The GI Bill is only for Veterans how is that racism you dumb ****?

He has to make up something to keep his delusions alive.

Me think the lady doth protest too much. We have the internet now you know.

Socialism is only for the right people, not all citizens.

Then you shouldn't have a problem finding proof of a claim YOU made. Typical lefty. Make a claim he refuses to back up.

And now you're reduced to slinging labels as per usual. Since you wish to hide from the truth, here's one to get you started. Now you can deny this as well on your road to obfuscation. If you had any curiosity rather than a mission of denial, you would do your own research and discover a not so rosey picture.

To say the there was no racial disparity in the ramifications and roll out of the GI Bill is simply patently false, but you cannot abide any query of the power structure. Such is the nature of american society. Horses to water, same phenomenon.

And you will now simply spin this into your being right about everything as well, as per usual. So this isn't really for you anyway, but the information is public for any who wish to understand this society better. Deny on my freind. I would suggest you stay tuned to your usual outlets of "information" rather than use this as a launching pad to research more for yourself; your meme will be threatened.

Sarah Turner and John Bound’s in depth analysis found the effects of the GI Bill to be racially unequal following World War II. The educational level completed by the veterans differed for black and white veterans, even though the bill technically provided the exact same aid to both races (Turner and Bound 2002). Turner and Bound argue that this disparity was completely based upon the location in which the veterans resided. In Turner and Bound’s research, they discovered that the accessibility of upper level education was much more constricted in the South than in the North. The colleges for black people were much less numerous than those for whites and the enrollment sizes were smaller in the South than in the North (Turner and Bound 2002, 7). Furthermore, admissions officers were much more likely to allow a black person into a traditionally white college in the Northern states than anywhere else. Harley L. Browning, Sally C. Lopreato, and Dudley L. Poston add to this argument and claim that, immediately after World War II, this inequality was also a result of different sets of societal norms in the different places where the veterans lived. They argue that when black veterans returned home, they were much less likely to try to leave the familiar socioeconomic class they had belonged to before the war. This was a lower class than most whites had been in pre-war. However, all of these historians only analyze the effects of the GI Bill immediately after World War II and fail to include evaluation of the time when Jim Crow did not play a major role in the South. In and of itself, the Bill was “race-neutral”; however, multiple external factors help explain why the benefits of the Bill were distributed unevenly among the races.


In addition to looking at the correlation between race, location, and levels of education of the veterans following World War II, I also analyze these trends in the time period following the Korean Conflict GI Bill in 1952 and the Post-Korean Conflict and Vietnam Era GI Bill in 1966. These two extensions provided similar benefits to the veterans of each respective war (Dortch 2016, 7). These later extensions occurred during the Cold War era, a tumultuous time period in American history with an extreme effect on the society and education system. During this time the government allocated funds to enhance both public and private educational opportunities, especially in science and math (Thelin, Edwards, and Moyen 2016). In addition, the Civil Rights movement in the 1960s broke down barriers for black people in higher education all across the country and most notably, in the South. However, there is very little literature discussing the distribution of the GI Bill during this time frame, so all analysis I have done is based upon the consideration of the census data and the information available about the effects of the Civil Rights movement and Cold War policies, rather than on historians’ studies of the bills.
Black and White Veterans and the GI Bill | History 90.01: Topics in Digital History

Searchlock.com

Those doing the research stated the disparity was geographic location. They even admitted the Bill was race neutral and factors other than race, basically ones of choice, produce the differing results. In other words, you claim that the bill was applied unequally are false. Just another example of a lefty claiming the lack of results equates to a lack of opportunity.

 

[Conservative65]

Actually

You say the objective reality is there yet provide none of it.

We've yet to see what you demand of others son. Your slogans are feckless.

I'm didn't make the claim. You did.

Actually you did make a claim, you can't even be honset about that.

I made the claim you didn't provide proof of your claim. Since you haven't, I've proven my claim.

You're nothing but canned slogans and denialist hot air son.

I claimed you didn't prove your claim. My claim was proven by your lack of not proving yours.

 

[Fenton Lum]

The GI Bill is only for Veterans how is that racism you dumb ****?

He has to make up something to keep his delusions alive.

Me think the lady doth protest too much. We have the internet now you know.

Socialism is only for the right people, not all citizens.

Then you shouldn't have a problem finding proof of a claim YOU made. Typical lefty. Make a claim he refuses to back up.

And now you're reduced to slinging labels as per usual. Since you wish to hide from the truth, here's one to get you started. Now you can deny this as well on your road to obfuscation. If you had any curiosity rather than a mission of denial, you would do your own research and discover a not so rosey picture.

To say the there was no racial disparity in the ramifications and roll out of the GI Bill is simply patently false, but you cannot abide any query of the power structure. Such is the nature of american society. Horses to water, same phenomenon.

And you will now simply spin this into your being right about everything as well, as per usual. So this isn't really for you anyway, but the information is public for any who wish to understand this society better. Deny on my freind. I would suggest you stay tuned to your usual outlets of "information" rather than use this as a launching pad to research more for yourself; your meme will be threatened.

Sarah Turner and John Bound’s in depth analysis found the effects of the GI Bill to be racially unequal following World War II. The educational level completed by the veterans differed for black and white veterans, even though the bill technically provided the exact same aid to both races (Turner and Bound 2002). Turner and Bound argue that this disparity was completely based upon the location in which the veterans resided. In Turner and Bound’s research, they discovered that the accessibility of upper level education was much more constricted in the South than in the North. The colleges for black people were much less numerous than those for whites and the enrollment sizes were smaller in the South than in the North (Turner and Bound 2002, 7). Furthermore, admissions officers were much more likely to allow a black person into a traditionally white college in the Northern states than anywhere else. Harley L. Browning, Sally C. Lopreato, and Dudley L. Poston add to this argument and claim that, immediately after World War II, this inequality was also a result of different sets of societal norms in the different places where the veterans lived. They argue that when black veterans returned home, they were much less likely to try to leave the familiar socioeconomic class they had belonged to before the war. This was a lower class than most whites had been in pre-war. However, all of these historians only analyze the effects of the GI Bill immediately after World War II and fail to include evaluation of the time when Jim Crow did not play a major role in the South. In and of itself, the Bill was “race-neutral”; however, multiple external factors help explain why the benefits of the Bill were distributed unevenly among the races.


In addition to looking at the correlation between race, location, and levels of education of the veterans following World War II, I also analyze these trends in the time period following the Korean Conflict GI Bill in 1952 and the Post-Korean Conflict and Vietnam Era GI Bill in 1966. These two extensions provided similar benefits to the veterans of each respective war (Dortch 2016, 7). These later extensions occurred during the Cold War era, a tumultuous time period in American history with an extreme effect on the society and education system. During this time the government allocated funds to enhance both public and private educational opportunities, especially in science and math (Thelin, Edwards, and Moyen 2016). In addition, the Civil Rights movement in the 1960s broke down barriers for black people in higher education all across the country and most notably, in the South. However, there is very little literature discussing the distribution of the GI Bill during this time frame, so all analysis I have done is based upon the consideration of the census data and the information available about the effects of the Civil Rights movement and Cold War policies, rather than on historians’ studies of the bills.
Black and White Veterans and the GI Bill | History 90.01: Topics in Digital History

Searchlock.com

Those doing the research stated the disparity was geographic location. They even admitted the Bill was race neutral and factors other than race, basically ones of choice, produce the differing results. In other words, you claim that the bill was applied unequally are false. Just another example of a lefty claiming the lack of results equates to a lack of opportunity.

American society is what it is; same applies for slavery post the Civil War, we just set up another system (Jim Crow) and called it something else, but the outcome was the same until the Civil Rights Movement. Any rational hominid understands that one article or one study on its own decides/defines nothing at all and I said that (a start for the curious, which you are not one of), you just need to avoid it. Of note is that this was a socialist program; an investment in society that bore vast societal economic fruit until the donor class rerigged the economic system in the 1980s to subsidize themselves. Your contention that it was “earned” by service is patently false, you merely approve of the recipient class of this socialist program. And the disparity in outcome along racial lines is/was what it is/was, all quibbling about what to blame aside.

 

[Fenton Lum]

Actually

We've yet to see what you demand of others son. Your slogans are feckless.

I'm didn't make the claim. You did.

Actually you did make a claim, you can't even be honset about that.

I made the claim you didn't provide proof of your claim. Since you haven't, I've proven my claim.

You're nothing but canned slogans and denialist hot air son.

I claimed you didn't prove your claim. My claim was proven by your lack of not proving yours.

As predicted, have a wonderful day my friend.

 

[Conservative65]

He has to make up something to keep his delusions alive.

Me think the lady doth protest too much. We have the internet now you know.

Socialism is only for the right people, not all citizens.

Then you shouldn't have a problem finding proof of a claim YOU made. Typical lefty. Make a claim he refuses to back up.

And now you're reduced to slinging labels as per usual. Since you wish to hide from the truth, here's one to get you started. Now you can deny this as well on your road to obfuscation. If you had any curiosity rather than a mission of denial, you would do your own research and discover a not so rosey picture.

To say the there was no racial disparity in the ramifications and roll out of the GI Bill is simply patently false, but you cannot abide any query of the power structure. Such is the nature of american society. Horses to water, same phenomenon.

And you will now simply spin this into your being right about everything as well, as per usual. So this isn't really for you anyway, but the information is public for any who wish to understand this society better. Deny on my freind. I would suggest you stay tuned to your usual outlets of "information" rather than use this as a launching pad to research more for yourself; your meme will be threatened.

Sarah Turner and John Bound’s in depth analysis found the effects of the GI Bill to be racially unequal following World War II. The educational level completed by the veterans differed for black and white veterans, even though the bill technically provided the exact same aid to both races (Turner and Bound 2002). Turner and Bound argue that this disparity was completely based upon the location in which the veterans resided. In Turner and Bound’s research, they discovered that the accessibility of upper level education was much more constricted in the South than in the North. The colleges for black people were much less numerous than those for whites and the enrollment sizes were smaller in the South than in the North (Turner and Bound 2002, 7). Furthermore, admissions officers were much more likely to allow a black person into a traditionally white college in the Northern states than anywhere else. Harley L. Browning, Sally C. Lopreato, and Dudley L. Poston add to this argument and claim that, immediately after World War II, this inequality was also a result of different sets of societal norms in the different places where the veterans lived. They argue that when black veterans returned home, they were much less likely to try to leave the familiar socioeconomic class they had belonged to before the war. This was a lower class than most whites had been in pre-war. However, all of these historians only analyze the effects of the GI Bill immediately after World War II and fail to include evaluation of the time when Jim Crow did not play a major role in the South. In and of itself, the Bill was “race-neutral”; however, multiple external factors help explain why the benefits of the Bill were distributed unevenly among the races.


In addition to looking at the correlation between race, location, and levels of education of the veterans following World War II, I also analyze these trends in the time period following the Korean Conflict GI Bill in 1952 and the Post-Korean Conflict and Vietnam Era GI Bill in 1966. These two extensions provided similar benefits to the veterans of each respective war (Dortch 2016, 7). These later extensions occurred during the Cold War era, a tumultuous time period in American history with an extreme effect on the society and education system. During this time the government allocated funds to enhance both public and private educational opportunities, especially in science and math (Thelin, Edwards, and Moyen 2016). In addition, the Civil Rights movement in the 1960s broke down barriers for black people in higher education all across the country and most notably, in the South. However, there is very little literature discussing the distribution of the GI Bill during this time frame, so all analysis I have done is based upon the consideration of the census data and the information available about the effects of the Civil Rights movement and Cold War policies, rather than on historians’ studies of the bills.
Black and White Veterans and the GI Bill | History 90.01: Topics in Digital History

Searchlock.com

Those doing the research stated the disparity was geographic location. They even admitted the Bill was race neutral and factors other than race, basically ones of choice, produce the differing results. In other words, you claim that the bill was applied unequally are false. Just another example of a lefty claiming the lack of results equates to a lack of opportunity.

American society is what it is; same applies for slavery post the Civil War, we just set up another system (Jim Crow) and called it something else, but the outcome was the same until the Civil Rights Movement. Any rational hominid understands that one article or one study on its own decides/defines nothing at all and I said that (a start for the curious, which you are not one of), you just need to avoid it. Of note is that this was a socialist program; an investment in society that bore vast societal economic fruit until the donor class rerigged the economic system in the 1980s to subsidize themselves. Your contention that it was “earned” by service is patently false, you merely approve of the recipient class of this socialist program. And the disparity in outcome along racial lines is/was what it is/was, all quibbling about what to blame aside.

The claim that blacks were denied something that, in the end, your own source shows it had nothing to do with race. Thanks for proving my claim that you haven't provided proof of your.

 

[Conservative65]

Actually

I'm didn't make the claim. You did.

Actually you did make a claim, you can't even be honset about that.

I made the claim you didn't provide proof of your claim. Since you haven't, I've proven my claim.

You're nothing but canned slogans and denialist hot air son.

I claimed you didn't prove your claim. My claim was proven by your lack of not proving yours.

As predicted, have a wonderful day my friend.

I'm not your ******* friend. I have higher standards.

 

[Fenton Lum]

Me think the lady doth protest too much. We have the internet now you know.

Socialism is only for the right people, not all citizens.

Then you shouldn't have a problem finding proof of a claim YOU made. Typical lefty. Make a claim he refuses to back up.

And now you're reduced to slinging labels as per usual. Since you wish to hide from the truth, here's one to get you started. Now you can deny this as well on your road to obfuscation. If you had any curiosity rather than a mission of denial, you would do your own research and discover a not so rosey picture.

To say the there was no racial disparity in the ramifications and roll out of the GI Bill is simply patently false, but you cannot abide any query of the power structure. Such is the nature of american society. Horses to water, same phenomenon.

And you will now simply spin this into your being right about everything as well, as per usual. So this isn't really for you anyway, but the information is public for any who wish to understand this society better. Deny on my freind. I would suggest you stay tuned to your usual outlets of "information" rather than use this as a launching pad to research more for yourself; your meme will be threatened.

Sarah Turner and John Bound’s in depth analysis found the effects of the GI Bill to be racially unequal following World War II. The educational level completed by the veterans differed for black and white veterans, even though the bill technically provided the exact same aid to both races (Turner and Bound 2002). Turner and Bound argue that this disparity was completely based upon the location in which the veterans resided. In Turner and Bound’s research, they discovered that the accessibility of upper level education was much more constricted in the South than in the North. The colleges for black people were much less numerous than those for whites and the enrollment sizes were smaller in the South than in the North (Turner and Bound 2002, 7). Furthermore, admissions officers were much more likely to allow a black person into a traditionally white college in the Northern states than anywhere else. Harley L. Browning, Sally C. Lopreato, and Dudley L. Poston add to this argument and claim that, immediately after World War II, this inequality was also a result of different sets of societal norms in the different places where the veterans lived. They argue that when black veterans returned home, they were much less likely to try to leave the familiar socioeconomic class they had belonged to before the war. This was a lower class than most whites had been in pre-war. However, all of these historians only analyze the effects of the GI Bill immediately after World War II and fail to include evaluation of the time when Jim Crow did not play a major role in the South. In and of itself, the Bill was “race-neutral”; however, multiple external factors help explain why the benefits of the Bill were distributed unevenly among the races.


In addition to looking at the correlation between race, location, and levels of education of the veterans following World War II, I also analyze these trends in the time period following the Korean Conflict GI Bill in 1952 and the Post-Korean Conflict and Vietnam Era GI Bill in 1966. These two extensions provided similar benefits to the veterans of each respective war (Dortch 2016, 7). These later extensions occurred during the Cold War era, a tumultuous time period in American history with an extreme effect on the society and education system. During this time the government allocated funds to enhance both public and private educational opportunities, especially in science and math (Thelin, Edwards, and Moyen 2016). In addition, the Civil Rights movement in the 1960s broke down barriers for black people in higher education all across the country and most notably, in the South. However, there is very little literature discussing the distribution of the GI Bill during this time frame, so all analysis I have done is based upon the consideration of the census data and the information available about the effects of the Civil Rights movement and Cold War policies, rather than on historians’ studies of the bills.
Black and White Veterans and the GI Bill | History 90.01: Topics in Digital History

Searchlock.com

Those doing the research stated the disparity was geographic location. They even admitted the Bill was race neutral and factors other than race, basically ones of choice, produce the differing results. In other words, you claim that the bill was applied unequally are false. Just another example of a lefty claiming the lack of results equates to a lack of opportunity.

American society is what it is; same applies for slavery post the Civil War, we just set up another system (Jim Crow) and called it something else, but the outcome was the same until the Civil Rights Movement. Any rational hominid understands that one article or one study on its own decides/defines nothing at all and I said that (a start for the curious, which you are not one of), you just need to avoid it. Of note is that this was a socialist program; an investment in society that bore vast societal economic fruit until the donor class rerigged the economic system in the 1980s to subsidize themselves. Your contention that it was “earned” by service is patently false, you merely approve of the recipient class of this socialist program. And the disparity in outcome along racial lines is/was what it is/was, all quibbling about what to blame aside.

The claim that blacks were denied something that, in the end, your own source shows it had nothing to do with race. Thanks for proving my claim that you haven't provided proof of your.

I have no doubt that's how you interpreted it.

 

[Fenton Lum]

Actually
Actually you did make a claim, you can't even be honset about that.

I made the claim you didn't provide proof of your claim. Since you haven't, I've proven my claim.

You're nothing but canned slogans and denialist hot air son.

I claimed you didn't prove your claim. My claim was proven by your lack of not proving yours.

As predicted, have a wonderful day my friend.

I'm not your ******* friend. I have higher standards.

That was sarcasm my blindass tone deaf friend.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

Black man keeping you down shoog?

Since blacks benefit from a government endorsed program that uses race to give them an advantage, the keeping down thing doesn't exist. If you use such a program, you've already indicated you can't do it on your own.

Like the GI Bill?

The GI Bill is only for Veterans how is that racism you dumb ****?

He has to make up something to keep his delusions alive.

Me think the lady doth protest too much. We have the internet now you know.

Socialism is only for the right people, not all citizens.

You made the claim it is your job to back it the **** up asshole. But then lies are hard to back up aren't they?

 

[Conservative65]

Since blacks benefit from a government endorsed program that uses race to give them an advantage, the keeping down thing doesn't exist. If you use such a program, you've already indicated you can't do it on your own.

Like the GI Bill?

The GI Bill is only for Veterans how is that racism you dumb ****?

He has to make up something to keep his delusions alive.

Me think the lady doth protest too much. We have the internet now you know.

Socialism is only for the right people, not all citizens.

You made the claim it is your job to back it the **** up asshole. But then lies are hard to back up aren't they?

Unless he states more lies then we have a vicious circle.

 

[Fenton Lum]

Since blacks benefit from a government endorsed program that uses race to give them an advantage, the keeping down thing doesn't exist. If you use such a program, you've already indicated you can't do it on your own.

Like the GI Bill?

The GI Bill is only for Veterans how is that racism you dumb ****?

He has to make up something to keep his delusions alive.

Me think the lady doth protest too much. We have the internet now you know.

Socialism is only for the right people, not all citizens.

You made the claim it is your job to back it the **** up asshole. But then lies are hard to back up aren't they?

The lie of american exceptionalism certainly is isn't it, that's why you're here to support it mindlessly.

Reality is out there for anyone who has the nads to confront it

 

[Fenton Lum]

Like the GI Bill?

The GI Bill is only for Veterans how is that racism you dumb ****?

He has to make up something to keep his delusions alive.

Me think the lady doth protest too much. We have the internet now you know.

Socialism is only for the right people, not all citizens.

You made the claim it is your job to back it the **** up asshole. But then lies are hard to back up aren't they?

Unless he states more lies then we have a vicious circle.

You already have the vicious circle of lies you cannot confront shoog. Shine on.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

Like the GI Bill?

The GI Bill is only for Veterans how is that racism you dumb ****?

He has to make up something to keep his delusions alive.

Me think the lady doth protest too much. We have the internet now you know.

Socialism is only for the right people, not all citizens.

You made the claim it is your job to back it the **** up asshole. But then lies are hard to back up aren't they?

The lie of american exceptionalism certainly is isn't it, that's why you're here to support it mindlessly.

Reality is out there for anyone who has the nads to confront it

You claimed blacks did not get the GI bill, you lied. Your own quoted section proves it the reason SOME did not get it was because of location and non available school seats.

 

[Conservative65]

The GI Bill is only for Veterans how is that racism you dumb ****?

He has to make up something to keep his delusions alive.

Me think the lady doth protest too much. We have the internet now you know.

Socialism is only for the right people, not all citizens.

You made the claim it is your job to back it the **** up asshole. But then lies are hard to back up aren't they?

Unless he states more lies then we have a vicious circle.

You already have the vicious circle of lies you cannot confront shoog. Shine on.

I made the claim you didn't provide proof of your claim. Since you haven't, I've proven my claim.

You're nothing but canned slogans and denialist hot air son.

I claimed you didn't prove your claim. My claim was proven by your lack of not proving yours.

As predicted, have a wonderful day my friend.

I'm not your ******* friend. I have higher standards.

That was sarcasm my blindass tone deaf friend.

My statement wasn't you low standard n*gger.

I stand corrected. You're not low standard, the standards you live by are normal for your kind they just happen to be low.