Violence And Intimidation Against Republicans Are Becoming The New Normal - Thanks, Snowflakes.

In reality more Democrats in Congress voted against giving President Bush the power to decide.
Hillary Clinton, Al Gore, John Kerry, etc...all made the case to go to war and take Hussein out. Thank you for admitting Democrats voted to give bush the authority to go to war, something Obama refused to do before he dragged the US into his own 2 wars.


"This is a difficult vote. This is probably the hardest decision I have ever had to make. Any vote that may lead to war should be hard, but I cast it with conviction. … My vote is not, however, a vote for any new doctrine of preemption or for unilateralism or for the arrogance of American power or purpose.” A vote for the resolution, “is not a vote to rush to war; it is a vote that puts awesome responsibility in the hands of our president. And we say to him: Use these powers wisely and as a last resort.”

Again, the historical context you continually ignore is that the push was to get the UN on board like GHWB did. But they had to lie to our friends on the SC and invade without the support of the UN.
My only point is that Bush went to Congress and asked for the Congressional authority to take the country to war before he took the country to war - period...something Obama never did before he dragged the US into 2 wars on his own.
 
So you Lefties support the use of violence against those with a different political view? And the denial of freedom of speech too. Sad days when people resort to this approach.
You rubes and Trump campaigned on hate. Don't be surprised at being met with opposition.
The leftist fanatics are following their script to a T. Notice how they refer to their own lies about conservatives, to justify the violence and intimidation they now use?
 
So you Lefties support the use of violence against those with a different political view? And the denial of freedom of speech too. Sad days when people resort to this approach.
You rubes and Trump campaigned on hate. Don't be surprised at being met with opposition.
The leftist fanatics are following their script to a T. Notice how they refer to their own lies about conservatives, to justify the violence and intimidation they now use?
^ :crybaby:
 
In reality more Democrats in Congress voted against giving President Bush the power to decide.
Hillary Clinton, Al Gore, John Kerry, etc...all made the case to go to war and take Hussein out. Thank you for admitting Democrats voted to give bush the authority to go to war, something Obama refused to do before he dragged the US into his own 2 wars.


"This is a difficult vote. This is probably the hardest decision I have ever had to make. Any vote that may lead to war should be hard, but I cast it with conviction. … My vote is not, however, a vote for any new doctrine of preemption or for unilateralism or for the arrogance of American power or purpose.” A vote for the resolution, “is not a vote to rush to war; it is a vote that puts awesome responsibility in the hands of our president. And we say to him: Use these powers wisely and as a last resort.”

Again, the historical context you continually ignore is that the push was to get the UN on board like GHWB did. But they had to lie to our friends on the SC and invade without the support of the UN.
My only point is that Bush went to Congress and asked for the Congressional authority to take the country to war before he took the country to war - period...something Obama never did before he dragged the US into 2 wars on his own.
"dragged the US into 2 wars on his own".....you know that's false, right?
 
In reality more Democrats in Congress voted against giving President Bush the power to decide.
Hillary Clinton, Al Gore, John Kerry, etc...all made the case to go to war and take Hussein out. Thank you for admitting Democrats voted to give bush the authority to go to war, something Obama refused to do before he dragged the US into his own 2 wars.


"This is a difficult vote. This is probably the hardest decision I have ever had to make. Any vote that may lead to war should be hard, but I cast it with conviction. … My vote is not, however, a vote for any new doctrine of preemption or for unilateralism or for the arrogance of American power or purpose.” A vote for the resolution, “is not a vote to rush to war; it is a vote that puts awesome responsibility in the hands of our president. And we say to him: Use these powers wisely and as a last resort.”

Again, the historical context you continually ignore is that the push was to get the UN on board like GHWB did. But they had to lie to our friends on the SC and invade without the support of the UN.
My only point is that Bush went to Congress and asked for the Congressional authority to take the country to war before he took the country to war - period...something Obama never did before he dragged the US into 2 wars on his own.

They did a masterful job schmoozing Congress and the Sheeple

Iraq Statements by US President George W. Bush - US - Iraq War - ProCon.org

Not every military action requires the approval of Congress.
 
In reality more Democrats in Congress voted against giving President Bush the power to decide.
Hillary Clinton, Al Gore, John Kerry, etc...all made the case to go to war and take Hussein out. Thank you for admitting Democrats voted to give bush the authority to go to war, something Obama refused to do before he dragged the US into his own 2 wars.


"This is a difficult vote. This is probably the hardest decision I have ever had to make. Any vote that may lead to war should be hard, but I cast it with conviction. … My vote is not, however, a vote for any new doctrine of preemption or for unilateralism or for the arrogance of American power or purpose.” A vote for the resolution, “is not a vote to rush to war; it is a vote that puts awesome responsibility in the hands of our president. And we say to him: Use these powers wisely and as a last resort.”

Again, the historical context you continually ignore is that the push was to get the UN on board like GHWB did. But they had to lie to our friends on the SC and invade without the support of the UN.
My only point is that Bush went to Congress and asked for the Congressional authority to take the country to war before he took the country to war - period...something Obama never did before he dragged the US into 2 wars on his own.
"dragged the US into 2 wars on his own".....you know that's false, right?

Easy has one of those magic 8 balls devices he uses to continuously repeat misinformation like that.
 
You rubes earned it :dunno:

So you Lefties support the use of violence against those with a different political view? And the denial of freedom of speech too. Sad days when people resort to this approach.

Like when Trump told people at rallies to beat up protestors, or when Trumpbots attacked blacks and immigrants screaming "go home" to immigrants, painted swastikas on synagogues and beat and attacked women wearing hijabs?

When you invite and incite violence, you can't whine about those who take you up on your invitation.

Trump invited "2nd Amendment" types to take out Hillary if she were elected. Liberals are using courts and protest marches.
 
You rubes earned it :dunno:

So you Lefties support the use of violence against those with a different political view? And the denial of freedom of speech too. Sad days when people resort to this approach.

Like when Trump told people at rallies to beat up protestors, or when Trumpbots attacked blacks and immigrants screaming "go home" to immigrants, painted swastikas on synagogues and beat and attacked women wearing hijabs?

When you invite and incite violence, you can't whine about those who take you up on your invitation.

Trump invited "2nd Amendment" types to take out Hillary if she were elected. Liberals are using courts and protest marches.

Trump did not tell people to beat up any and all protestors. he was discussing one protestor in particular who threatened to hurl tomatoes at him. That would constitute assault, so Trump would be well justified in using force against him.

I know you can't help lying about everything, but at least restrict yourself to lies that haven't already been exposed over and over.
 
Oh ya it is!!
YRdXZQmRQL6DNGvdD8uk_George%20Wink%20Point.gif

You voted for that big fat pile of excrement in the whitehouse.
putin's puppet.!

Seems you have a bit of butt hurt going on, so you are like him a whiny little bitch.

You are exactly like that whiny little bitch in the whitehouse. Whine away you little cry baby whiny bitch.

Violence And Intimidation Against Republicans Are Becoming The New Normal

"Violence and intimidation against Republicans are quickly becoming the new normal in an increasingly tense political climate.

In one of the most recent incidents, police in Tennessee
charged a woman with felony reckless endangerment on Thursday for allegedly trying to run Republican Congressman David Kustoff off the road after a town hall. The woman, Wendi Wright, was reportedly enraged over Kustoff’s support for the American Health Care Act and screamed at the congressman and his aide, striking his car windows and reaching inside the vehicle. The same day that Tennessee police charged Wright for reckless endangerment, police in North Dakota escorted an enraged man from another town hall after he became physical with Republican Rep. Kevin Cramer over his support for the GOP Obamacare replacement."

'Triggered'.


"The day before that, a Huffington Post article that showed “how to really turn up the heat on elected officials” went viral. The author, Michaelangelo Signorile, called on protesters to harass Republicans at dinner, when they’re out shopping and even at home. Societal norms for the basic levels of decency one should afford political opponents, Signorile argued, no longer apply to liberals.

“It’s time to move beyond polite protests within specified boundaries. It’s time to escalate the expression of our outrage and our anger in a massive way,” he wrote."



Liberals are now promoting civil unrest, harassment, and even violence.



"Political violence has been increasingly common as left-wing organizations have whipped up mobs against Republicans and supporters of the president. An email warning parade organizers promised 200 or more protesters would rush into the parade and drag the Republican marchers out, if that’s what it took to keep them from participating. “You have seen how much power we have downtown and that the police cannot stop us from shutting down roads so please consider your decision wisely,” the email warned. Portland has been a site for organized left-wing protests, which have often turned into violent riots."

Hillary's campaign was exposed as having paid groups to send violent protestors to Trump rallies to disrupt the events and engage in violence against Trump supporters.



Snowflakes / radical leftists believe theirs is the only tolerable opinion, that all other voices and ideas must be silenced...at any cost. This has been demonstrated time and again but none better than through the violent riots a Berkley in which radical leftists engaged in riots, destruction of property, arson, looting, terrorism, assaults, etc in which they successfully silenced the right of Free Speech. They proved violence 'trumps' (no pun intended) Freedom of Speech and seem to have decided they will make doing so a part of the 'norm' they seek to impose on everyone from now on.
dude, too funny, you got the trumpets loud and whiny, wow.
or not.
 
- Like how Obama had ISIS fenced in...until they conducted the worst attack on Paris since WWII the very next night?


It was the Shiite Iraqi government who let ISIS take over the Sunni strongholds in the West. We only got back involved to save Erbil, the Oil Capital of Kurdistan. But gee, it's like we never left. well except our kids aren't the ones fighting and dying in the battles over there.

Funny how you guys still try to conflate a terrorist attack in France with a military campaign to take back territory in the ME.
Neanderthal Rising: Echoes of a Prehistoric Horror

Thrill-killing subhuman Muzzies do get inspiration from the ISIS beasts' successes. You're trying to use human psychology on these creatures.
 
"This is a difficult vote. This is probably the hardest decision I have ever had to make. Any vote that may lead to war should be hard, but I cast it with conviction. … My vote is not, however, a vote for any new doctrine of preemption or for unilateralism or for the arrogance of American power or purpose.” A vote for the resolution, “is not a vote to rush to war; it is a vote that puts awesome responsibility in the hands of our president. And we say to him: Use these powers wisely and as a last resort.”

.

Panzers in Pantsuits

Hillarians have seen too much Xena and Jennifer Lawrence (Bimbo With a Bow), whooping out battle cries at the command of a nagological warmonger.
 
You rubes earned it :dunno:

So you Lefties support the use of violence against those with a different political view? And the denial of freedom of speech too. Sad days when people resort to this approach.

Like when Trump told people at rallies to beat up protestors, or when Trumpbots attacked blacks and immigrants screaming "go home" to immigrants, painted swastikas on synagogues and beat and attacked women wearing hijabs?

When you invite and incite violence, you can't whine about those who take you up on your invitation.

Trump invited "2nd Amendment" types to take out Hillary if she were elected. Liberals are using courts and protest marches.

Trump did not tell people to beat up any and all protestors. he was discussing one protestor in particular who threatened to hurl tomatoes at him. That would constitute assault, so Trump would be well justified in using force against him.

I know you can't help lying about everything, but at least restrict yourself to lies that haven't already been exposed over and over.

Trump would be well justified in having security remove the guy. He is NOT justified in inciting violence against him, or offering to pay legal fees if someone gets arresting for assaulting the guy. Incitement to violence is illegal.

I don't lie. I don't have to. Trump provides all of the ammunition needed to prove his incompetence and his criminality via his tweets and interviews.

He admits firing Comey because of the Russia investigation. That's obstruction of justice, which is an impeachable offence.

He admits to giving highly classified intel to the Russians, which the Israelis asked not to be revealed. While Trump was within his rights to do so, how eager will the Israelis be to share future intelligence to the US?

And Korea continues to ramp up the threats after Trump's supposed military action was commenced. Did Trump's armada get lost again?
 
"This is a difficult vote. This is probably the hardest decision I have ever had to make. Any vote that may lead to war should be hard, but I cast it with conviction. … My vote is not, however, a vote for any new doctrine of preemption or for unilateralism or for the arrogance of American power or purpose.” A vote for the resolution, “is not a vote to rush to war; it is a vote that puts awesome responsibility in the hands of our president. And we say to him: Use these powers wisely and as a last resort.”

.

Panzers in Pantsuits

Hillarians have seen too much Xena and Jennifer Lawrence (Bimbo With a Bow), whooping out battle cries at the command of a nagological warmonger.

Denigration is a typical ploy of revisionist

As if real words spoken on the Senate floor have any connection to a fantasy world in Hollywood.
 
Panzers in Pantsuits

Hillarians have seen too much Xena and Jennifer Lawrence (Bimbo With a Bow), whooping out battle cries at the command of a nagological warmonger.

Denigration is a typical ploy of revisionist

As if real words spoken on the Senate floor have any connection to a fantasy world in Hollywood.
Pomposity Produces Popcorn

It's the reverse: fantasizing political preaching gives a cue to Hollywood on what to push as reality. The screen presents itself as an ideal to strive for.
 

Forum List

Back
Top