TheGreenHornet
Platinum Member
- Nov 21, 2017
- 6,241
- 4,090
- 940
- Thread starter
- Banned
- #101
They are supposed to support the Constitution, not a party or person. This is a pivotal moment, though, in the military's history when it is apparent that they are being assigned or removed from a detail based on their political opinions. It's a bad, bad precedent to set.– the United States military – has chosen sides.
Another lie. The military support the Constitution.
The dangerous precedent was one branch of our Government sending an enraged mob to the Capitol to stop another branch of our government from the Constitutional function/duty that the Joint Session of Congress was carrying out. If this reaction to that violence looks bad, blame it on Trump's violent opposition to the lawful transfer of power.
No....it was merely a peaceful demonstration....a couple of windows got broken and some of the capital popo leece hit some protestors with their batons and they were retaliated against.....all in all there were not that many protestors that went into capitol...they considered what they were doing more of a prank than anything else....aka sitting in Pelosi's office with feet propped up on her desk....just a joke.
If the protestors had intended to harm anyone they would have been armed....not a single shot was fired except by the cop in plainclothes.....and why was he in plainclothes?
He shot a lady protestor who was unarmed and he was not even in the same room with her...he was hiding in a adjoining room stuck his arm out with the pistol and shot her down in cold blood through a window......unspeakable cowardice....not to mention there were other poleece who were armed all around her....so her murder was completely un-called for...completely un-justified not even to mention she had honorably served America for l4 years......and they are still hiding the identity of this cop....which most likely means he was either a black or a muslim.