Vegas Shooter was a Muzzie

Status
Not open for further replies.
The guy is apparently not a "Muslim," convert or otherwise.
The sheriff said a check of federal and state databases showed Paddock was not on law enforcement authorities' radar before the bloodbath.

Aaron Rouse, the FBI agent in charge in Las Vegas, said investigators saw no immediate evidence connecting it to an international terror organization, despite a claim of responsibility from the Islamic State group.
So why did ISIS make that claim?
Are they known for falsely claiming responsibility?
They lie?
If there was a tie to ISIS or another terrorist group, I do not believe the FBI or LE would hide it. They've taken egg on the face in the past when they knew the guy and let him off the hook. I don't think they're lying to us now.
 
The guy is apparently not a "Muslim," convert or otherwise.
The sheriff said a check of federal and state databases showed Paddock was not on law enforcement authorities' radar before the bloodbath.

Aaron Rouse, the FBI agent in charge in Las Vegas, said investigators saw no immediate evidence connecting it to an international terror organization, despite a claim of responsibility from the Islamic State group.

9/11 hijackers weren't on their radar either, until they had taken over the planes...
That's true, Pupps and it is possible, though seems improbable. I'm totally open to the truth, once it is learned. I just don't see any reason to question what the authorities are telling us so far.
 
The guy is apparently not a "Muslim," convert or otherwise.
The sheriff said a check of federal and state databases showed Paddock was not on law enforcement authorities' radar before the bloodbath.

Aaron Rouse, the FBI agent in charge in Las Vegas, said investigators saw no immediate evidence connecting it to an international terror organization, despite a claim of responsibility from the Islamic State group.
So why did ISIS make that claim?
Are they known for falsely claiming responsibility?

Yes.
Got any examples?


As Paul Cruickshank, the editor-in-chief of the CTC Sentinel, and a CNN terrorism analyst, pointed out, ISIS’ claims of responsibility for terrorist acts a are often exaggerated, and an attempt to portray them as more powerful than they are:

3h
Paul Cruickshank

✔@CruickshankPaul

Thread from me upcoming on ISIS Amaq claim of responsibility for Las Vegas attack, a claim made without a shred of evidence.


Follow
Paul Cruickshank

✔@CruickshankPaul

1. ISIS in recent months has made a number of demonstrably false claims for attacks and incidents that had no jihadi terror nexus.

10:27 AM - Oct 2, 2017
Twitter Ads info and privacy
I have read of false claims elsewhere also.
 
The guy is apparently not a "Muslim," convert or otherwise.
The sheriff said a check of federal and state databases showed Paddock was not on law enforcement authorities' radar before the bloodbath.

Aaron Rouse, the FBI agent in charge in Las Vegas, said investigators saw no immediate evidence connecting it to an international terror organization, despite a claim of responsibility from the Islamic State group.
So why did ISIS make that claim?
Are they known for falsely claiming responsibility?
They lie?
If there was a tie to ISIS or another terrorist group, I do not believe the FBI or LE would hide it. They've taken egg on the face in the past when they knew the guy and let him off the hook. I don't think they're lying to us now.
Im not calling them liars. But how long have they had to actually dig into this guy?
What if the connection lies with that woman? There are still so many questions.
And the reason i asked if ISIS has ever lied about responsibility before is, i have never known of them to do it. Im not putting it beneath them though lol
But something like that would extremely hurt their credibility.
 
The guy is apparently not a "Muslim," convert or otherwise.
The sheriff said a check of federal and state databases showed Paddock was not on law enforcement authorities' radar before the bloodbath.

Aaron Rouse, the FBI agent in charge in Las Vegas, said investigators saw no immediate evidence connecting it to an international terror organization, despite a claim of responsibility from the Islamic State group.

9/11 hijackers weren't on their radar either, until they had taken over the planes...
That's true, Pupps and it is possible, though seems improbable. I'm totally open to the truth, once it is learned. I just don't see any reason to question what the authorities are telling us so far.

All they've said so far is that they don't know...ie, he wasn't on our watch list or made pro-islamic posts on the net. However, Islamic state has claimed responsibility.
 
The guy is apparently not a "Muslim," convert or otherwise.
The sheriff said a check of federal and state databases showed Paddock was not on law enforcement authorities' radar before the bloodbath.

Aaron Rouse, the FBI agent in charge in Las Vegas, said investigators saw no immediate evidence connecting it to an international terror organization, despite a claim of responsibility from the Islamic State group.
So why did ISIS make that claim?
Are they known for falsely claiming responsibility?

Yes.
Got any examples?


As Paul Cruickshank, the editor-in-chief of the CTC Sentinel, and a CNN terrorism analyst, pointed out, ISIS’ claims of responsibility for terrorist acts a are often exaggerated, and an attempt to portray them as more powerful than they are:

3h
Paul Cruickshank

✔@CruickshankPaul

Thread from me upcoming on ISIS Amaq claim of responsibility for Las Vegas attack, a claim made without a shred of evidence.


Follow
Paul Cruickshank

✔@CruickshankPaul

1. ISIS in recent months has made a number of demonstrably false claims for attacks and incidents that had no jihadi terror nexus.

10:27 AM - Oct 2, 2017
Twitter Ads info and privacy
I have read of false claims elsewhere also.
That isnt examples.
Exaggerations are different from flat out lying and destroying their credibility.
Do you or anyone else have examples of them lying about incident responsibility?
 
The guy is apparently not a "Muslim," convert or otherwise.
The sheriff said a check of federal and state databases showed Paddock was not on law enforcement authorities' radar before the bloodbath.

Aaron Rouse, the FBI agent in charge in Las Vegas, said investigators saw no immediate evidence connecting it to an international terror organization, despite a claim of responsibility from the Islamic State group.
So why did ISIS make that claim?
Are they known for falsely claiming responsibility?
They lie?
If there was a tie to ISIS or another terrorist group, I do not believe the FBI or LE would hide it. They've taken egg on the face in the past when they knew the guy and let him off the hook. I don't think they're lying to us now.
Im not calling them liars. But how long have they had to actually dig into this guy?
What if the connection lies with that woman? There are still so many questions.
And the reason i asked if ISIS has ever lied about responsibility before is, i have never known of them to do it. Im not putting it beneath them though lol
But something like that would extremely hurt their credibility.
I'm sure the ISIS fan club reacts much like the Trumpbots--they believe what the bubble speak says and chalk up the rest to fake news.
 
The guy is apparently not a "Muslim," convert or otherwise.
The sheriff said a check of federal and state databases showed Paddock was not on law enforcement authorities' radar before the bloodbath.

Aaron Rouse, the FBI agent in charge in Las Vegas, said investigators saw no immediate evidence connecting it to an international terror organization, despite a claim of responsibility from the Islamic State group.
So why did ISIS make that claim?
Are they known for falsely claiming responsibility?
They lie?
If there was a tie to ISIS or another terrorist group, I do not believe the FBI or LE would hide it. They've taken egg on the face in the past when they knew the guy and let him off the hook. I don't think they're lying to us now.
Im not calling them liars. But how long have they had to actually dig into this guy?
What if the connection lies with that woman? There are still so many questions.
And the reason i asked if ISIS has ever lied about responsibility before is, i have never known of them to do it. Im not putting it beneath them though lol
But something like that would extremely hurt their credibility.
I'm sure the ISIS fan club reacts much like the Trumpbots--they believe what the bubble speak says and chalk up the rest to fake news.
Jesus Christ
Have a good day...
 
The guy is apparently not a "Muslim," convert or otherwise.
The sheriff said a check of federal and state databases showed Paddock was not on law enforcement authorities' radar before the bloodbath.

Aaron Rouse, the FBI agent in charge in Las Vegas, said investigators saw no immediate evidence connecting it to an international terror organization, despite a claim of responsibility from the Islamic State group.
So why did ISIS make that claim?
Are they known for falsely claiming responsibility?
They lie?
If there was a tie to ISIS or another terrorist group, I do not believe the FBI or LE would hide it. They've taken egg on the face in the past when they knew the guy and let him off the hook. I don't think they're lying to us now.
Im not calling them liars. But how long have they had to actually dig into this guy?
What if the connection lies with that woman? There are still so many questions.
And the reason i asked if ISIS has ever lied about responsibility before is, i have never known of them to do it. Im not putting it beneath them though lol
But something like that would extremely hurt their credibility.
Neither have I tbh. I do wonder though weather or not we would even really know when they lie to take credit. It is not as though that would be something that the news would focus on in a general sense.
 
The guy is apparently not a "Muslim," convert or otherwise.
The sheriff said a check of federal and state databases showed Paddock was not on law enforcement authorities' radar before the bloodbath.

Aaron Rouse, the FBI agent in charge in Las Vegas, said investigators saw no immediate evidence connecting it to an international terror organization, despite a claim of responsibility from the Islamic State group.
So why did ISIS make that claim?
Are they known for falsely claiming responsibility?
They lie?
If there was a tie to ISIS or another terrorist group, I do not believe the FBI or LE would hide it. They've taken egg on the face in the past when they knew the guy and let him off the hook. I don't think they're lying to us now.
Im not calling them liars. But how long have they had to actually dig into this guy?
What if the connection lies with that woman? There are still so many questions.
And the reason i asked if ISIS has ever lied about responsibility before is, i have never known of them to do it. Im not putting it beneath them though lol
But something like that would extremely hurt their credibility.
Neither have I tbh. I do wonder though weather or not we would even really know when they lie to take credit. It is not as though that would be something that the news would focus on in a general sense.
Another good point. Also, alot of their claims are for incidents in other countries..
 
"We have not been able to find a real lie from ISIS," said Katz, who follows the group's social media obsessively with a critical eye. "Despite the fact that they are a terrorist organization, they want to provide their followers and supporters with authentic information."

Joscelyn said he can't think of an example of an outright false claim by ISIS in the U.S. and western Europe. There are plenty of exaggerations — on death tolls, for instance — and the statements shouldn't be assumed to be true. (For instance, the ISIS claim for the attack on a concert in Manchester didn't describe a suicide bomber, and had slightly inflated numbers of the dead and wounded.)

Rita Katz SITE intelligence
 
Don't need to. All one needs to know is that any number won't be considered acceptable by the Muslim lovers.
So you dont need to have supporting logic behind banning a religion in the united states of america....such as "x-percent of this religion commit mass murder?"

That would be a weird leadership strategy.

I provided logic. You ignored it because there is no number that would satisfy you as when to ban a group that has shown they hate the U.S.

The weird strategy is coddling them then thinking they'll be nice by doing so.
I dont coddle anybody, that wasnt logic.

Saying "no number is good enough" isnt logic.

Its not even a basis for a decision, let alone one that violates our constitution.

When no number is good enough, saying it's not good enough is perfect logic.

For those of you that make excuses for the raghead, I can only hope you're the ones that get what they have to offer.
Thats anger, not logic.

That's logic. If you support (fill in the blank) and it produces a negative result, logic dictates you should have no problem being one that feels the effects.
 
If this is true watch the left crawl back into their spidey holes
And if it's not true, the OP is embarrassed and will continue to pretend it's true. No corroboration from law officials or any respectable news outlet as to him being an Islam convert.
As the OP is a muslim himself, he has tremendous insight to all things muslim. That said, his original premises is much like all of his other premises: it's complete batshit.

Hope this helps.
 
ISIS has falsely claimed responsibility for attacks in the past, including a June attack at a casino in the Philippines that left 37 people dead. Police denied the incident was terror-related despite ISIS's claim, and said it was instead perpetrated by a 42-year-old man who had a gambling problem and was in debt.
ISIS claims responsibility for Las Vegas shooting, calls gunman one of its 'soldiers'
They dont even know who the guy is. They are not even sure if he is a foreigner or not.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Forum List

Back
Top