Vegas Shooter was a Muzzie

[SassyIrishLass]

If this is true watch the left crawl back into their spidey holes

And if it's not true, the OP is embarrassed and will continue to pretend it's true. No corroboration from law officials or any respectable news outlet as to him being an Islam convert.

Notice I said "if" you befuddled loon

Frazier said "if" as well Pinky.

Oh look at Asslips chime in like anyone cares. As usual the point goes over your head.

 

[Asclepias]

If this is true watch the left crawl back into their spidey holes

And if it's not true, the OP is embarrassed and will continue to pretend it's true. No corroboration from law officials or any respectable news outlet as to him being an Islam convert.

Notice I said "if" you befuddled loon

Frazier said "if" as well Pinky.

Oh look at Asslips chime in like anyone cares. As usual the point goes over your head.

Obviously you care. Why else would you reply Pinky?

 

[Conservative65]

We need MUZZIE control not muzzle control. When a "religion" becomes non-religious, it looses its constitutional protections.

wtf is looses

and whats the threshold % of acts of the few that we should take away the right of the many

put a number on it, genius...and then lets see all the things we can get fascist with and ban.

When it's .0000001% of gun owners, that's all that's needed for gun hater to want to pass laws affecting the other 99.9999999% that didn't misuse a gun.

When it's .0000001% of Christians, that's all that's needed for people to blame the other 99.9999999% that didn't do it.

When Muslims continue to do thing that support the claim they're practicing their religion, it's never enough.

You dont have a number in mind, then?

Don't need to. All one needs to know is that any number won't be considered acceptable by the Muslim lovers.

So you dont need to have supporting logic behind banning a religion in the united states of america....such as "x-percent of this religion commit mass murder?"

That would be a weird leadership strategy.

I provided logic. You ignored it because there is no number that would satisfy you as when to ban a group that has shown they hate the U.S.

The weird strategy is coddling them then thinking they'll be nice by doing so.

 

[kiwiman127]

Converted months ago. Islamic state takes credit.

You ignorant lying bastard!

Just saw it reported on Bloomberg Business.

No. You didn't see it reported on Bloomberg Business.

Yes I did.

Here's Bloomberg News story updated 5 minutes ago.
Gunman in High-rise Hotel Kills At Least 58 in Las Vegas

At this point there is no evidence that the Islamic State telling the truth. The IS has made many claims that proved to false in the past.

 

[Conservative65]

If this is true watch the left crawl back into their spidey holes

And if it's not true, the OP is embarrassed and will continue to pretend it's true. No corroboration from law officials or any respectable news outlet as to him being an Islam convert.

Notice I said "if" you befuddled loon

Frazier said "if" as well Pinky.

Oh look at Asslips chime in like anyone cares. As usual the point goes over your head.

Obviously you care. Why else would you reply Pinky?

Same applies to you boy despite saying you don't when you reply to your superior which is ME.

 

[G.T.]

wtf is looses

and whats the threshold % of acts of the few that we should take away the right of the many

put a number on it, genius...and then lets see all the things we can get fascist with and ban.

When it's .0000001% of gun owners, that's all that's needed for gun hater to want to pass laws affecting the other 99.9999999% that didn't misuse a gun.

When it's .0000001% of Christians, that's all that's needed for people to blame the other 99.9999999% that didn't do it.

When Muslims continue to do thing that support the claim they're practicing their religion, it's never enough.

You dont have a number in mind, then?

Don't need to. All one needs to know is that any number won't be considered acceptable by the Muslim lovers.

So you dont need to have supporting logic behind banning a religion in the united states of america....such as "x-percent of this religion commit mass murder?"

That would be a weird leadership strategy.

I provided logic. You ignored it because there is no number that would satisfy you as when to ban a group that has shown they hate the U.S.

The weird strategy is coddling them then thinking they'll be nice by doing so.

I dont coddle anybody, that wasnt logic.

Saying "no number is good enough" isnt logic.

Its not even a basis for a decision, let alone one that violates our constitution.

 

[Votto]

Assuming the shooter was not a Muslim, do they still get the 72 virgins?

 

[Conservative65]

The brother also told NBC News that Stephen Paddock was retired and was “just a guy” who frequented the hotels, gambled and attended shows. He had “no religious affiliation” and “no political affiliation, he added. “Not an avid gun guy at all,” the brother told “CBS This Morning.”

Lets face it folks, when white people get pissed, instead of seeking help, they grab guns and have a field day harming people......

Yea and they also said they don’t talk or see him much!

Yea and when every black thug that attacks the police and gets killed the family of the thug says he was a good kid, wouldn’t hurt anyone and was great at schools. Doesn’t matter her was a gangbanger shooting at the police.


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

Blacks that attack the police????? Bitch you watch too much gotdamn tv. And just for the record, its them nice nigga's that cops like shooting...God forbid they do their jobs and go after them really tough mf's, they may end up with bullet or break a nail.

You mean like Michael Brown after he tried to steal a cop's gun?

And all the eye witness lies that came along with it.

There were those that claimed to be witnesses in that case claiming Brown had his hands up. When it got down to the truth, many of them weren't there and only repeated what some liar that was told them.

 

[Ted Frazier]

Converted months ago. Islamic state takes credit.

This thread has now been moved to the "Conspiracy Theories" forum.
Awkward!

 

[Conservative65]

When it's .0000001% of gun owners, that's all that's needed for gun hater to want to pass laws affecting the other 99.9999999% that didn't misuse a gun.

When it's .0000001% of Christians, that's all that's needed for people to blame the other 99.9999999% that didn't do it.

When Muslims continue to do thing that support the claim they're practicing their religion, it's never enough.

You dont have a number in mind, then?

Don't need to. All one needs to know is that any number won't be considered acceptable by the Muslim lovers.

So you dont need to have supporting logic behind banning a religion in the united states of america....such as "x-percent of this religion commit mass murder?"

That would be a weird leadership strategy.

I provided logic. You ignored it because there is no number that would satisfy you as when to ban a group that has shown they hate the U.S.

The weird strategy is coddling them then thinking they'll be nice by doing so.

I dont coddle anybody, that wasnt logic.

Saying "no number is good enough" isnt logic.

Its not even a basis for a decision, let alone one that violates our constitution.

When no number is good enough, saying it's not good enough is perfect logic.

For those of you that make excuses for the raghead, I can only hope you're the ones that get what they have to offer.

 

[G.T.]

You dont have a number in mind, then?

Don't need to. All one needs to know is that any number won't be considered acceptable by the Muslim lovers.

So you dont need to have supporting logic behind banning a religion in the united states of america....such as "x-percent of this religion commit mass murder?"

That would be a weird leadership strategy.

I provided logic. You ignored it because there is no number that would satisfy you as when to ban a group that has shown they hate the U.S.

The weird strategy is coddling them then thinking they'll be nice by doing so.

I dont coddle anybody, that wasnt logic.

Saying "no number is good enough" isnt logic.

Its not even a basis for a decision, let alone one that violates our constitution.

When no number is good enough, saying it's not good enough is perfect logic.

For those of you that make excuses for the raghead, I can only hope you're the ones that get what they have to offer.

Thats anger, not logic.

 

[easyt65]

Our laws are somewhat difficult in that TRUE 'guilt' is not in what we KNOW but what we can PROVE.

We may 'know' (talking 'gut' here, what we feel, as well as understanding based on circumstantial evidence) a group of Muslims are 'terrorists', but we can not 'round them all up', especially after some terrorist attack committed by 1 person.

Our Constitution and laws provide for 'Innocent Until Proven Guilty', Due Process, a 'Right to a fair trial', etc...

 

[OldLady]

The guy is apparently not a "Muslim," convert or otherwise.
The sheriff said a check of federal and state databases showed Paddock was not on law enforcement authorities' radar before the bloodbath.

Aaron Rouse, the FBI agent in charge in Las Vegas, said investigators saw no immediate evidence connecting it to an international terror organization, despite a claim of responsibility from the Islamic State group.

https://twitter.com/LVMPD

 

[TNHarley]

The guy is apparently not a "Muslim," convert or otherwise.
The sheriff said a check of federal and state databases showed Paddock was not on law enforcement authorities' radar before the bloodbath.

Aaron Rouse, the FBI agent in charge in Las Vegas, said investigators saw no immediate evidence connecting it to an international terror organization, despite a claim of responsibility from the Islamic State group.

So why did ISIS make that claim?
Are they known for falsely claiming responsibility?

 

[GHook93]

If this is true watch the left crawl back into their spidey holes

And if it's not true, the OP is embarrassed and will continue to pretend it's true. No corroboration from law officials or any respectable news outlet as to him being an Islam convert.

It is only a few hours into this. It may take a few more days for the facts to come out


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

 

[Peach]

The guy is apparently not a "Muslim," convert or otherwise.
The sheriff said a check of federal and state databases showed Paddock was not on law enforcement authorities' radar before the bloodbath.

Aaron Rouse, the FBI agent in charge in Las Vegas, said investigators saw no immediate evidence connecting it to an international terror organization, despite a claim of responsibility from the Islamic State group.

So why did ISIS make that claim?
Are they known for falsely claiming responsibility?

Yes.

 

[TNHarley]

The guy is apparently not a "Muslim," convert or otherwise.
The sheriff said a check of federal and state databases showed Paddock was not on law enforcement authorities' radar before the bloodbath.

Aaron Rouse, the FBI agent in charge in Las Vegas, said investigators saw no immediate evidence connecting it to an international terror organization, despite a claim of responsibility from the Islamic State group.

So why did ISIS make that claim?
Are they known for falsely claiming responsibility?

Yes.

Got any examples?

 

[FA_Q2]

The guy is apparently not a "Muslim," convert or otherwise.
The sheriff said a check of federal and state databases showed Paddock was not on law enforcement authorities' radar before the bloodbath.

Aaron Rouse, the FBI agent in charge in Las Vegas, said investigators saw no immediate evidence connecting it to an international terror organization, despite a claim of responsibility from the Islamic State group.

So why did ISIS make that claim?
Are they known for falsely claiming responsibility?

Likely because it is the worst mass shooting in the US and will dominate the headlines for a while to come.

 

[TNHarley]

The guy is apparently not a "Muslim," convert or otherwise.
The sheriff said a check of federal and state databases showed Paddock was not on law enforcement authorities' radar before the bloodbath.

Aaron Rouse, the FBI agent in charge in Las Vegas, said investigators saw no immediate evidence connecting it to an international terror organization, despite a claim of responsibility from the Islamic State group.

So why did ISIS make that claim?
Are they known for falsely claiming responsibility?

Likely because it is the worst mass shooting in the US and will dominate the headlines for a while to come.

thats a good point.

 

[ZZ PUPPS]

The guy is apparently not a "Muslim," convert or otherwise.
The sheriff said a check of federal and state databases showed Paddock was not on law enforcement authorities' radar before the bloodbath.

Aaron Rouse, the FBI agent in charge in Las Vegas, said investigators saw no immediate evidence connecting it to an international terror organization, despite a claim of responsibility from the Islamic State group.

9/11 hijackers weren't on their radar either, until they had taken over the planes...