LordBrownTrout
Diamond Member
All of a sudden.......its okay..every good govt employee should have his/her own server to conduct official govt business. We're just the taxpayers. Who the hell are we?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yeah? maybe lobbying for foreign moneyGiven how dry she acts and speaks most of the time, I doubt there is much in her email that is 'controversial', regardless of whether she used her private email.

Well, how is that 'controversial' or a relevation, as she has had foreign support for many years now.Yeah? maybe lobbying for foreign moneyGiven how dry she acts and speaks most of the time, I doubt there is much in her email that is 'controversial', regardless of whether she used her private email.![]()
Democrats leaked this commie boy.... Your "Smart people"
You do understand that goes further into explaining why it went "broadband" now and not in 2013 don't you?
.
Because the Republicans were holding off for political purposes?![]()
You're really an idiot. I proved that her use of her private email was already known in 2013.
A use of private email that is allowed under State Dept regs, just like Powell and Rice used private email.Democrats leaked this commie boy.... Your "Smart people"
You do understand that goes further into explaining why it went "broadband" now and not in 2013 don't you?
.
Because the Republicans were holding off for political purposes?![]()
You're really an idiot. I proved that her use of her private email was already known in 2013.
No. Smart people knew about this in 2013 and knew it was a non-story. It's only stupid, knuckledragging Cons who just figured it out.Democrats leaked this commie boy.... Your "Smart people"
You do understand that goes further into explaining why it went "broadband" now and not in 2013 don't you?
.
Because the Republicans were holding off for political purposes?![]()
You're really an idiot. I proved that her use of her private email was already known in 2013.
Funny the public didn't know about it until now
So, some people in USMB really are stupid enough to believe that rot. Color me surprised.Probably Obama himself.If this is the truth, it just further confirms, for me, there is another Obama waiting in the wings
That is something that worries me. Before he became POTUS he was musing about third terms becoming constitutional. So, Barry could break some more rules and be the candidate, in the event ISIS hasn't taken us over by then.
So, some people in USMB really are stupid enough to believe that rot. Color me surprised.Probably Obama himself.If this is the truth, it just further confirms, for me, there is another Obama waiting in the wings
That is something that worries me. Before he became POTUS he was musing about third terms becoming constitutional. So, Barry could break some more rules and be the candidate, in the event ISIS hasn't taken us over by then.
Gesendet von meinem GT-I9515 mit Tapatalk
Not Kerry. It's Al Gore. Democrats have convinced themselves that global warming is a sure winner.I heard today Kerry may be waiting in the wings...
Hillary thinks she is untouchable, and always has, this time she might find differently.
Because it's RW propaganda BS, fool Duh lol....The story isn't true. Her email situation was known about in 2013.
But, was it reported? Why is this story gaining steam now? Ultimately, regardless of when it was known, reported, gained traction, etc., do Americans want their Administration officials, be it Republican or Democrat, keeping offline, unsecured, electronic messages outside of Government policies? If that is the case, then Democrats have once again set a precedent I believe is going to bite them in the ass. They will have no ground to stand on if they continue to sidestep this and defend Hillary.
Because it's RW propaganda BS, fool Duh lol....The story isn't true. Her email situation was known about in 2013.
But, was it reported? Why is this story gaining steam now? Ultimately, regardless of when it was known, reported, gained traction, etc., do Americans want their Administration officials, be it Republican or Democrat, keeping offline, unsecured, electronic messages outside of Government policies? If that is the case, then Democrats have once again set a precedent I believe is going to bite them in the ass. They will have no ground to stand on if they continue to sidestep this and defend Hillary.

All of a sudden.......its okay..every good govt employee should have his/her own server to conduct official govt business. We're just the taxpayers. Who the hell are we?
There's nothing new , no evidence of wrongdoing, just BS propaganda on Pubbizarroworld, hater dupe.