- Thread starter
- #41
The government should not be mis-using our tax dollars in order to give a woman or a minority preferential treatment, despite the fact that they may NOT be the best value for our tax dollars.
For example, I made mention upthread of that black man who owned a small business, and was going gangbusters for the 8 years he qualified for favoritism. Once that expired, and he had to compete on the competence of his staff and the value of his service, the contracts ran out.
He was desperate and thus asked me to form a business under which all the contracts would funnel down to him. All I had to to is be the “front,” and he offered me a lot of money to do it.
I refused.
For example, I made mention upthread of that black man who owned a small business, and was going gangbusters for the 8 years he qualified for favoritism. Once that expired, and he had to compete on the competence of his staff and the value of his service, the contracts ran out.
He was desperate and thus asked me to form a business under which all the contracts would funnel down to him. All I had to to is be the “front,” and he offered me a lot of money to do it.
I refused.
