"Utterly Insane"....Says Elon Musk About The "Big, Beautiful Bill" Gutting All Clean Energy Incentives. And He Is Correct.

So pollution doesn't exist either, simp???


Yahoo must have banned the good Doctor eh? Now the red-yahoo HS boys I dropped like rocks come over here. I got banned on commee yahoo for typing the words “2020 Election Fraud”. Imagine the Doctor reporting record to Moderation?
 
Last edited:
Pollution is not just about CO2 and climate change, imbecile.
That 'pollution' has been reduced to @ 98% less than it was 40 years ago here in the USA.

China and India on the other hand burn their coal without use of SO2 scrubbers, and that is pollution.*
Bet you can't tell us what kind.
Take your rant overseas where it is "needed".

* Flue-gas desulfurization

BTW, your username is pollution and toxic ...
 
You want to continue destroying the planet with more oil spills and pollution....and continue to have the Federal government provide billions of dollars in subsidies to the oil and gas companies perpetuating this environmental destruction and pollution.

You are as ******* stupid and deranged as they come, simp.
An oil spill can clean itself, when you dump solar panels and they poison the earth.
 
Show a line item in BBB that says $1B for oil exploration, fuel refinery build to Exxonor Shell or Chevron? Vauge language about “spending in the Tax code” is just gobbldy-gook on Twatter type message boards.
 
The federal government provides numerous subsidies, both direct and indirect, to the fossil fuel industry. Special provisions in the U.S. tax code designed to specifically support and reward domestic fossil fuel‐related production are direct subsidies. Other provisions in the tax code aimed at businesses in general create indirect subsidies that are not exclusive to the fossil fuels industry. In certain cases, quantifying these subsidies is fairly simple. In the case of indirect subsidies, establishing an amount associated with these subsidies is more challenging. While not covered in this fact sheet, another source of federal aid to the fossil fuel industry is the discounted cost of leasing federal lands for fossil fuel extraction. Some fossil fuel subsidies provide public assistance, such as the Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program (LIHEAP), which assists low-income households with heating costs.
You should read your links. I color-coded the part you didn't read or understand.
 
I wasn't talking about carbon dioxide, simp. Your imbecile MAGA buddy Mac-7 was.
Yet the "REALLY BIG" solution you AGW/ACC scammers want implemented is totally focused on reducing CO2 levels which you psuedo-greenies call "pollution".
Are you a liar ?
Are you dumber than a box of rocks ?
Or both the above ?
 
Yet the "REALLY BIG" solution you AGW/ACC scammers want implemented is totally focused on reducing CO2 levels which you psuedo-greenies call "pollution".
Are you a liar ?
Are you dumber than a box of rocks ?
Or both the above ?
You can fight you idiotic MAGA crusade against the "climate change hoax" while breathing cleaner air, simp.
 
I understand it perfectly....why aren't the same benefits being extended to green energy?

You have no answer.
No you don't.
There are subsidies, undeserved, for "alternative" or Pseudo "renewable" energy.
But "green energy" isn't really "green". Just the opposite.*

* Factor in the full and real; costs of resource procurement, production, and eventual disposal of "green energy" and it cost$ more along with doing more harm to the environment(pollution).
 
I already do -simp.

Doesn't undo that you are a phony and an idiot.
No you don't, shit-for-brains.

Since you want Republicans to keep focusing on more fossil fuel production, instead of cleaner energy.

You would rather take a couple of years off your life and your family's life....just so you can continue to whine about the "climate change hoax".
 
15th post
No you don't, shit-for-brains.

Since you want Republicans to keep focusing on more fossil fuel production, instead of cleaner energy.

You would rather take a couple of years off your life and your family's life....just so you can continue to whine about the "climate change hoax".
1) I accept NATURAL Climate Change which is a constant. I don't accept/believe in the phony case of Anthropogenic = Human Caused/Made.
2) I for any "cleaner energy" that is actually "clean".

Meanwhile, I need to tend my yard and gardens, which have billions of self-replicating, self-expanding biological, flora CO2 recyclers.

Change your pajamas and step out of your parent's basement, get some fresh air.
 
No you don't, shit-for-brains.

Since you want Republicans to keep focusing on more fossil fuel production, instead of cleaner energy.

You would rather take a couple of years off your life and your family's life....just so you can continue to whine about the "climate change hoax".

Cheaper reliable nuclear and fossil fuel energy adds years to the lives of everyone in my family, everyone in the world.
 
Meanwhile, I need to tend my yard and gardens, which have billions of self-replicating, self-expanding biological, flora CO2 recyclers.
And you will have fewer days on planet Earth enjoying these activities....because of your MAGA derangement about clean energy and climate change.
 
Back
Top Bottom