USAID inside look

~~~~~~
Then can you explain why even Forbes is exposing the illicit funding from USAID and the Dept. HHS?
  • "The USAID budget totalled $43.4 billion in fiscal year 2023, according to the Congressional Research Service, and approximately 130 countries received USAID assistance—Europe and Eurasia received 40% of the funding ($17.2 billion), since Ukraine was the top foreign recipient for USAID in fiscal year 2023.
  • USAID has distributed more than $30 billion in direct financial support to the government of Ukraine between fiscal years 2022 and 2024, according to the CRS.
  • Non-governmental organizations (NGOs) implement the majority (52%) of USAID programs, while public international organizations administer 34%, the U.S. government is responsible for about 10% and foreign governments implement about 4%, according to a CRS study of USAID non-military funding between fiscal years 2013-2022.
  • Among public international organizations, which are formed via a partnership between foreign governments, the World Bank Group was the top recipient of non-military USAID assistance, receiving more than $20 billion between fiscal years 2013 and 2022, followed by the World Food Program, which received more than $15 billion.
  • For-profit firms received 40% of all USAID NGO funding in the nine-year period included in the CRS report, with four receiving at least $1 billion.

Top Ngo Usaid Recipients (fiscal Years 2013-2022)

1. Catholic Relief Services: $4.6 billion (nonprofit)​
2. Chemonics International: $4.5 billion (for-profit)​
3. FHI 360: $3.8 billion (nonprofit)​
4. Development Alternatives, Inc.: $3 billion (for-profit​
5. ABT Associates, Inc.: $2.6 billion (for-profit)​
6. RTI International: $2.3 billion (research institute)​
7. John Snow International: $1.8 billion (nonprofit)​
8. Save the Children Federation, Inc.: $1.5 billion (nonprofit)​
9. ARD, Inc.: $1.5 billion (nonprofit)​
10. Jhpiego Corporation: $1.3 billion (nonprofit)​
Source:
Who is Chemonics International?


They report profits of 1.5 billion a year.

"According to Murphy, he started Chemonics because "I've always wanted a way to do two things: one, have my own C.I.A..."

The New York Times said the company received 98 percent of its revenue in the form of agency contracts and increased revenues four-fold over the past decade. Chemonics was awarded a $5 million, three-year contract in 1995 to manage the creation of Ukraine's Agricultural Commodity Exchange. In 1997, the company received funding to continue co-managing a privatization project for non-farm land in Ukraine...

Chemonics received USAID funding in early 2014 to operate the Sindh Reading Programme to improve literacy in Sindh, Pakistan. The company had received $501.7 million from USAID by November 2014. Chemonics worked with USAID to help three coastal cities in Mozambique adapt to climate change. As part of the work, Chemonics and USAID constructed model homes to teach residents about low-cost solutions to protect homes during storms.

In 2015, USAID awarded Chemonics a $9.5 billion, eight-year IDIQ contract, the agency's largest award to date. The contract funds health supply chain programs to prevent and treat HIV/AIDS, malaria, and tuberculosis. In 2017, Devex reported that only 7 percent of the health commodity shipments delivered through the program arrived "on time and in full".

In 2016, Chemonics launched the Blockchain for Development Solutions Lab.... can you say MONEY LAUNDERING?
 
Since USAID wasn't sending much money for sex changes in Africa, the fact remains that Musk doesn't have the authority t cose government agencies, no matter how much you suck on his dick. Musk was under contract with Ukraine; that's what's being investigated, and USAID has the right to do that since they are paying Musk.
/—-/ With homeless VETs, we don’t send any money anywhere for your perverted sex change operations. You like it so much, donate your money.
 
I did, it's in their own words....they were doing an internal investigation into their own oversight. The goals, to see how Ukraine used the starlink systems THEY provided, and to inspection their own monitoring of how Ukraine used them.
You think it’s prudent that any agency investigates themselves?
 
Who is Chemonics International?


They report profits of 1.5 billion a year.

"According to Murphy, he started Chemonics because "I've always wanted a way to do two things: one, have my own C.I.A..."

The New York Times said the company received 98 percent of its revenue in the form of agency contracts and increased revenues four-fold over the past decade. Chemonics was awarded a $5 million, three-year contract in 1995 to manage the creation of Ukraine's Agricultural Commodity Exchange. In 1997, the company received funding to continue co-managing a privatization project for non-farm land in Ukraine...

Chemonics received USAID funding in early 2014 to operate the Sindh Reading Programme to improve literacy in Sindh, Pakistan. The company had received $501.7 million from USAID by November 2014. Chemonics worked with USAID to help three coastal cities in Mozambique adapt to climate change. As part of the work, Chemonics and USAID constructed model homes to teach residents about low-cost solutions to protect homes during storms.

In 2015, USAID awarded Chemonics a $9.5 billion, eight-year IDIQ contract, the agency's largest award to date. The contract funds health supply chain programs to prevent and treat HIV/AIDS, malaria, and tuberculosis. In 2017, Devex reported that only 7 percent of the health commodity shipments delivered through the program arrived "on time and in full".

In 2016, Chemonics launched the Blockchain for Development Solutions Lab.... can you say MONEY LAUNDERING?
pure ponzi to line their pockets, round them up and send them to gitmo, they are all stealing from the US taxpayer

f-u to fleece me and send my money outside the USA for something I don't really care about, let them fix their own shit with their money
 
I did, it's in their own words....they were doing an internal investigation into their own oversight. The goals, to see how Ukraine used the starlink systems THEY provided, and to inspection their own monitoring of how Ukraine used them.
Yet they refused to cooperate with congressional oversight as constitutionally mandated.
 
You think it’s prudent that any agency investigates themselves?
First, it wasn't an "investigation", their word was "inspection", and yes, any organization should be looking internally at its own operations to see if they are working as intended.
 
Yet they refused to cooperate with congressional oversight as constitutionally mandated.
Right, I'm just pointing out that usaid wasn't investigating musk, as the OP seems to allege.


I think your post was merged with another amyway...I was originally responding to an OP suggesting musk was doing all of this because usaid was investigating him.

Yeah, IM2s thread was merged into this one
 
Last edited:
First, it wasn't an "investigation", their word was "inspection", and yes, any organization should be looking internally at its own operations to see if they are working as intended.
Well, I’m sure the outcome will be that they’re doing a fine job….😉
 
You know this how.

You know they were doing that under Biden......and who was real popular with the Trump crowd?

The article that IM2 linked made the allegations, i just found their own words within the story, that said usaid was only doing an internal inspection.


This thread just got confusing when they merged it with IM2s thread.

Post 172 of this thread was IM2s original post, which is what I was responding to. They appear to have merged it with this thread and now our conversation doesn't make sense..in context.
 
Last edited:
1738935914084.webp



SON'S OF BITCHES
 
15th post
The Free Press:

This past week, the clandestine coders of DOGE are looking at the flabbiest-seeming government agency: USAID. It’s already being dismantled.

USAID turns out to be lining coffers for Dems who are between jobs, kind of like the MyPillow of the left. I honestly had no idea how big this grift was. For example: Nina Jankowicz, Biden’s would-be disinformation czar, who resigned after an uproar over her Ministry of Truth, then spent some time at the Centre for Information Resilience, which was partially funded by USAID. USAID was apparently partnering with Burisma, the Ukrainian group where Hunter Biden sat on the board. USAID was also the second-largest funder of the BBC’s charity arm. Which is crazy. We fought a war (a revolutionary one!) so we wouldn’t have to tune in to British propaganda. And now we’re footing the bill?...
 
Back
Top Bottom