US Soldiers NOT Allowed To Defend US Borders From Foreign Enemies

'Does the United States military exist only to defend the borders of foreign countries in the Middle East or is it allowed to defend the borders of the U.S. against terrorist cartels, espionage, infiltrations, and smuggling?'

Sound like a stupid question? Here's one that's going to sound even MORE stupid:

Do US military troops have the right to DEFED THEMSELVES in their own country, on their own die of the border, when approached by foreign troops who order them to surrender their weapons?


According to a NorthCom spokesman, the military troops are there NOT in a Law Enforcement capacity.
-- Well, NO SHIT! The US military is used for the defense of the United States...and since there is an illegal invasion going on right now, why can't they be accepted as being there to protect this nation during this 'invasion'?



Military's mission doesn't include enforcement, so smugglers cross Rio Grande right in front of them
No, they can't shoot unarmed civilians. So sorry about that.
American history is not Easy's friend either. LOL
 
The entire US military has become a court-martial red-light district:
  • Sex segregation & discrimination
  • Rape, sexual assault & false accusations thereof
  • Commercial sex trafficking NXIVM, ALVN, #MeToo, etc.
If it isn't sex, they're dealing drugs, and if you don't have enough rank, you keep your mouth shut & just take the drugs they deal. Murder for hire is rampant.

The Mafia establishment has “made men” in the military: usually pretty good rank, but they keep most of the dirty work “below the Beltway” — that is, below the rank of general, outside the Pentagon.

Those fellows tend to have too many masonic degrees and secret handshakes, unusual decorations from out of left field somewhere, VFW, American Legion, other fraternal organizations.
 
No, they can't shoot unarmed civilians. So sorry about that.

No but they absolutely ought to be wiping out foreign troops who point weapons at them inside our border.

They should also be using some of the less lethal means of crowd control to dissipate hordes of illegals trying to breech barriers.

Sorry but someone running to the boarder to seek asylum is not illegal...

Also how does a soldier know they are not US Citizens?
 
No, they can't shoot unarmed civilians. So sorry about that.
American history is not Easy's friend either. LOL

Actually I was a history minor in college...and no one stated the military can shoot unarmed citizens, as the resident mentally unstable lying snowflake insinuated...but please don't let me stop the snowflake love-fest / BS session you two are engaged in...
 
...
This is exactly what democrats want. Those candidates who spoke in Spanish have nothing to say to English speaking Americans. ...


They have nothing of value to say because they are democrats, not because they spoke a little Spanish. Lots of Americans speak Spanish.
 
...
This is exactly what democrats want. Those candidates who spoke in Spanish have nothing to say to English speaking Americans. ...


They have nothing of value to say because they are democrats, not because they spoke a little Spanish. Lots of Americans speak Spanish.

Just another testimony....Our politicians selling their asses to Mexico...while ignorant pieces of shits cry RUSSIA!
 
The entire US military has become a court-martial red-light district:
  • Sex segregation & discrimination
  • Rape, sexual assault & false accusations thereof
  • Commercial sex trafficking NXIVM, ALVN, #MeToo, etc.
If it isn't sex, they're dealing drugs, and if you don't have enough rank, you keep your mouth shut & just take the drugs they deal. Murder for hire is rampant.

The Mafia establishment has “made men” in the military: usually pretty good rank, but they keep most of the dirty work “below the Beltway” — that is, below the rank of general, outside the Pentagon.

Those fellows tend to have too many masonic degrees and secret handshakes, unusual decorations from out of left field somewhere, VFW, American Legion, other fraternal organizations.
That's always been a part of the mystic of the military...
 
I know I am correct you're a crazy idiot.

You know nothing as you are the crazy idiot. Your defense of Trump proves that.
your DTS is well documented in here. why would I expect you to stop now. hahahahhahaa crazy idiot you are.

Trump Derangement Syndrome causes Trump defenders to say stupid things because that is the only way they can defend him. You sound like a idiot.
 
Posse Comitatus Act
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Posse Comitatus Act
The Posse Comitatus Act is a United States federal law (18 U.S.C. § 1385, original at 20 Stat. 152) signed on June 18, 1878, by President Rutherford B. Hayes. The purpose of the act – in concert with the Insurrection Act of 1807 – is to limit the powers of the federal government in using federal military personnel to enforce domestic policies within the United States. It was passed as an amendment to an army appropriation bill following the end of Reconstruction and was updated in 1956 and 1981.

The act specifically applies only to the United States Army and, as amended in 1956, the United States Air Force. Although the act does not explicitly mention the United States Navy and the United States Marine Corps, the Department of the Navy has prescribed regulations that are generally construed to give the act force with respect to those services as well. The act does not prevent the Army National Guard or the Air National Guard under state authority from acting in a law enforcement capacity within its home state or in an adjacent state if invited by that state's governor. The United States Coast Guard, which operates under the Department of Homeland Security, is not covered by the Posse Comitatus Act either, primarily because although the Coast Guard is an armed service, it also has both a maritime law enforcement mission and a federal regulatory agency mission.

The title of the act comes from the legal concept of posse comitatus, the authority under which a county sheriff, or other law officer, conscripts any able-bodied person to assist in keeping the peace.
So you all think our military can’t protect our own land? :auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg:

They can only stop enemy soldiers trying to take over the country.
every foreigner that enters illegal enters as an enemy. don't need to be a soldier.

Soldiers cannot enforce civil laws. End of discussion.
illegal entry to my country is an act of war, military can be used.

I have a say too and apparently the Pentagon agrees with me.
 
Trump Derangement Syndrome causes Trump defenders to say stupid things because that is the only way they can defend him. You sound like a idiot.

:yapyapyapf:

Unlike conservatives / NON-TDS-suffering Americans, you demonstrate how you and other snowflakes constantly spew emotionally-manipulated ignorant, unsubstantiated OPIONS, insults, and attacks, accusing others - who regularly post links, articles, testimony, etc... - of doing that you / snowflakes do.

:rolleyes:

.
 
'Does the United States military exist only to defend the borders of foreign countries in the Middle East or is it allowed to defend the borders of the U.S. against terrorist cartels, espionage, infiltrations, and smuggling?'

Sound like a stupid question? Here's one that's going to sound even MORE stupid:

Do US military troops have the right to DEFED THEMSELVES in their own country, on their own die of the border, when approached by foreign troops who order them to surrender their weapons?


According to a NorthCom spokesman, the military troops are there NOT in a Law Enforcement capacity.
-- Well, NO SHIT! The US military is used for the defense of the United States...and since there is an illegal invasion going on right now, why can't they be accepted as being there to protect this nation during this 'invasion'?



Military's mission doesn't include enforcement, so smugglers cross Rio Grande right in front of them
Considering those coming across our border are violating our countries sovereignty, this is an act of war. Sorry... but its time to start repelling the invaders..
A Trumptard's wet dream. Shooting brown people.
 
Here is another definition.

an instance of invading a country or region with an armed force.

That is the military's job. Stopping unarmed women and children is not.

1. Thank you for admitting that the Mexican Military crossing into the United States, ordering US military members on US soil to surrender, and taking their weapons is, according to your definition, an invasion, a military incursion, and it is well within the duty, responsibility, and mission of the US Military to defend themselves and this nation.

2. Official reports have described heavily armored / armed Mexican Drug Cartels / Smugglers escorting illegals across our border and into the United States. There are also past reports of members of Mexico's own military escorting Mexican Drug Cartels and drug shipments into the US, on US soil. By your own definition it was well within the duty, responsibility, and mission of the United States Military to engage and militarily defend the United States.

3. You / your definition does NOT address 'irregular warfare' and / or terrorist / non-official foreign military invasions / incursions / operations into the United States. Official US Govt Intel sources HAVE reported that terrorists / individuals associated with terrorist organizations HAVE infiltrated / invaded this country.

Both US Intel and Law Enforcement entities have officially reported that MS13 - an recognized internationally recognized violent crime organization - has invaded this country through our unsecured border and that they have perpetrated violent, heinous crimes against US citizens, to including HACKING CHILDREN / ADULTS TO PIECES and in one case SETTING A YOUNG GIRL ON FIRE AFTER SEVERAL MS13 MEMBERS GANG RAPED HER.

If you do think Mexican Drug Cartels, Human / Sex Traffickers MS13, and individuals associated with known terrorist groups entering the US is NOT an 'invasion' / is not part of an 'ATTACK' on the United States and its citizens then YOU'RE A FRIGGIN' IDIOT!

1. The fact is that whether they were in Mexico or the US is debatable. Nobody did anything stupid like shooting and it was resolved peacefully.

2. You are talking about enforcing civil law which the military cannot do. They can provide limited support such as surveillance but cannot make any arrests.

3. You are relying on reports from the Trump Administration and no proof has ever emerged from this. Certainly there have been no arrests despite the so-called accusations. This claim was made about the group of people moving towards the US in the mid-terms. Where are the arrests?

You cite your boogey men essentially to shut down debate. The fact is that the DEA has cited the ports of entry as major avenues for drug smuggling. Where are the arrests? There is no upsurge in arrests of MS13 members. ICE makes false claims about young men being members of MS13 and have lied to federal judges. There is no ATTACK on the US and YOU ARE THE FREAKIN IDIOT AND A MIND NUMBED ROBOT OF YOUR OWN HATE.
 
I know I am correct you're a crazy idiot.

You know nothing as you are the crazy idiot. Your defense of Trump proves that.
your DTS is well documented in here. why would I expect you to stop now. hahahahhahaa crazy idiot you are.

Trump Derangement Syndrome causes Trump defenders to say stupid things because that is the only way they can defend him. You sound like a idiot.
and yet there you are.
 
'Does the United States military exist only to defend the borders of foreign countries in the Middle East or is it allowed to defend the borders of the U.S. against terrorist cartels, espionage, infiltrations, and smuggling?'

Sound like a stupid question? Here's one that's going to sound even MORE stupid:

Do US military troops have the right to DEFED THEMSELVES in their own country, on their own die of the border, when approached by foreign troops who order them to surrender their weapons?


According to a NorthCom spokesman, the military troops are there NOT in a Law Enforcement capacity.
-- Well, NO SHIT! The US military is used for the defense of the United States...and since there is an illegal invasion going on right now, why can't they be accepted as being there to protect this nation during this 'invasion'?



Military's mission doesn't include enforcement, so smugglers cross Rio Grande right in front of them
Considering those coming across our border are violating our countries sovereignty, this is an act of war. Sorry... but its time to start repelling the invaders..
A Trumptard's wet dream. Shooting brown people.

unarmed, underfed, tired, homeless and often women and minor brown people.
 
Two of our soldiers over two months ago were briefly detained, probably over mixed up territory lines? No one was hurt. Let's kill some unarmed civilians over it.

Or lets kill some mexican soldiers who were probably running security for the cartel.
The two soldiers were in an unmarked vehicle south of the security perimeter. Someone got his pistol taken. You could be right that the soldiers were running interference for the cartel, but that's a pretty cynical viewpoint to take of every Mexican soldier, Pete.

You're not just looking to shoot people, are you?
 
So you all think our military can’t protect our own land? :auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg:

They can only stop enemy soldiers trying to take over the country.
every foreigner that enters illegal enters as an enemy. don't need to be a soldier.

Soldiers cannot enforce civil laws. End of discussion.
illegal entry to my country is an act of war, military can be used.

I have a say too and apparently the Pentagon agrees with me.
it says so right here in the oath of office our representative swear on...

"The oath used today has not changed since 1966 and is prescribed in Title 5, Section 3331 of the United States Code. It reads: “I, AB, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion, and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me God."
what does this mean? enemies, foreign and domestic;
 
They can only stop enemy soldiers trying to take over the country.
every foreigner that enters illegal enters as an enemy. don't need to be a soldier.

Soldiers cannot enforce civil laws. End of discussion.
illegal entry to my country is an act of war, military can be used.

I have a say too and apparently the Pentagon agrees with me.
it says so right here in the oath of office our representative swear on...

"The oath used today has not changed since 1966 and is prescribed in Title 5, Section 3331 of the United States Code. It reads: “I, AB, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion, and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me God."
what does this mean? enemies, foreign and domestic;

Use Google and read up on the Posse Comitatus Act. The military can't be used as law enforcement.
 

Forum List

Back
Top