US signs anti-abortion declaration with group of largely authoritarian governments

[Correll]

Yep .... so much for all the ' smaller less intrusive gov'ment' rhetoric if it involves a females' innards or who people love.

Even the most ardent of "small government" Conservatives will agree that the government has a legitimate role to play in protecting the lives and rights of children who can not speak for, nor defend themselves.

uh-huh. tell that to all the caged post born kiddies down at the border.

or the post born who go hungry every night.

That is a system set up by YOU PEOPLE, designed to FAIL so that the alternative is to just release foreign nationals into the country without limit.

We would have them staying in their own shithole country, if it was up to US.

 

[playtime]

I find the republicans hypocrites when they are so concerned about the fetus but not the child.

Your pretense that Republicans don't care about children is you being retarded.

They don't.

Says one of their fiercest enemies.


As one of US, I say we do care. And that you are just retarded.


Hey, we seem to be forgetting how to NOT have people shit in the streets. How does that help the children that they have to walk to school though human shit?

Now you talking about people shitting in the streets in Fl , TX and CA,

and your worried about children?? really.

Yes. What part of not wanting our children to have to walk though literal SHIT to get to school, do you not understand?

And it is not just on those dem strongholds but other cities to, to a lesser extent.

BUT, the trend is that way, more and more.


What part of this, don't you understand?

how many have to duck & cover between bullets flying? & b4 you go off on some tangent about (D) cities like chicago .... all the surrounding states that have lax gun laws are a bigley part of the problem.

 

[jknowgood]

Just how "authoritarian" is ripping an unborn baby out of the womb and murdering her/him?

They don't rip a fetus out of the womb.

Just sucks their brain out of there head. One abortion doctor said the baby would try to avoid the snips. I'm sure while your in hell, you will witness this over and over for eternity.

 

[playtime]

tell that to all the caged post born kiddies down at the border.

or the post born who go hungry every night.

Who Built the Cages, Joe?

Obama. And since he always takes credit for events while he was VP, Joe. https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/washington-secrets/baracks-ice-chief-cages-were-obamas-idea

www.usmessageboard.com

lol .... unaccompanied minors are not babies in diapers. & they weren't detained for more than a few days per the law.

Washington Examiner


Has this Media Source failed a fact check? LET US KNOW HERE.




Share:

RIGHT BIAS
These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward conservative causes through story selection and/or political affiliation. They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports and omit reporting of information that may damage conservative causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy. See all Right Bias sources.

• Overall, we rate the Washington Examiner Right Biased based on editorial positions that almost exclusively favor the right and Mixed for factual reporting due to several failed fact checks.

Washington Examiner - Media Bias/Fact Check


lol.... next?

 

[playtime]

Yep .... so much for all the ' smaller less intrusive gov'ment' rhetoric if it involves a females' innards or who people love.

Even the most ardent of "small government" Conservatives will agree that the government has a legitimate role to play in protecting the lives and rights of children who can not speak for, nor defend themselves.

playtime is such a bitch, the way she pretends that there is no other perspective than her own.

^^^ most ironic post today ^^^

 

[Correll]

I find the republicans hypocrites when they are so concerned about the fetus but not the child.

Your pretense that Republicans don't care about children is you being retarded.

They don't.

Says one of their fiercest enemies.


As one of US, I say we do care. And that you are just retarded.


Hey, we seem to be forgetting how to NOT have people shit in the streets. How does that help the children that they have to walk to school though human shit?

Now you talking about people shitting in the streets in Fl , TX and CA,

and your worried about children?? really.

Yes. What part of not wanting our children to have to walk though literal SHIT to get to school, do you not understand?

And it is not just on those dem strongholds but other cities to, to a lesser extent.

BUT, the trend is that way, more and more.


What part of this, don't you understand?

how many have to duck & cover between bullets flying? & b4 you go off on some tangent about (D) cities like chicago .... all the surrounding states that have lax gun laws are a bigley part of the problem.

1 What does that have to do with our strange inability to not shit in the streets?

2. High crime is caused by the breakdown in the family, not by guns. Your lib social change is the whole of the problem.

 

[Correll]

Yep .... so much for all the ' smaller less intrusive gov'ment' rhetoric if it involves a females' innards or who people love.

Even the most ardent of "small government" Conservatives will agree that the government has a legitimate role to play in protecting the lives and rights of children who can not speak for, nor defend themselves.

playtime is such a bitch, the way she pretends that there is no other perspective than her own.

^^^ most ironic post today ^^^

I address differences of opinion and/or policy. I don't pretend that they don't exist, like you just did, you brainless moron.

 

[j-mac]

Standing up for the lives of the unborn that can not defend themselves is honorable.

If you don't want an abortion, don't have one.

It would be medically impossible for me to be in the position...

 

[playtime]

Yep .... so much for all the ' smaller less intrusive gov'ment' rhetoric if it involves a females' innards or who people love.

Even the most ardent of "small government" Conservatives will agree that the government has a legitimate role to play in protecting the lives and rights of children who can not speak for, nor defend themselves.

playtime is such a bitch, the way she pretends that there is no other perspective than her own.

^^^ most ironic post today ^^^

I address differences of opinion and/or policy. I don't pretend that they don't exist, like you just did, you brainless moron.

bullshit.

my point stands.

 

[Chuz Life]

tell that to all the caged post born kiddies down at the border.

or the post born who go hungry every night.

Who Built the Cages, Joe?

Obama. And since he always takes credit for events while he was VP, Joe. https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/washington-secrets/baracks-ice-chief-cages-were-obamas-idea

www.usmessageboard.com

lol .... unaccompanied minors are not babies in diapers. & they weren't detained for more than a few days per the law.

Washington Examiner


Has this Media Source failed a fact check? LET US KNOW HERE.




Share:

RIGHT BIAS
These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward conservative causes through story selection and/or political affiliation. They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports and omit reporting of information that may damage conservative causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy. See all Right Bias sources.

• Overall, we rate the Washington Examiner Right Biased based on editorial positions that almost exclusively favor the right and Mixed for factual reporting due to several failed fact checks.

Washington Examiner - Media Bias/Fact Check


lol.... next?

PolitiFact Media Bias Rating

Learn the AllSides Media Bias Rating of PolitiFact. AllSides rates the media bias of hundreds of news outlets, media sources and writers.

www.allsides.com

.

 

[j-mac]

So the US, under the "leadership" of trump, takes another giant leap into authoritarianism, and installing a right-wing theocracy to rule over a once-free people. They always go after women and LGBTs first, as we are considered expendable.

The US government has no business taking any stand on abortion, which is not an issue that legitimately involves government. It is purely ideological and there is no universal agreement.

yep .... so much for all the ' smaller less intrusive gov'ment' rhetoric if it involves a females' innards or who people love.

It's not as much about the adult woman that instead of making the responsible decision to NOT spread her legs, as much as it is protecting the result of her poor decision, that the innocent, defensless baby had no part in....

 

[Penelope]

Who are men and some women feel its their business to stop abortion.

Republicans a very sorry state , anti everything, anti gay, anti abortion, anti trans,

how miserable it must be to be one to put one noses in everyone business.

 

[j-mac]

Who are men and some women feel its their business to stop abortion.

Republicans a very sorry state , anti everything, anti gay, anti abortion, anti trans,

how miserable it must be to be one to put one noses in everyone business.

Stop killing defensless babies and we couldn't care any less what you do...

 

[Monk-Eye]

" Dealing With Mindless Drivel And Willful Ignorance Of Theocrats "

* Constitution Of State Citizens And Equal Protection For Dummies *

What the Constitution actually says.
" No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. " - 14th Amendment
Key points to take away.
1. Children are persons, whether they are "CITIZENS" (persons born or naturalized) or not.
2. The Constitution is extremely INCLUSIVE when it specifically says "ANY person" is entitled to the EQUAL protections of our laws.
3. The Constitution does NOT say how old, young, developed or otherwise convenient to others "ANY PERSON" needs to be, in order to qualify for their rights or Constitutional protections.

You wrote , " Children are persons " ; well duh , children have been born whereby equal protection applies as they have completed the necessary requirement of birth .

1 U.S. Code § 8 - “Person”, “human being”, “child”, and “individual” as including born-alive infant

www.law.cornell.edu

(a) In determining the meaning of any Act of Congress, or of any ruling, regulation, or interpretation of the various administrative bureaus and agencies of the United States, the words “person”, “human being”, “child”, and “individual”, shall include every infant member of the species homo sapiens who isborn aliveat any stage of development.

 

[Monk-Eye]

" Damned Dirty Apes "

* Quality Versus Quantity *

Illogical AND immoral.

Illogical and immoral are ideological hypocrites greedy to validate their own vanity and pride , who promote indifference to and dictate for the gluttony of people resigned to helplessness and poverty .

* Gawd Of Nature Finds It Neither Immoral Nor Illogical *

Breaking News, Analysis, Politics, Blogs, News Photos, Video, Tech Reviews - TIME.com

A study has revealed that among the mustached tamarins, the mothers can be a deadly menace to their offspring -- and their infanticidal tendencies can provide some insight into human behavior too

content.time.com

The explanation for such pitiless behavior is as cold as it is unavoidable: tamarin mothers are simply very good at balancing their genetic ledgers and know when they're heading for a loss. If they're raising babies that have a poor chance of surviving anyway, why make a pointless investment of time, resources and calories trying to keep them alive? Better to cut their losses, bag the babies and wait for a better season to breed.

 

[Chuz Life]

" Dealing With Mindless Drivel And Willful Ignorance Of Theocrats "

* Constitution Of State Citizens And Equal Protection For Dummies *

What the Constitution actually says.
" No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. " - 14th Amendment
Key points to take away.
1. Children are persons, whether they are "CITIZENS" (persons born or naturalized) or not.
2. The Constitution is extremely INCLUSIVE when it specifically says "ANY person" is entitled to the EQUAL protections of our laws.
3. The Constitution does NOT say how old, young, developed or otherwise convenient to others "ANY PERSON" needs to be, in order to qualify for their rights or Constitutional protections.

You wrote , " Children are persons " ; well duh , children have been born whereby equal protection applies as they have completed the necessary requirement of birth .

1 U.S. Code § 8 - “Person”, “human being”, “child”, and “individual” as including born-alive infant

www.law.cornell.edu

(a) In determining the meaning of any Act of Congress, or of any ruling, regulation, or interpretation of the various administrative bureaus and agencies of the United States, the words “person”, “human being”, “child”, and “individual”, shall include every infant member of the species homo sapiens who isborn aliveat any stage of development.

I wish I could buy your fucktarded opinions for what they are worth and then sell them for what you think they are worth.

Here is a clue for you fucktard. . . I'll give it to you real slow.

Fetal

HOMICIDE

laws.

 

[Eric Arthur Blair]

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ. Its none of your fucking business.

...Said the Nazis to the rest of the world when the Holocaust was discovered.

 

[Monk-Eye]

" Broken Record Repetitive Banal Does Not Learn "

* Mouthpiece Of Anti-Choice Disinformation *

I wish I could buy your fucktarded opinions for what they are worth and then sell them for what you think they are worth.
Here is a clue for you fucktard. . . I'll give it to you real slow.
Fetal
HOMICIDE
laws.

The fetus does not have constitutional protections and any egregious harm to the fetus violates the constitutional protections afforded to the mother , and the punishment may be befitting of the crime .

Capital punishment is not an option of punishment for killing a fetus as to have ones wright to life removed requires that one remove a wright to life of another by having killed them .

Unborn Victims of Violence Act - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

(D) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the death penalty shall not be imposed for an offense under this section.

 

[Eric Arthur Blair]

Illogical and immoral are ideological hypocrites greedy to validate their own vanity and pride , who promote indifference to and dictate for the gluttony of people resigned to helplessness and poverty .

* Gawd Of Nature Finds It Neither Immoral Nor Illogical *

The GOD of nature also has predators eating and tearing apart the children of others in the wilds.
We do not fashion our laws based on what wild animals do. Male chimpanzee seen snatching seconds-old chimp and eating it

I hope this doesn't depress you. By the way, being born into a home that is less than
ideal only resigns one to "helplessness and poverty" if that's what the shitty human beings around that child want.

I don't know where you came from but I would urge you to hurry back.

 

[Monk-Eye]

" Pretending To Provide A Valid Argument "

* Apes With A Keyboard *

...Said the Nazis to the rest of the world when the Holocaust was discovered.

Godwin's law - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Godwin's law (or Godwin's rule of Hitler analogies)[1][2] is an Internet adage asserting that "as an online discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Nazis or Hitler approaches 1".[2][3] That is, if an online discussion (regardless of topic or scope) goes on long enough, sooner or later someone will compare someone or something to Adolf Hitler or his deeds, the point at which effectively the discussion or thread often ends.

There are many corollaries to Godwin's law, some considered more canonical (by being adopted by Godwin himself)[3] than others.[1] For example, there is a tradition in many newsgroups and other Internet discussion forums that, when a Hitler comparison is made, the thread is finished and whoever made the comparison loses whatever debate is in progress.[8] This principle is itself frequently referred to as Godwin's law.[9]

Godwin's law itself can be abused as a distraction, diversion or even as censorship, fallaciously miscasting an opponent's argument as hyperbole when the comparisons made by the argument are actually appropriate.[10]