US bill to cut aid

[Phoenall]

They are going to cut funding for Dayton's Forces?

Funding is going to be cut for all those private Swiss bank accounts. I still think we should dig up Arafart and hang the SOB properly.

Indeed, Arafat, Abbas, Fayyad, and others are the appointed oligarchs of Palestine.

They get rich selling their people down the river.

So why do the people appoint them, why not say NOT IN MY NAME and kick them all out.

 

[MJB12741]

Let alll peace loving people join together & pray it is so. LET THERE BE PEACE ALREADY!

Bill, S. 2265, before congress for unanimous consent will require the palestinians to comply with certain demands or loose funds, more than $100 million, needed to keep functioning.
I think it should be a month by month basis not year by year. This should have been done years ago.

>>The bill will essentially cut off all U.S. aid to the Palestinians until the president certifies on a yearly basis that the P.A. has publicly recognized Israel as a Jewish state, renounced terrorism, purged terrorists from all areas of the government, ended its funding for anti-Israel and anti-American propaganda, and publicly vowed not to start war with Israel.

The P.A. would have five weeks to comply with the bill before U.S. aid dries up.<<

They are going to cut funding for Dayton's Forces?

They are going to stop bankrolling Palestinian terrorism and starve them into submission.

 

[P F Tinmore]

Funding is going to be cut for all those private Swiss bank accounts. I still think we should dig up Arafart and hang the SOB properly.

Indeed, Arafat, Abbas, Fayyad, and others are the appointed oligarchs of Palestine.

They get rich selling their people down the river.

So why do the people appoint them, why not say NOT IN MY NAME and kick them all out.

They were not appointed by the Palestinians.

 

[Hossfly]

Indeed, Arafat, Abbas, Fayyad, and others are the appointed oligarchs of Palestine.

They get rich selling their people down the river.

So why do the people appoint them, why not say NOT IN MY NAME and kick them all out.

They were not appointed by the Palestinians.

Catch 22? Seems to me the Palestinians file everything under Catch 22.

 

[Roudy]

Indeed, Arafat, Abbas, Fayyad, and others are the appointed oligarchs of Palestine.

They get rich selling their people down the river.

So why do the people appoint them, why not say NOT IN MY NAME and kick them all out.

They were not appointed by the Palestinians.

Yup, Muslims are never to blame for what they do and say. It's always someone elses fault. Arafat the terrorist thief and founder of the Palestinian national movement is now someone else's fault.

 

[toastman]

They are going to cut funding for Dayton's Forces?

They are talking about potentially cutting funding to the Palestinian leeches.

The Israeli leeches get billions from the U.S., not a measly 100 million. The EU and the oil states will replace the 100 million.

Lol Israel recieves money mainly for defence.
Palestinians recieve money because they are a welfare 'state'

Israel has a GDP of well over $200 billion, which is impressive for such a small population. Plus they are sitting atop a gold mine of natural gas.
They can easily survive without US funding.

The Palestinians would shrivel up like a leech who's been exposed to salt if they didn't have funding. They are a thorn in the side of the world..

 

[Phoenall]

Indeed, Arafat, Abbas, Fayyad, and others are the appointed oligarchs of Palestine.

They get rich selling their people down the river.

So why do the people appoint them, why not say NOT IN MY NAME and kick them all out.

They were not appointed by the Palestinians.

Elections were held and the people were elected, so if the elections were faked why haven't the people voiced their disgust in the matter. The only possible reason is because they are happy with them as their leaders.

 

[P F Tinmore]

So why do the people appoint them, why not say NOT IN MY NAME and kick them all out.

They were not appointed by the Palestinians.

Elections were held and the people were elected, so if the elections were faked why haven't the people voiced their disgust in the matter. The only possible reason is because they are happy with them as their leaders.

The elections were not fake. They were judged free and fair by all international observers.

That was the "problem." The wrong people were elected.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KGKzP9EhJMY]Iran-Contra 2.0- how bush armed Fatah to fight Hamas - YouTube[/ame]

 

[aris2chat]

They are going to cut funding for Dayton's Forces?

Funding is going to be cut for all those private Swiss bank accounts. I still think we should dig up Arafart and hang the SOB properly.

Indeed, Arafat, Abbas, Fayyad, and others are the appointed oligarchs of Palestine.

They get rich selling their people down the river.

Fayyad was appointed by Abbas.
Abbas was chosen by the PLO.
Arafat was named by Nasser as leader of the palestinians. Then he was elected chairman of the PLO, by the PLO. Arafat was elected by the Central Council of the Palestine National Council, the governing body of the PLO, to be the president. When an election was held he ran against a 73 yr old mother of 5, grandmother of 13 charity worker against Arafat. He got more than 80% of the votes.

 

[P F Tinmore]

Funding is going to be cut for all those private Swiss bank accounts. I still think we should dig up Arafart and hang the SOB properly.

Indeed, Arafat, Abbas, Fayyad, and others are the appointed oligarchs of Palestine.

They get rich selling their people down the river.

Fayyad was appointed by Abbas.
Abbas was chosen by the PLO.
Arafat was named by Nasser as leader of the palestinians. Then he was elected chairman of the PLO, by the PLO. Arafat was elected by the Central Council of the Palestine National Council, the governing body of the PLO, to be the president. When an election was held he ran against a 73 yr old mother of 5, grandmother of 13 charity worker against Arafat. He got more than 80% of the votes.

OK, this looks pretty good except Fayyad was never approved by the legislature as required in their constitution. He was never legally the prime minister of Palestine.

 

[Roudy]

Indeed, Arafat, Abbas, Fayyad, and others are the appointed oligarchs of Palestine.

They get rich selling their people down the river.

Fayyad was appointed by Abbas.
Abbas was chosen by the PLO.
Arafat was named by Nasser as leader of the palestinians. Then he was elected chairman of the PLO, by the PLO. Arafat was elected by the Central Council of the Palestine National Council, the governing body of the PLO, to be the president. When an election was held he ran against a 73 yr old mother of 5, grandmother of 13 charity worker against Arafat. He got more than 80% of the votes.

OK, this looks pretty good except Fayyad was never approved by the legislature as required in their constitution. He was never legally the prime minister of Palestine.

Prime minister of a state that never existed? Ha ha ha. Ho ho ho. Hee hee hee.

 

[Hossfly]

They were not appointed by the Palestinians.

Elections were held and the people were elected, so if the elections were faked why haven't the people voiced their disgust in the matter. The only possible reason is because they are happy with them as their leaders.

The elections were not fake. They were judged free and fair by all international observers.

That was the "problem." The wrong people were elected.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KGKzP9EhJMY]Iran-Contra 2.0- how bush armed Fatah to fight Hamas - YouTube[/ame]

You shoulda Got Out The Vote, Tinmore.

 

[Phoenall]

They were not appointed by the Palestinians.

Elections were held and the people were elected, so if the elections were faked why haven't the people voiced their disgust in the matter. The only possible reason is because they are happy with them as their leaders.

The elections were not fake. They were judged free and fair by all international observers.

That was the "problem." The wrong people were elected.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KGKzP9EhJMY]Iran-Contra 2.0- how bush armed Fatah to fight Hamas - YouTube[/ame]

So the elections were fair, the people made their choice, and the terrorists were elected to power. So why have you constantly said the leaders were not appointed by the people when they elections were done above board. Your video is irrelevant to the topic and just shows that you are prepared to twist anything round in a futile attempt at putting the blame elsewhere.

THE PROBLEMS ARE ALL DOWN TO THE PALESTINIANS CHOICE OF LEADERS AND NOTHING ELSE

 

[Two Thumbs]

Bill, S. 2265, before congress for unanimous consent will require the palestinians to comply with certain demands or loose funds, more than $100 million, needed to keep functioning.
I think it should be a month by month basis not year by year. This should have been done years ago.

>>The bill will essentially cut off all U.S. aid to the Palestinians until the president certifies on a yearly basis that the P.A. has publicly recognized Israel as a Jewish state, renounced terrorism, purged terrorists from all areas of the government, ended its funding for anti-Israel and anti-American propaganda, and publicly vowed not to start war with Israel.

The P.A. would have five weeks to comply with the bill before U.S. aid dries up.<<

Why are we giving money to terrorist in the first place?

 

[RoccoR]

Two Thumbs, et al,

It is a fair question, to which there may be no real answer.

Bill, S. 2265, before congress for unanimous consent will require the palestinians to comply with certain demands or loose funds, more than $100 million, needed to keep functioning.
I think it should be a month by month basis not year by year. This should have been done years ago.

>>The bill will essentially cut off all U.S. aid to the Palestinians until the president certifies on a yearly basis that the P.A. has publicly recognized Israel as a Jewish state, renounced terrorism, purged terrorists from all areas of the government, ended its funding for anti-Israel and anti-American propaganda, and publicly vowed not to start war with Israel.

The P.A. would have five weeks to comply with the bill before U.S. aid dries up.<<

Why are we giving money to terrorist in the first place?

(COMMENT)

All aid to the Palestinians (West Bank and Gaza Strip), had a subliminal intent of humanitarian assistance and the imprinting of a favorable impression of America. While there have been many anecdotal outcomes that could be characterized as favorable, in the final analysis, neither the expectations of the Palestinian or the US have been met.

The Palestinians come in two flavors:

• The non-Violent Arab Palestinian (nVAP).
• The Hostile Arab Palestinian (HoAP).

Not all Palestinians are terrorists. Yet most Palestinians support and contribute to HoAP that threaten US Interests, in one way or another.

Successive Administrations have requested aid for the Palestinians in apparent support of at least three major U.S. policy priorities of interest to Congress:

&#8226; Preventing terrorism against Israel from Hamas and other militant organizations.
&#8226; Fostering stability, prosperity, and self-governance in the West Bank that inclines Palestinians toward peaceful coexistence with Israel and a &#8220;two-state solution.&#8221;
&#8226; Meeting humanitarian needs.​

SOURCE: Congressional Research Service www.crs.gov RS22967

Most US Foreign Aid to Palestinians has not been successful. It has been used as a bribe (political incentive) to encourage Palestinians to seek peaceful solutions. With the exception of the Clinton Administration, the US has not demonstrated the knowledge, skills and abilities either in leadership or diplomacy to achieve expectations.

Most Respectfully,
R

 

[P F Tinmore]

Two Thumbs, et al,

It is a fair question, to which there may be no real answer.

Bill, S. 2265, before congress for unanimous consent will require the palestinians to comply with certain demands or loose funds, more than $100 million, needed to keep functioning.
I think it should be a month by month basis not year by year. This should have been done years ago.

>>The bill will essentially cut off all U.S. aid to the Palestinians until the president certifies on a yearly basis that the P.A. has publicly recognized Israel as a Jewish state, renounced terrorism, purged terrorists from all areas of the government, ended its funding for anti-Israel and anti-American propaganda, and publicly vowed not to start war with Israel.

The P.A. would have five weeks to comply with the bill before U.S. aid dries up.<<

Why are we giving money to terrorist in the first place?

(COMMENT)

All aid to the Palestinians (West Bank and Gaza Strip), had a subliminal intent of humanitarian assistance and the imprinting of a favorable impression of America. While there have been many anecdotal outcomes that could be characterized as favorable, in the final analysis, neither the expectations of the Palestinian or the US have been met.

The Palestinians come in two flavors:

• The non-Violent Arab Palestinian (nVAP).
• The Hostile Arab Palestinian (HoAP).

Not all Palestinians are terrorists. Yet most Palestinians support and contribute to HoAP that threaten US Interests, in one way or another.

Successive Administrations have requested aid for the Palestinians in apparent support of at least three major U.S. policy priorities of interest to Congress:

• Preventing terrorism against Israel from Hamas and other militant organizations.
• Fostering stability, prosperity, and self-governance in the West Bank that inclines Palestinians toward peaceful coexistence with Israel and a “two-state solution.”
• Meeting humanitarian needs.​

SOURCE: Congressional Research Service www.crs.gov RS22967

Most US Foreign Aid to Palestinians has not been successful. It has been used as a bribe (political incentive) to encourage Palestinians to seek peaceful solutions. With the exception of the Clinton Administration, the US has not demonstrated the knowledge, skills and abilities either in leadership or diplomacy to achieve expectations.

Most Respectfully,
R

The problem is that all of the so called peaceful solutions offered to the Palestinians required them to sign away their rights.

 

[Phoenall]

Two Thumbs, et al,

It is a fair question, to which there may be no real answer.

Why are we giving money to terrorist in the first place?

(COMMENT)

All aid to the Palestinians (West Bank and Gaza Strip), had a subliminal intent of humanitarian assistance and the imprinting of a favorable impression of America. While there have been many anecdotal outcomes that could be characterized as favorable, in the final analysis, neither the expectations of the Palestinian or the US have been met.

The Palestinians come in two flavors:

• The non-Violent Arab Palestinian (nVAP).
• The Hostile Arab Palestinian (HoAP).

Not all Palestinians are terrorists. Yet most Palestinians support and contribute to HoAP that threaten US Interests, in one way or another.

Successive Administrations have requested aid for the Palestinians in apparent support of at least three major U.S. policy priorities of interest to Congress:

• Preventing terrorism against Israel from Hamas and other militant organizations.
• Fostering stability, prosperity, and self-governance in the West Bank that inclines Palestinians toward peaceful coexistence with Israel and a “two-state solution.”
• Meeting humanitarian needs.​

SOURCE: Congressional Research Service www.crs.gov RS22967

Most US Foreign Aid to Palestinians has not been successful. It has been used as a bribe (political incentive) to encourage Palestinians to seek peaceful solutions. With the exception of the Clinton Administration, the US has not demonstrated the knowledge, skills and abilities either in leadership or diplomacy to achieve expectations.

Most Respectfully,
R

The problem is that all of the so called peaceful solutions offered to the Palestinians required them to sign away their rights.

No just to stop all terrorism and belligerence.