US Attorney Doc: IRS Issued Grand Jury Subpoena to JPMorgan for Hunter, James Biden Bank Records In Probe into Biden Family’s China Connections

[Dragonlady]

We know he hasn’t. Yet. Maybe he never will. Maybe politics has gotten in the way? Perhaps a different prosecutor, down the road, will proceed differently.

If they couldn't prosecute him when Trump was in office and begging them to do it, it's unlikely that anything will be found now.

 

[BackAgain]

If they couldn't prosecute him when Trump was in office and begging them to do it, it's unlikely that anything will be found now.

Trump didn’t exactly get a whole lot of cooperation from the Miscarriage Department of Justice.

 

[FA_Q2]

Trump didn’t exactly get a whole lot of cooperation from the Miscarriage Department of Justice.

Irrelevant.

Nothing happened then. Nothing is even MORE likely now.

And there continues to be nothing happening here, no matter how much you want the story to go somewhere.

 

[BackAgain]

Irrelevant.

Nothing happened then. Nothing is even MORE likely now.

And there continues to be nothing happening here, no matter how much you want the story to go somewhere.

Your post would have been self descriptive and accurate if had left just that first sentence and not entered another keystroke before submitting your worthless effort.

it is not irrelevant to note that Trump had to deal with a corrupted DOJ when anyone claims that “his” DOJ did nothing. It wasn’t “his” DOJ.

 

[Batcat]

US Attorney Doc: ​

IRS Issued Grand Jury Subpoena to JPMorgan for Hunter, James Biden Bank Records In Probe into Biden Family’s China Connections​

US Attorney Doc: IRS Issued Grand Jury Subpoena to JPMorgan for Hunter, James Biden Bank Records In Probe into Biden Family’s China Connections

A criminal IRS investigation into Hunter Biden appears to have convened a grand jury as far back as May 2019, a confidential subpoena reveals.

www.breitbart.com

20 Jan 2022 ~~ By Emma-Jo Morris & Matthew Boyle
A criminal IRS investigation into Hunter Biden — President Biden’s son — appears to have convened a grand jury as far back as May 2019, a confidential subpoena served to JPMorgan Chase bank reveals. The subpoena also seeks bank records of James Biden, the president’s brother, which appears to be the first time another Biden family member has surfaced in connection with the investigation.
The document, obtained by Breitbart News, specifically demands information on related transactions between JPMorgan Chase Bank, which the document calls “correspondent bank,” and the Bank of China, which the document calls the “originating or beneficiary bank.”
The document appears to show that as President Biden was launching his campaign that spring, federal prosecutors in the U.S. Attorney’s office in Delaware had impaneled a grand jury and were demanding the production of bank records relating to Hunter and James Biden, as well as two of their business associates Devon Archer and Eric Schwerin.
While it has been reported that subpoenas were issued in a Hunter Biden criminal probe from federal investigators, the level of detail this document contains has never been reported.
2860621444721370703 Biden Subpoena Redacted Final by Breitbart News on Scribd
~Snip~
The question that remains is why Bill Barr directly intervened to ensure that the U.S. Attorney in Delaware’s investigation into Joe’s family was kept from the public for over 17 months until after the election, as previous reporting has confirmed. David Weiss and Bill Barr—or someone with a conscience inside the Justice Department—should answer that question for the American people,” Ziegler said in a statement to Breitbart News.
The aforementioned Politico story suggests Weiss took steps to keep his investigation from going public in 2019 because he did not want it coming out in the middle of an election, and a subsequent Wall Street Journal piece in December 2020 suggests that Barr did the same.
It is unclear if JPMorgan Chase Bank cooperated with this subpoena. It is worth noting that the bank’s outside counsel firm Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP announced it hired former U.S. Attorney General Loretta Lynch shortly after receiving this subpoena. It is unclear if Lynch had any involvement on this specific matter, however, she has worked on similar matters involving JPMorgan Chase Bank compliance.
It is also unclear where this criminal investigation stands.


Commentary:
This "news" although three years old, has been sitting in Christopher Wray's FBI closet, ñext to Hunter's laptop gathering dust.
Recently the FBI literally sent a SWAT team to get Biden's daughter's diary back. It's now also sitting next to Hunter's laptop in the vault.
Yet we never heard a peep about this before the 2020 election. What are the odds we would have heard nothing if there was a criminal investigation of one of Trump’s children?
Like Hunter's laptop and the testimony of Tony Bobulinski and Bevan Cooney have long been buried by the Quisling Media and the compliant accomplices within the DOJ and FBI.
Really, if Hillary can destroy evidence under subpoena and that ignored, why should Joe Biden and family be prosecuted for selling out the nation and stealing our children's future?
From 2016 to 2021 Americans were told incessantly by the Quisling Media that our 45th president-elect and then president colluded with Russia based upon a fictitious dossier. Yet, the same media and federal authorities responsible for protecting this nation have buried factual evidence of the traitorous criminal despotic actions of Joseph Robinette Biden, his son and his family,

After watching how the FBI treated Trump and his associates as compared to how the FBI treated Hillary and the Biden family it makes me wonder if today’s FBI is worse than the FBI when J. Edgar Hoover ran it.

J. Edgar Hoover was a Corrupt Leader of the FBI - Academic Master

John Edgar Hoover served as the first director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI). Appointed in 1924 as the leader of the predecessor of the

academic-master.com

 

[TheGreatSatan]

After watching how the FBI treated Trump and his associates as compared to how the FBI treated Hillary and the Biden family it makes me wonder if today’s FBI is worse than the FBI when J. Edgar Hoover ran it.

J. Edgar Hoover was a Corrupt Leader of the FBI - Academic Master

John Edgar Hoover served as the first director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI). Appointed in 1924 as the leader of the predecessor of the

academic-master.com

America's intel people will all say this is russian propaganda.

 

[Batcat]

America's intel people will all say this is russian propaganda.

That’s exactly what the intel agencies did with the original story on Hunter’s computer. It is possible if they had told the truth Trump would be President today and we wouldn’t be int the mess we are.

Named and Shamed: The 51 Intel Officials Who Lied About the Hunter Biden Laptop Emails - Election Central

www.uspresidentialelectionnews.com

So we have a liberal media that lies to us all the time and intelligence agencies who also lie to us plus a bunch of brainwashed younger people who think Marxist socialism is a great idea.

This nation will be damned lucky to survive one more generation.

 

[BackAgain]

Yes.

Grand Jury has very specific time limits and at the conclusion of their work they establish if the case has probable cause to charge people. Charges would be public and since no charges were brought the case is dead.

^ nonsense. A Grand Jury subpoena can be issued and items of possible evidentiary value obtained — and yet the prosecutor finds that she or he still needs more evidence to present a valid legally sufficient case for a grand jury’s consideration. If the term of that sitting grand jury expires, the prosecutor may still present a case to a different grand jury.

Anton is either making shit up because he doesn’t know what he’s talking about — or he is lying.

 

[AntonToo]

^ nonsense. A Grand Jury subpoena can be issued and items of possible evidentiary value obtained — and yet the prosecutor finds that she or he still needs more evidence to present a valid legally sufficient case for a grand jury’s consideration. If the term of that sitting grand jury expires, the prosecutor may still present a case to a different grand jury.

Anton is either making shit up because he doesn’t know what he’s talking about — or he is lying.

There was no "different grand jury"

 

[BackAgain]

There was no "different grand jury"

Please tell me where I said there was.

 

[Nostra]

The coverup for the Biden Crime Syndicate continues.

 

[struth]

It's now 2022.

This is not relevant if the case died.

we need a special prosecutor. Obviously xiden was going to kill the case.

 

[AntonToo]

Please tell me where I said there was.

Are you fn serious?

If grand Jury has specific terms and no new grand jury convened...do you need me to finish that one for you?

 

[CowboyTed]

After 40 years in congress with all the dirt Biden has on others there is ZERO chance of him ever being charged with anything, same as Hillary.

But last week you called him senile old fool... Make up your mind...

 

[struth]

But last week you called him senile old fool... Make up your mind...

criminals can get old and go senile

 

[BackAgain]

Are you fn serious?

If grand Jury has specific terms and no new grand jury convened...do you need me to finish that one for you?

Are you fn stupid? Never mind. It was strictly rhetorical. Of course you’re stupid. Try to follow along. Maybe get an adult to assist you.

If no new grand jury is empaneled in one term, a new grand jury may be empaneled in some other (future) term on some future date. Do you actually imagine it makes a damn bit of difference if a bit of evidence happens to be a bit old? A future grand jury can’t consider evidence acquired in a previous year or so? Is that what you’re saying?

There is one time constraint. Any applicable statute of limitations. But that’s not the issue here.

 

[AntonToo]

Are you fn stupid? Never mind. It was strictly rhetorical. Of course you’re stupid. Try to follow along. Maybe get an adult to assist you.

If no new grand jury is empaneled in one term, a new grand jury may be empaneled in some other (future) term on some future date. Do you actually imagine it makes a damn bit of difference if a bit of evidence happens to be a bit old? A future grand jury can’t consider evidence acquired in a previous year or so? Is that what you’re saying?

There is one time constraint. Any applicable statute of limitations. But that’s not the issue here.

Ok moron you keep on wishing and hoping and waiting.

Meanwhile, nothing here to even talk about.

 

[BackAgain]

Ok moron you keep on wishing and hoping and waiting.

Meanwhile, nothing here to even talk about.

You couldn’t possibly be any dumber if an anvil dropped by a coyote off of a cliff landed squarely on your head leaving it two dimensional.

It really would have been easier and less embarrassing for you if you had just simply acknowledged your error. Alternatively you could even have just slunk off without posting another of your many ignorant and imbecilic words.

BTW: I didn’t say anything about wishing or hoping etc. That’s just you hearing voices that aren’t there.

 

[AntonToo]

You couldn’t possibly be any dumber if an anvil dropped by a coyote off of a cliff landed squarely on your head leaving it two dimensional.

It really would have been easier and less embarrassing for you if you had just simply acknowledged your error. Alternatively you could even have just slunk off without posting another of your many ignorant and imbecilic words.

BTW: I didn’t say anything about wishing or hoping etc. That’s just you hearing voices that aren’t there.

What error retard?

It's been three years and this inquiry is as dead as a doornob. This thread is a waste, there is nothing to discuss here.

 

[BluesLegend]

But last week you called him senile old fool... Make up your mind...

No that was this week. Last week we called him inept and corrupt.