- Banned
- #301
I assumed that. You know as well as I do that libturds who parrot "right of the militia"
United States v Miller USSC 1939
Heller.
Individual right.
That's it.
Assuming you ignored "The Right of the People"
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I assumed that. You know as well as I do that libturds who parrot "right of the militia"
United States v Miller USSC 1939
Miller said the people did not have a right to non-military weapons, which would be a "well regulated militia" read of the 2nd amendment. Heller completely repudiated that clause, and made it an individual right, instead of a communal one.
She was not a New York resident. She was just passing through. She did not use the firearms in any crime nor was there an intent to do so. She should not have been considered a criminal for possession of firearms that was legal for her to own. The SAFE Act sucks. It was passed by batshit crazy unreasonable Liberals.
A reasonable police officer would have told her the law and then sent her on her way.
You want the police officer to ignore the law? Do you live in a sanctuary city?
So in other words the Miller decision gave the "privilege" to a government controlled collective, and Heller returned us to the intent of the second amendment where we have the right to own military weapons.
Sanctuary from leftist tyranny? That's entirely different than enforcing immigration law.
She was not a New York resident. She was just passing through. She did not use the firearms in any crime nor was there an intent to do so. She should not have been considered a criminal for possession of firearms that was legal for her to own. The SAFE Act sucks. It was passed by batshit crazy unreasonable Liberals.
A reasonable police officer would have told her the law and then sent her on her way.
You want the police officer to ignore the law? Do you live in a sanctuary city?
You have your arguments crossed. Miller gave a communal right to military weapons, Heller gave an individual right to sporting and defensive weapons Scalia specifically upheld the governments right to keep dangerous, ie strictly military, weapons out of the hands of individuals.
I do not have the wisdom to know which laws to follow and which laws to ignore.
The SAFE is unreasonable and it was unreasonable to arrest somebody that obviously didn't understand the law and was just passing through.
By the way, that filthy ass bitch Crooked Hillary certainly broke the law and she was let off the hook because the police (FBI) said she had no intent.
Here's the fundamental error in your entire program.
The Bill of Rights declares that The Right of the People to bear arms is granted to all men is granted by God. The authority the men who created the document and hence the nation believed they were working under.
Here's the fundamental error in your entire program.
The Bill of Rights declares that The Right of the People to bear arms is granted to all men is granted by God. The authority the men who created the document and hence the nation believed they were working under.
The founding fathers mentioned several inalienable rights, principally life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. All other rights also being god given, and only enumerated by man.
The right to bear arms can't be god given, if only two countries in the world put that right into their constitutions. Leaving 99% of the world godless.
By the way, that filthy ass bitch Crooked Hillary certainly broke the law and she was let off the hook because the police (FBI) said she had no intent.
John Hinckley shot the president, and was let off the hook. Intent, mens rea, is the core of determining criminal responsibility.
I think probably just the magazine.What is the attraction of an AR15 if it is no different from any other rifle of the same caliber?
By the way, all "assault rifles" are modified so they can't be fired automatically before they are sold, as far as I know. Correct me if I'm wrong.
Despite claims to the contrary, the AR 15 is essentially a semi-auto M16, which has a selector to go from semi- to full. They take the same clip (magazine).
M-16s and AR-15s do not use clips. Your statement just outted you as an unreliable source.
You also forgot the M-4.
Does it upset smuthurt ashflakes when the non-pc word 'clip' is used? Does a gunner 'grammarnazi' stand ever ready at attention to shoot down all verbal 'error'?
Yes, an AR15 looks authentic to the other guys, shows how serious the bearer is. A mere semi-auto hunting rifle just doesn't say "ready to take on the U.S. Army" the way a replica M16 does.
You do understand that The Declaration of Independence has nothing to do with the LAW right?
No... you don't. You don't even understand the concept of law.
Here's the fundamental error in your entire program.
The Bill of Rights declares that The Right of the People to bear arms is granted to all men is granted by God. The authority the men who created the document and hence the nation believed they were working under.
The founding fathers mentioned several inalienable rights, principally life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. All other rights also being god given, and only enumerated by man.
The right to bear arms can't be god given, if only two countries in the world put that right into their constitutions. Leaving 99% of the world godless.
This lady didn't shoot anybody. She was arrested for something that is legal in most other parts of this country.
John Hinckley shot the president, and was let off the hook. Intent, mens rea, is the core of determining criminal responsibility.
Can a woman get a 2nd or 3rd trimester abortion in Texas, because it's legal in California? That's the argument you're giving, as a rejection of states rights.