UPDATE!--Backfire in Ohio: Mother is Pregnant by her 10 Year Old Child's Rapist!

[flacaltenn]

It wasn’t a “chop shop” and she wasn’t “law avoiding”, it wasn’t Illinois, she reported it per the rules.

You better think this thru and read what I've written here. Because otherwise, you're ACTUALLY condoning AVOIDING STATE LAW on child abuse.

That's on the mother and the 2 consulting abortion providers. All 3 of them conspired to avoid REPORTING the child abuse.. Because MOM LOVES the rapist and is now carrying HIS baby.

What dont you get here?

 

[Coyote]

Yes, she could have. You liberal goul. Really?

The Ohio AG said this:

Ohio AG clarifies Ohio abortion ban exemptions

Ohio's six-week abortion ban contains three exemptions in the legislation.

www.13abc.com

Yost says there are three exemptions to the abortion ban:

• Cases of ectopic pregnancy
• Cases that would cause death of the mother
• Cases that cause a serious risk of substantial, irreversible impairment to a major bodily function of the mother

None those would apply with out question, to this case.

And more lies from the AG…Docs dispute AG's claim that Ohio law allows 10-year-olds to get abortions - Ohio Capital Journal

 

[EvilCat Breath]

It's simply a bad ABUSIVE relationship. That's common everywhere. And a woman that cares MORE about a abusive partner than her kids. Dont ask me about this. I can barely fathom what it takes to be that oblivious to personal security.

Then why is this daughter in a household where she has been abused, with the full approval of her mother? I know families that have experienced this kind of abuse. Five children were removed and put in foster care. What makes this home so different? Mother does not find her nine year old daughter is sexually active the least unusual.

 

[Coyote]

Maybe they MIGHT -- IF THEY had used a rape kit on the child or preserved some fetal DNA. But this was recommended by the Illinois abortion director because SHE KNOWS if you take the child OUT of the state -- INDIANA isn't required to file a Child Protective order. To DO SO would 'violate the over-riding FEDERAL HIPPA laws".

Without that DNA evidence on the fetus or child -- there's likely no case. It's diabolical.

There's a LIMIT to "no questions asked" abortions. And child/woman abuse is a major limit.

It seems like you are turning this Indiana doctor into some sort of villain unnecessarily. A police report was filed. The doctors involved followed the required procedures. Ohio law DID NOT have an exception in it’s abortion law for this, at least NOT one that would have guaranteed legal legitimacy for the doctor and no doctor is willing take the risk of losing his license or prison time. The doctors aren’t the villains here, the rapist is, and possibly the mother as an accomplice.

 

[flacaltenn]

The Ohio AG said this:

Ohio AG clarifies Ohio abortion ban exemptions

Ohio's six-week abortion ban contains three exemptions in the legislation.

www.13abc.com

Yost says there are three exemptions to the abortion ban:

• Cases of ectopic pregnancy
• Cases that would cause death of the mother
• Cases that cause a serious risk of substantial, irreversible impairment to a major bodily function of the mother

None those would apply with out question, to this case.

And more lies from the AG…Docs dispute AG's claim that Ohio law allows 10-year-olds to get abortions - Ohio Capital Journal

You're right -- it was Ohio. But makes NO DIFF. Because a PREGNANT 10 year IS A ******* MEDICAL EMERGENCY for a kid that young. Stop GOOGLING AND BELIEVE what I heard him say in 2 different press conferences. GEEZ..,.,,

You ever IMAGINED what a 6 month pregnancy LOOKS LIKE on a girl that young?

 

[Coyote]

You better think this thru and read what I've written here. Because otherwise, you're ACTUALLY condoning AVOIDING STATE LAW on child abuse.

What specific state law was avoided and how do you know it was purposely avoided?

That's on the mother and the 2 consulting abortion providers. All 3 of them conspired to avoid REPORTING the child abuse.. Because MOM LOVES the rapist and is now carrying HIS baby.

What dont you get here?

What I don’t get here is this all edged “conspiracy” by the doctors when there is no evidence of it. Now the mother? Ya, you have a point THERE.

 

[Dogmaphobe]

No, she could not have mary.

But hey, your the ghoul who would have the state force this child to bare a child.

What country are you from?

English is obviously your second language.

 

[Curried Goats]

You better think this thru and read what I've written here. Because otherwise, you're ACTUALLY condoning AVOIDING STATE LAW on child abuse.

That's on the mother and the 2 consulting abortion providers. All 3 of them conspired to avoid REPORTING the child abuse.. Because MOM LOVES the rapist and is now carrying HIS baby.

What dont you get here?

Kind of seems this AG is talking out of his ass and grifting dumb mother fuckers on the right who would believe almost anything.

The doctor's report to state health officials on July 2 -- two days after the procedure -- indicates the pregnancy was the result of the patient being "abused."

After CNN got the documents Bernard filed with the health department, Rokita's office added: "As we stated, we are gathering evidence from multiple sources and agencies related to these allegations. Our legal review of it remains open."

CNN has asked the Indiana State Department of Child Services whether Bernard also filed a report with that office and also reached out to Ohio's attorney general.

Bernard's attorney said the doctor "took every appropriate and proper action in accordance with the law and both her medical and ethical training as a physician."

"She followed all relevant policies, procedures, and regulations in this case, just as she does every day to provide the best possible care for her patients," attorney Kathleen DeLaney said in a statement. "She has not violated any law, including patient privacy laws, and she has not been disciplined by her employer.

On Friday, DeLaney sent a cease and desist letter to the attorney general asking him to stop "making false and misleading statements about alleged misconduct by Dr. Bernard in her profession, which constitute defamation per se."

"We want (the attorney general) to stop the smear and then we want him to stop this dangerous rhetoric that he's using where he is whipping people up into a frenzy at a very unsettled time in our nation's history and we want to make sure that our client stays safe," DeLaney told CNN's Erin Burnett on Friday night.

I'll guess we'll know you're one of the mark ass bitches getting grifted by the right when talk of charging this doctor just evaporate into nothing.

 

[Coyote]

You're right -- it was Ohio. But makes NO DIFF. Because a PREGNANT 10 year IS A ******* MEDICAL EMERGENCY for a kid that young. Stop GOOGLING AND BELIEVE what I heard him say in 2 different press conferences. GEEZ..,.,,

You ever IMAGINED what a 6 month pregnancy LOOKS LIKE on a girl that young?

Of course it is an “emergency” to NORMAL people, but it is NOT laid out in the law in such a way as to protect the doctor from liability.

• Cases that cause a serious risk of substantial, irreversible impairment to a major bodily function of the mother

Sadly, children as young as that DO deliver babies. The law is CRAP and poorly written. A woman would need to pre-eclampsia, have an ectopic pregnancy or in an actual medical emergency. Don’t blame the doctors on this one, it is on the freaking extremists who wrote that law.

 

[flacaltenn]

What specific state law was avoided and how do you know it was purposely avoided?




What I don’t get here is this all edged “conspiracy” by the doctors when there is no evidence of it. Now the mother? Ya, you have a point THERE.

I could comb the web and use the Googler and probably FIND YOU PIX of 10 yr girl carrying a 6 month pregnancy. Wanna SEE IT? Cant believe how you latch on to stuff and defend the indefensible to death.

 

[Missourian]

I told you that already. The AGeneral of ILLINOIS reminded folks that the kid WOULD be able to have an abortion under Illinois state law. This whole thing is about THE MOTHER NOT wanting the rape reported.

So she found an IMMORAL, law avoiding abortion director who got her into some chop shop in Indiana where they serviced the kid WITHOUT ANY QUESTIONS ABOUT CHILD ABUSE.

Who wants that? 10 yr old pregnant and an abortion provider WILLING TO PROTECT the child rapist? Which TURNS OUT to be the father of fetus the MOTHER IS NOW CARRYING.

You'd certainly TURN YOUR back on a CHILD AND WOMAN abuser. Wouldn't ya??????

No questions asked abortions --- DO NOT APPLY TO RAPED 10 year olds -- you despicable moron.

Quoted For Truth.

 

[flacaltenn]

Of course it is an “emergency” to NORMAL people, but it is NOT laid out in the law in such a way as to protect the doctor from liability.

• Cases that cause a serious risk of substantial, irreversible impairment to a major bodily function of the mother

Sadly, children as young as that DO deliver babies. The law is CRAP and poorly written. A woman would need to pre-eclampsia, have an ectopic pregnancy or in an actual medical emergency. Don’t blame the doctors on this one, it is on the freaking extremists who wrote that law.

Really disappointed here. Children HERE are NEVER forced to term because they likely WOULD NOT SURVIVE a full pregnancy. Besides the weight and metabolic stress, it WOULD risk serious organ damage and other FATAL effects.

 

[Coyote]

I could comb the web and use the Googler and probably FIND YOU PIX of 10 yr girl carrying a 6 month pregnancy. Wanna SEE IT? Cant believe how you latch on to stuff and defend the indefensible to death.

I don’t think you and I are talking about the same thing here. I really don’t.

The child abused. This was all properly reported. NO ONE IS DEFENDING THE INDEFENSIBLE. But for some reason, you have latched on to the Ohio doctor and the Indiana doctor WHO FILED THE APPROPRIATE PAPERS TO TBE APPROPRIATE AUTHORITIES IDENTIFYING THIS AS CHILD ABUSE.

And then you call it a chop shop and accuse anyone who disagrees of defending the indefensible? They reported it it! Blame the rapist and the mother!

 

[Coyote]

Quoted For Truth.

Not exactly. It was Ohio. There was no “no questions asked” abortion. Paperwork and charges were filed. An arrest was made.

 

[flacaltenn]

Doctors Appalled By 10-Year-Old Giving Birth

A 10-year-old child in Colombia recently gave birth to a baby daughter, highlighting the dangers of early pregnancy.

www.livescience.com

A 10-year-old girl in Colombia recently gave birth via caesarian section, placing her among the youngest mothers in the world. Though the girl is now recovering, her case highlights the dangers of pregnancy before maturity, doctors say.

"No 10-year-old anywhere in the world should be having a baby," Lewis Wall, a professor of obstetrics and gynecology at the Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, told LiveScience.

According to Good Morning America, the 10-year-old girl, a member of the Wayuu tribe in Manaure, Colombia, delivered a 5-pound (2.26 kilogram) baby girl. The age of the father is not known, but Colombian police reportedly cannot press charges as the tribe is under its own jurisdiction.

"Any 10-year-old who is pregnant has already been abused significantly by somebody," he said. "That probably should go without saying."

"The placenta preferentially will take nutrition from the mother, who really is a child," said Sherry Thomas, an ob/gyn at Mission Community Hospital in Panorama City, Calif. That means that the developing fetus will leach calcium and other nutrients from a child who should still be growing herself. Likewise, pregnancy puts a major strain on the cardiovascular system, according to Wall. Pregnant women have about 50 percent more blood circulating through their bodies compared with non-pregnant women. [8 Odd Bodily Changes During Pregnancy]

 

[Missourian]

What specific state law was avoided and how do you know it was purposely avoided?




What I don’t get here is this all edged “conspiracy” by the doctors when there is no evidence of it. Now the mother? Ya, you have a point THERE.

The way I see it ... the mother USED the abortion law as an excuse to take her 10 year old to another state and get an abortion where the report would go to Indiana law enforcement.

Little did she know that the POS abortionist would attempt to make political hay out of the rape of a 10 year old girl...not knowing that the mother was attempting to foil an investigation into the rape in Ohio.

Every participant in this tale is lower than whale defecate at the bottom of the ocean EXCEPT for the poor 10 year old victim who has been raped, betrayed by her mother, and used as cannon fodder by the pro-abortionists INCLUDING the abortionist who contributed to traumatizing her a second time to score political points.

Sickening all the way around.

 

[flacaltenn]

WHO FILED THE APPROPRIATE PAPERS TO TBE APPROPRIATE AUTHORITIES IDENTIFYING THIS AS CHILD ABUSE.

The Ohio doc simply concocted the work-around. NO PAPERS FILED IN the state of residence. And I HIGHLY DOUBT that the Indiana clinic filed any "child abuse" paperwork BECAUSE the STATE of Indiana HAS NO JURISDICTION ON THE CRIMES and would be VIOLATING over-riding HIPPA law by doing so.

Ohio AG said there were NO PAPERS FILED on any child protection accusations that the state had received even several days after the diabolical Ohio abortion director executed this plan and they posted 'THE LIE" on social media.

 

[Curried Goats]

Doctors Appalled By 10-Year-Old Giving Birth

A 10-year-old child in Colombia recently gave birth to a baby daughter, highlighting the dangers of early pregnancy.

www.livescience.com

A 10-year-old girl in Colombia recently gave birth via caesarian section, placing her among the youngest mothers in the world. Though the girl is now recovering, her case highlights the dangers of pregnancy before maturity, doctors say.

"No 10-year-old anywhere in the world should be having a baby," Lewis Wall, a professor of obstetrics and gynecology at the Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, told LiveScience.

According to Good Morning America, the 10-year-old girl, a member of the Wayuu tribe in Manaure, Colombia, delivered a 5-pound (2.26 kilogram) baby girl. The age of the father is not known, but Colombian police reportedly cannot press charges as the tribe is under its own jurisdiction.

"Any 10-year-old who is pregnant has already been abused significantly by somebody," he said. "That probably should go without saying."

"The placenta preferentially will take nutrition from the mother, who really is a child," said Sherry Thomas, an ob/gyn at Mission Community Hospital in Panorama City, Calif. That means that the developing fetus will leach calcium and other nutrients from a child who should still be growing herself. Likewise, pregnancy puts a major strain on the cardiovascular system, according to Wall. Pregnant women have about 50 percent more blood circulating through their bodies compared with non-pregnant women. [8 Odd Bodily Changes During Pregnancy]

You keep referencing science and doctors as if ignorant Republicans give a shit about those things. You think professionals are going to risk their careers and freedom on whether a Republican respects the opinions of doctors? Just look how much they respect the opinion of doctors who acknowledge transgendered individuals and would prescribe hormone treatments or blockers.

 

[Coyote]

Really disappointed here. Children HERE are NEVER forced to term because they likely WOULD NOT SURVIVE a full pregnancy. Besides the weight and metabolic stress, it WOULD risk serious organ damage and other FATAL effects.

That USED TO BE THE CASE! Before Roe was overturned and all these Republican states went into a race to the bottom to see who could create the most punitive and draconian anti abortion laws!

THERE ARE NO PROTECTIONS FOR DOCTORS! None!

Of course a child should not be forced to bear a child, but do you even read what is put out by the right on this?

Pregnancy From Rape Is 'An Opportunity' For Women, Says Republican Trying To Ban Abortion

Ohio state Rep. Jean Schmidt (R) defended her abortion ban recently, arguing that "just because you have emotional scars doesn’t give you the right to take a life.”

news.yahoo.com

“Rape is a difficult issue and it emotionally scars the individual, all or in part, for the rest of their life ― just as child abuse does. But if a baby is created, it is a human life and whether that mother ends that pregnancy or not the scars will not go away, period,” said Schmidt.

“It is a shame that it happens, but there’s an opportunity for that woman – no matter how young or old she is ― to make a determination about what she’s going to do to help that life be a productive human being

 

[flacaltenn]

Not exactly. It was Ohio. There was no “no questions asked” abortion. Paperwork and charges were filed. An arrest was made.

Now youre making shit up. The mom LIED to protect her "baby-daddy" to the OHIO clinic.

Mom of 10-year-old Ohio girl who got abortion defends child’s rapist

The mother of the 10-year-old Ohio girl who crossed state lines to get an abortion has defended her daughter’s 27-year-old confessed rapist — who was wrongly listed as a minor during th…

nypost.com

The mother of a 10-year-old Ohio girl who crossed state lines to get an abortion has defended her daughter’s 27-year-old confessed rapist — who was wrongly listed as a minor during the medical visit, according to reports.

The shocking case came to light when the girl was taken across state lines to terminate the pregnancy in Indiana on June 30, with President Biden highlighting it as proof of the evils of anti-abortion legislation.

However, despite Fuentes being 27, the person listed as getting the girl pregnant was described as a minor in the report her abortionist sent to authorities, according to Fox News Digital, which obtained a copy.

Dr. Caitlin Bernard listed the rapist as being approximately 17 in her official filing to the Indiana Department of Health, the outlet said.

Gerson Fuentes, an illegal immigrant from Guatemala, was held on $2 million bond after being charged with felony rape of someone under 13.WCMH-TV
It was not immediately clear if Fuentes was identified in the document. Fox only said it showed how Bernard reported performing a non-surgical abortion for a 6-weeks-pregnant 10-year-old girl of Mexican ethnicity on June 30.

----------------------------------------------------------

Now realize -- NO PAPERS in state of Residency in Ohio as you asserted. THESE papers filed in INDIANA. And like I said -- the clinic in Indiana did not ASK questions. Dont know if they used a rape kit or preserved fetal DNA evidence. And the MOTHER LIED about the rapist being 17.

It was all a BIG LIE. And LITTLE CURIOUSITY from the doc in Ohio referring her to out-of-state. The woman probably WAS TOLD to lie when she went out of state KNOWING that Indiana wasn't going to investigate a "non-resident".