Unwillingness from the Intelligence Committee Today ~ Total Bullshit

Eaglewings

Platinum Member
Aug 9, 2012
15,452
3,500
350
San Francisco Bay Area
Refusing to answer is just looking really bad..wow


Panel Chiefs Conclude Hearing Lamenting Witnesses Lack of Candor
The chairman and vice chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee ended the hearing with expressions of disappointment about the witnesses declining to answer questions about whether President Donald Trump asked them to interfere in any way with the ongoing probe into his former associates.

Intelligence Officials Testify in Senate Hearing -- Live Coverage
 
Too funny.

A few months ago y'all mocked Trump for being a douche towards our intelligence community.

NOW you expect us all to believe, that the community he once excouriated is now falling on the sword for the very man that you claim demeaned them.

This shit is writing itself.
 
Refusing to answer is just looking really bad..wow


Panel Chiefs Conclude Hearing Lamenting Witnesses Lack of Candor
The chairman and vice chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee ended the hearing with expressions of disappointment about the witnesses declining to answer questions about whether President Donald Trump asked them to interfere in any way with the ongoing probe into his former associates.

Intelligence Officials Testify in Senate Hearing -- Live Coverage


Cest La Vie
 
Too funny.

A few months ago y'all mocked Trump for being a douche towards our intelligence community.

NOW you expect us all to believe, that the community he once excouriated is now falling on the sword for the very man that you claim demeaned them.

This shit is writing itself.
BOOM goes the dynamite
 
Because we know that Democrats would just blurt out classified information for all to hear.
 
Because we know that Democrats would just blurt out classified information for all to hear.

Both sides of the isle as they asked their questions and all 4 basically refused to answer said nothing they were discussing was classified. Some of it had already been discussed in public.
 
Refusing to answer is just looking really bad..wow


Panel Chiefs Conclude Hearing Lamenting Witnesses Lack of Candor
The chairman and vice chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee ended the hearing with expressions of disappointment about the witnesses declining to answer questions about whether President Donald Trump asked them to interfere in any way with the ongoing probe into his former associates.

Intelligence Officials Testify in Senate Hearing -- Live Coverage
THERE GOES THE NARRATIVE:

DNI Director Dan Coats: “I Have Never Been Pressured,” Nor Have I “Felt Pressure To Intervene.”
 
Refusing to answer is just looking really bad..wow


Panel Chiefs Conclude Hearing Lamenting Witnesses Lack of Candor
The chairman and vice chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee ended the hearing with expressions of disappointment about the witnesses declining to answer questions about whether President Donald Trump asked them to interfere in any way with the ongoing probe into his former associates.

Intelligence Officials Testify in Senate Hearing -- Live Coverage


Cest La Vie

Don't you want this to end, and get to the bottom of the total truth or do you just love the daily drama?
 
"the witnesses declining to answer questions about whether President Donald Trump asked them to interfere in any way with the ongoing probe into his former associates."

They don't want to go to jail. Transactional immunity and let's do it again.
 
Because we know that Democrats would just blurt out classified information for all to hear.

Both sides of the isle as they asked their questions and all 4 basically refused to answer said nothing they were discussing was classified. Some of it had already been discussed in public.
In fact, they did not say that nothing they were discussing was classified. They said they would be more open and free to answer in a closed session. For people who have never had a security clearance, they don't understand the minefield that comes ith that clearance. To stick to the topic, lets play this game.

Senator A asks one of the guys if he had had a conversation with the President with regard to the Russian investigation.

The guy answers, yes.

It is now an open question that has been answered, and Senator A can now drill into that conversation because the witness has opened that line of questioning. This would include the classified parts of the conversation. The witness risks problems if he lets slip accidentally classified information trying to answer it. The witness is now in serious legal jeopardy.

However, if he defers answering to a closed session where any answer is given to people who have a 'need to know' this information, he is no longer in legal jeopardy.
 
Refusing to answer is just looking really bad..wow


Panel Chiefs Conclude Hearing Lamenting Witnesses Lack of Candor
The chairman and vice chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee ended the hearing with expressions of disappointment about the witnesses declining to answer questions about whether President Donald Trump asked them to interfere in any way with the ongoing probe into his former associates.

Intelligence Officials Testify in Senate Hearing -- Live Coverage
THERE GOES THE NARRATIVE:

DNI Director Dan Coats: “I Have Never Been Pressured,” Nor Have I “Felt Pressure To Intervene.”

This was the headline yesterday, so he was told exactly what to say today..

Top intelligence official told associates Trump asked him if he could intervene with Comey on FBI Russia probe

Top intelligence official told associates Trump asked him if he could intervene with Comey on FBI Russia probe
 
what the senate finds and what Mueller find are two different piles of Trump shit.
 
Because we know that Democrats would just blurt out classified information for all to hear.

Both sides of the isle as they asked their questions and all 4 basically refused to answer said nothing they were discussing was classified. Some of it had already been discussed in public.
In fact, they did not say that nothing they were discussing was classified. They said they would be more open and free to answer in a closed session. For people who have never had a security clearance, they don't understand the minefield that comes ith that clearance. To stick to the topic, lets play this game.

Senator A asks one of the guys if he had had a conversation with the President with regard to the Russian investigation.

The guy answers, yes.

It is now an open question that has been answered, and Senator A can now drill into that conversation because the witness has opened that line of questioning. This would include the classified parts of the conversation. The witness risks problems if he lets slip accidentally classified information trying to answer it. The witness is now in serious legal jeopardy.

However, if he defers answering to a closed session where any answer is given to people who have a 'need to know' this information, he is no longer in legal jeopardy.

They must have been up all night practicing...lol.... So will we hear what they say in closed session? Do you know?
 
Refusing to answer is just looking really bad..wow


Panel Chiefs Conclude Hearing Lamenting Witnesses Lack of Candor
The chairman and vice chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee ended the hearing with expressions of disappointment about the witnesses declining to answer questions about whether President Donald Trump asked them to interfere in any way with the ongoing probe into his former associates.

Intelligence Officials Testify in Senate Hearing -- Live Coverage
THERE GOES THE NARRATIVE:

DNI Director Dan Coats: “I Have Never Been Pressured,” Nor Have I “Felt Pressure To Intervene.”

This was the headline yesterday, so he was told exactly what to say today..

Top intelligence official told associates Trump asked him if he could intervene with Comey on FBI Russia probe

Top intelligence official told associates Trump asked him if he could intervene with Comey on FBI Russia probe
Ah yes. The media gives no fake news and everyone is now lying under oath.:boohoo:
 
Because we know that Democrats would just blurt out classified information for all to hear.

Both sides of the isle as they asked their questions and all 4 basically refused to answer said nothing they were discussing was classified. Some of it had already been discussed in public.
In fact, they did not say that nothing they were discussing was classified. They said they would be more open and free to answer in a closed session. For people who have never had a security clearance, they don't understand the minefield that comes ith that clearance. To stick to the topic, lets play this game.

Senator A asks one of the guys if he had had a conversation with the President with regard to the Russian investigation.

The guy answers, yes.

It is now an open question that has been answered, and Senator A can now drill into that conversation because the witness has opened that line of questioning. This would include the classified parts of the conversation. The witness risks problems if he lets slip accidentally classified information trying to answer it. The witness is now in serious legal jeopardy.

However, if he defers answering to a closed session where any answer is given to people who have a 'need to know' this information, he is no longer in legal jeopardy.

They must have been up all night practicing...lol.... So will we hear what they say in closed session? Do you know?


too much public info and the Russians get involved ...
 

Forum List

Back
Top