Unquestionably in violation

[Independent thinker]

No. It's not wonderful. WTF is wrong with you?

When you open up a can of worms then you've got to live with it. Democrats opened up the can of worms and now their panties are all in a wad because Republicans are doing it better than they did. You should have never opened up the can.

 

[westwall]

More lame deflections.

Why don't you ever comment on the topic?

We did. Your topic is both stupid, and a violation of law. Your hacktavist judges are about to lose their entire Courts.

Time to eliminate them.

 

[airplanemechanic]

The idea is this, the president is not a king and may not make up laws he wants and ignore the ones he doesn't like...This is not an autocracy and Trump is limited in his actions according to law...There must be boundaries even if yer infatuation with a man is tantamount to lawlessness.

Zoomba

You mean like Biden ignoring the law that states you can't steal classified documents and take them home with you? Ignoring the law like that you mean?

Trump isn't doing anything wrong deporting illegals who have committed crimes. Nope, state the law that says that's illegal.

Good luck.

 

[Meathead]

Judge says US government didn’t follow court order on deportations​

In an emergency hearing he called to address reports that immigrants had been sent to South Sudan, Judge Brian E. Murphy in Boston said the eight migrants aboard the plane were not given a meaningful opportunity to object that the deportation could put them in danger. Minutes before the hearing, administration officials accused “activist judges” of advocating the release of dangerous criminals.

“The department actions in this case are unquestionably in violation of this court’s order,” Murphy said Wednesday, arguing that the deportees didn’t have “meaningful opportunity” to object to being sent to South Sudan. The group was flown out of the United States just hours after getting notice, leaving them no chance to contact lawyers who could object in court.

This is a clear and deliberate violation of a lawful and unambiguous court order.

There must be consequences to maintain the rule of law.

That "constitutional crisis" is getting closer and closer.

So impeach Trump. LOL

 

[WEATHER53]

This judiciary is comprised of 800 members. 98.5% of them are not on a TDS mission. They are coequal in whole, the 1.5% “got him now” rouges in black robes have misconstrued and misapplied their limited authority

 

[Orangecat]

We're currently in a Constitutional crisis.

 

[Tumblin Tumbleweed]

When you open up a can of worms then you've got to live with it. Democrats opened up the can of worms and now their panties are all in a wad because Republicans are doing it better than they did. You should have never opened up the can.

I didn't open any can, you hack. You making arguments personal is your weakness. Democrats and Republicans are two monkey-see, monkey-do ends of the same shit pile.

 

[Meathead]

We're currently in a Constitutional crisis.

 

[Orangecat]

Isn't it wonderful that democrats taught Republicans how to just go ahead and do whatever the hell you want, legal or no, Constitutional or not, and let the courts hash it out for years afterward?

The old “I gots me a pen and phone” doctrine.

 

[Independent thinker]

I didn't open any can, you hack. You making arguments personal is your weakness. Democrats and Republicans are two monkey-see, monkey-do ends of the same shit pile.

Democrats opened the can. Now they are paying the price for it.

 

[Orangecat]

No. It's not wonderful. WTF is wrong with you?

You suck at nuance. Ever hear of sarcasm?

 

[jknowgood]

More lame deflections.

Why don't you ever comment on the topic?

Exactly as I thought, you're a hypocrite.

 

[jackflash]

And what would happen to all of the cases if the district courts are "defunded"?

The courts would revert back to what the situation was before the district court system was formed, meaning state judges would be handling the cases.

 

[LAUGHatLEFTISTS]

We're currently in a Constitutional crisis.

Nope. The constitutional crisis was Veggie *Joe being so severely dementia riddled he was incapable of carrying out the duties of POTUS.

 

[ThisIsMe]

Not if they are in a foreign country exercising their right to bear arms against this nation.

OK, but he was a US citizen.

But I'm glad we got that cleared up. So, not everyone is entitled to due process....got it..

 

[The Irish Ram]

Mandate:

 

[westwall]

You suck at nuance. Ever hear of sarcasm?

Recognizing sarcasm requires intelligence, just sayin.....

 

[WEATHER53]

Mandate:
View attachment 1114616

If you came in incorrectly than you set your own trap to be sent back

 

[Orangecat]

Recognizing sarcasm requires intelligence, just sayin.....

Yeah, but we're dealing with deeply emotionally damaged children here.

 

[Moonglow]

OK, but he was a US citizen.

But I'm glad we got that cleared up. So, not everyone is entitled to due process....got it..

No, in times of war the rules do change. Especially if that citizen has declared war against their own nation.