Unquestionably in violation

[Nuthin' Fancy]

The judicial is an EQUAL branch of gov't. They cannot tell the executive how to run his country.

So fuck off.

Trump U. graduate.

 

[Moonglow]

Did Anwar awlaki get a trial before he was assassinated by drone strike? What about his son?

Also, where do district judges get the power to tell Washington to do anything? Is this a power both sides have and wield?

Do you always support terrorist who take up arms against their own country?

 

[Moonglow]

The judicial is an EQUAL branch of gov't. They cannot tell the executive how to run his country.

So fuck off.

Wow, they have been doing it fer over two hundred years.

 

[theHawk]

Judge says US government didn’t follow court order on deportations​

In an emergency hearing he called to address reports that immigrants had been sent to South Sudan, Judge Brian E. Murphy in Boston said the eight migrants aboard the plane were not given a meaningful opportunity to object that the deportation could put them in danger. Minutes before the hearing, administration officials accused “activist judges” of advocating the release of dangerous criminals.

“The department actions in this case are unquestionably in violation of this court’s order,” Murphy said Wednesday, arguing that the deportees didn’t have “meaningful opportunity” to object to being sent to South Sudan. The group was flown out of the United States just hours after getting notice, leaving them no chance to contact lawyers who could object in court.

This is a clear and deliberate violation of a lawful and unambiguous court order.

There must be consequences to maintain the rule of law.

That "constitutional crisis" is getting closer and closer.

Enforcing the law and deporting illegals isn’t violating the law, it’s following it.

Judges ordering the government to keep illegals is the violation of law actually happening.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

That "constitutional crisis" is getting closer and closer.

We're currently in a Constitutional crisis.

 

[SeaMajor7]

We're currently in a Constitutional crisis.

If you consider the actions of rogue judges, maybe.

 

[Scoutster]

If you consider the actions of rogue judges, maybe.

 

[Nuthin' Fancy]

If you consider the actions of rogue judges, maybe.

A rogue, idiot US president SeaSwab.

Just move to Russia, already.

Putin Close to Winning New Power Over Judiciary​

The Washington Post
https://www.washingtonpost.com › politics › 2004/10/02
Oct 2, 2004 — Putin would also have the right to dismiss any judge he had appointed, with the support of a majority of the collegium, and the Federation ...

Putin's Courts Playing Central Role in Keeping Russians ...​

The Jamestown Foundation
https://jamestown.org › program › putins-courts-playing-...
Feb 27, 2025 — Russian President Vladimir Putin has made the Russian courts part of his repressive machine, transforming them from being potentially the ...

 

[airplanemechanic]

Wow, they have been doing it fer over two hundred years.

Because we've allowed them to. Trump is standing up and saying "I'm president, I'm elected, you're not." Unelected district judges across the country cannot stop the president from doing his job. If they can, what's the point of having a president?

SOWWY.

 

[Moonglow]

Because we've allowed them to. Trump is standing up and saying "I'm president, I'm elected, you're not." Unelected district judges across the country cannot stop the president from doing his job. If they can, what's the point of having a president?

SOWWY.

The idea is this, the president is not a king and may not make up laws he wants and ignore the ones he doesn't like...This is not an autocracy and Trump is limited in his actions according to law...There must be boundaries even if yer infatuation with a man is tantamount to lawlessness.

Zoomba

 

[jknowgood]

I'm fine with accountability.

Lame deflections suck ass and make you look stupid.

Should the people that used the auto pen while Biden couldn't function be held accountable?

 

[Crepitus]

Should the people that used the auto pen while Biden couldn't function be held accountable?

More lame deflections.

Why don't you ever comment on the topic?

 

[scruffy]

The idea is this, the president is not a king and may not make up laws he wants and ignore the ones he doesn't like...This is not an autocracy and Trump is limited in his actions according to law...There must be boundaries even if yer infatuation with a man is tantamount to lawlessness.

Zoomba

President Trump isn't making up any laws.

He's OBEYING the laws that Biden ignored

 

[Seymour Flops]

Judge says US government didn’t follow court order on deportations​

In an emergency hearing he called to address reports that immigrants had been sent to South Sudan, Judge Brian E. Murphy in Boston said the eight migrants aboard the plane were not given a meaningful opportunity to object that the deportation could put them in danger. Minutes before the hearing, administration officials accused “activist judges” of advocating the release of dangerous criminals.

“The department actions in this case are unquestionably in violation of this court’s order,” Murphy said Wednesday, arguing that the deportees didn’t have “meaningful opportunity” to object to being sent to South Sudan. The group was flown out of the United States just hours after getting notice, leaving them no chance to contact lawyers who could object in court.

This is a clear and deliberate violation of a lawful and unambiguous court order.

There must be consequences to maintain the rule of law.

That "constitutional crisis" is getting closer and closer.

What's the law that says if that if their home country won't take an illegal immigrant to the United States who commits violent crimes while in this country, we have to keep them forever?

 

[Seymour Flops]

Did Anwar awlaki get a trial before he was assassinated by drone strike? What about his son?

Also, where do district judges get the power to tell Washington to do anything? Is this a power both sides have and wield?

Very good point.

Crepitus are you going to be fine with it, when Trump appoints hundreds of low-level federal judges during the next four years with approval from the GOP dominated Senate, who then "overturn" every important decision the next Democrat president makes and calls their ruling from the Federal District of Guam, or the heavily rural district of Montana a new "law" that applies everywhere in the nation?

 

[TheGreatSatan]

Democrats want to fly back all the gang bangers Trump deported, give them large tax payer paid settlements, and turn them loose on Americans.

Democrats = traitors

 

[justoffal]

Judge says US government didn’t follow court order on deportations​

In an emergency hearing he called to address reports that immigrants had been sent to South Sudan, Judge Brian E. Murphy in Boston said the eight migrants aboard the plane were not given a meaningful opportunity to object that the deportation could put them in danger. Minutes before the hearing, administration officials accused “activist judges” of advocating the release of dangerous criminals.

“The department actions in this case are unquestionably in violation of this court’s order,” Murphy said Wednesday, arguing that the deportees didn’t have “meaningful opportunity” to object to being sent to South Sudan. The group was flown out of the United States just hours after getting notice, leaving them no chance to contact lawyers who could object in court.

This is a clear and deliberate violation of a lawful and unambiguous court order.

There must be consequences to maintain the rule of law.

That "constitutional crisis" is getting closer and closer.

Fuck the courts... They don't work for Americans.....coopted by globalists.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Judge says US government didn’t follow court order on deportations​

In an emergency hearing he called to address reports that immigrants had been sent to South Sudan, Judge Brian E. Murphy in Boston said the eight migrants aboard the plane were not given a meaningful opportunity to object that the deportation could put them in danger. Minutes before the hearing, administration officials accused “activist judges” of advocating the release of dangerous criminals.

“The department actions in this case are unquestionably in violation of this court’s order,” Murphy said Wednesday, arguing that the deportees didn’t have “meaningful opportunity” to object to being sent to South Sudan. The group was flown out of the United States just hours after getting notice, leaving them no chance to contact lawyers who could object in court.

This is a clear and deliberate violation of a lawful and unambiguous court order.

There must be consequences to maintain the rule of law.

That "constitutional crisis" is getting closer and closer.

Judges DO NOT SET Immigration policy, that's up to POTUS

 

[ThisIsMe]

Do you always support terrorist who take up arms against their own country?

ooooh, so now we're saying if they committed crimes, they don't get due process?

 

[Crepitus]

What's the law that says if that if their home country won't take an illegal immigrant to the United States who commits violent crimes while in this country, we have to keep them forever?

Cool deflection, but not really on topic.