"Unity"

[Curried Goats]

Ok. So you do value Constitutional limits on state power. Earlier it seemed you were dismissing that notion.

I value limits and powers of government and society, (depending), anyway I can come by them. I don't care what form they come in. If Christianity convinces a majority of white society to believe in god given equality then I'm happy to have it, even though I'm agnostic. Where I disagree with you is your belief that the Constitution can't be interpreted differently to suit the desires of the people in power doing the interpretation. Trump has said he wishes to do away with the 13th Amendments constitutional right to birthright citizenship. If he can pack the court with people who agree with him what's to stop him?

It's the Court's interpretation that matters.

Exactly. The Constitution is up for subjective interpretation. That's my argument. That's it.

So if a state decided to go rogue and legalize slavery, and the Court had any shred of integrity left, they'd strike it down and the state wouldn't be allowed to do that. You seem to implicitly recognize the value of that in your comment above, but now you're saying it's silly, that it's "waving a piece of parchment" at them. Make up your mind.

What I don't see any value in is make believing me and everyone else have the same notion of integrity.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Of course I wouldn't be comfortable with it, what kind of silly question is that?

Any government interested in bringing back slavery by force is going to be unmoved by your interpretation of the Constitution, that's what you don't seem to get. I'm amused you think you're going to combat people intent on bringing slavery back by waving a piece of parchment at them.

Didn't Trump put y'all in chains in 2017??

 

[MisterBeale]

Your intense desire to be white, obviously.

. . . and you make the assumption that he isn't?

 

[ThisIsMe]

Just because you want to talk about the past now doesn't change the fact that my comments were in jest of your claims about the original intent of the scotus. In case you got emotional and forgot here is your quote.



The original intent of the cotus was to forge a chattel Slave State. You frail whites can pretend all you like but that's what it did.


No, you're backtracking now like a little bitch and trying to pretend as if you weren't make believing about the cotus's original intent but I just showed the quote.

It did and i showed with your own quote how my response was relevant. The original cotus allowed for the owning of human beings, including children, as property. It allowed State governments to raise militias to put down slave revolts as those men, women and children tried to resist their State sponsored bondage. Don't be so frail about it you little bitches. It's just a fact.

You're the one trying to pretend you weren't fantasizing about the original intent of the cotus. There there.

Just because you want to talk about the past now doesn't change the fact that my comments were in jest of your claims about the original intent of the scotus. In case you got emotional and forgot here is your quote.

Obviously i was referring to how the cotus is a limiting document on the government, not in reference to the things that were bad and got removed. I understand you want to dwell on those things and take them as my meaning, I think you're purposely being contrary.

The original intent of the cotus was to forge a chattel Slave State. You frail whites can pretend all you like but that's what it did

No, it's not, if you believe that, you don't understand the cotus

You frail whites

OK IM2.......this is where I ask you, too, to telle why you think I'm white. You have no clue what ethnicity I am....but I love the bigotry lol

No, you're backtracking now like a little bitch and trying to pretend as if you weren't make believing about the cotus's original intent but I just showed the quote.

No, I'm not back tracking. I stand by my statement. You just seem to either not understand, or choose to ignore, context.

If you read my whole statement, instead of the parts you selectively want to read, you would see i was talking about how we ignored the constitutional role of government, and because of that, government has gotten too big.

It did and i showed with your own quote how my response was relevant. The original cotus allowed for the owning of human beings, including children, as property. It allowed State governments to raise militias to put down slave revolts as those men, women and children tried to resist their State sponsored bondage. Don't be so frail about it you little bitches. It's just a fact.

Lol, and none of that slave owning is in the cotus today. Stop living in the past

You're the one trying to pretend you weren't fantasizing about the original intent of the cotus

I'm not fantasizing, I think we need to get back to the original intent....and since you don't understand context, when I say that, I mean about how the federal government is to have limited powers.

 

[Contumacious]

I'm happy to educate you.

Of couse those laws have been voided

I'm happy to educate you.

Fortunately those laws have been nullified. Those who were victimized by those UNconstitutional laws or rules should have sought judicial remedies.

 

[Curried Goats]

Obviously i was referring to how the cotus is a limiting document on the government, not in reference to the things that were bad and got removed. I understand you want to dwell on those things and take them as my meaning, I think you're purposely being contrary.



No, it's not, if you believe that, you don't understand the cotus



OK IM2.......this is where I ask you, too, to telle why you think I'm white. You have no clue what ethnicity I am....but I love the bigotry lol




No, I'm not back tracking. I stand by my statement. You just seem to either not understand, or choose to ignore, context.

If you read my whole statement, instead of the parts you selectively want to read, you would see i was talking about how we ignored the constitutional role of government, and because of that, government has gotten too big.



Lol, and none of that slave owning is in the cotus today. Stop living in the past

No. It's was in the original one you dumb bitch. Your red herring response has nothing to do with my comments about your comments about the original intent of the cotus which was indeed to forge a Slave State. Read a fucking history book you clown. That actually happened.

I'm not fantasizing, I think we need to get back to the original intent....and since you don't understand context, when I say that, I mean about how the federal government is to have limited powers.

You are fantasizing if you're make believing the original intent wasn't the intention of a group of slavers.

 

[dblack]

No. It's was in the original one you dumb bitch. Your red herring response has nothing to do with my comments about your comments about the original intent of the cotus which was indeed to forge a Slave State. Read a fucking history book you clown. That actually happened.

You are fantasizing if you're make believing the original intent wasn't the intention of a group of slavers.

Revisionist history notwithstanding, clear Constitutional limits on government make democracy possible. Without them, minorities have little reason to play along, and won't. They'll revoke sovereignty, implicitly or explicitly, and the country will become ungovernable.

 

[Contumacious]

Revisionist history notwithstanding, clear Constitutional limits on government make democracy possible. Without them, minorities have little reason to play along, and won't. They'll revoke sovereignty, implicitly or explicitly, and the country will become ungovernable.

We are there already

In the blue corner we have freaks who communicate using unintelligible woke languages and want to destroy the nation

In the Red Corner there are Patriots who want to restore the US to the great nation it used to be

 

[Curried Goats]

Revisionist history notwithstanding, clear Constitutional limits on government make democracy possible. Without them, minorities have little reason to play along, and won't. They'll revoke sovereignty, implicitly or explicitly, and the country will become ungovernable.

Who's revisitionist history? The Founders were slavers. Real shit. And as you said Constitutional limits are whatever who's doing the interpreting say they are. If the majority of the country votes to enable a man who wants to do away with the 13th Amendment's guarantee of birthright citizenship then all he has to do is pack the court with like minded people and it's done.

 

[Contumacious]

The Founders were slavers.

But that is no longer an issue.

Let's move forward and Make America Great AGain.

 

[Curried Goats]

But that is no longer an issue.

Let's move forward and Make America Great AGain.

When white America can accept that Black Americans are deserving of justice.

 

[Contumacious]

When white America can accept that Black Americans are deserving of justice.

AFro-AMerican Michaela Montgomery spoke for me when she declared that electing President Trump is seeking justice !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

[Unkotare]

When white America can accept that Black Americans are deserving of justice.

There is no "white America" and "black America." There is just AMERICA.

 

[Curried Goats]

There is no "white America" and "black America." There is just AMERICA.

America is a country you dipshit. Countries are full of these things called people. There are white people in this country and they have socioeconomically disenfranchised black people. That's called American history. Hope this clears it up for you, Moron.

 

[dblack]

Who's revisitionist history? The Founders were slavers. Real shit. And as you said Constitutional limits are whatever who's doing the interpreting say they are. If the majority of the country votes to enable a man who wants to do away with the 13th Amendment's guarantee of birthright citizenship then all he has to do is pack the court with like minded people and it's done.

Clear Constitutional limits on government make democracy possible. Without them, minorities have little reason to play along, and won't. They'll revoke sovereignty, implicitly or explicitly, and the country will become ungovernable.

 

[Unkotare]

America is a country you dipshit. Countries are full of these things called people. ...

Those people are called Americans, Dipshit. Not black Americans and white Americans or whatever else Americans, just Americans, moron.

 

[Contumacious]

America is a country you dipshit. Countries are full of these things called people. There are white people in this country and they have socioeconomically disenfranchised black people. That's called American history. Hope this clears it up for you, Moron.

I am an Afro-Puerto Rican , have some people discriminated against me YES, is there systemic discrimination? NO I am now retited after 57 years ? Am I financially comfortable ? Yes

I did it you can do it too.

Learn a marketable skill saty away from socialist Community organizers.

Better yet , Listen to Michaela Montgomery , Candace Owens, Larry Elders ...........

 

[Curried Goats]

Clear Constitutional limits on government make democracy possible.

I dont even know what you think that means. When America was a slave state that only let white land owning males vote it was still, technically, a democracy.

Without them, minorities have little reason to play along, and won't. They'll revoke sovereignty, implicitly or explicitly, and the country will become ungovernable.

Again, I don't know what you think that means. Black people and women have been second class citizens if not property for much of this countries existence.

 

[Curried Goats]

Those people are called Americans, Dipshit. Not black Americans and white Americans or whatever else Americans, just Americans, moron.

So let me get this straight. The police put out an A.P.B. for a suspect and it should just say, American? You don't see race?

 

[Curried Goats]

I am an Afro-Puerto Rican , have some people discriminated against me YES, is there systemic discrimination? NO I am now retited after 57 years ? Am I financially comfortable ? Yes

I did it you can do it too.

Learn a marketable skill saty away from socialist Community organizers.

Better yet , Listen to Michaela Montgomery , Candace Owens, Larry Elders ...........

Bitch please. If you want to demonstrate your superiority to me then make a rational argument instead of one based on a personal anecdote.