"Unity"

[ThisIsMe]

That's not a very clear argument. They were clear that it was okay for some to own others as property. I wouldn't characterize that as particularly restrictive myself, but maybe we're grading on separate curves.

The part that allowed slave masters to count non free persons towards their voting power, for example.

I'm arguing today about your hilarious interpretation of the past. Be less of a bitch about it. If you're able.

What do either of those have to do with how the Constitution allowed for human chattel slavery?

That's not a very clear argument. They were clear that it was okay for some to own others as property. I wouldn't characterize that as particularly restrictive myself, but maybe we're grading on separate curves.

The part that allowed slave masters to count non free persons towards their voting power, for example.

What part of "that in the past" do you not understand?

I'm arguing today about your hilarious interpretation of the past. Be less of a bitch about it. If you're able.

No, I'm not interpreting the past, you are. I'm trying to get you to see the cotus for what it is today, not what it was back then. It's been improved, so none of the things you are talking about are still there.

What do either of those have to do with how the Constitution allowed for human chattel slavery?

They don't, but then those were not relevant to the post you were responding to, and not what I was addressing.

 

[ThisIsMe]

What point? Maybe make one instead of alluding to one so I know what you're talking about.

I did, you are deliberately trying to avoid it.

 

[Orangecat]

Your argument was a frail strawman.

What’s your obsession with frailty? An ode to your wrists?

And I speak multiple dialects of English so I'm happy to speak in whatever one you're versed in.

Try the one that won’t flunk you out of school, bitch.

 

[BrokeLoser]

You're only critiquing your own frail fantasy there, Marvin. How impressed should anyone be by it?

What I advocate for is economic justice for the people who helped build your country and who you're too frail to look in the eye. Hence all the make believe.

Awwww….the ole…”I swear I don’t need free shit, I’m just so fucking noble I’ll fight for free shit for others” bit huh?

 

[BrokeLoser]

Its not free money Dipshit. Learn to logic.

When you economically disenfranchise people you are robbing from them. It's white America who robbed generation after generation of hard earned Black wealth. Wanting that wealth back in form of reparations isn't a hand out, that's called justice. The fact that you don't know this is just a testament to your shit white education.

Translation:
“The dude who couldn’t articulate the English language who cleaned the shitters at Microsoft deserves some free shit.”

 

[Clipper]

No one here is farther on the other side of the fence of "unity" than you, the perennial purveyor of DISUNITY.

Wow, talk about cognitive self-deception.

The 'other side"? Your MAGA side is on the other side of actual reality. And it's about to knock you upside the head beginning on J20.

BTW, can you ask Mikey Johnson how those tire tracks along his back feel after that subhuman Trump & his sidekick JD threw him under the bus today?

 

[Harry Dresden]

The 'other side"? Your MAGA side is on the other side of actual reality. And it's about to knock you upside the head beginning on J20.

BTW, can you ask Mikey Johnson how those tire tracks along his back feel after that subhuman Trump & his sidekick JD threw him under the bus today?

ask joe biden he was thrown under them too....by your people...

 

[Curried Goats]

What part of "that in the past" do you not understand?

Just because you want to talk about the past now doesn't change the fact that my comments were in jest of your claims about the original intent of the scotus. In case you got emotional and forgot here is your quote.

ALL of this because we got away from the original intent of the cotus. If we had just stuck to what it says, we'd have not let the government get so big, allowed to do so many things.

The original intent of the cotus was to forge a chattel Slave State. You frail whites can pretend all you like but that's what it did.

No, I'm not interpreting the past, you are. I'm trying to get you to see the cotus for what it is today, not what it was back then. It's been improved, so none of the things you are talking about are still there.

No, you're backtracking now like a little bitch and trying to pretend as if you weren't make believing about the cotus's original intent but I just showed the quote.

They don't, but then those were not relevant to the post you were responding to, and not what I was addressing.

It did and i showed with your own quote how my response was relevant. The original cotus allowed for the owning of human beings, including children, as property. It allowed State governments to raise militias to put down slave revolts as those men, women and children tried to resist their State sponsored bondage. Don't be so frail about it you little bitches. It's just a fact.

I did, you are deliberately trying to avoid it.

You're the one trying to pretend you weren't fantasizing about the original intent of the cotus. There there.

 

[Curried Goats]

What’s your obsession with frailty? An ode to your wrists?

My obsession revolves around pointing out the implication of your emotional need for fantasy as arguments. Like that wrist thing.

Try the one that won’t flunk you out of school, bitch.

1. We're not in school. If you stopped make believing for a moment you might be able to recognize reality around you for once.

2. I don't know what failing system educated you but I know there is no real objective right way to write English. What you've learned, sufficiently I might add, is conformity, not objective reality.

 

[Curried Goats]

Awwww….the ole…”I swear I don’t need free shit, I’m just so fucking noble I’ll fight for free shit for others” bit huh?

Again, not free shit. I do fight for justice for others, yes. You and your frail white kin only know how to pretend at it.

Translation:
“The dude who couldn’t articulate the English language who cleaned the shitters at Microsoft deserves some free shit.”

See. Frail white make believe. That's all your cuckolded generation is capable of espousing. The ability for rational thought has been inbred out of you people.

 

[Orangecat]

My obsession revolves around pointing out the implication of your emotional need for fantasy as arguments. Like that wrist thing.

1. We're not in school. If you stopped make believing for a moment you might be able to recognize reality around you for once.

2. I don't know what failing system educated you but I know there is no real objective right way to write English. What you've learned, sufficiently I might add, is conformity, not objective reality.

Good god, you’re pathetic. Best of luck with your reparations-begging campaign. You obviously lack the skills to succeed on your own.

 

[Curried Goats]

Good god, you’re pathetic. Best of luck with your reparations-begging campaign. You obviously lack the skills to succeed on your own.

You obviously lack the skills to make a compelling argument so you fashioned one out of things you make believe.

 

[dblack]

Good god, you’re pathetic. Best of luck with your reparations-begging campaign. You obviously lack the skills to succeed on your own.

I'd be fine with reparations, if it was treated as a straight-up class action lawsuit. Figure out the damages, send everyone a check and be done with it. Drop all shit about "equity" and move on. But somehow, I don't think would satisfy reformers like CG.

 

[Contumacious]

There's another current thread that uses the term "unity" but under a different context. So rather than derail that one, let's try one that is specific to the term itself.

In that thread and pretty much all threads here, the term "unity" is scoffed at and mocked. No surprise. Personally, given this country's present condition, I thought it was dumb when Biden tried to use it when he was first elected. We're just not close enough to it to even discuss it right now.

Anyway, here's what I'm wondering: Since so many here are pretty much on the other side of the fence from unity, what would "disunity" look like to you? My guess is that you want to "beat" the other side and impose your will on them (with specific laws and legislation, I guess) going forward. Is that correct?

So can anyone here go into detail on what "anti-unity" would look like, in practice, on a day-to-day basis? Think out of the box and lay it out. What is the goal here?

Americans Agree Nation Is Divided on Key Values

Eight in 10 Americans, a new high, perceive the U.S. as being greatly divided on the most important values.

news.gallup.com

How can there be UNITY when the Socialist Demon Rats are treasonous seditious anti AMerican criminals who believe they have a right to
1- steal elections and effectuate a Coup d' Etat
2- start an unwinnable deadly nuclear WW3 in Ukraine
3- allow over 15,000,0000 unvetted illegals into our country
4- impose socialism/marxism

No way no how

 

[Curried Goats]

I'd be fine with reparations, if it was treated as a straight-up class action lawsuit. Figure out the damages, send everyone a check and be done with it. Drop all shit about "equity" and move on. But somehow, I don't think would satisfy reformers like CG.

1. You're fantasizing.

2. The damages weren't just financial.

3. We generally disagree on how the government should operate and what it's goals should be, that, in and of itself has nothing to do with reparations.

4. In this argument you reveal the justice is something you wish to barter on rather than something you actually believe in, fundamentally.

 

[marvin martian]

Every Black American over the age of 65 and their families. You have heard of segregation right? Or did your educators think you to frail to learn about it?

"to frail"...LOL

You're such a fucking moron.

 

[Curried Goats]

"to frail"...LOL

You're such a fucking moron.

I have to ask because of your stupid question. How did you not know your country socially and economically disenfranchised Black people all they way to 1964?

 

[dblack]

1. You're fantasizing.

2. The damages weren't just financial.

3. We generally disagree on how the government should operate and what it's goals should be, that, in and of itself has nothing to do with reparations.

4. In this argument you reveal the justice is something you wish to barter on rather than something you actually believe in, fundamentally.

Exactly. Reparations is just a wedge. You want you ubiquitous state control.

 

[Curried Goats]

Exactly. Reparations is just a wedge. You want you ubiquitous state control.

It's only a wedge for those who don't want to see Black Americans justly compensated for the socioeconomic injustice they endured. As a libertarian, isn't that what you're supposed to mostly be about?

 

[Orangecat]

You obviously lack the skills to make a compelling argument so you fashioned one out of things you make believe.

You excel at saying nothing, and not sounding particularly intelligent while doing so. It’s no wonder you spend your days whining and begging.