"Unity"

There's another current thread that uses the term "unity" but under a different context. So rather than derail that one, let's try one that is specific to the term itself.

In that thread and pretty much all threads here, the term "unity" is scoffed at and mocked. No surprise. Personally, given this country's present condition, I thought it was dumb when Biden tried to use it when he was first elected. We're just not close enough to it to even discuss it right now.

Anyway, here's what I'm wondering: Since so many here are pretty much on the other side of the fence from unity, what would "disunity" look like to you? My guess is that you want to "beat" the other side and impose your will on them (with specific laws and legislation, I guess) going forward. Is that correct?

So can anyone here go into detail on what "anti-unity" would look like, in practice, on a day-to-day basis? Think out of the box and lay it out. What is the goal here?

The left defines unity as everyone agreeing with them.
 
Still being a little cuckold. I'm not impressed. Mutual benefit? :lmao: Bitch please.

I don't even know why you're being a cuckold over this whole thing. You got one foot in the water but too pussy to take the plunge.
You’re a smart dude…I’ll never understand why ALL smart black people don’t exhaust all energy in exposing the cultural problems within the black populations, in demanding better of your people…instead you choose to make them believe they can’t do/be better because Whitey, they can’t move up the socioeconomic latter unless and until they get their free shit/reparations. It’s actually quite sad.
 
You’re a smart dude…I’ll never understand why ALL smart black people don’t exhaust all energy in exposing the cultural problems within the black populations, in demanding better of your people…instead you choose to make them believe they can’t do/be better because Whitey, they can’t move up the socioeconomic latter unless and until they get their free shit/reparations. It’s actually quite sad.
You pretending to know what all smart Black think or do is hilarious cuckold type behavior. It's the need to pretend that makes you all cuckolds. :lol:
 
So everyone who’s white and lived during the 1950’s is guilty?
Guilty of unfairly benefiting from a political and socioeconomic system that kept others down, yes. That's what segregation did. Let me know when you're all emotionally ready to acknowledge that. I'll be here. Intellectually that's just a fact.
 
I'm not leveling accusations against you unless you happen to be a white guy who lived during segregation.
But you expect me to pay in various ways for segregation that I was not a part of
 
Is that right? What hilarious bit of white science are you basing this off of? I'm fascinated. Share all the details. :lmao:
Blacks were primitive villagers brought to work among advanced people in advanced societies…They are/were ‘behind’ for this reason alone and not because whitey. When they became free they didn’t suddenly become advanced people….A quick glance around ALL world proves this as virtually ALL black societies still tend to be a bit ‘behind’ the rest of the world.
It’s obviously deeper than that but you get the gist.
 
But you expect me to pay in various ways for segregation that I was not a part of
You're an American citizen, I expect you accept the responsibilities that come along with that. When a cop accidently shoots an innocent person and the city has to pay out millions to the family, you're not out thinking you're tax dollars should be exempt from the payout because you didn't shoot anybody, do you? Is that how you think government works? You get all the benefits and none of the responsibilities?
 
Blacks were primitive villagers brought to work among advanced people in advanced societies…They are/were ‘behind’ for this reason alone and not because whitey. When they became free they didn’t suddenly become advanced people….A quick glance around ALL world proves this as virtually ALL black societies still tend to be a bit ‘behind’ the rest of the world.
It’s obviously deeper than that but you get the gist.
I get that you've gisted your way though life as a mediocre white guy. :lol: I just don't see industrialized slavery to Capital holders as some mark of advanced civilization, but I do recognize the hilarity in devotion to that system by white working class folk like yourself. Other whites were the first enslaved by their aristocratic, capital holding betters, and boy did that enslavement take. Even now your people love to be trickled on. :lol:
 
When a cop accidently shoots an innocent person and the city has to pay out millions to the family, you're not out thinking you're tax dollars should be exempt from the payout because you didn't shoot anybody, do you?
You are conflating a single event involving one person to a whole group of people

But since you asked I dont think the family deserves millions

If the person was a sole provider then the family should get a pension equal to the victim’s income at the time

But no Cadillacs or vacations to Hawaii

Nor does everyone in the neighborhood deserve walking around money
 
You don't understand basic subject/object rules of English grammar.

I'm not surprised. Maybe one of your former oppressors can help you out with that (if you beg nicely). :badgrin:
Which oppressor? I don't live in your fantasies, you're going to have to explain them better.
 
You're an American citizen, I expect you accept the responsibilities that come along with that. When a cop accidently shoots an innocent person and the city has to pay out millions to the family, you're not out thinking you're tax dollars should be exempt from the payout because you didn't shoot anybody, do you? Is that how you think government works? You get all the benefits and none of the responsibilities?
Damages must be proven long before theres any “payout”.
You have no damages.
 
You are conflating a single event involving one person to a whole group of people

But since you asked I dont think the family deserves millions

If the person was a sole provider then the family should get a pension equal to the victim’s income at the time

But no Cadillacs or vacations to Hawaii

Nor does everyone in the neighborhood deserve walking around money
No, I'm likening an act of injustice that tax payers are ultimately responsible for to a much larger one that occur over decades and generations.
 
You are doing a lousy job of it

Blacks are owed nothing they are not already getting
One might contend they’re not even owed what they’re getting now. No one should be given preferential treatment by the government.
 
Actually they don’t that’s why there’s been no “payout” in the form of reparations.
One doesn't have anything to do with the other but why would I expect your frail white ass to know how to logic? :dunno: :lol:
 
Because you don't actually believe in justice. I know. We've been over that. That's what makes yours a shit culture and Black Americans the actual American ideal who've consistently been on the side advocating for actual equal justice because you can't have equal justice when some of you don't think Black Americans entitled to it.
Equal justice isn’t the same thing as Marxist wealth redistribution.
 
Back
Top Bottom