Yo, all Politicians need money? Just like Obama did when he first ran for office, he can thank Socialist George Soros!!!
"GTP"
^ and that's the problem
1stRambo ^
as long as we elect people based on money we end up with
pimps and ho's, buying and selling votes through the commercialized media
Why not invest those campaign dollars DIRECTLY into solutions and reforms?
You have the advantage of being conservative, you know that power and responsibility
and resources should be invested locally into sovereign programs run by self-government.
Why keep paying for the bigger corporate pigs to bully it out and get nothing done that way?
If conservatives and Constitutionalists organized coalitions around real reforms,
then picked Candidates to lead these programs, and prove which solutions work,
we could use THAT as public campaigns for candidates and leaders to run for office.
Why not invest in solutions, and then use THOSE as publicity to run for office?
So the money goes into the programs directly, and the candidates run on their record,
"competing" to prove their leadership skills by actually SOLVING and reforming govt.
Yo, "pimps and ho's" funny Emily, you sound more like a Tea Party Member? I agree with your assessment! But this is America, and if you are going to run against people who are out to destroy HER, America? You need all you can get, to fight fire with fire in the meantime!
"GTP"
View attachment 37717
Hi
1stRambo I may end up joining the Tea Party or starting my own, to follow up on the Constitutional education, ethics and mediation on political beliefs.
Constitutional authority is enforceable if we don't breach it ourselves.
It is important to stick to rule of law and respect all beliefs equally in order to enforce the same protections for ourselves.
If we make the mistake of pushing politically too far, that opens the door for others to do that, and it goes in circles.
Neither agenda is Constitutionally defensible if it keeps violating, excluding or discriminating against the beliefs of the other.
The best way to check Democrats is NOT to push political beliefs,
but to enforce them IN PRIVATE, and AGREE to shift what isn't supported by the public
into PRIVATELY managed and governed programs. So the Constitution is enforced
to limit federal govt to just what all parties AGREE is authorized, and the rest is reverted to states and people,
possibly through parties so this can cover both state and national programs and still be outside govt.
With the ACA and gay marriage, why not all agree to push these contested issues
back to states and people to work out, according to their BELIEFS.
By recognizing the Democrats and political platforms as pushing BELIEFS
and supporting these to be practiced and paid for in PRIVATE, this can be kept out of govt
unless there is a consensus on policies and programs. If the public AGREES then those can be in govt.
And stop this nonsense of fighting to fund one party's beliefs over others.
We would not allow Hindus and Muslims to rule by majority or pay for the bigger bully to impose laws on the nation
that are based on their private beliefs. Why continue to let parties push their political beliefs like religions?
To stop this practice, we have to stand on common principles of the Constitution.
If we overreach and start pushing our own political agenda, we enable others to breach Constitutional limits also.
We enforce a common standards, and stop all breaches on all sides.
Then we can invest our resources into the programs of our choice, freely independent of govt,
instead of fighting to push one policy over another. Let public laws be decided by consensus, so there
cannot be any agenda pushing. Either we all agree that programs and reforms are Constitutional,
so we agree that is govt and to fund them without any conflicts that are resolved in advance,
or places we don't agree get separated that from govt, so all political beliefs are respected equally and carried out in private.
That will stop the fighting, by enforcing a consistent standard based on consensus of what is Constitutional or not.
, but who in Government now? Goes by the Constitution? The Tea Party Members! The Liberals interpret the Constitution as they see fit? The Elite Republicans just go along to get along! 
